Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 132 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6551 FRVBC 18-Black 1683 7-2 78% 18 CO
6552 SA Renegades Adidas 11-1 1683 21-6 70% 11 TX
6553 Crank It 14-Black 1683 31-8 79% 14 MI
6554 NVA 11-Futuro paulo 1683 22-4 85% 11 FL
6555 VOLT 14-Power 1683 15-4 71% 14 ND
6556 FDL Fusion 17-Purple 1683 17-6 74% 17 WI
6557 MAVA 10-Hammerhead 1683 32-14 70% 10 KY
6558 De Pere Diggers 13-S 1683 8-2 80% 13 WI
6559 Dynamix 17-Black 1683 35-12 74% 17 CA
6560 East Texas 14-B 1683 17-5 71% 14 TX
6561 PROZONE FL 14-White 1683 23-9 72% 14 FL
6562 Victory 14-National green 1683 23-16 56% 14 TX
6563 RISE 16-Elise 1683 24-9 73% 16 CA
6564 Spartans 12 1683 19-6 76% 12 IN
6565 SVE 16 1683 7-1 88% 16 GA
6566 2026 Nola Heather/Jade 13-S 1683 23-9 68% 13
6567 Oasis OVA 13-G elite 1683 5-3 63% 13
6568 LRVBC 14-3 1683 6-5 55% 14
6569 EndMo VBC 14-Power blue 1683 36-16 69% 14 PA
6570 Ozark Juniors 14-Reg plus 1683 39-11 78% 14 AR
6571 JoCo 15-Black 1683 17-6 74% 15 NC
6572 HEAT 14-National amanda 1683 19-7 73% 14 CA
6573 Game Day 16-1 1683 36-18 67% 16 OR
6574 FSJ 14-National 1683 24-11 67% 14 AR
6575 OPVC 16-Deimling 1683 45-25 64% 16 OH
6576 CUVC 15-N1 1683 33-19 63% 15 NC
6577 Seal Beach 15-Blue 1683 33-21 61% 15 CA
6578 Ultimate G13 Gold 1683 30-23 57% 13 IL
6579 Premier 14-Crimson 1683 24-15 56% 14 TX
6580 Pipeline 14-Adidas 1683 12-14 46% 14 CA
6581 WAJ 17-Purple storm white 1682 11-4 73% 17
6582 Arkansas Surge 15-National 1682 25-8 76% 15
6583 Mabel-Canton 12 1682 6-0 100% 12
6584 A5 12-Jose 1682 48-22 69% 12 GA
6585 Mindset Regional 12-Red 1682 21-7 75% 12 IL
6586 575 16-Pcna alaina 1682 44-29 60% 16 GA
6587 Prodigy VA 15-1 premier 1682 8-2 80% 15 NY
6588 UVA 13-Randell 1682 33-23 59% 13 LA
6589 CCJ 14-1 1682 31-28 53% 14 AL
6590 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 18-Navy 1682 18-9 67% 18 CO
6591 Sunshine 16 Westside 1682 46-24 66% 16 CA
6592 PSVC 16-Valarie 1682 29-28 51% 16 SC
6593 ASTARZ 16 1682 4-4 50% 16 AB
6594 Club Four 10-Boost 1682 16-8 62% 10 IL
6595 Carolina CHAOS 18 Royal 1682 26-9 74% 18 NC
6596 Point West 18-Aaron 1682 28-19 60% 18 CA
6597 TVC 16-Royal 1682 29-30 49% 16 OH
6598 Iowa Impact 16-1 elite 1682 33-36 48% 16 IA
6599 The RIDGE 12-Blue 1682 14-4 78% 12 AR
6600 MJVA 13-1 1682 5-2 71% 13 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.