Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 132 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6551 Sunshine 16 Westside 1684 46-24 66% 16 CA
6552 Triangle 13-Blue 1684 31-32 49% 13 NC
6553 Galaxy 15 Jon 1684 23-10 70% 15 NC
6554 Pequot Lakes 17 1684 8-1 89% 17 MN
6555 CMASS EDGE 17-White 1684 34-13 72% 17 MA
6556 Alta Sierra 16-S coach matt 1684 32-10 76% 16 CA
6557 ALJRS 15 American 1684 32-9 78% 15 AL
6558 SAND 14-Gold 1684 21-18 54% 14 CA
6559 Katy United 14-Adidas 1684 64-54 54% 14 TX
6560 AZ REV 14 Elite 1684 48-48 50% 14 AZ
6561 HP 14-1 1684 18-25 42% 14 MI
6562 Idaho ONE 18 Elite 1684 37-30 55% 18 ID
6563 ASTARZ 16 1684 4-4 50% 16 WA
6564 Point West 18-Aaron 1684 28-19 60% 18 CA
6565 Iowa Elite 16-Even 1684 18-6 75% 16 IA
6566 MARIN 13-Green 1684 38-26 59% 13 CA
6567 FEVA 11-Danny 1684 34-12 74% 11 FL
6568 Momentum Volleyball 13-Reven 1684 41-28 59% 13 CO
6569 HIC 18-N kim 1684 18-15 55% 18 UT
6570 Victory 17-National black 1684 24-24 50% 17 TX
6571 SVC 18-National 1684 19-16 54% 18 MO
6572 Husky 15-National 1684 26-29 47% 15 CT
6573 Team Pineapple 16-Black 1684 26-29 47% 16 IN
6574 RVA G14-Pink 1684 52-40 57% 14 WI
6575 WVBA 14-Elite black 1684 47-17 73% 14 FL
6576 Athlete HQ 15-Whitney 1684 30-29 51% 15 OH
6577 Surfside 12-Pv elite 1684 33-24 58% 12 CA
6578 Northern Tier 14-Blue 1684 13-3 65% 14 PA
6579 Solon Spartans 13-Black 1684 9-3 56% 13 IA
6580 Cincy Crush 12-1 1684 32-18 64% 12 OH
6581 Pipeline 13-Adidas 1684 31-18 63% 13 CA
6582 TAMPA UNITED VBA 17-Black 1684 34-33 51% 17 FL
6583 SC Legends 18-Elite 1684 21-19 53% 18 CA
6584 Prime Time 15-Blue 1684 36-13 73% 15 IL
6585 DBQ Insanity 15-1 national 1684 35-19 64% 15 IA
6586 E2 12-1 1683 12-2 86% 12 KY
6587 LBK 14-2 1683 17-7 71% 14 OH
6588 MODE 12 National 1683 20-13 61% 12 WA
6589 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 12-Blue 1683 32-13 71% 12 FL
6590 East Texas 14-B 1683 17-5 71% 14 LA
6591 CWAVE Coreno 14 1683 24-9 73% 14 OH
6592 BSVBC 12-Blue 1683 22-12 59% 12 IL
6593 CAVC 14-Power black 1683 30-7 81% 14 VA
6594 DBQ Insanity 12-1 national 1683 8-3 73% 12 IA
6595 Lady Legends 12-Purple 1683 10-4 67% 12 PA
6596 Queen City 14 Bells 1683 11-5 69% 14 PA
6597 NYCLBVC 12-Blue 1683 23-13 64% 12 NJ
6598 Matchbox 14-Premier 1683 14-6 67% 14 SD
6599 VolleyFX 14 Spell 1683 40-9 78% 14 NY
6600 Cornwall Volleyball Club 14-1 1683 22-7 76% 14 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.