Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 131 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6501 SP2VC 14-Blue 1685 32-10 76% 14 NC
6502 ACT 13-Quon 1685 20-24 45% 13 CA
6503 ARVC 15 1685 30-10 75% 15 NC
6504 A-E Edge 12-Blue 1685 7-2 78% 12 MN
6505 CVH SELECT 13-1 1685 11-3 79% 13 PR
6506 TNT 15 Viper 1685 27-5 84% 15 PA
6507 SF Elite 16-Nono 1685 28-20 58% 16 CA
6508 shockwave reading 17-1 1685 30-17 64% 17 PA
6509 Girls 12 1685 28-4 88% 12 CA
6510 Zona VBC 14-Red 1685 29-18 62% 14 AZ
6511 PSVBA 16-Legacy 2 1685 37-28 57% 16 WA
6512 Iowa United 13-1 elite 1685 33-23 59% 13 IA
6513 MJVA 16-2 1685 10-6 63% 16 TN
6514 Black Hills Juniors 17-Black 1685 5-0 100% 17 WY
6515 Atomic! 18-Short 1685 16-3 84% 18 MI
6516 BYVA 11-1 1685 12-5 63% 11 MN
6517 Amarillo Xtreme 10 Blackout 1685 20-6 77% 10 TX
6518 OK Charge 15-Select 1685 30-6 83% 15 OK
6519 MAVA 12-Hammerhead 1685 44-13 77% 12 KY
6520 UVA 13-Randell 1685 33-23 59% 13 CA
6521 Ignite 17 Blaze 1685 32-24 57% 17 TX
6522 MINOI 14-Grey 1685 31-16 65% 14 UT
6523 MODE 14-Premier 1685 10-8 56% 14 WA
6524 MIDTN 14-BLUE 1685 30-18 60% 14 TN
6525 SERV 12 Select 1685 42-12 78% 12 VA
6526 LVL 15 VICTORIA 1685 24-13 65% 15 LA
6527 NU Breed 14-Gold 1685 6-1 86% 14 CA
6528 AVA 13-1 1685 23-5 77% 13 MA
6529 Husky 16-New england red 1685 27-18 60% 16 CT
6530 Dinos 16-1 1685 5-4 56% 16 AB
6531 Twisters 14-Julia 1685 13-3 81% 14 CA
6532 SUX Premier 16 16 SUX Premier 1684 18-3 86% 16
6533 CVC 17 Eric 1684 22-6 76% 17
6534 Frenchtown 14-1 1684 8-10 36% 14
6535 FSJ 14-National 1684 24-11 67% 14 AR
6536 MVA 17 1684 17-4 81% 17 OH
6537 Team Yakima 18-Summit 1684 22-10 69% 18 WA
6538 Southland 12-Black 1684 22-5 81% 12 LA
6539 Exodus VBC 15-1 1684 6-0 100% 15 CA
6540 Southern smash volleyball club 14 14 u Natalie/MC (BY) 1684 12-3 80% 14 LA
6541 Mindset Premier 14-Black 1684 47-19 71% 14 IL
6542 NVA 11-Futuro paulo 1684 22-4 85% 11 FL
6543 ID Crush 18 Engelson 1684 25-26 49% 18 ID
6544 Jonesboro Metro 10-Tb 1684 18-3 86% 10 TN
6545 Black Swamp 10-1 1684 12-3 80% 10 OH
6546 Shoebox Volleyball 17-1 1684 23-9 72% 17 MI
6547 MJVA 13-1 1684 5-2 71% 13 TN
6548 OK Charge 16-American 1684 30-12 71% 16 OK
6549 Riptide 12-Hurricane 1684 23-9 72% 12 ID
6550 LAVA Islands 15 Molten 1684 28-14 67% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.