Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 128 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6351 MARIN 13-Green 1688 38-26 59% 13 CA
6352 ARIZONA STORM 15 BOLTZ 1688 24-24 50% 15 AZ
6353 Lockdown VBC 18-Eagles 1688 26-29 47% 18 MA
6354 Team Pineapple 16-Black 1688 26-29 47% 16 IN
6355 Club 16 1688 3-5 38% 16 CA
6356 MN Select 12-Black 1687 31-8 79% 12 MN
6357 Katy United 16 Molten 1687 37-18 65% 16 TX
6358 Zoo City 13 Cheetahs 1687 31-11 74% all
6359 Grandlake 13-Bergman 1687 6-0 100% 13 OH
6360 Apex 16-National red 1687 13-8 62% 16 MO
6361 Laredo Premier 10-Force 1687 12-4 71% 10 TX
6362 FVBC 15 National 1687 32-7 78% 15 MD
6363 Prime Time 15-Blue 1687 36-13 73% 15 IL
6364 Tulsa Power 18-1 1687 30-15 67% 18 OK
6365 COVC 15-Nationals 1687 17-9 65% 15 OR
6366 PEAK 10-1 elite 1687 29-11 73% 10 AZ
6367 So. PHX Rebels 12-S 1687 57-14 80% 12 AZ
6368 CALI 13-Gold south 1687 33-9 79% 13 NY
6369 CSF 14-Black 1687 15-4 79% 14 NC
6370 Volisur 12-1 1687 21-8 72% 12 PR
6371 Cap City 17-Gold 1687 28-13 68% 17 NC
6372 Happy Volley 17 Elite 1687 22-16 58% 17 PA
6373 Next Level 17-Lehua 1687 21-23 48% 17 CA
6374 Optimus Volleyball 16-1 1687 37-26 59% 16 PA
6375 Sharks 16-Navy 1687 35-26 57% 16 FL
6376 MOVSelect 17-Black 1687 33-9 79% 17 OH
6377 Wisconsin Elite 13-Elite 1687 52-19 72% 13 WI
6378 ENCORE 11-Janet 1687 8-0 100% 11 CA
6379 Desert Sports 13 National 1687 24-3 89% 13 CA
6380 MichioChicago 12-Bluesmoke 1687 21-27 44% 12 IL
6381 Platform PV Slammers 12 1687 5-1 83% 12
6382 Essor 16-Blanc 1687 4-3 57% 16
6383 Zootown 15-1 select 1687 4-3 57% 15
6384 TI Elite 15.2 1687 40-30 57% 15
6385 MVVC 15-White 1687 29-26 53% 15 CA
6386 Ignite 15 National (SC) 1687 24-24 50% 15 CA
6387 Galaxy 13 Ashley 1687 20-5 80% 13 NC
6388 Jr Trojans 12 Royal 1687 18-6 75% 12 IN
6389 CEV Sapphire 14-1 1687 24-9 73% 14 OH
6390 Vaqueras 16-F lewis 1687 26-11 70% 16 PR
6391 Red Rock 14-Destiny - martinez 1687 20-9 69% 14 CA
6392 IVC 16U National 1687 19-9 68% 16 TX
6393 Iowa One 14-Sydney 1687 18-10 64% 14 IA
6394 Club Cactus 13-Silver 1687 29-16 64% 13 AZ
6395 PREVA 13-Angel 1687 12-7 63% 13 PR
6396 Madtown 14-1 select 1687 25-19 57% 14 WI
6397 Premier 16-Black d 1687 25-22 51% 16 TX
6398 OC Lady Elite 16-Black 1687 29-29 50% 16 NY
6399 A5 Chattanooga 13-1 1687 19-20 49% 13 TN
6400 Frenchtown 14-1 1686 8-10 36% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.