Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 127 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6301 ''ELEU 14 1688 7-0 100% 14
6302 MCJO 14-S 1688 10-1 91% 14
6303 KS Rise 12-1 1688 6-0 100% 12 KS
6304 ARIZONA STORM 16 BOLTZ 1688 26-22 54% 16 AZ
6305 Empire 12-Nevaeh 1688 9-3 75% 12 CA
6306 MIDTN 16-BLACK 1688 21-13 62% 16 TN
6307 ID Peak 18-Bailee 1688 6-2 75% 18 ID
6308 314 VBC 12-Red 1688 31-12 66% 12 MO
6309 Shockwave 18 1688 17-9 65% 18 KS
6310 Headlines VBC 14 Navy 1688 37-24 61% 14 OH
6311 Tri-Star 18-Navy 1688 28-6 82% 18 TN
6312 RockwoodThunder 14-Carolina 1688 54-32 61% 14 MO
6313 HJV 15-National 1688 24-28 46% 15 TX
6314 Delta Valley 14-Blue 1688 23-12 66% 14 CA
6315 Arbuckle 15 1688 28-8 78% 15 CA
6316 TAMPA UNITED VBA 17-Black 1688 34-33 51% 17 FL
6317 GSEVC 17-Premier 1688 26-35 43% 17 NJ
6318 FVA 18 Inferno 1688 21-13 62% 18 AK
6319 Vail Peak 17U Pink 1688 25-9 74% 17 CO
6320 STVA 15-Navy-2 1688 38-18 68% 15 TX
6321 TEXSTAR 18 1688 22-13 61% 18 TX
6322 GSEVC 16-Premier 1688 29-28 51% 16 NJ
6323 HIC 18-N kim 1688 18-15 55% 18 UT
6324 KS Rise 17-1 1688 20-5 74% 17 KS
6325 863 Elite 12-1 black 1688 34-19 64% 12 FL
6326 BRUSA 12-Tobi 1688 27-17 61% 12 CA
6327 I AM VBC 11-Red 1688 25-8 76% 11 WI
6328 Attack VBC 17-Mizuno lime 1688 29-29 50% 17 TX
6329 CVC 11-White 1688 10-1 91% 11 OH
6330 Vortex 17-National - felicia 1688 23-17 56% 17 UT
6331 RISE 11 MATT 1688 30-13 70% 11 CA
6332 Momentum 16 Riley 1688 23-19 55% 16 CO
6333 South Gate VC 16-1 1688 20-1 95% 16
6334 VIP 14-Metro 1688 15-1 79% 14
6335 League City Sharks 12 1688 21-5 78% 12 TX
6336 NLVA 13-1 gold 1688 36-14 72% 13 NC
6337 HVA 14-RED 1688 31-12 70% 14 TX
6338 Slainte 12-Black 1688 19-10 66% 12 CA
6339 Niagara Frontier 15 Navy 1688 29-27 52% 15 NY
6340 Kansas Rise VBC 13-1 1688 13-1 87% 13 KS
6341 AVBC 12-S diamonds 1688 34-6 85% 12 AZ
6342 COASTLINE 16-Black 1688 37-9 80% 16 NC
6343 SI Wave 16-Black 1688 37-10 79% 16 IL
6344 PVA 16-Blue 1688 34-12 72% 16 VA
6345 CRVBC 14-1 ospreys 1688 22-5 71% 14 NH
6346 Oasis 16 National 1688 43-19 69% 16 CA
6347 OK Charge South 14-1 1688 46-19 69% 14 OK
6348 Lady Legends 13 1688 14-6 67% 13 PA
6349 SVC 16-Black national 1688 23-12 66% 16 MO
6350 Tenacity 14-1 1688 28-17 62% 14 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.