Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 122 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6051 CJV 14 National 1694 30-17 63% 14 AR
6052 AAVA 15-2 rain 1694 36-14 72% 15 OR
6053 Renegades 18-1 1694 20-3 87% 18 TX
6054 SMASH 16-2 1694 8-1 89% 16 MA
6055 NKJV 13-Blue 1694 26-22 54% 13 KY
6056 Sports Academy VBC 13-Premier 1694 8-2 80% 13 CA
6057 OMNI 13-National 1694 38-42 48% 13 CA
6058 Sandhills 13-Tay-jay 1694 21-7 75% 13 NC
6059 NNJ Volleyball 18-Braysen 1694 13-4 76% 18 NV
6060 GVA 17-Pink 1694 13-11 54% 17 PR
6061 HEAT 10-Black 1694 26-8 72% 10 TX
6062 OK Premier 14-Diamonds 1694 36-8 82% 14 OK
6063 NRG 16-Ampd blue 1694 28-19 56% 16 TX
6064 MAVS KC 13-2 1694 7-1 88% 13 KS
6065 JJVA Club 14-C 1694 14-1 93% 14 FL
6066 Cedar Falls Juniors 15 1694 8-3 62% 15 IA
6067 Lockdown VBC 15-Owls 1694 30-23 57% 15 MA
6068 Angels Elite VBC 14-S 1694 9-1 90% 14 CA
6069 Bama Elite 14-N narwhals 1694 50-14 78% 14 AL
6070 Ocean 14-National 1694 26-11 70% 14 NJ
6071 KeAloha 13-1 jaws 1694 29-8 78% 13 IN
6072 HEVC 17-Allen 1694 37-14 73% 17 FL
6073 Alamo 13-Gold 1 1694 40-16 71% 13 TX
6074 SEVA 14 Crimson 1694 33-10 77% 14 TN
6075 Cajun Elite 14-1 1694 5-2 71% 14 LA
6076 Sky High Adidas 13-Silver 1694 32-13 71% 13 IL
6077 Idaho Peak Myah 15-S 1694 12-6 67% 15
6078 Niagara Frontier 18 Navy 1694 35-21 61% 18 NY
6079 Slainte 18-National 1694 16-12 57% 18 CA
6080 SF Elite 15-Manalo 1694 25-19 57% 15 CA
6081 NorCal 15-2 blue 1694 29-24 55% 15 CA
6082 LI Knights 16-1 1693 13-3 81% 16
6083 Lehigh Valley Juniors 14-S 1693 44-17 72% 14
6084 SAVA 12-Blue 1693 42-12 78% 12 AL
6085 Kali 11-F josé 1693 5-1 83% 11 PR
6086 Midwest Penguins 14-1 1693 43-29 60% 14 WI
6087 WVBA 13 Regional 1693 33-25 57% 13 WA
6088 Colorado Impact 18-S 1693 36-18 67% 18 CO
6089 Eudora Chaos Volleyball Club 13-1 1693 10-3 63% 13 KS
6090 OCVBC 13-1 1693 17-8 68% 13 NJ
6091 HP South 18 Premier 1693 22-21 50% 18 MO
6092 Wildfire 12-N isa 1693 18-35 34% 12 FL
6093 Wrecking Crew 14-1 1693 13-7 65% 14 TX
6094 The House 16-Premier 1693 26-9 74% 16 CA
6095 Alpha Omega 17-Elite 1693 24-10 71% 17 MO
6096 Cajun Elite 15 Caroline 1693 23-11 68% 15 LA
6097 TVVC 14-Teal 1693 18-4 82% 14 OR
6098 H. Prep 14-Mizuno 1693 33-25 57% 14 TX
6099 STL Crossfire 12-Sr1 1693 48-15 76% 12 MO
6100 Freeze ND 12-Polar 1693 24-6 77% 12 ND
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.