Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 131 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6501 Prodigy 15-Red 1684 30-13 70% 15 NY
6502 Black Swamp 10-1 1684 12-3 80% 10 OH
6503 Blue Royals 12 Bling 1684 41-20 67% 12 WA
6504 MIDTN Volleyball 16-Black 1684 15-8 65% 16 TN
6505 Roots 11-1 green 1684 26-10 72% 11 IA
6506 Princeton 16-Black 1684 21-20 51% 16 NJ
6507 FEVA 13-Brittany 1684 48-15 76% 13 FL
6508 Iowa PowerPlex 17-Brogean 1684 6-0 100% 17 IA
6509 Riptide 12-Hurricane 1684 23-9 72% 12 WA
6510 Ultimate VBC 16-Blue 1684 8-1 89% 16 IL
6511 CJVA 13-Black 1684 38-30 56% 13 NJ
6512 Madtown 16-1 select 1684 31-17 65% 16 WI
6513 CUVC 16-National1 1684 11-7 61% 16 NC
6514 Exodus VBC 15-1 1684 6-0 100% 15 CA
6515 Iowa Rockets 14-Black 1684 38-11 76% 14 IA
6516 OK Charge 15-Ua tulsa 1684 33-31 51% 15 OK
6517 TC ELITE 15-Jon 1684 29-13 69% 15 LA
6518 WVBA 14-Elite black 1684 47-17 73% 14 FL
6519 DIG 17-Black 1684 21-13 55% 17 TX
6520 MVA 17 1684 17-4 81% 17 OH
6521 Jonesboro Metro 10-Tb 1684 18-3 86% 10
6522 LAVA Islands 15 Molten 1684 28-14 67% 15 CA
6523 Performance Juniors 14-1 1684 42-25 63% 14 NY
6524 Summit 15-National blue 1684 24-16 55% 15 TX
6525 NSVBC 15-Select black 1684 29-6 83% 15 WI
6526 SF Juniors Volleyball 14-Black 1684 8-2 80% 14 CA
6527 Monsters 12-Black 1684 25-7 78% 12 MI
6528 PNW VBC 14-3 white 1684 26-8 76% 14 WA
6529 WBLVC 16-1 1684 32-9 76% 16 MN
6530 Lunatics 17-Jeanna 1684 11-3 73% 17 UT
6531 CLVC 14-Red 1684 35-15 70% 14 NC
6532 PSVA 12-1 1684 36-18 67% 12 FL
6533 Pipeline 13-Adidas 1684 28-14 67% 13 CA
6534 SCENIC CITY 15-National 1684 26-13 67% 15 TN
6535 603 United 17-Seacoast white 1684 31-16 66% 17 NH
6536 KC Power 17-3 1684 23-15 61% 17 KS
6537 SOINE 14-1 1684 29-21 58% 14 KY
6538 AZ EVJ 14-Select 1684 33-29 53% 14 AZ
6539 Husky 15-National 1684 26-29 47% 15 CT
6540 NETFORCE 14-Kelly/dayion 1683 9-3 75% 14
6541 KEVC 14-2 1683 10-1 91% 14
6542 Stratford VC 17-1 1683 4-1 80% 17
6543 Club Sol 16-Pink 1683 36-34 49% 16
6544 CVC 17 Eric 1683 22-6 76% 17
6545 Rival 13-State premier 1683 49-20 71% 13 FL
6546 LIV 13-Royal 1683 6-1 86% 13 LA
6547 Integrity Elite 14-Black 1683 16-6 67% 14 IL
6548 RVT 14-3 sail 1683 29-14 67% 14 NY
6549 Texas Fury 17 Impact 1683 38-17 69% 17 TX
6550 WV Galaxy 17 1683 37-23 62% 17 WV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.