Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 125 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6201 Prodigy 16-Red 1691 30-11 73% 16 NY
6202 Tsunami 15-1e andressa 1691 33-22 60% 15 GA
6203 JoCo 13-Black 1691 19-6 76% 13 NC
6204 Next Level 18 Lehua 1691 30-19 61% 18 CA
6205 ROCK Volleyball 13-Sky 1691 33-23 59% 13 PA
6206 Blue Royals 14 Crystal 1691 31-28 53% 14 WA
6207 CJV 15-National white 1691 27-32 46% 15 NC
6208 SVC NGV 17-Jeff 1691 30-24 56% 17 GA
6209 Waco Lightning 13-Black 1691 15-3 79% 13 TX
6210 CG 17-Blue 1691 16-7 70% 17 TX
6211 Tyrants 14-Black 1691 19-13 59% 14 CA
6212 SynergyForce 16-Gold 1691 29-25 54% 16 CA
6213 YVA 18 1690 19-4 76% 18
6214 MAVA 12-Hammerhead 1690 44-13 77% 12 KY
6215 Anthem United 12-Agape 1690 21-4 84% 12 GA
6216 Net Force 12-1 elite 1690 26-9 67% 12 IL
6217 Hunter's 13-Red travel 1690 36-12 75% 13 FL
6218 VVA 14-Roden 1690 28-15 65% 14 CA
6219 SASVBC 17-Andy 1690 30-19 61% 17 HI
6220 Maine Jrs 18-National 1690 37-16 70% 18 ME
6221 AJV 16-Helix 1690 46-26 64% 16 TX
6222 UNION 17-Blue 1690 54-22 71% 17 CA
6223 InfinitySouth 14-1 1690 32-9 78% 14 LA
6224 314 VBC 14-Red 1690 39-21 63% 14 MO
6225 Momentum 14-Neon 1690 30-8 79% 14 FL
6226 Boiler Jrs 14-R white 1690 39-7 85% 14 IN
6227 808AC 15-Tarann 1690 22-14 61% 15 HI
6228 Madfrog 16-N white 1690 25-21 51% 16 TX
6229 SMASH 15-2 1690 6-1 86% 15 MA
6230 Unified 18-1 1690 19-28 40% 18 MI
6231 USA South 14 Mizuno 1690 31-19 62% 14 FL
6232 Alliance 12-Ren 1690 29-27 52% 12 TN
6233 Pakmen 16-Gold 1690 4-1 80% 16 ON
6234 Skyline 15-Silver 1690 36-12 72% 15 TX
6235 MDJRS 17-Elite black 1690 32-35 48% 17 MD
6236 Reign 15-Gold 1690 18-8 69% 15 FL
6237 407 13-Blue 1690 39-19 67% 13 FL
6238 SIVA 15-Black 1690 29-17 63% 15 ID
6239 New York Elite 17-Silver 1690 12-2 86% 17 NY
6240 WPVC 18-Armour orange 1690 30-40 43% 18 FL
6241 SMASH 17-1 1690 4-3 57% 17 MA
6242 OK Charge 13-1 stillwater 1690 23-14 57% 13 OK
6243 Idaho Peak BAILEE NATIONAL 18 1690 11-14 44% 18
6244 Xtreme VBC 13 Adidas 1690 20-5 80% 13 WI
6245 Y Not 13-1 1690 20-5 80% 13 VA
6246 SOVC Davis 16-A 1690 4-1 80% 16 OH
6247 CID 13-Blue 1690 20-5 77% 13 UT
6248 SP2VC 14-Blue 1690 32-10 76% 14 NC
6249 Matchbox 14-Premier 1690 14-6 67% 14 SD
6250 Dig This 15-Pink 1690 20-11 65% 15 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.