2025-2026 Season — Page 131 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6501 | Prodigy 15-Red | 1684 | 30-13 | 70% | 15 | NY |
| 6502 | Black Swamp 10-1 | 1684 | 12-3 | 80% | 10 | OH |
| 6503 | Blue Royals 12 Bling | 1684 | 41-20 | 67% | 12 | WA |
| 6504 | MIDTN Volleyball 16-Black | 1684 | 15-8 | 65% | 16 | TN |
| 6505 | Roots 11-1 green | 1684 | 26-10 | 72% | 11 | IA |
| 6506 | Princeton 16-Black | 1684 | 21-20 | 51% | 16 | NJ |
| 6507 | FEVA 13-Brittany | 1684 | 48-15 | 76% | 13 | FL |
| 6508 | Iowa PowerPlex 17-Brogean | 1684 | 6-0 | 100% | 17 | IA |
| 6509 | Riptide 12-Hurricane | 1684 | 23-9 | 72% | 12 | WA |
| 6510 | Ultimate VBC 16-Blue | 1684 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | IL |
| 6511 | CJVA 13-Black | 1684 | 38-30 | 56% | 13 | NJ |
| 6512 | Madtown 16-1 select | 1684 | 31-17 | 65% | 16 | WI |
| 6513 | CUVC 16-National1 | 1684 | 11-7 | 61% | 16 | NC |
| 6514 | Exodus VBC 15-1 | 1684 | 6-0 | 100% | 15 | CA |
| 6515 | Iowa Rockets 14-Black | 1684 | 38-11 | 76% | 14 | IA |
| 6516 | OK Charge 15-Ua tulsa | 1684 | 33-31 | 51% | 15 | OK |
| 6517 | TC ELITE 15-Jon | 1684 | 29-13 | 69% | 15 | LA |
| 6518 | WVBA 14-Elite black | 1684 | 47-17 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 6519 | DIG 17-Black | 1684 | 21-13 | 55% | 17 | TX |
| 6520 | MVA 17 | 1684 | 17-4 | 81% | 17 | OH |
| 6521 | Jonesboro Metro 10-Tb | 1684 | 18-3 | 86% | 10 | |
| 6522 | LAVA Islands 15 Molten | 1684 | 28-14 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 6523 | Performance Juniors 14-1 | 1684 | 42-25 | 63% | 14 | NY |
| 6524 | Summit 15-National blue | 1684 | 24-16 | 55% | 15 | TX |
| 6525 | NSVBC 15-Select black | 1684 | 29-6 | 83% | 15 | WI |
| 6526 | SF Juniors Volleyball 14-Black | 1684 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | CA |
| 6527 | Monsters 12-Black | 1684 | 25-7 | 78% | 12 | MI |
| 6528 | PNW VBC 14-3 white | 1684 | 26-8 | 76% | 14 | WA |
| 6529 | WBLVC 16-1 | 1684 | 32-9 | 76% | 16 | MN |
| 6530 | Lunatics 17-Jeanna | 1684 | 11-3 | 73% | 17 | UT |
| 6531 | CLVC 14-Red | 1684 | 35-15 | 70% | 14 | NC |
| 6532 | PSVA 12-1 | 1684 | 36-18 | 67% | 12 | FL |
| 6533 | Pipeline 13-Adidas | 1684 | 28-14 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 6534 | SCENIC CITY 15-National | 1684 | 26-13 | 67% | 15 | TN |
| 6535 | 603 United 17-Seacoast white | 1684 | 31-16 | 66% | 17 | NH |
| 6536 | KC Power 17-3 | 1684 | 23-15 | 61% | 17 | KS |
| 6537 | SOINE 14-1 | 1684 | 29-21 | 58% | 14 | KY |
| 6538 | AZ EVJ 14-Select | 1684 | 33-29 | 53% | 14 | AZ |
| 6539 | Husky 15-National | 1684 | 26-29 | 47% | 15 | CT |
| 6540 | NETFORCE 14-Kelly/dayion | 1683 | 9-3 | 75% | 14 | |
| 6541 | KEVC 14-2 | 1683 | 10-1 | 91% | 14 | |
| 6542 | Stratford VC 17-1 | 1683 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | |
| 6543 | Club Sol 16-Pink | 1683 | 36-34 | 49% | 16 | |
| 6544 | CVC 17 Eric | 1683 | 22-6 | 76% | 17 | |
| 6545 | Rival 13-State premier | 1683 | 49-20 | 71% | 13 | FL |
| 6546 | LIV 13-Royal | 1683 | 6-1 | 86% | 13 | LA |
| 6547 | Integrity Elite 14-Black | 1683 | 16-6 | 67% | 14 | IL |
| 6548 | RVT 14-3 sail | 1683 | 29-14 | 67% | 14 | NY |
| 6549 | Texas Fury 17 Impact | 1683 | 38-17 | 69% | 17 | TX |
| 6550 | WV Galaxy 17 | 1683 | 37-23 | 62% | 17 | WV |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.