Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 121 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6001 FW Fire 16-2 purple 1695 23-8 74% 16 TX
6002 Southland 14-Black 1695 29-9 74% 14 LA
6003 SVC Girls 16-1 1695 26-11 70% 16 NY
6004 Club Gold 17-Blue 1695 8-8 50% 17 WA
6005 Elevate 16-Pink 1695 18-5 78% 16 TX
6006 SAVBC 17-1 1695 17-18 49% 17 CA
6007 MWVC 10-Bobby 1695 19-6 76% 10 CA
6008 ID Peak 18-Cami 1695 4-11 27% 18 ID
6009 HAVC 15-H blue 1695 9-1 75% 15 MN
6010 1W 16 Crimson 1695 24-7 77% 16 WI
6011 CSVC 12-1 pickles 1695 29-7 81% 12 IN
6012 Columbus 14-1 1695 22-15 49% 14 OH
6013 Pipeline 16-Adidas 1695 28-29 49% 16 CA
6014 OVVC 14-Green 1695 19-5 79% 14 OH
6015 CALI 13-Blue 1695 44-10 80% 13 NY
6016 Xcel 14-Blue 1695 6-1 86% 14 TX
6017 MiElite 12 Mizuno 1695 31-29 52% 12 MI
6018 Adversity-WI 12-1 1695 26-5 81% 12 WI
6019 IVC Garrison 13 1695 14-3 74% 13
6020 Lady Strikers Red 14 1695 11-4 73% 14
6021 SynergyForce 12-1 natl 1695 20-27 43% 12 CA
6022 Monon 15-3r congos 1695 44-20 69% 15 IN
6023 IVC 14-N 1695 9-3 69% 14 AK
6024 HVA Heat 15-Pink 1695 30-15 67% 15 LA
6025 BVC 13-National lance 1695 27-14 66% 13 AL
6026 RADD Elite 17-1 1695 25-13 66% 17 FL
6027 Freeze ND 14 Polar 1695 30-14 64% 14 ND
6028 MARIN 15-Green 1695 39-22 64% 15 CA
6029 KCV 15 NATIONAL 1695 35-21 63% 15 TX
6030 Idaho ONE 17-Blue 1695 45-28 62% 17 ID
6031 WAVE 14-Hayden 1695 25-16 61% 14 CA
6032 NorthShore 16 Gators 1695 35-23 60% 16 MI
6033 GSEVC 14-Premier 1695 16-12 57% 14 NJ
6034 Lockdown VBC 17-Blue jays 1695 28-22 56% 17 MA
6035 1W 14-1 elite 1695 37-29 56% 14 WI
6036 MTRX 18 Mayhem 1695 12-10 55% 18 MS
6037 MSVB 14-R kayla/camryn 1695 9-6 53% 14 AK
6038 Jordan Jags 12-1 1694 14-3 82% 12
6039 NVA 11-Junior willie 1694 37-20 65% 11 FL
6040 IA VIBE 14-1 nike 1694 32-18 63% 14 CA
6041 Club Legacy 12-Alpha 1694 13-8 62% 12 NE
6042 Ark Jrs 17-National 1694 22-8 73% 17 AR
6043 Vital 17-1 gold 1694 28-43 39% 17 MN
6044 CVVC 11-1 1694 18-0 86% 11 MT
6045 TEMPO 16 Royal 1694 23-15 61% 16 WI
6046 Athlete HQ 13-Caja 1694 29-10 74% 13 OH
6047 TNT 16-Electric 1694 40-27 60% 16 PA
6048 I AM VBC 17-Black 1694 36-24 60% 17 WI
6049 TORCH 14-Katie 1694 27-22 55% 14 CA
6050 South County 14-Rachel 1694 14-14 39% 14 RI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.