Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 129 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6401 SDVBC 15-Drea 1687 36-26 58% 15 CA
6402 GVG 10-Uchristian 1687 10-8 56% 10 PR
6403 Zona VBC 17-Red 1687 25-16 61% 17 AZ
6404 GCVA 15-1 coast 1687 21-13 62% 15 TX
6405 Core 18-F national 1687 16-10 62% 18 CA
6406 NET 16-Force 1687 34-20 63% 16 NY
6407 Allegro 16-Red 1687 33-19 63% 16 NJ
6408 NE Shock 17-Electric 1687 9-6 60% 17 CT
6409 TAV South 12-Royal 1687 12-8 57% 12 TX
6410 AVA 17 ONYX 1687 24-47 34% 17 PA
6411 KOKUA 16-1 1687 32-33 49% 16 WA
6412 ARIZONA STORM 16 BOLTZ 1687 26-22 54% 16 AZ
6413 OT 13-T ike 1687 43-17 72% 13 FL
6414 NC Coastal 14 Jacob 1687 43-23 65% 14 NC
6415 JoCo 13-Black 1687 19-6 76% 13 NC
6416 LAVA 17 Matt 1687 21-4 84% 17 NC
6417 OPVC 16-Deimling 1687 45-25 64% 16 OH
6418 Wrecking Crew 14-1 1687 13-7 65% 14 TX
6419 LSV Orange 12 1687 12-5 71% 12 FL
6420 DBQ Insanity 15-2 black 1687 23-9 68% 15 IA
6421 PNW VBC 14-3 white 1687 26-8 76% 14 OR
6422 Louisiana Legends 13 1687 20-5 80% 13 LA
6423 QCA 16-Under armour black 1687 30-14 68% 16 MS
6424 SF Juniors Volleyball 14-Black 1687 8-2 80% 14 CA
6425 HP Illinois 17-Select 1687 24-19 56% 17 MO
6426 Premier 15-1 blue 1687 29-10 67% 15 AL
6427 SEVA 14 Crimson 1687 33-10 77% 14 TN
6428 FRVBC 15-White 1687 31-16 66% 15 CO
6429 BEVBC 16 Navy 1687 43-20 67% 16 MD
6430 GCVC 17 Silver 1687 26-38 41% 17 OH
6431 Clarence VBC 17-1 1687 19-3 73% 17 NY
6432 VEVA Brave 17-Blue 1687 98-83 54% 17 PA
6433 YVA 18 1687 19-4 76% 18 MT
6434 Top Flight 13-Psi 1687 12-3 80% 13 IL
6435 New York Elite 17-Silver 1687 12-2 86% 17 NY
6436 VIPERS 15 ELITE 1687 38-21 64% 15 FL
6437 Performance Juniors 18-1 1687 22-18 55% 18 VA
6438 Main Beach 12-Premier 1687 23-9 72% 12 CA
6439 Sonics 15-1 1687 17-2 77% 15 NY
6440 Club V 12-Prodigy krista 1687 16-27 35% 12 UT
6441 MCV 15-Carter 1687 28-12 70% 15 NC
6442 VSTX 15-Dean 1687 22-15 52% 15 TX
6443 Trujillovoli 12 12U Xiomara (PU) 1686 9-2 82% 12 PR
6444 Kansas Rise VBC 13-1 1686 13-1 87% 13 KS
6445 UVA 12-Conan 1686 29-17 63% 12 CA
6446 Platform 13-Adidas 1686 39-27 59% 13 IA
6447 NVA 14-Black 1686 40-35 53% 14 PA
6448 C-Force VBC 14-1 1686 10-6 63% 14 TN
6449 Premier 14 Tokidoki 1686 34-26 57% 14 OH
6450 InfinitySouth 14-1 1686 32-9 78% 14 LA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.