2025-2026 Season — Page 127 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6301 | Club 281 14-1 | 1689 | 13-4 | 72% | 14 | |
| 6302 | Summit 15-National blue | 1689 | 24-16 | 55% | 15 | TX |
| 6303 | South Georgia Heat 14-1 | 1689 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | |
| 6304 | NSSC 12-Black | 1689 | 32-9 | 78% | 12 | MO |
| 6305 | FIVE 15-1 | 1689 | 35-9 | 80% | 15 | FL |
| 6306 | The RIDGE 12-Blue | 1689 | 14-4 | 78% | 12 | AR |
| 6307 | Austin Skyline 14 Molten | 1689 | 33-19 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 6308 | Delta Valley 14-Blue | 1689 | 23-12 | 66% | 14 | CA |
| 6309 | GSEVC 14-Premier | 1689 | 16-12 | 57% | 14 | NJ |
| 6310 | Northeast 16-Orange | 1689 | 27-8 | 77% | 16 | CT |
| 6311 | VOLT 14-Power | 1689 | 15-4 | 71% | 14 | ND |
| 6312 | CRVBC 14-1 ospreys | 1689 | 22-5 | 71% | 14 | NH |
| 6313 | AVA TX 18 Adidas | 1689 | 18-10 | 64% | 18 | TX |
| 6314 | FeVA 12 (BG) | 1689 | 36-15 | 71% | 12 | WI |
| 6315 | Iowa Impact 17-2 elite | 1689 | 44-30 | 59% | 17 | IA |
| 6316 | A3 12-X | 1689 | 42-16 | 72% | 12 | TN |
| 6317 | FL Conquer 12 State | 1689 | 29-9 | 76% | 12 | FL |
| 6318 | Catalyst 15-Green | 1689 | 33-19 | 63% | 15 | TX |
| 6319 | Alliance 12-Ren | 1689 | 29-27 | 52% | 12 | TN |
| 6320 | LevelUp 16-Black | 1689 | 26-12 | 68% | 16 | MI |
| 6321 | HJV 15-National | 1689 | 24-28 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 6322 | Prodigy 15-Red | 1689 | 30-13 | 70% | 15 | KY |
| 6323 | White Tiger Elite Volleyball 10 | 1689 | 18-4 | 82% | 10 | FL |
| 6324 | NYC Juniors 18-National | 1689 | 36-19 | 65% | 18 | NY |
| 6325 | RockCity 15-N3 | 1689 | 43-14 | 75% | 15 | OH |
| 6326 | NE Shock 14-1 | 1689 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | CT |
| 6327 | Roadrunner 15 Crimson | 1689 | 45-23 | 66% | 15 | TX |
| 6328 | SG Elite 16-Elite carlos | 1689 | 41-18 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 6329 | Ka Ulukoa 15 Geno | 1689 | 35-17 | 67% | 15 | HI |
| 6330 | TEXSTAR 18 | 1689 | 22-13 | 61% | 18 | TX |
| 6331 | BRUSA 15-Madison/des | 1689 | 25-15 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 6332 | TI Elite 15.2 | 1689 | 40-30 | 57% | 15 | IN |
| 6333 | MVVC 16-Black | 1689 | 35-22 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 6334 | Black Swamp 18-1 | 1689 | 11-5 | 69% | 18 | OH |
| 6335 | VCNebraska 15-Blue | 1689 | 6-4 | 60% | 15 | NE |
| 6336 | ID Peak 18-Bailee | 1689 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | WA |
| 6337 | PJVBC 17 National | 1689 | 48-34 | 56% | 17 | WA |
| 6338 | NEVA 16-Black lexi | 1689 | 28-9 | 74% | 16 | UT |
| 6339 | Ashland Aces 12 Ashland Aces | 1689 | 9-0 | 100% | 12 | KY |
| 6340 | WYORVC-DMTYS 15 Green | 1689 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | WY |
| 6341 | Alpha Omega 17-Elite | 1689 | 24-10 | 71% | 17 | MO |
| 6342 | Madfrog 16-N white | 1689 | 25-21 | 51% | 16 | TX |
| 6343 | A5 Gwinnett 16-Gus | 1689 | 38-24 | 61% | 16 | GA |
| 6344 | VIP 14-Metro | 1689 | 15-1 | 79% | 14 | |
| 6345 | Eclipse 13 Solar | 1688 | 25-13 | 66% | 13 | WI |
| 6346 | Putnam VBC 18 Putnam VBC - Elite | 1688 | 22-21 | 51% | 18 | OH |
| 6347 | KS Rise 12-1 | 1688 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | KS |
| 6348 | ARIZONA STORM 15 BOLTZ | 1688 | 24-24 | 50% | 15 | AZ |
| 6349 | Kairos 16 Gamma | 1688 | 29-29 | 50% | 16 | SD |
| 6350 | MCJO 14-S | 1688 | 10-1 | 91% | 14 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.