2025-2026 Season — Page 123 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6101 | HVVC 12-1 | 1694 | 28-9 | 74% | 12 | OR |
| 6102 | JJVA Club 14-C | 1694 | 14-1 | 93% | 14 | FL |
| 6103 | ECVC 17-National scott | 1694 | 11-1 | 92% | 17 | AL |
| 6104 | HEAT 10-Black | 1694 | 26-8 | 72% | 10 | TX |
| 6105 | ID Peak 18-Cami | 1694 | 4-11 | 27% | 18 | WA |
| 6106 | CKYV 14-1 | 1694 | 26-8 | 76% | 14 | KY |
| 6107 | SDVBC 14-Noah | 1694 | 27-12 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 6108 | TAV Houston 12 Royal | 1694 | 26-10 | 70% | 12 | TX |
| 6109 | Libero Volleyball Club 12-Huskies | 1694 | 31-18 | 63% | 12 | VA |
| 6110 | Club South 15-Black | 1694 | 24-10 | 71% | 15 | WA |
| 6111 | Blacktooth Volleyball Club 15-Black | 1694 | 34-13 | 72% | 15 | WY |
| 6112 | WPVC 18-Armour orange | 1694 | 30-40 | 43% | 18 | FL |
| 6113 | Dynamite Adidas 13-1 | 1694 | 28-24 | 54% | 13 | MI |
| 6114 | Athlete HQ 13-Caja | 1694 | 29-10 | 74% | 13 | OH |
| 6115 | Eudora Chaos Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1694 | 16-4 | 70% | 13 | KS |
| 6116 | KeAloha 16-1 cloudbreak | 1694 | 34-17 | 67% | 16 | IN |
| 6117 | South County 14-Rachel | 1694 | 14-14 | 39% | 14 | UT |
| 6118 | ECVC 17-Black | 1694 | 32-29 | 52% | 17 | VA |
| 6119 | IVC Garrison 13 | 1694 | 14-3 | 74% | 13 | LA |
| 6120 | Unified 17-1 | 1694 | 34-36 | 49% | 17 | MI |
| 6121 | CJV 15-Select navy | 1694 | 28-10 | 74% | 15 | NC |
| 6122 | Millennium 15-J.hiser | 1694 | 41-19 | 68% | 15 | OH |
| 6123 | ProPlay 14-Niloo | 1694 | 18-12 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 6124 | MARIN 15-Green | 1694 | 39-22 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 6125 | MSVB 18-National | 1694 | 22-8 | 73% | 18 | AK |
| 6126 | Force 16-Trina | 1694 | 11-1 | 85% | 16 | UT |
| 6127 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-2 | 1694 | 11-2 | 85% | 13 | KS |
| 6128 | EndMo VBC 14-Power blue | 1694 | 36-16 | 69% | 14 | PA |
| 6129 | Prince George Youth Volleyball Club 16 PGYVC Kodiaks | 1694 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | |
| 6130 | SAVA 12-Blue | 1694 | 42-12 | 78% | 12 | KY |
| 6131 | OK Elevate 15-1 | 1693 | 35-14 | 70% | 15 | OK |
| 6132 | Bama Elite 16-N renegades | 1693 | 39-12 | 76% | 16 | AL |
| 6133 | Blue Royals 14 Crystal | 1693 | 31-28 | 53% | 14 | WA |
| 6134 | Edge Elite 14-Gold | 1693 | 12-5 | 71% | 14 | PA |
| 6135 | Southwest 15-N terry | 1693 | 26-32 | 45% | 15 | OH |
| 6136 | LevelUp 13-1 | 1693 | 12-2 | 86% | 13 | MS |
| 6137 | COASTLINE 16-Black | 1693 | 37-9 | 80% | 16 | NC |
| 6138 | Club Elevate VBC 16-1 | 1693 | 29-12 | 71% | 16 | WA |
| 6139 | 1W 14-1 elite | 1693 | 37-29 | 56% | 14 | WI |
| 6140 | Elevate 16-Pink | 1693 | 18-5 | 78% | 16 | IL |
| 6141 | Oasis 16 National | 1693 | 43-19 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 6142 | Augusta 4:12 13-Jakeman | 1693 | 15-2 | 88% | 13 | VA |
| 6143 | CMASS EDGE 16-Blue | 1693 | 30-29 | 51% | 16 | MA |
| 6144 | SA Force 14 National | 1693 | 34-17 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 6145 | Invasion 17-Black | 1693 | 12-17 | 41% | 17 | MO |
| 6146 | HVC 11-Black | 1693 | 12-3 | 71% | 11 | IN |
| 6147 | Central California Volleyball Academy 15-Elite | 1693 | 14-5 | 74% | 15 | CA |
| 6148 | KeAloha 13-1 jaws | 1693 | 29-8 | 78% | 13 | IN |
| 6149 | Matrix 17 18 Melissa | 1693 | 16-12 | 57% | 17 | AZ |
| 6150 | TORCH 14-Katie | 1693 | 27-22 | 55% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.