Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 134 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6651 A5 Calhoun 14-Red 1681 52-16 76% 14 GA
6652 Altitude 18-Black 1681 49-28 64% 18 AZ
6653 ATHENA VB 18-2 black national 1681 29-30 49% 18 OR
6654 Cajun Elite 18-S mya 1681 12-5 71% 18 LA
6655 Colorado Juniors 18-Trevor 1681 23-13 64% 18 CO
6656 GCVC 17 Silver 1681 26-38 41% 17 OH
6657 FaR Out 13-Red 1681 38-13 75% 13 MI
6658 Rocky Elite 13-National 1681 32-16 67% 13 CO
6659 RVC 18 Brittyn 1681 26-26 50% 18 PA
6660 Spa City 15 Aqua 1681 28-34 45% 15 NY
6661 STL Crossfire 14 R2 1681 32-11 73% 14 MO
6662 SPVC 17-1 adidas 1681 9-5 64% 17 CA
6663 Vibe 14-Havoc 1681 28-14 67% 14 CA
6664 VVA 16-Adams 1681 35-30 54% 16 CA
6665 Cincy Crush 12-1 1681 32-18 64% 12 OH
6666 BSVBC 12-Blue 1681 22-12 59% 12 IL
6667 Club V 15-Amelia 1681 25-20 56% 15 UT
6668 ACT 14-Craig 1681 24-18 57% 14 CA
6669 NET 16-Force 1681 34-20 63% 16 NY
6670 Net Force 13-2 legacy 1681 29-9 73% 13 IL
6671 Epic United 15-National 1681 24-20 55% 15 IN
6672 OPVC 11-Nadler 1681 27-22 55% 11 OH
6673 805 Elite 14-National 1681 18-11 62% 14 CA
6674 Dig This! VB Ohana 15-Pink 1681 8-2 80% 15 KY
6675 Topeka Elite 13-1 1681 5-3 45% 13 KS
6676 Lockdown VBC 14-Mockjays 1681 6-2 75% 14 MA
6677 TVC 14-A-p kahlil 1681 43-12 78% 14 FL
6678 VSTX 15-Dean 1681 22-15 52% 15 TX
6679 KC Power 16-3 1681 25-10 71% 16 KS
6680 Les Mousquetaires 14 1681 9-0 100% 14
6681 Paradigm Rebellion 16-S 1681 42-19 69% 16
6682 MVVC 16-Black 1681 35-22 61% 16 CA
6683 SAND 14-Gold 1681 21-18 54% 14 UT
6684 CB Elite 14-Navy 1681 15-5 75% 14 WA
6685 TPV 12-Red 1680 28-11 72% 12
6686 WT Elite 15 10 1680 18-4 82% 10
6687 LAVA West 15-Molten hh 1680 29-23 56% 15 CA
6688 CJV 13-Regional+ 1680 37-11 77% 13 AR
6689 K2 14 Edge 1680 28-28 50% 14 TN
6690 Black Swamp 13-1 1680 12-8 60% 13 OH
6691 AVA TX 18 Adidas 1680 18-10 64% 18 TX
6692 Boiler Jrs 14-E black 1680 43-38 53% 14 IN
6693 AVBC 17-A hannahs/smith 1680 20-7 74% 17 OH
6694 BCS Skyline H 15-Black 1680 35-22 61% 15 TX
6695 Buffalo Stampeders 16-1 1680 49-22 69% 16 FL
6696 Galaxy 15 Jon 1680 23-10 70% 15 NC
6697 ForceVC 13-1 1680 32-27 54% 13 OH
6698 Munciana 17 Jaguars 1680 34-30 53% 17 IN
6699 MJVA 18-Elite black 1680 23-14 62% 18 TN
6700 Spa City 18 Aqua 1680 28-27 51% 18 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.