2025-2026 Season — Page 127 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6301 | ''ELEU 14 | 1688 | 7-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 6302 | MCJO 14-S | 1688 | 10-1 | 91% | 14 | |
| 6303 | KS Rise 12-1 | 1688 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | KS |
| 6304 | ARIZONA STORM 16 BOLTZ | 1688 | 26-22 | 54% | 16 | AZ |
| 6305 | Empire 12-Nevaeh | 1688 | 9-3 | 75% | 12 | CA |
| 6306 | MIDTN 16-BLACK | 1688 | 21-13 | 62% | 16 | TN |
| 6307 | ID Peak 18-Bailee | 1688 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | ID |
| 6308 | 314 VBC 12-Red | 1688 | 31-12 | 66% | 12 | MO |
| 6309 | Shockwave 18 | 1688 | 17-9 | 65% | 18 | KS |
| 6310 | Headlines VBC 14 Navy | 1688 | 37-24 | 61% | 14 | OH |
| 6311 | Tri-Star 18-Navy | 1688 | 28-6 | 82% | 18 | TN |
| 6312 | RockwoodThunder 14-Carolina | 1688 | 54-32 | 61% | 14 | MO |
| 6313 | HJV 15-National | 1688 | 24-28 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 6314 | Delta Valley 14-Blue | 1688 | 23-12 | 66% | 14 | CA |
| 6315 | Arbuckle 15 | 1688 | 28-8 | 78% | 15 | CA |
| 6316 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 17-Black | 1688 | 34-33 | 51% | 17 | FL |
| 6317 | GSEVC 17-Premier | 1688 | 26-35 | 43% | 17 | NJ |
| 6318 | FVA 18 Inferno | 1688 | 21-13 | 62% | 18 | AK |
| 6319 | Vail Peak 17U Pink | 1688 | 25-9 | 74% | 17 | CO |
| 6320 | STVA 15-Navy-2 | 1688 | 38-18 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 6321 | TEXSTAR 18 | 1688 | 22-13 | 61% | 18 | TX |
| 6322 | GSEVC 16-Premier | 1688 | 29-28 | 51% | 16 | NJ |
| 6323 | HIC 18-N kim | 1688 | 18-15 | 55% | 18 | UT |
| 6324 | KS Rise 17-1 | 1688 | 20-5 | 74% | 17 | KS |
| 6325 | 863 Elite 12-1 black | 1688 | 34-19 | 64% | 12 | FL |
| 6326 | BRUSA 12-Tobi | 1688 | 27-17 | 61% | 12 | CA |
| 6327 | I AM VBC 11-Red | 1688 | 25-8 | 76% | 11 | WI |
| 6328 | Attack VBC 17-Mizuno lime | 1688 | 29-29 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 6329 | CVC 11-White | 1688 | 10-1 | 91% | 11 | OH |
| 6330 | Vortex 17-National - felicia | 1688 | 23-17 | 56% | 17 | UT |
| 6331 | RISE 11 MATT | 1688 | 30-13 | 70% | 11 | CA |
| 6332 | Momentum 16 Riley | 1688 | 23-19 | 55% | 16 | CO |
| 6333 | South Gate VC 16-1 | 1688 | 20-1 | 95% | 16 | |
| 6334 | VIP 14-Metro | 1688 | 15-1 | 79% | 14 | |
| 6335 | League City Sharks 12 | 1688 | 21-5 | 78% | 12 | TX |
| 6336 | NLVA 13-1 gold | 1688 | 36-14 | 72% | 13 | NC |
| 6337 | HVA 14-RED | 1688 | 31-12 | 70% | 14 | TX |
| 6338 | Slainte 12-Black | 1688 | 19-10 | 66% | 12 | CA |
| 6339 | Niagara Frontier 15 Navy | 1688 | 29-27 | 52% | 15 | NY |
| 6340 | Kansas Rise VBC 13-1 | 1688 | 13-1 | 87% | 13 | KS |
| 6341 | AVBC 12-S diamonds | 1688 | 34-6 | 85% | 12 | AZ |
| 6342 | COASTLINE 16-Black | 1688 | 37-9 | 80% | 16 | NC |
| 6343 | SI Wave 16-Black | 1688 | 37-10 | 79% | 16 | IL |
| 6344 | PVA 16-Blue | 1688 | 34-12 | 72% | 16 | VA |
| 6345 | CRVBC 14-1 ospreys | 1688 | 22-5 | 71% | 14 | NH |
| 6346 | Oasis 16 National | 1688 | 43-19 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 6347 | OK Charge South 14-1 | 1688 | 46-19 | 69% | 14 | OK |
| 6348 | Lady Legends 13 | 1688 | 14-6 | 67% | 13 | PA |
| 6349 | SVC 16-Black national | 1688 | 23-12 | 66% | 16 | MO |
| 6350 | Tenacity 14-1 | 1688 | 28-17 | 62% | 14 | TN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.