2025-2026 Season — Page 126 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6251 | ENCORE 14-Navy kimmy | 1690 | 38-21 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 6252 | USA South 12-Premier purple | 1690 | 32-18 | 64% | 12 | FL |
| 6253 | NIVBC 15-Becky | 1690 | 6-4 | 60% | 15 | ID |
| 6254 | Illini Elite 14-Black | 1690 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 6255 | VCNebraska 14-White | 1690 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | NE |
| 6256 | MAVS 816 17-National | 1690 | 16-14 | 53% | 17 | KS |
| 6257 | Venetian Bay Auburn 16-1 papaya | 1690 | 17-15 | 53% | 16 | AL |
| 6258 | CinciVB Acad 16-2 | 1690 | 31-27 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 6259 | ECVC 17-Black | 1690 | 32-29 | 52% | 17 | VA |
| 6260 | CUVC 14 Premier | 1690 | 35-35 | 50% | 14 | NC |
| 6261 | Iowa Impact 14-1 elite | 1690 | 33-38 | 46% | 14 | IA |
| 6262 | Club V 15-Prodigy jolana | 1690 | 28-36 | 44% | 15 | UT |
| 6263 | HP 14-1 | 1690 | 18-25 | 42% | 14 | MI |
| 6264 | MCE 16-1 | 1689 | 15-4 | 79% | 16 | |
| 6265 | TEVA 14 12 | 1689 | 19-14 | 58% | 12 | |
| 6266 | LES 16-Storm | 1689 | 36-17 | 68% | 16 | |
| 6267 | MIDTN 12-Black | 1689 | 28-15 | 65% | 12 | TN |
| 6268 | FL Conquer 12 State | 1689 | 29-9 | 76% | 12 | FL |
| 6269 | TW Skyline 13-Royal | 1689 | 17-32 | 34% | 13 | TX |
| 6270 | H Skyline 12-Gray | 1689 | 16-8 | 64% | 12 | TX |
| 6271 | AVA 13-1 | 1689 | 23-5 | 77% | 13 | MA |
| 6272 | VolleyFX 12 Wish | 1689 | 33-7 | 77% | 12 | NY |
| 6273 | Midwest Penguins 15-N | 1689 | 51-27 | 65% | 15 | WI |
| 6274 | FVA 15-2 | 1689 | 43-20 | 64% | 15 | AK |
| 6275 | Calvary AA 15U Gold | 1689 | 15-9 | 63% | 15 | PA |
| 6276 | Dig It VBC 15-1 | 1689 | 18-2 | 90% | 15 | IL |
| 6277 | Northeast 16-Orange | 1689 | 27-8 | 77% | 16 | CT |
| 6278 | NEVA 18-Blue kalani | 1689 | 19-9 | 68% | 18 | UT |
| 6279 | Twisters 14-Julia | 1689 | 13-3 | 81% | 14 | TX |
| 6280 | Shockwave VBC 18 | 1689 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | KS |
| 6281 | RockCity 17 N2 | 1689 | 44-24 | 65% | 17 | OH |
| 6282 | Elite 11-Premier nick | 1689 | 46-16 | 74% | 11 | FL |
| 6283 | NU Breed 14-Gold | 1689 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | |
| 6284 | Centennial CVA 15-1 kelly | 1689 | 9-3 | 75% | 15 | |
| 6285 | Zias 12-Enchv | 1689 | 24-11 | 69% | 12 | |
| 6286 | Architects 16-Black | 1689 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | |
| 6287 | Mojo Volleyball Utah 16-National | 1689 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | |
| 6288 | TLVC 17-1 | 1689 | 5-9 | 36% | 17 | |
| 6289 | Alta Sierra 16-S coach matt | 1689 | 32-10 | 76% | 16 | CA |
| 6290 | Ballyhoo 18-Black | 1689 | 32-12 | 73% | 18 | PA |
| 6291 | GSVC 14-White | 1689 | 37-9 | 80% | 14 | NH |
| 6292 | 912 Volleyball Academy 16 | 1689 | 21-6 | 78% | 16 | GA |
| 6293 | BEVBC 17 Navy | 1689 | 45-26 | 63% | 17 | MD |
| 6294 | New WaveS 14-Veronica | 1689 | 26-16 | 62% | 14 | FL |
| 6295 | Countdown 14-Elite | 1689 | 37-25 | 60% | 14 | FL |
| 6296 | Cloud Peak 14 National | 1689 | 49-31 | 60% | 14 | WY |
| 6297 | CMASS EDGE 16-Blue | 1689 | 30-29 | 51% | 16 | MA |
| 6298 | MOD Elite 13-Blue | 1689 | 27-27 | 50% | 13 | IL |
| 6299 | Bay Area Eagles 12-1 | 1689 | 21-22 | 49% | 12 | CA |
| 6300 | South Georgia Heat 14-1 | 1688 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.