Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 123 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6101 Next Level 13-Lehua 1693 27-17 61% 13 CA
6102 ProPlay 14-Niloo 1693 18-12 60% 14 CA
6103 Invasion 17-Black 1693 12-17 41% 17 MO
6104 Dynamite Adidas 13-1 1693 28-24 54% 13 MI
6105 1W 15-Crimson 1693 18-7 72% 15 WI
6106 KIVA 16 Silver 1693 54-31 64% 16 KY
6107 AVA TX 17 Adidas 1693 33-31 52% 17 TX
6108 Idaho Show 13-National pfefferle 1693 19-10 63% 13 ID
6109 HVC 11-Black 1693 12-3 71% 11 BC
6110 BEVBC 16 Navy 1693 43-20 67% 16 MD
6111 SA Force 14 National 1693 34-17 67% 14 TX
6112 STMA 14-1 1693 24-7 77% 14 MN
6113 Platinum 15-Apex m 1693 29-14 67% 15 UT
6114 FORZA1 13 ONE 1693 22-19 54% 13 CA
6115 C-Force VBC 14-1 1693 10-6 63% 14 TN
6116 COLAVOL 16-Black 1693 27-17 61% 16 AL
6117 HP Illinois 17-Select 1693 24-19 56% 17 IL
6118 501 Volley 12-2 reg plus 1693 28-8 78% 12 AR
6119 CROI VBC 14 1693 42-15 74% 14 IN
6120 FaR Out 13 Steel 1693 36-8 82% 13 MI
6121 Decatur Force 13-Aqua 1693 17-5 77% 13 IN
6122 Valley Heat 16-Black 1693 7-1 88% 16
6123 O4G Lights Out 17 1693 18-14 56% 17
6124 NSSC 12-Black 1693 32-9 78% 12 MO
6125 MVC Panthers 14-Pink 1692 16-8 67% 14
6126 Pipestone Area 18-S 1692 8-0 100% 18
6127 EPIC - Corry 17-S 1692 20-6 77% 17 PA
6128 DBQ Insanity 15-2 black 1692 23-9 68% 15 IA
6129 NT 16-Hunters creek 1692 55-14 80% 16 FL
6130 EP STRiVE VBC 16-S black 1692 47-22 67% 16 TX
6131 AEV 11 National 1692 21-4 84% 11 TX
6132 Force 16-Trina 1692 11-1 85% 16 CA
6133 Iowa Impact 17-2 elite 1692 44-30 59% 17 IA
6134 EVA 17 National 1692 48-21 70% 17 AR
6135 808AC 18-Dayne 1692 16-5 76% 18 HI
6136 Austin County 13-Red 1692 18-6 75% 13 TX
6137 501 Volley 12-3 regional 1692 27-7 79% 12 AR
6138 Tstreet 14-Nick 1692 25-18 58% 14 CA
6139 Crush 15-1 wheeler 1692 24-3 89% 15 TX
6140 Roots 15-1 green 1692 28-31 47% 15 IA
6141 Roadrunner 15 Crimson 1692 45-23 66% 15 TX
6142 Sideout 16-T marissa 1692 25-9 74% 16 NJ
6143 DVA 15 Elite 1692 27-19 59% 15 PA
6144 NYC Juniors 18-National 1692 36-19 65% 18 NY
6145 Bama Elite 16-N renegades 1692 39-12 76% 16 AL
6146 KIVA 13 Silver 1692 44-28 61% 13 KY
6147 Idaho ONE 16 Navy 1692 36-26 58% 16 ID
6148 913Athletics 15-2 1692 7-0 88% 15 KS
6149 MVSA 18 Chaos 1692 23-23 50% 18 MD
6150 VAQUERAS 10-F jose 1692 20-7 74% 10 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.