Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 134 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6651 Tulsa Power 18-1 1682 30-15 67% 18 OK
6652 NHouston Elite 16 Premier 1682 30-17 64% 16 TX
6653 HVVC 13-Blue 1682 26-15 63% 13 MI
6654 WI Juniors 13-1 1682 86-61 59% 13 WI
6655 Horizon VBC 17 18 Powderhorn 1682 12-4 75% 17 KY
6656 Club V 15-Amelia 1682 25-20 56% 15 UT
6657 Elevate Athletics 16-Nike masi 1682 18-23 44% 16 UT
6658 Epic 15-Adidas 1682 46-22 68% 15 WI
6659 FVBC 15 National 1682 32-7 78% 15 MD
6660 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 13 SWVC GR13-CALKINS 1682 6-3 50% 13 WY
6661 Cap City 17-Gold 1682 28-13 68% 17 NC
6662 A5 17-Kortney 1682 63-27 70% 17 GA
6663 Crush 15-1 wheeler 1682 24-3 89% 15 GA
6664 WBLVC 13-1 1682 20-6 71% 13 MN
6665 Club Four 10-Boost 1682 16-8 62% 10 MO
6666 MVC 17 MAQ 1682 33-18 65% 17 OH
6667 FC Elite 10 Navy 1682 14-3 82% 10 WI
6668 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 13-National black 1682 11-12 48% 13 NV
6669 PSVC 16-Valarie 1682 29-28 51% 16 SC
6670 CINCY EAST 15-2 blue 1682 40-23 63% 15 OH
6671 PSVC 13 Jim 1682 26-14 65% 13 SC
6672 Top Notch 16-Elite 1682 16-21 43% 16 MO
6673 PVA 15-2 1682 5-1 83% 15 MO
6674 Galaxy 13 Ashley 1682 20-5 80% 13 NC
6675 BBVCL 15 Kyle 1682 30-23 57% 15 NV
6676 Vortex 17-National - felicia 1682 23-17 56% 17 UT
6677 Attack VBC 17-Mizuno lime 1682 29-29 50% 17 MI
6678 WBLVC 16-1 1682 32-9 76% 16 MN
6679 805 Elite 13-National 1682 22-13 63% 13 CA
6680 CJV 13-Regional+ 1682 37-11 77% 13 AR
6681 Club Sand 17-Kaniela 1682 22-23 49% 17 UT
6682 FWFIRE 17-1p 1682 10-8 50% 17 TX
6683 Boston United 15-National 1682 32-30 52% 15 MA
6684 OP2 13-1 elite 1682 5-0 100% 13
6685 Les Mousquetaires 14 1681 9-0 100% 14
6686 JoCo 15-Black 1681 17-6 74% 15 NC
6687 Putnam VBC 17 Putnam VBC - Heat 1681 47-20 70% 17 OH
6688 Wisconsin Elite 13-Elite 1681 52-19 72% 13 WI
6689 Elevate 12-Kickin kangas 1681 33-12 73% 12 WI
6690 SCVC 16-Sarah/jarrett 1681 12-4 75% 16 UT
6691 CCJ 14-1 1681 31-28 53% 14 LA
6692 A5 Calhoun 14-Red 1681 52-16 76% 14 GA
6693 Performance Juniors 14-1 1681 42-25 63% 14 VA
6694 Ho'opa 14-2 1681 6-2 75% 14 HI
6695 LAVA Islands 14-Kim 1681 25-4 86% 14 CA
6696 IVC 14-National 1681 16-8 67% 14 AK
6697 Pipeline 14-Adidas 1681 19-16 54% 14 CA
6698 KEVC 14-2 1681 10-1 91% 14 MN
6699 Slainte 13-Nationals 1681 9-9 50% 13 CA
6700 Lions 12-Red 1681 37-26 59% 12 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.