Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 124 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6151 Putnam VBC 18-Elite 1692 5-3 63% 18 WV
6152 CPU CVB 15 1692 6-1 67% 15 IA
6153 Premier Nebraska 13-Silver 1692 17-10 63% 13 NE
6154 Kokoro Volleyball 15-2 1692 41-30 58% 15 MN
6155 SDVBC 14-Noah 1692 27-12 69% 14 CA
6156 Iowa United 14-2 elite 1692 35-32 52% 14 IA
6157 BRUSA 15-Madison/des 1692 25-15 63% 15 CA
6158 BEVBC 15 Navy 1692 42-22 64% 15 MD
6159 TX SPARKS 12-2 paige 1692 23-4 79% 12 TX
6160 LevelOne Sherwood 14-1 1692 27-6 82% 14 OR
6161 Intense 14-S - ricky 1692 33-10 77% 14 SC
6162 NTX Pressure 16-Amp 1692 10-4 71% 16
6163 BC 16-1 1692 5-3 63% 16 CA
6164 PEAK 12-2 1692 24-9 73% 12 AZ
6165 Queen City 14 Bells 1691 11-5 69% 14
6166 Netforce 15-Ryan 1691 27-9 75% 15
6167 NW Elite 12-1 gold 1691 25-10 71% 12 OR
6168 Club V 15-Keleni 1691 24-9 73% 15 UT
6169 NC Coastal 13 Sarah 1691 29-8 78% 13 NC
6170 Active 13-Yancey 1691 23-9 72% 13 VA
6171 Peak VA 14-Black 1691 29-11 73% 14 TX
6172 LAV 18-Regional black 1691 34-10 77% 18 AL
6173 Club South 15-Black 1691 24-10 71% 15 WA
6174 Blast 16-Tigers 1691 25-19 57% 16 RI
6175 Roanoke United 16-Blue 1691 23-5 82% 16 VA
6176 MIDTN 14-BLUE 1691 17-12 59% 14 TN
6177 Yakima Elite 16-Premier 1691 23-12 66% 16 WA
6178 C4 16-1 kevin 1691 36-8 82% 16 TN
6179 Next Level 15-Rylie 1691 15-2 88% 15 CA
6180 Avalanche 16 1691 30-7 79% 16 AZ
6181 Core STL 13 Carolina 1691 35-17 65% 13 MO
6182 OK Charge 15-Select 1691 30-6 83% 15 OK
6183 AZ SKY 10-Gold 1691 10-2 83% 10 AZ
6184 FeVA 12 (BG) 1691 36-15 71% 12 WI
6185 Sonics 15-1 1691 17-2 77% 15 MI
6186 SVE 15-1 1691 40-25 62% 15 GA
6187 Aus Velocity 16-2 emerald 1691 34-17 67% 16 TX
6188 LVA 15-Elite white 1691 24-16 56% 15 TX
6189 ETA1 14-Black 1691 26-9 67% 14 TX
6190 Nebraska ONE 14-Phoenix 1691 20-10 67% 14 NE
6191 FIVE 15-1 1691 35-9 80% 15 FL
6192 Panhandle Powerhouse 14-Pink 1691 16-3 84% 14 NE
6193 Illini Elite 17-White 1691 40-18 69% 17 IL
6194 FC Elite 17-Black 1691 26-11 70% 17 WI
6195 FEVA 15-Elite legacy 1691 35-12 74% 15 TN
6196 CMVBC 13-1 1691 20-12 63% 13 MO
6197 CUVC 15 Premier 1691 31-36 46% 15 NC
6198 Impact VBC 12-A 1691 16-4 80% 12 OH
6199 Reef 15-National erika 1691 35-17 67% 15 CA
6200 LAVA 17 Matt 1691 21-4 84% 17 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.