2025-2026 Season — Page 123 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6101 | Next Level 13-Lehua | 1693 | 27-17 | 61% | 13 | CA |
| 6102 | ProPlay 14-Niloo | 1693 | 18-12 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 6103 | Invasion 17-Black | 1693 | 12-17 | 41% | 17 | MO |
| 6104 | Dynamite Adidas 13-1 | 1693 | 28-24 | 54% | 13 | MI |
| 6105 | 1W 15-Crimson | 1693 | 18-7 | 72% | 15 | WI |
| 6106 | KIVA 16 Silver | 1693 | 54-31 | 64% | 16 | KY |
| 6107 | AVA TX 17 Adidas | 1693 | 33-31 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 6108 | Idaho Show 13-National pfefferle | 1693 | 19-10 | 63% | 13 | ID |
| 6109 | HVC 11-Black | 1693 | 12-3 | 71% | 11 | BC |
| 6110 | BEVBC 16 Navy | 1693 | 43-20 | 67% | 16 | MD |
| 6111 | SA Force 14 National | 1693 | 34-17 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 6112 | STMA 14-1 | 1693 | 24-7 | 77% | 14 | MN |
| 6113 | Platinum 15-Apex m | 1693 | 29-14 | 67% | 15 | UT |
| 6114 | FORZA1 13 ONE | 1693 | 22-19 | 54% | 13 | CA |
| 6115 | C-Force VBC 14-1 | 1693 | 10-6 | 63% | 14 | TN |
| 6116 | COLAVOL 16-Black | 1693 | 27-17 | 61% | 16 | AL |
| 6117 | HP Illinois 17-Select | 1693 | 24-19 | 56% | 17 | IL |
| 6118 | 501 Volley 12-2 reg plus | 1693 | 28-8 | 78% | 12 | AR |
| 6119 | CROI VBC 14 | 1693 | 42-15 | 74% | 14 | IN |
| 6120 | FaR Out 13 Steel | 1693 | 36-8 | 82% | 13 | MI |
| 6121 | Decatur Force 13-Aqua | 1693 | 17-5 | 77% | 13 | IN |
| 6122 | Valley Heat 16-Black | 1693 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | |
| 6123 | O4G Lights Out 17 | 1693 | 18-14 | 56% | 17 | |
| 6124 | NSSC 12-Black | 1693 | 32-9 | 78% | 12 | MO |
| 6125 | MVC Panthers 14-Pink | 1692 | 16-8 | 67% | 14 | |
| 6126 | Pipestone Area 18-S | 1692 | 8-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 6127 | EPIC - Corry 17-S | 1692 | 20-6 | 77% | 17 | PA |
| 6128 | DBQ Insanity 15-2 black | 1692 | 23-9 | 68% | 15 | IA |
| 6129 | NT 16-Hunters creek | 1692 | 55-14 | 80% | 16 | FL |
| 6130 | EP STRiVE VBC 16-S black | 1692 | 47-22 | 67% | 16 | TX |
| 6131 | AEV 11 National | 1692 | 21-4 | 84% | 11 | TX |
| 6132 | Force 16-Trina | 1692 | 11-1 | 85% | 16 | CA |
| 6133 | Iowa Impact 17-2 elite | 1692 | 44-30 | 59% | 17 | IA |
| 6134 | EVA 17 National | 1692 | 48-21 | 70% | 17 | AR |
| 6135 | 808AC 18-Dayne | 1692 | 16-5 | 76% | 18 | HI |
| 6136 | Austin County 13-Red | 1692 | 18-6 | 75% | 13 | TX |
| 6137 | 501 Volley 12-3 regional | 1692 | 27-7 | 79% | 12 | AR |
| 6138 | Tstreet 14-Nick | 1692 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 6139 | Crush 15-1 wheeler | 1692 | 24-3 | 89% | 15 | TX |
| 6140 | Roots 15-1 green | 1692 | 28-31 | 47% | 15 | IA |
| 6141 | Roadrunner 15 Crimson | 1692 | 45-23 | 66% | 15 | TX |
| 6142 | Sideout 16-T marissa | 1692 | 25-9 | 74% | 16 | NJ |
| 6143 | DVA 15 Elite | 1692 | 27-19 | 59% | 15 | PA |
| 6144 | NYC Juniors 18-National | 1692 | 36-19 | 65% | 18 | NY |
| 6145 | Bama Elite 16-N renegades | 1692 | 39-12 | 76% | 16 | AL |
| 6146 | KIVA 13 Silver | 1692 | 44-28 | 61% | 13 | KY |
| 6147 | Idaho ONE 16 Navy | 1692 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | ID |
| 6148 | 913Athletics 15-2 | 1692 | 7-0 | 88% | 15 | KS |
| 6149 | MVSA 18 Chaos | 1692 | 23-23 | 50% | 18 | MD |
| 6150 | VAQUERAS 10-F jose | 1692 | 20-7 | 74% | 10 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.