Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 129 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6401 SVC JVC 16-Jing 1686 10-9 53% 16
6402 WTX Xplosion 13-S 1686 17-7 71% 13
6403 Performance 16-1 1686 15-4 79% 16
6404 SMV 16-3 silver 1686 46-20 70% 16 MN
6405 AZ EVJ 13-Elite 1686 42-35 55% 13 AZ
6406 MCV 15-Carter 1686 28-12 70% 15 NC
6407 OMNI 15-Elite 1686 27-29 48% 15 CA
6408 MODE 14-Premier 1686 10-8 56% 14 WA
6409 Aspire 16-2 pink 1686 31-10 76% 16 AB
6410 Spikers 16-1 1686 23-6 79% 16 OK
6411 Vibe VBC 15-1 1686 9-4 69% 15 CA
6412 GSVC 17-Black 1686 12-5 71% 17 NH
6413 AZ REV 10-Premier 1686 9-3 75% 10 AZ
6414 SIVA 16 JOE 1686 31-25 55% 16 WA
6415 EMV 10-Black krista 1686 31-19 58% 10 TX
6416 307 Impact Impact 16-Calie 1686 15-6 68% 16 WY
6417 STVA 17-Navy-1 1686 35-29 55% 17 TX
6418 Va Wave 16 Tsunami 1686 36-16 69% 16 VA
6419 CVH SELECT 13-1 1686 11-3 79% 13 PR
6420 SAND 18 Gold 1686 28-20 58% 18 UT
6421 Windthorst 11-Holliday 1686 13-2 76% 11 TX
6422 STL Crossfire 13 SR1 1686 37-15 71% 13 MO
6423 PEAK 12-4 1686 17-9 65% 12 AZ
6424 Arkansas Jrs 12-1 1686 8-1 89% 12 AR
6425 DBQ Insanity 12-1 national 1686 8-3 73% 12 IA
6426 Team Yakima 18-Summit 1686 22-10 69% 18 WA
6427 VIPERS 15 ELITE 1686 38-21 64% 15 FL
6428 BSVBC 16-White 1686 33-17 62% 16 IL
6429 Niagara Frontier 13 Navy 1686 29-8 78% 13 NY
6430 Huskies 14-Premier 1686 6-1 86% 14 CT
6431 MVA 15-Dayanna 1686 31-6 84% 15 FL
6432 MEVC 15-Black 1686 33-7 83% 15 MD
6433 573 Missouri Juniors 14-A 1686 6-2 75% 14 MO
6434 OT 13-T ike 1686 43-17 72% 13 FL
6435 CLVC 13-Black 1686 37-15 71% 13 NC
6436 Team Pineapple 12-Black 1686 33-14 70% 12 IN
6437 adidas DYNASTY 14-3 1686 4-2 67% 14 KS
6438 RVBC 14-White 1686 21-12 64% 14 PA
6439 Beach South 14-1 1686 5-3 63% 14 NC
6440 AVB Fire 16-1 red 1686 33-20 62% 16 MN
6441 SUPERIOR 14 ADIDAS 1686 28-19 60% 14 TX
6442 VCNebraska 15-Blue 1686 6-4 60% 15 NE
6443 Premier 14 Tokidoki 1686 34-26 57% 14 OH
6444 PJVBC 17 National 1686 48-34 56% 17 WA
6445 SoCal VBC 18-Beacons 1686 26-22 54% 18 CA
6446 NVA 14-Black 1686 40-35 53% 14 PA
6447 Boston United 15-National 1686 32-30 52% 15 MA
6448 Southwest 15-N terry 1686 26-32 45% 15 OH
6449 ALJRS 15 American 1685 32-9 78% 15
6450 Iowa United 13-1 elite 1685 33-23 59% 13 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.