Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 125 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6201 Architects 16-Black 1692 6-4 60% 16
6202 VVA 16-Adams 1692 35-30 54% 16 CA
6203 MT NW 16 Elite 1692 24-17 53% 16 MT
6204 Jersey Jrs 14-1 1692 17-21 45% 14 NJ
6205 Munciana Indy 12 Valkyrie 1692 29-37 44% 12 IN
6206 TW Skyline 13-Royal 1692 17-32 34% 13 TX
6207 NTX Pressure 16-Amp 1691 10-4 71% 16
6208 Team Pineapple 14 ENTP8H 1691 19-4 83% 14 IN
6209 Platform PV Slammers 12 1691 5-1 83% 12 IA
6210 Ga Fusion 12-1 1691 30-7 81% 12 GA
6211 Ballyhoo 18-Black 1691 32-12 73% 18 PA
6212 NorthShore 16 Gators 1691 35-23 60% 16 MI
6213 Volisur 12-1 1691 21-8 72% 12 PR
6214 WPVC 12-Armour orange 1691 56-26 68% 12 FL
6215 Platinum 15-Apex m 1691 29-14 67% 15 UT
6216 Momentum Volleyball 16-Allison 1691 38-21 64% 16 CO
6217 ROCK Volleyball 13-Sky 1691 33-23 59% 13 PA
6218 SC Rockstar 12-Lyanna 1691 37-22 63% 12 CA
6219 Seal Beach 15-Blue 1691 33-21 61% 15 CA
6220 Roanoke United 16-Red 1691 42-21 67% 16 VA
6221 NASA 11-1 1691 11-4 73% 11 AL
6222 Pioneer VBC 15-1 1691 17-6 74% 15 OH
6223 Yakima Elite 16-Premier 1691 23-12 66% 16 WA
6224 Club 16 1691 3-5 38% 16 UT
6225 FEVA 15-Elite legacy 1691 35-12 74% 15 KY
6226 CROI VBC 14 1691 42-15 74% 14 IN
6227 SMASH 17-1 1691 4-3 57% 17 MA
6228 ETA1 14-Black 1691 26-9 67% 14 TX
6229 Madtown 14-1 select 1691 25-19 57% 14 WI
6230 LES 16-Storm 1691 36-17 68% 16 NY
6231 KIVA 13 Silver 1691 44-28 61% 13 KY
6232 Boss CLE 13-2 1691 34-18 65% 13 OH
6233 SoCal VBC 18-Beacons 1691 26-22 54% 18 CA
6234 Club One AZ 13-Platinum 1691 41-30 58% 13 AZ
6235 MDJRS 17-Elite black 1691 32-35 48% 17 MD
6236 AZ EVJ 13-Elite 1691 42-35 55% 13 AZ
6237 Venetian Bay Auburn 16-1 papaya 1691 17-15 53% 16 AL
6238 AVB Fire 17-1 1691 29-11 73% 17 MN
6239 Vail Peak 17U Pink 1691 25-9 74% 17 CO
6240 RRVBC 13-National 1691 30-15 67% 13 GA
6241 Momentum Volleyball 16-Riley 1691 27-22 55% 16 CO
6242 HEAT 14 NATIONAL 1691 44-30 56% 14 OK
6243 TEMPO 16 Royal 1691 23-15 61% 16 WI
6244 Pulse 16 Chavez 1691 29-21 58% 16 CA
6245 Gold Diggers Volleyball Club 14 Gold Diggers 1691 5-0 100% 14
6246 WYO 14 1691 6-1 86% 14 CO
6247 AVBC 12-S diamonds 1691 34-6 85% 12 AZ
6248 Panthers Volleyball Club 15 Panthers Volley 1691 23-4 85% 15 FL
6249 Panhandle Powerhouse 14-Pink 1691 16-3 84% 14 WY
6250 AZ SKY 10-Gold 1691 10-2 83% 10 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.