Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 122 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6051 AVA TX 17 Adidas 1695 33-31 52% 17 TX
6052 Aspire NW 18-1 vancouver 1695 6-1 86% 18 WA
6053 C4 16-1 kevin 1695 36-8 82% 16 TN
6054 Chatham Blaze 10-Black 1695 8-0 100% 10 IL
6055 SoDak Juniors 12-Windom 1695 23-8 74% 12 MN
6056 Premier Nebraska 13-Silver 1695 17-10 63% 13 NE
6057 MVA 18-Elite 1695 31-11 67% 18 MT
6058 OPVC 11-Young 1695 27-9 75% 11 OH
6059 Club Velocity 15-1 1695 41-18 69% 15 MN
6060 Premier 16-Black d 1695 25-22 51% 16 TX
6061 Iowa Impact 16-1 elite 1695 33-36 48% 16 IA
6062 Juab Volleyball Club 15 Lunatics 16: Jeanna (IM) (35) 1695 9-1 90% 15 UT
6063 Elite Mountain 18 1695 15-7 68% 18 AZ
6064 BRYC 17-White 1695 44-14 72% 17 VA
6065 AVBC 17-A hannahs/smith 1695 20-7 74% 17 OH
6066 IVC 14-N 1695 9-3 69% 14 AK
6067 CJV 15-National white 1695 27-32 46% 15 NC
6068 STL Crossfire 12-Sr1 1695 48-15 76% 12 MO
6069 Monon 15-3r congos 1695 44-20 69% 15 IN
6070 Chi City Elite 13-1 1695 21-28 43% 13 IL
6071 Cajun Elite 14 Reggi 1695 28-8 76% 14 LA
6072 Blast 16-Tigers 1695 25-19 57% 16 RI
6073 BHJ 18-Black 1695 18-12 60% 18 SD
6074 TAV 15-Black 1695 45-19 70% 15 IL
6075 HAVC 15-H blue 1695 9-1 75% 15 SD
6076 Southland 14-Black 1695 29-9 74% 14 LA
6077 CWVC 17-Black 1695 18-6 75% 17 WI
6078 RockCity 17 N2 1695 44-24 65% 17 OH
6079 NYC Juniors 12-Blue 1695 29-15 66% 12 NY
6080 GVA 17-Pink 1695 13-11 54% 17 PR
6081 Slainte 18-National 1695 16-12 57% 18 CA
6082 Stars Tijuana 12 StarsTJ U12H (MX) (11) 1695 7-3 70% 12 MX
6083 Impact VBC 12-A 1694 16-4 80% 12 OH
6084 RoVo 15 1694 19-11 63% 15 VA
6085 Lockdown VBC 17-Blue jays 1694 28-22 56% 17 MA
6086 Zias 12-Enchv 1694 24-11 69% 12 TX
6087 AAVA 15-1 storm 1694 28-33 46% 15 OR
6088 TX SPARKS 12-2 paige 1694 23-4 79% 12 TX
6089 JAG VBC 16-1 national 1694 51-19 73% 16 WI
6090 MVSA 18 Chaos 1694 23-23 50% 18 MD
6091 AJV 16-Helix 1694 46-26 64% 16 TX
6092 USA South 12-Premier purple 1694 32-18 64% 12 FL
6093 League City Sharks 12 1694 21-5 78% 12 TX
6094 Headlines VBC 14 Navy 1694 37-24 61% 14 OH
6095 CPVBC 16-Blue 1694 40-23 63% 16 PA
6096 KIVA 16 Silver 1694 54-31 64% 16 KY
6097 Putnam VBC 18-Elite 1694 5-3 63% 18 OH
6098 Shonto Starlings 16-S pink 1694 49-20 71% 16 AZ
6099 Aleta 12-3 1694 6-0 100% 12 OH
6100 Core 16-National 1694 19-14 58% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.