Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 126 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6251 ENCORE 14-Navy kimmy 1690 38-21 64% 14 CA
6252 USA South 12-Premier purple 1690 32-18 64% 12 FL
6253 NIVBC 15-Becky 1690 6-4 60% 15 ID
6254 Illini Elite 14-Black 1690 19-13 59% 14 IL
6255 VCNebraska 14-White 1690 7-6 54% 14 NE
6256 MAVS 816 17-National 1690 16-14 53% 17 KS
6257 Venetian Bay Auburn 16-1 papaya 1690 17-15 53% 16 AL
6258 CinciVB Acad 16-2 1690 31-27 53% 16 OH
6259 ECVC 17-Black 1690 32-29 52% 17 VA
6260 CUVC 14 Premier 1690 35-35 50% 14 NC
6261 Iowa Impact 14-1 elite 1690 33-38 46% 14 IA
6262 Club V 15-Prodigy jolana 1690 28-36 44% 15 UT
6263 HP 14-1 1690 18-25 42% 14 MI
6264 MCE 16-1 1689 15-4 79% 16
6265 TEVA 14 12 1689 19-14 58% 12
6266 LES 16-Storm 1689 36-17 68% 16
6267 MIDTN 12-Black 1689 28-15 65% 12 TN
6268 FL Conquer 12 State 1689 29-9 76% 12 FL
6269 TW Skyline 13-Royal 1689 17-32 34% 13 TX
6270 H Skyline 12-Gray 1689 16-8 64% 12 TX
6271 AVA 13-1 1689 23-5 77% 13 MA
6272 VolleyFX 12 Wish 1689 33-7 77% 12 NY
6273 Midwest Penguins 15-N 1689 51-27 65% 15 WI
6274 FVA 15-2 1689 43-20 64% 15 AK
6275 Calvary AA 15U Gold 1689 15-9 63% 15 PA
6276 Dig It VBC 15-1 1689 18-2 90% 15 IL
6277 Northeast 16-Orange 1689 27-8 77% 16 CT
6278 NEVA 18-Blue kalani 1689 19-9 68% 18 UT
6279 Twisters 14-Julia 1689 13-3 81% 14 TX
6280 Shockwave VBC 18 1689 6-1 86% 18 KS
6281 RockCity 17 N2 1689 44-24 65% 17 OH
6282 Elite 11-Premier nick 1689 46-16 74% 11 FL
6283 NU Breed 14-Gold 1689 6-1 86% 14
6284 Centennial CVA 15-1 kelly 1689 9-3 75% 15
6285 Zias 12-Enchv 1689 24-11 69% 12
6286 Architects 16-Black 1689 6-4 60% 16
6287 Mojo Volleyball Utah 16-National 1689 3-4 43% 16
6288 TLVC 17-1 1689 5-9 36% 17
6289 Alta Sierra 16-S coach matt 1689 32-10 76% 16 CA
6290 Ballyhoo 18-Black 1689 32-12 73% 18 PA
6291 GSVC 14-White 1689 37-9 80% 14 NH
6292 912 Volleyball Academy 16 1689 21-6 78% 16 GA
6293 BEVBC 17 Navy 1689 45-26 63% 17 MD
6294 New WaveS 14-Veronica 1689 26-16 62% 14 FL
6295 Countdown 14-Elite 1689 37-25 60% 14 FL
6296 Cloud Peak 14 National 1689 49-31 60% 14 WY
6297 CMASS EDGE 16-Blue 1689 30-29 51% 16 MA
6298 MOD Elite 13-Blue 1689 27-27 50% 13 IL
6299 Bay Area Eagles 12-1 1689 21-22 49% 12 CA
6300 South Georgia Heat 14-1 1688 14-6 70% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.