Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 126 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6251 501 Volley 16-3 reg plus 1691 30-7 81% 16 AR
6252 NT 16-Hunters creek 1691 55-14 80% 16 FL
6253 Sports Academy VBC 13-Premier 1691 8-2 80% 13 CA
6254 501 Volley 12-3 regional 1691 27-7 79% 12 AR
6255 Club Ace Long Island 13-Gold south 1691 27-8 77% 13 NY
6256 Putnam VBC 14 Putnam VBC - Blaze (OV) 1691 13-4 76% 14 OH
6257 Pioneer VBC 15-2 1691 12-4 75% 15 OH
6258 Elite 11-Premier nick 1691 46-16 74% 11 FL
6259 Momentum 14-Neon 1691 43-15 74% 14 FL
6260 Intense 14-S - ricky 1690 33-10 77% 14 LA
6261 TEVA 14 12 1690 19-14 58% 12 NJ
6262 AJ 14-Red 1690 33-10 77% 14 LA
6263 FORZA1 13 ONE 1690 22-19 54% 13 CA
6264 ECC 16-South national 1690 23-24 49% 16 NJ
6265 MVVC G 13-White 1690 33-16 67% 13 CA
6266 Central California Volleyball Academy 13-Elite 1690 10-4 71% 13 CA
6267 RockwoodThunder 14-Carolina 1690 54-32 61% 14 MO
6268 VVA 14-Roden 1690 28-15 65% 14 CA
6269 CEV Sapphire 14-1 1690 24-9 73% 14 OH
6270 CLVC 13-Black 1690 37-15 71% 13 NC
6271 H Skyline 12-Gray 1690 16-8 64% 12 TX
6272 Ignite 15 National (SC) 1690 24-24 50% 15 CA
6273 Temecula Viper 12-1 kehau/ashlyn 1690 21-15 58% 12 CA
6274 EMV 10-Black krista 1690 31-19 58% 10 TX
6275 Active 13-Yancey 1690 23-9 72% 13 VA
6276 NC Coastal 13 Sarah 1690 29-8 78% 13 NC
6277 Boiler Jrs 14-R white 1690 39-7 85% 14 IN
6278 Monsters 14-Elite black 1690 31-11 74% 14 MI
6279 Centennial CVA 15-1 kelly 1690 9-3 75% 15 IA
6280 BRUSA 12-Tobi 1690 27-17 61% 12 CA
6281 MN Select 12-Black 1690 31-8 79% 12 MN
6282 ''ELEU 14 1690 7-0 100% 14 HI
6283 Coastal VBC 13 Navy 1690 28-6 78% 13 DE
6284 Midwest Penguins 14-1 1690 43-29 60% 14 WI
6285 Legacy 15-Elite east 1690 38-12 76% 15 MI
6286 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 18-National 1690 26-11 70% 18 ME
6287 Sierra Club 15-Mark 1690 21-5 81% 15 CO
6288 Limitless 18-Heat 1690 32-11 74% 18 MD
6289 OC Lady Elite 16-Black 1690 29-29 50% 16 NY
6290 USA South 14 Mizuno 1690 31-19 62% 14 FL
6291 DaKine 15-National navy 1690 44-21 68% 15 WA
6292 Waco Lightning 12-Black 1690 25-7 74% 12 TX
6293 NEVA 18-Blue kalani 1690 19-9 68% 18 UT
6294 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 17-T savannah 1690 22-8 73% 17 NJ
6295 EVA 17 National 1690 48-21 70% 17 AR
6296 Honu Volleyball Club 16 16 Aloha 1690 18-12 60% 16 FL
6297 STL Crossfire 13 SR1 1690 37-15 71% 13 MO
6298 KC Power 18-2 1690 18-9 67% 18 KS
6299 TEJAS 14-Black carrie 1690 31-24 53% 14 TX
6300 Lockdown VBC 18-Eagles 1690 26-29 47% 18 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.