Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 130 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6451 AZ EVJ 14-Select 1686 33-29 53% 14 AZ
6452 AZ REV 10-Premier 1686 9-3 75% 10 AZ
6453 HP Illinois 15-Select 1686 26-16 62% 15 MO
6454 Netforce 15-Ryan 1686 27-9 75% 15 AL
6455 Lockdown VBC 15-Owls 1686 30-23 57% 15 MA
6456 Arkansas Jrs 12-1 1686 8-1 89% 12 AR
6457 Coastal VBC 18 Navy 1686 24-5 80% 18 DE
6458 Iowa One 14-Sydney 1686 18-10 64% 14 IA
6459 Freeze ND 12-Polar 1686 24-6 77% 12 ND
6460 SUPERIOR 14 ADIDAS 1686 28-19 60% 14 TX
6461 Windthorst 11-Holliday 1686 13-2 76% 11 TX
6462 New WaveS 14-Veronica 1686 26-16 62% 14 FL
6463 1 Flight 14-1 national 1686 39-14 74% 14 OR
6464 Jr Trojans 12 Royal 1686 18-6 75% 12 IN
6465 WV Galaxy 17 1686 37-23 62% 17 WV
6466 Ultimate VBC 16-Blue 1686 8-1 89% 16 IL
6467 VCNebraska 14-White 1686 7-6 54% 14 NE
6468 AJ 15-Red 1686 27-8 77% 15 LA
6469 407 13-Blue 1686 39-19 67% 13 FL
6470 603 United 17-Seacoast white 1686 31-16 66% 17 NH
6471 WTX Xplosion 13-S 1686 17-7 71% 13 TX
6472 Ridgeland Reds-Red 12 1686 18-9 67% 12 WI
6473 PEAK 12-4 1686 17-9 65% 12 OK
6474 Iowa United 14-2 elite 1686 35-32 52% 14 IA
6475 RVBC 14-White 1686 21-12 64% 14 PA
6476 ZVC 17 VBC18s 1686 5-2 71% 17 UT
6477 Blue Royals 12 Bling 1686 41-20 67% 12 WA
6478 Va Wave 16 Tsunami 1686 36-16 69% 16 VA
6479 STVA 15-Navy-2 1686 38-18 68% 15 TX
6480 NLVA 13-1 gold 1686 36-14 72% 13 NC
6481 Jax Skyline 11-Royal 1686 38-21 64% 11 FL
6482 SIVBC 16-Tornado 1686 24-24 50% 16 WA
6483 Sonora DRG 18 1686 16-4 80% 18 MX
6484 IVC 16U National 1685 19-9 68% 16 TX
6485 FEVA 13-Brittany 1685 48-15 76% 13 FL
6486 Rockhill Blast 12 1685 18-7 72% 12 TX
6487 FEVA 14-Jenna 1685 44-16 73% 14 FL
6488 OVA 16-National rich 1685 25-22 53% 16 CA
6489 Net Force 13-2 legacy 1685 29-9 73% 13 IA
6490 OMNI 15-Elite 1685 27-29 48% 15 CA
6491 Wildfire 12-N isa 1685 18-35 34% 12 FL
6492 MichioChicago 12-Bluesmoke 1685 21-27 44% 12 IL
6493 Premier 14-Crimson 1685 24-15 56% 14 TX
6494 Cajun Elite 12-Crystal / rhyan 1685 35-15 70% 12 LA
6495 Laredo Premier 10-Force 1685 12-4 71% 10 TX
6496 Roots 11-1 green 1685 26-10 72% 11 TX
6497 Cajun Elite 18-1 1685 6-2 75% 18 LA
6498 Iowa Select 14-Black 1685 33-10 73% 14 IA
6499 Odessa 4G VBC 13 O4G FORCE 1685 15-5 75% 13 TX
6500 OK Charge 15-Ua tulsa 1685 33-31 51% 15 OK
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.