Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 130 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6451 Triangle 13-Blue 1685 31-32 49% 13 NC
6452 Rancho 16-Select maikel 1685 22-14 61% 16 CA
6453 OK Charge 16-American 1685 30-12 71% 16 OK
6454 Cajun Elite 13-Caroline/terri 1685 27-11 69% 13 LA
6455 AZ REV 18 Elite 1685 20-40 33% 18 AZ
6456 Empire 12 National 1685 47-21 69% 12 CA
6457 SoCal Legends 13-Nike 1685 8-2 80% 13 CA
6458 Temecula Viper 17-1 michelle/natalie 1685 18-14 56% 17 CA
6459 Ignite 17 Blaze 1685 32-24 57% 17 TX
6460 BYVA 11-1 1685 12-5 63% 11 CA
6461 SA Juniors 16-National 1685 36-25 59% 16 TX
6462 MODE 12 National 1685 20-13 61% 12 WA
6463 Mizuno M1 16-2 1685 49-27 64% 16 MN
6464 ARVC 15 1685 30-10 75% 15 NC
6465 Monsters 14-Elite black 1685 31-11 74% 14 MI
6466 GVG 10-Uchristian 1685 10-8 56% 10 PR
6467 Tsunami 16-2e noni 1685 33-19 63% 16 GA
6468 MVC 17 MAQ 1685 33-18 65% 17 OH
6469 Dinos 16-1 1685 5-4 56% 16 AB
6470 Legacy Elite VBA 17-E 1685 36-11 77% 17 OH
6471 WF Elite 12-Black 1685 22-13 56% 12 TX
6472 Amarillo Xtreme 10 Blackout 1685 20-6 77% 10 TX
6473 CJVA 17-Black 1685 33-39 46% 17 NJ
6474 HVVC 13-Blue 1685 26-15 63% 13 MI
6475 IVC 12 Home 1685 9-8 50% 12 AK
6476 SG Elite 16-Elite carlos 1685 41-18 69% 16 CA
6477 Hobcab VBC 12-1 1685 5-0 100% 12 KY
6478 WF Elite Black 18 1685 6-1 86% 18
6479 Shonto 18-S 1685 22-15 59% 18
6480 MVVC G 13-White 1685 33-16 67% 13 CA
6481 MVVC 16-White 1685 29-24 55% 16 CA
6482 Ashland VC 17-1 1685 11-0 100% 17 OR
6483 Coastal VBC 18 Navy 1685 24-5 80% 18 MD
6484 The Shore 12-Navy 1685 22-6 79% 12 MI
6485 A3 14-X 1685 47-17 73% 14 TN
6486 Cleveland Chaos 16-Ue 1685 38-17 69% 16 NC
6487 Metro 18-North 1685 32-15 68% 18 DC
6488 Stars 14 Chastain 1685 43-20 68% 14 SC
6489 SC Legends 15-Elite 1685 20-13 61% 15 CA
6490 Warren Sixpack 17-red 1685 27-20 57% 17 NJ
6491 BHJ 16-Black 1685 23-17 57% 16 SD
6492 Balboa Bay 17-Blue 1685 29-30 49% 17 CA
6493 KOKUA 16-1 1685 32-33 49% 16 WA
6494 Munciana Indy 12 Valkyrie 1685 29-37 44% 12 IN
6495 Pequot Lakes 17 1684 8-1 89% 17
6496 A-E Edge 12-Blue 1684 7-2 78% 12
6497 CJHEAT 13-1 1684 15-3 83% 13 NJ
6498 608 Juniors 16-Elite 1684 50-23 68% 16 WI
6499 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-2 1684 11-2 85% 13 KS
6500 WGVC 13-Elite purple 1684 25-8 76% 13 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.