2025-2026 Season — Page 130 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6451 | Triangle 13-Blue | 1685 | 31-32 | 49% | 13 | NC |
| 6452 | Rancho 16-Select maikel | 1685 | 22-14 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 6453 | OK Charge 16-American | 1685 | 30-12 | 71% | 16 | OK |
| 6454 | Cajun Elite 13-Caroline/terri | 1685 | 27-11 | 69% | 13 | LA |
| 6455 | AZ REV 18 Elite | 1685 | 20-40 | 33% | 18 | AZ |
| 6456 | Empire 12 National | 1685 | 47-21 | 69% | 12 | CA |
| 6457 | SoCal Legends 13-Nike | 1685 | 8-2 | 80% | 13 | CA |
| 6458 | Temecula Viper 17-1 michelle/natalie | 1685 | 18-14 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 6459 | Ignite 17 Blaze | 1685 | 32-24 | 57% | 17 | TX |
| 6460 | BYVA 11-1 | 1685 | 12-5 | 63% | 11 | CA |
| 6461 | SA Juniors 16-National | 1685 | 36-25 | 59% | 16 | TX |
| 6462 | MODE 12 National | 1685 | 20-13 | 61% | 12 | WA |
| 6463 | Mizuno M1 16-2 | 1685 | 49-27 | 64% | 16 | MN |
| 6464 | ARVC 15 | 1685 | 30-10 | 75% | 15 | NC |
| 6465 | Monsters 14-Elite black | 1685 | 31-11 | 74% | 14 | MI |
| 6466 | GVG 10-Uchristian | 1685 | 10-8 | 56% | 10 | PR |
| 6467 | Tsunami 16-2e noni | 1685 | 33-19 | 63% | 16 | GA |
| 6468 | MVC 17 MAQ | 1685 | 33-18 | 65% | 17 | OH |
| 6469 | Dinos 16-1 | 1685 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | AB |
| 6470 | Legacy Elite VBA 17-E | 1685 | 36-11 | 77% | 17 | OH |
| 6471 | WF Elite 12-Black | 1685 | 22-13 | 56% | 12 | TX |
| 6472 | Amarillo Xtreme 10 Blackout | 1685 | 20-6 | 77% | 10 | TX |
| 6473 | CJVA 17-Black | 1685 | 33-39 | 46% | 17 | NJ |
| 6474 | HVVC 13-Blue | 1685 | 26-15 | 63% | 13 | MI |
| 6475 | IVC 12 Home | 1685 | 9-8 | 50% | 12 | AK |
| 6476 | SG Elite 16-Elite carlos | 1685 | 41-18 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 6477 | Hobcab VBC 12-1 | 1685 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | KY |
| 6478 | WF Elite Black 18 | 1685 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | |
| 6479 | Shonto 18-S | 1685 | 22-15 | 59% | 18 | |
| 6480 | MVVC G 13-White | 1685 | 33-16 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 6481 | MVVC 16-White | 1685 | 29-24 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 6482 | Ashland VC 17-1 | 1685 | 11-0 | 100% | 17 | OR |
| 6483 | Coastal VBC 18 Navy | 1685 | 24-5 | 80% | 18 | MD |
| 6484 | The Shore 12-Navy | 1685 | 22-6 | 79% | 12 | MI |
| 6485 | A3 14-X | 1685 | 47-17 | 73% | 14 | TN |
| 6486 | Cleveland Chaos 16-Ue | 1685 | 38-17 | 69% | 16 | NC |
| 6487 | Metro 18-North | 1685 | 32-15 | 68% | 18 | DC |
| 6488 | Stars 14 Chastain | 1685 | 43-20 | 68% | 14 | SC |
| 6489 | SC Legends 15-Elite | 1685 | 20-13 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 6490 | Warren Sixpack 17-red | 1685 | 27-20 | 57% | 17 | NJ |
| 6491 | BHJ 16-Black | 1685 | 23-17 | 57% | 16 | SD |
| 6492 | Balboa Bay 17-Blue | 1685 | 29-30 | 49% | 17 | CA |
| 6493 | KOKUA 16-1 | 1685 | 32-33 | 49% | 16 | WA |
| 6494 | Munciana Indy 12 Valkyrie | 1685 | 29-37 | 44% | 12 | IN |
| 6495 | Pequot Lakes 17 | 1684 | 8-1 | 89% | 17 | |
| 6496 | A-E Edge 12-Blue | 1684 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | |
| 6497 | CJHEAT 13-1 | 1684 | 15-3 | 83% | 13 | NJ |
| 6498 | 608 Juniors 16-Elite | 1684 | 50-23 | 68% | 16 | WI |
| 6499 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-2 | 1684 | 11-2 | 85% | 13 | KS |
| 6500 | WGVC 13-Elite purple | 1684 | 25-8 | 76% | 13 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.