Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 127 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6301 Club 281 14-1 1689 13-4 72% 14
6302 Summit 15-National blue 1689 24-16 55% 15 TX
6303 South Georgia Heat 14-1 1689 14-6 70% 14
6304 NSSC 12-Black 1689 32-9 78% 12 MO
6305 FIVE 15-1 1689 35-9 80% 15 FL
6306 The RIDGE 12-Blue 1689 14-4 78% 12 AR
6307 Austin Skyline 14 Molten 1689 33-19 63% 14 TX
6308 Delta Valley 14-Blue 1689 23-12 66% 14 CA
6309 GSEVC 14-Premier 1689 16-12 57% 14 NJ
6310 Northeast 16-Orange 1689 27-8 77% 16 CT
6311 VOLT 14-Power 1689 15-4 71% 14 ND
6312 CRVBC 14-1 ospreys 1689 22-5 71% 14 NH
6313 AVA TX 18 Adidas 1689 18-10 64% 18 TX
6314 FeVA 12 (BG) 1689 36-15 71% 12 WI
6315 Iowa Impact 17-2 elite 1689 44-30 59% 17 IA
6316 A3 12-X 1689 42-16 72% 12 TN
6317 FL Conquer 12 State 1689 29-9 76% 12 FL
6318 Catalyst 15-Green 1689 33-19 63% 15 TX
6319 Alliance 12-Ren 1689 29-27 52% 12 TN
6320 LevelUp 16-Black 1689 26-12 68% 16 MI
6321 HJV 15-National 1689 24-28 46% 15 TX
6322 Prodigy 15-Red 1689 30-13 70% 15 KY
6323 White Tiger Elite Volleyball 10 1689 18-4 82% 10 FL
6324 NYC Juniors 18-National 1689 36-19 65% 18 NY
6325 RockCity 15-N3 1689 43-14 75% 15 OH
6326 NE Shock 14-1 1689 20-10 67% 14 CT
6327 Roadrunner 15 Crimson 1689 45-23 66% 15 TX
6328 SG Elite 16-Elite carlos 1689 41-18 69% 16 CA
6329 Ka Ulukoa 15 Geno 1689 35-17 67% 15 HI
6330 TEXSTAR 18 1689 22-13 61% 18 TX
6331 BRUSA 15-Madison/des 1689 25-15 63% 15 CA
6332 TI Elite 15.2 1689 40-30 57% 15 IN
6333 MVVC 16-Black 1689 35-22 61% 16 CA
6334 Black Swamp 18-1 1689 11-5 69% 18 OH
6335 VCNebraska 15-Blue 1689 6-4 60% 15 NE
6336 ID Peak 18-Bailee 1689 6-2 75% 18 WA
6337 PJVBC 17 National 1689 48-34 56% 17 WA
6338 NEVA 16-Black lexi 1689 28-9 74% 16 UT
6339 Ashland Aces 12 Ashland Aces 1689 9-0 100% 12 KY
6340 WYORVC-DMTYS 15 Green 1689 5-1 83% 15 WY
6341 Alpha Omega 17-Elite 1689 24-10 71% 17 MO
6342 Madfrog 16-N white 1689 25-21 51% 16 TX
6343 A5 Gwinnett 16-Gus 1689 38-24 61% 16 GA
6344 VIP 14-Metro 1689 15-1 79% 14
6345 Eclipse 13 Solar 1688 25-13 66% 13 WI
6346 Putnam VBC 18 Putnam VBC - Elite 1688 22-21 51% 18 OH
6347 KS Rise 12-1 1688 6-0 100% 12 KS
6348 ARIZONA STORM 15 BOLTZ 1688 24-24 50% 15 AZ
6349 Kairos 16 Gamma 1688 29-29 50% 16 SD
6350 MCJO 14-S 1688 10-1 91% 14 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.