Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 133 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6601 Carolina CHAOS 18 Royal 1682 26-9 74% 18 NC
6602 CCJ 14-1 1682 31-28 53% 14 AL
6603 HOV 15 Navy 1682 18-5 78% 15 VA
6604 MAVS KC 16-Premier 1682 19-10 66% 16 KS
6605 Mindset Regional 12-Red 1682 21-7 75% 12 IL
6606 NIVA 13-WHITE 1682 28-14 67% 13 IN
6607 PSVC 16-Valarie 1682 29-28 51% 16 SC
6608 SEIVB 17 Elite 1682 25-6 81% 17 IN
6609 Point West 18-Aaron 1682 28-19 60% 18 CA
6610 Sunshine 16 Westside 1682 46-24 66% 16 CA
6611 1 Flight 14-1 national 1682 39-14 74% 14 OR
6612 The RIDGE 12-Blue 1682 14-4 78% 12 AR
6613 Zona VBC 14-Red 1682 29-18 62% 14 AZ
6614 501 Volley 17-1 national 1682 35-28 55% 17 AR
6615 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 18-Navy 1682 18-9 67% 18 CO
6616 UVA 12-Conan 1682 29-17 63% 12 LA
6617 UVA 13-Randell 1682 33-23 59% 13 LA
6618 ASTARZ 16 1682 4-4 50% 16 AB
6619 FEVA 11-Danny 1682 34-12 74% 11 FL
6620 Summit Volleyball Club 18-1 1682 6-1 86% 18 MO
6621 TVC 16-Royal 1682 29-30 49% 16 OH
6622 A5 12-Jose 1682 48-22 69% 12 GA
6623 575 16-Pcna alaina 1682 44-29 60% 16 GA
6624 MJVA 13-1 1682 5-2 71% 13 TN
6625 De Pere Diggers 13-S 1682 8-2 80% 13 WI
6626 Upstate VBC 14U Purple 1682 16-4 73% 14 SC
6627 VOLT 14-Power 1682 15-4 71% 14 ND
6628 Top Flight 13-Psi 1682 12-3 80% 13 IL
6629 FH 16-2 ikaika mady/pearl 1682 12-6 63% 16 TX
6630 SUSA 16-Red 1682 12-1 75% 16 UT
6631 Coastal VBC 13 Navy 1682 28-6 78% 13 PA
6632 Wrecking Crew 14-E 1682 11-3 79% 14 TX
6633 OP2 13-1 elite 1682 5-0 100% 13
6634 EndMo VBC 14-Power blue 1682 36-16 69% 14 PA
6635 NNJ 16-Alix 1682 17-19 47% 16 NV
6636 PYA 12-R black 1682 22-9 71% 12 CA
6637 A5 Gwinnett 16-Gus 1682 38-24 61% 16 GA
6638 LAVA Islands 14-Kim 1682 25-4 86% 14 CA
6639 WSRVC 14-Coats 1681 37-19 66% 14
6640 WSRVC 16-Fink 1681 23-7 77% 16
6641 CHAMP 14-1 1681 11-4 61% 14
6642 CINCY EAST 15-2 blue 1681 40-23 63% 15 OH
6643 HDVC 15-Jordan 1681 27-8 77% 15 CA
6644 Rockhill Blast 12 1681 18-7 72% 12 NM
6645 VQ 11-2 1681 7-5 58% 11 PR
6646 Idaho ONE 18 Elite 1681 37-30 55% 18 ID
6647 JET 18 CARR 1681 12-8 60% 18 TX
6648 Xcel VB 15-5 premier 1681 22-7 73% 15 TX
6649 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Altitude 1681 16-11 59% 14 TX
6650 shockwave reading 17-1 1681 30-17 64% 17 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.