2025-2026 Season — Page 124 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6151 | Putnam VBC 18-Elite | 1692 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | WV |
| 6152 | CPU CVB 15 | 1692 | 6-1 | 67% | 15 | IA |
| 6153 | Premier Nebraska 13-Silver | 1692 | 17-10 | 63% | 13 | NE |
| 6154 | Kokoro Volleyball 15-2 | 1692 | 41-30 | 58% | 15 | MN |
| 6155 | SDVBC 14-Noah | 1692 | 27-12 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 6156 | Iowa United 14-2 elite | 1692 | 35-32 | 52% | 14 | IA |
| 6157 | BRUSA 15-Madison/des | 1692 | 25-15 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 6158 | BEVBC 15 Navy | 1692 | 42-22 | 64% | 15 | MD |
| 6159 | TX SPARKS 12-2 paige | 1692 | 23-4 | 79% | 12 | TX |
| 6160 | LevelOne Sherwood 14-1 | 1692 | 27-6 | 82% | 14 | OR |
| 6161 | Intense 14-S - ricky | 1692 | 33-10 | 77% | 14 | SC |
| 6162 | NTX Pressure 16-Amp | 1692 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | |
| 6163 | BC 16-1 | 1692 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 6164 | PEAK 12-2 | 1692 | 24-9 | 73% | 12 | AZ |
| 6165 | Queen City 14 Bells | 1691 | 11-5 | 69% | 14 | |
| 6166 | Netforce 15-Ryan | 1691 | 27-9 | 75% | 15 | |
| 6167 | NW Elite 12-1 gold | 1691 | 25-10 | 71% | 12 | OR |
| 6168 | Club V 15-Keleni | 1691 | 24-9 | 73% | 15 | UT |
| 6169 | NC Coastal 13 Sarah | 1691 | 29-8 | 78% | 13 | NC |
| 6170 | Active 13-Yancey | 1691 | 23-9 | 72% | 13 | VA |
| 6171 | Peak VA 14-Black | 1691 | 29-11 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 6172 | LAV 18-Regional black | 1691 | 34-10 | 77% | 18 | AL |
| 6173 | Club South 15-Black | 1691 | 24-10 | 71% | 15 | WA |
| 6174 | Blast 16-Tigers | 1691 | 25-19 | 57% | 16 | RI |
| 6175 | Roanoke United 16-Blue | 1691 | 23-5 | 82% | 16 | VA |
| 6176 | MIDTN 14-BLUE | 1691 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | TN |
| 6177 | Yakima Elite 16-Premier | 1691 | 23-12 | 66% | 16 | WA |
| 6178 | C4 16-1 kevin | 1691 | 36-8 | 82% | 16 | TN |
| 6179 | Next Level 15-Rylie | 1691 | 15-2 | 88% | 15 | CA |
| 6180 | Avalanche 16 | 1691 | 30-7 | 79% | 16 | AZ |
| 6181 | Core STL 13 Carolina | 1691 | 35-17 | 65% | 13 | MO |
| 6182 | OK Charge 15-Select | 1691 | 30-6 | 83% | 15 | OK |
| 6183 | AZ SKY 10-Gold | 1691 | 10-2 | 83% | 10 | AZ |
| 6184 | FeVA 12 (BG) | 1691 | 36-15 | 71% | 12 | WI |
| 6185 | Sonics 15-1 | 1691 | 17-2 | 77% | 15 | MI |
| 6186 | SVE 15-1 | 1691 | 40-25 | 62% | 15 | GA |
| 6187 | Aus Velocity 16-2 emerald | 1691 | 34-17 | 67% | 16 | TX |
| 6188 | LVA 15-Elite white | 1691 | 24-16 | 56% | 15 | TX |
| 6189 | ETA1 14-Black | 1691 | 26-9 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 6190 | Nebraska ONE 14-Phoenix | 1691 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | NE |
| 6191 | FIVE 15-1 | 1691 | 35-9 | 80% | 15 | FL |
| 6192 | Panhandle Powerhouse 14-Pink | 1691 | 16-3 | 84% | 14 | NE |
| 6193 | Illini Elite 17-White | 1691 | 40-18 | 69% | 17 | IL |
| 6194 | FC Elite 17-Black | 1691 | 26-11 | 70% | 17 | WI |
| 6195 | FEVA 15-Elite legacy | 1691 | 35-12 | 74% | 15 | TN |
| 6196 | CMVBC 13-1 | 1691 | 20-12 | 63% | 13 | MO |
| 6197 | CUVC 15 Premier | 1691 | 31-36 | 46% | 15 | NC |
| 6198 | Impact VBC 12-A | 1691 | 16-4 | 80% | 12 | OH |
| 6199 | Reef 15-National erika | 1691 | 35-17 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 6200 | LAVA 17 Matt | 1691 | 21-4 | 84% | 17 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.