Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 133 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6601 Boiler Jrs 14-E black 1683 43-38 53% 14 IN
6602 TKVBC 15-Aces elite 1683 44-29 60% 15 GA
6603 Stratford VC 17-1 1683 4-1 80% 17 MI
6604 CUVC 16-National1 1683 11-7 61% 16 NC
6605 Next Level 15-Rylie 1683 15-2 88% 15 MI
6606 UNION 15-Purple 1683 49-27 64% 15 IN
6607 Epic United 15-National 1683 24-20 55% 15 IL
6608 DIG 17-Black 1683 21-13 55% 17 TX
6609 Jax Skyline 15-Black 1683 47-30 61% 15 FL
6610 1W 16 Crimson 1683 24-7 77% 16 WI
6611 I AM VBC 17-Black 1683 36-24 60% 17 WI
6612 RVC 18 Brittyn 1683 26-26 50% 18 UT
6613 Game Day 16-1 1683 36-18 67% 16 OR
6614 FEVA 16-Elite future 1683 3-2 60% 16 KY
6615 SA Renegades Adidas 11-1 1683 21-6 70% 11 TX
6616 EVA 16 National 1683 43-26 62% 16 AR
6617 Stockdale RVC 15-Adidas 1683 41-26 61% 15 TX
6618 XP 13-Elite 1 1683 27-18 60% 13 IL
6619 TC ELITE 15-Jon 1683 29-13 69% 15 LA
6620 NIVBC 15-Becky 1683 6-4 60% 15 WA
6621 Academy Volleyball Club 17-Rashad 1683 28-22 56% 17 SC
6622 SAND 18 Gold 1683 28-20 58% 18 CA
6623 501 Volley 17-1 national 1683 35-28 55% 17 AR
6624 Black Swamp 13-1 1683 12-8 60% 13 OH
6625 Apex 13-1 girls 1683 28-29 49% 13 SC
6626 Empowered 17-Elite black 1683 24-30 44% 17 IN
6627 ForceVC 13-1 1683 32-27 54% 13 OH
6628 SMV 16-3 silver 1683 46-20 70% 16 MN
6629 WGVC 13-Elite purple 1683 25-8 76% 13 FL
6630 CUVC 15-N1 1683 33-19 63% 15 NC
6631 NSVBC 15-Select black 1683 29-6 83% 15 WI
6632 Munciana 17 Jaguars 1683 34-30 53% 17 IN
6633 Emerald Coast 13-National - kelly 1683 8-5 62% 13 FL
6634 WyoBraska Sky 16-1 1682 7-3 70% 16
6635 South Gate VC 16-1 1682 20-1 95% 16 CA
6636 WF Elite 12-Black 1682 22-13 56% 12 TX
6637 PREVA 14-Carlos r 1682 20-8 71% 14 PR
6638 Jordan Jags 12-1 1682 14-3 82% 12 MN
6639 A3 14-X 1682 47-17 73% 14 TN
6640 WSRVC 14-Coats 1682 37-19 66% 14 WY
6641 KCV 12 NATIONAL 1682 35-19 65% 12 TX
6642 Monsters 12-Black 1682 25-7 78% 12 MI
6643 MVI 14-Jana 1682 14-4 78% 14 ID
6644 Wrecking Crew 14-E 1682 11-3 79% 14 TX
6645 ACT 14-Craig 1682 24-18 57% 14 CA
6646 Redline Zia VBC 14-1 1682 0-0 0% 14 CO
6647 SUSA 14-Navy 1682 11-9 50% 14 UT
6648 Iowa Impact 14-1 elite 1682 33-38 46% 14 IA
6649 Ark Jrs 14-National 1682 18-15 55% 14 AR
6650 Tsunami 14-1e shota 1682 28-27 51% 14 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.