2025-2026 Season — Page 125 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6201 | Prodigy 16-Red | 1691 | 30-11 | 73% | 16 | NY |
| 6202 | Tsunami 15-1e andressa | 1691 | 33-22 | 60% | 15 | GA |
| 6203 | JoCo 13-Black | 1691 | 19-6 | 76% | 13 | NC |
| 6204 | Next Level 18 Lehua | 1691 | 30-19 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 6205 | ROCK Volleyball 13-Sky | 1691 | 33-23 | 59% | 13 | PA |
| 6206 | Blue Royals 14 Crystal | 1691 | 31-28 | 53% | 14 | WA |
| 6207 | CJV 15-National white | 1691 | 27-32 | 46% | 15 | NC |
| 6208 | SVC NGV 17-Jeff | 1691 | 30-24 | 56% | 17 | GA |
| 6209 | Waco Lightning 13-Black | 1691 | 15-3 | 79% | 13 | TX |
| 6210 | CG 17-Blue | 1691 | 16-7 | 70% | 17 | TX |
| 6211 | Tyrants 14-Black | 1691 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 6212 | SynergyForce 16-Gold | 1691 | 29-25 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 6213 | YVA 18 | 1690 | 19-4 | 76% | 18 | |
| 6214 | MAVA 12-Hammerhead | 1690 | 44-13 | 77% | 12 | KY |
| 6215 | Anthem United 12-Agape | 1690 | 21-4 | 84% | 12 | GA |
| 6216 | Net Force 12-1 elite | 1690 | 26-9 | 67% | 12 | IL |
| 6217 | Hunter's 13-Red travel | 1690 | 36-12 | 75% | 13 | FL |
| 6218 | VVA 14-Roden | 1690 | 28-15 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 6219 | SASVBC 17-Andy | 1690 | 30-19 | 61% | 17 | HI |
| 6220 | Maine Jrs 18-National | 1690 | 37-16 | 70% | 18 | ME |
| 6221 | AJV 16-Helix | 1690 | 46-26 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 6222 | UNION 17-Blue | 1690 | 54-22 | 71% | 17 | CA |
| 6223 | InfinitySouth 14-1 | 1690 | 32-9 | 78% | 14 | LA |
| 6224 | 314 VBC 14-Red | 1690 | 39-21 | 63% | 14 | MO |
| 6225 | Momentum 14-Neon | 1690 | 30-8 | 79% | 14 | FL |
| 6226 | Boiler Jrs 14-R white | 1690 | 39-7 | 85% | 14 | IN |
| 6227 | 808AC 15-Tarann | 1690 | 22-14 | 61% | 15 | HI |
| 6228 | Madfrog 16-N white | 1690 | 25-21 | 51% | 16 | TX |
| 6229 | SMASH 15-2 | 1690 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | MA |
| 6230 | Unified 18-1 | 1690 | 19-28 | 40% | 18 | MI |
| 6231 | USA South 14 Mizuno | 1690 | 31-19 | 62% | 14 | FL |
| 6232 | Alliance 12-Ren | 1690 | 29-27 | 52% | 12 | TN |
| 6233 | Pakmen 16-Gold | 1690 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | ON |
| 6234 | Skyline 15-Silver | 1690 | 36-12 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 6235 | MDJRS 17-Elite black | 1690 | 32-35 | 48% | 17 | MD |
| 6236 | Reign 15-Gold | 1690 | 18-8 | 69% | 15 | FL |
| 6237 | 407 13-Blue | 1690 | 39-19 | 67% | 13 | FL |
| 6238 | SIVA 15-Black | 1690 | 29-17 | 63% | 15 | ID |
| 6239 | New York Elite 17-Silver | 1690 | 12-2 | 86% | 17 | NY |
| 6240 | WPVC 18-Armour orange | 1690 | 30-40 | 43% | 18 | FL |
| 6241 | SMASH 17-1 | 1690 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | MA |
| 6242 | OK Charge 13-1 stillwater | 1690 | 23-14 | 57% | 13 | OK |
| 6243 | Idaho Peak BAILEE NATIONAL 18 | 1690 | 11-14 | 44% | 18 | |
| 6244 | Xtreme VBC 13 Adidas | 1690 | 20-5 | 80% | 13 | WI |
| 6245 | Y Not 13-1 | 1690 | 20-5 | 80% | 13 | VA |
| 6246 | SOVC Davis 16-A | 1690 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | OH |
| 6247 | CID 13-Blue | 1690 | 20-5 | 77% | 13 | UT |
| 6248 | SP2VC 14-Blue | 1690 | 32-10 | 76% | 14 | NC |
| 6249 | Matchbox 14-Premier | 1690 | 14-6 | 67% | 14 | SD |
| 6250 | Dig This 15-Pink | 1690 | 20-11 | 65% | 15 | NV |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.