Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 128 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6351 MOD Elite 15-Gold 1688 36-28 56% 15 IL
6352 MVVC 16-White 1688 29-24 55% 16 CA
6353 MAVS 816 17-National 1688 16-14 53% 17 KS
6354 Legacy Elite VBA 17-E 1688 36-11 77% 17 OH
6355 Calvary AA 15U Gold 1688 15-9 63% 15 PA
6356 ENCORE 14-Navy kimmy 1688 38-21 64% 14 CA
6357 NRG 16-Ampd blue 1688 28-19 56% 16 TX
6358 CJV 14 National 1688 30-17 63% 14 AR
6359 Millennium 16-Ew 1688 37-23 62% 16 OH
6360 863 Elite 12-1 black 1688 34-19 64% 12 FL
6361 912 Volleyball Academy 16 1688 21-6 78% 16 GA
6362 314 VBC 12-Red 1688 31-12 66% 12 MO
6363 Upstate VBC 14U Purple 1688 16-4 73% 14 NY
6364 573 Missouri Juniors 14-A 1688 6-2 75% 14 MO
6365 LES 14 Norman 1688 15-2 79% 14 AL
6366 CVC 11-White 1688 10-1 91% 11 OH
6367 MVC Panthers 14-Pink 1688 16-8 67% 14 IL
6368 MoCo MAVS 16-Red 1688 21-33 39% 16 TX
6369 TVC 16-Royal 1688 29-30 49% 16 OH
6370 LAVA West 15-Molten hh 1688 29-23 56% 15 CA
6371 LI Knights 16-1 1688 13-3 81% 16 NY
6372 COVC 15-Nationals 1688 17-9 65% 15 OR
6373 CJVA 13-Black 1688 38-30 56% 13 NJ
6374 Club Legacy 17-Bravo 1688 24-13 65% 17 NE
6375 ALL IN VOLLEYBALL CLUB 18-1 1688 32-6 84% 18 NV
6376 Xtreme VBC 13 Adidas 1688 20-5 80% 13 WI
6377 Empire 12 National 1688 47-21 69% 12 CA
6378 MVA 15-National (EV) 1688 23-13 57% 15 MT
6379 EP STRiVE VBC 16-S black 1688 47-22 67% 16 TX
6380 Club Cactus 13-Silver 1688 29-16 64% 13 AZ
6381 Gators VBC 15 Premier 1688 36-16 69% 15 OH
6382 Idaho Peak BAILEE NATIONAL 18 1688 11-14 44% 18 ID
6383 Unified 18-1 1688 19-28 40% 18 MI
6384 Nebraska ONE 14-Phoenix 1688 20-10 67% 14 NE
6385 Lions 14 Teal 1688 34-20 63% 14 IL
6386 Desert Sports 13 National 1688 24-3 89% 13 CA
6387 FVA 14-Ember - m1 1688 10-4 71% 14 AK
6388 Hunter's 13-Red travel 1688 36-12 75% 13 FL
6389 OK Charge South 14-1 1688 46-19 69% 14 OK
6390 Integrity Elite 15-Black 1688 26-9 74% 15 IL
6391 FaR Out 13 Steel 1688 36-8 82% 13 MI
6392 MILTON EDGE 14 Milton Edge Eclipse 1688 4-1 80% 14
6393 Essor 16-Blanc 1687 4-3 57% 16 FL
6394 Aspire 16-2 pink 1687 31-10 76% 16 AB
6395 PREVA 13-Angel 1687 12-7 63% 13 PR
6396 575 16-Pcna alaina 1687 44-29 60% 16 GA
6397 SA Juniors 16-National 1687 36-25 59% 16 TX
6398 M2 Volleyball 12-E1 1687 46-27 63% 12 GA
6399 BHJ 16-Black 1687 23-17 57% 16 SD
6400 Optimus Volleyball 16-1 1687 37-26 59% 16 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.