2025-2026 Season — Page 128 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6351 | MOD Elite 15-Gold | 1688 | 36-28 | 56% | 15 | IL |
| 6352 | MVVC 16-White | 1688 | 29-24 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 6353 | MAVS 816 17-National | 1688 | 16-14 | 53% | 17 | KS |
| 6354 | Legacy Elite VBA 17-E | 1688 | 36-11 | 77% | 17 | OH |
| 6355 | Calvary AA 15U Gold | 1688 | 15-9 | 63% | 15 | PA |
| 6356 | ENCORE 14-Navy kimmy | 1688 | 38-21 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 6357 | NRG 16-Ampd blue | 1688 | 28-19 | 56% | 16 | TX |
| 6358 | CJV 14 National | 1688 | 30-17 | 63% | 14 | AR |
| 6359 | Millennium 16-Ew | 1688 | 37-23 | 62% | 16 | OH |
| 6360 | 863 Elite 12-1 black | 1688 | 34-19 | 64% | 12 | FL |
| 6361 | 912 Volleyball Academy 16 | 1688 | 21-6 | 78% | 16 | GA |
| 6362 | 314 VBC 12-Red | 1688 | 31-12 | 66% | 12 | MO |
| 6363 | Upstate VBC 14U Purple | 1688 | 16-4 | 73% | 14 | NY |
| 6364 | 573 Missouri Juniors 14-A | 1688 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | MO |
| 6365 | LES 14 Norman | 1688 | 15-2 | 79% | 14 | AL |
| 6366 | CVC 11-White | 1688 | 10-1 | 91% | 11 | OH |
| 6367 | MVC Panthers 14-Pink | 1688 | 16-8 | 67% | 14 | IL |
| 6368 | MoCo MAVS 16-Red | 1688 | 21-33 | 39% | 16 | TX |
| 6369 | TVC 16-Royal | 1688 | 29-30 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 6370 | LAVA West 15-Molten hh | 1688 | 29-23 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 6371 | LI Knights 16-1 | 1688 | 13-3 | 81% | 16 | NY |
| 6372 | COVC 15-Nationals | 1688 | 17-9 | 65% | 15 | OR |
| 6373 | CJVA 13-Black | 1688 | 38-30 | 56% | 13 | NJ |
| 6374 | Club Legacy 17-Bravo | 1688 | 24-13 | 65% | 17 | NE |
| 6375 | ALL IN VOLLEYBALL CLUB 18-1 | 1688 | 32-6 | 84% | 18 | NV |
| 6376 | Xtreme VBC 13 Adidas | 1688 | 20-5 | 80% | 13 | WI |
| 6377 | Empire 12 National | 1688 | 47-21 | 69% | 12 | CA |
| 6378 | MVA 15-National (EV) | 1688 | 23-13 | 57% | 15 | MT |
| 6379 | EP STRiVE VBC 16-S black | 1688 | 47-22 | 67% | 16 | TX |
| 6380 | Club Cactus 13-Silver | 1688 | 29-16 | 64% | 13 | AZ |
| 6381 | Gators VBC 15 Premier | 1688 | 36-16 | 69% | 15 | OH |
| 6382 | Idaho Peak BAILEE NATIONAL 18 | 1688 | 11-14 | 44% | 18 | ID |
| 6383 | Unified 18-1 | 1688 | 19-28 | 40% | 18 | MI |
| 6384 | Nebraska ONE 14-Phoenix | 1688 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | NE |
| 6385 | Lions 14 Teal | 1688 | 34-20 | 63% | 14 | IL |
| 6386 | Desert Sports 13 National | 1688 | 24-3 | 89% | 13 | CA |
| 6387 | FVA 14-Ember - m1 | 1688 | 10-4 | 71% | 14 | AK |
| 6388 | Hunter's 13-Red travel | 1688 | 36-12 | 75% | 13 | FL |
| 6389 | OK Charge South 14-1 | 1688 | 46-19 | 69% | 14 | OK |
| 6390 | Integrity Elite 15-Black | 1688 | 26-9 | 74% | 15 | IL |
| 6391 | FaR Out 13 Steel | 1688 | 36-8 | 82% | 13 | MI |
| 6392 | MILTON EDGE 14 Milton Edge Eclipse | 1688 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | |
| 6393 | Essor 16-Blanc | 1687 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 6394 | Aspire 16-2 pink | 1687 | 31-10 | 76% | 16 | AB |
| 6395 | PREVA 13-Angel | 1687 | 12-7 | 63% | 13 | PR |
| 6396 | 575 16-Pcna alaina | 1687 | 44-29 | 60% | 16 | GA |
| 6397 | SA Juniors 16-National | 1687 | 36-25 | 59% | 16 | TX |
| 6398 | M2 Volleyball 12-E1 | 1687 | 46-27 | 63% | 12 | GA |
| 6399 | BHJ 16-Black | 1687 | 23-17 | 57% | 16 | SD |
| 6400 | Optimus Volleyball 16-1 | 1687 | 37-26 | 59% | 16 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.