2025-2026 Season — Page 121 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6001 | Areté 15-Steel ethos | 1696 | 33-18 | 59% | 15 | TX |
| 6002 | Kairos 14-White | 1696 | 40-15 | 73% | 14 | SD |
| 6003 | APV 13-1 | 1696 | 4-3 | 57% | 13 | TX |
| 6004 | Synergy 16-Inferno | 1696 | 27-39 | 41% | 16 | PA |
| 6005 | Midwest Penguins 15-N | 1696 | 51-27 | 65% | 15 | WI |
| 6006 | SMV 13-1 | 1696 | 12-2 | 86% | 13 | MN |
| 6007 | Cheetah West 15 | 1696 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | NY |
| 6008 | FVA 18 Inferno | 1696 | 21-13 | 62% | 18 | AK |
| 6009 | Mass Impact 16-Libby | 1696 | 20-6 | 77% | 16 | MA |
| 6010 | ENCORE 12-Jeanette | 1696 | 12-0 | 100% | 12 | CA |
| 6011 | Vibe 15-Sylvia | 1696 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 6012 | Idaho Peak IFJS BREAH/CAMI 13-S | 1696 | 12-14 | 41% | 13 | ID |
| 6013 | NWVBC 15-1 | 1696 | 13-1 | 93% | 15 | WI |
| 6014 | NKYVC 11-1 tsunami | 1696 | 24-12 | 67% | 11 | KY |
| 6015 | WVBA 13 Regional | 1696 | 33-25 | 57% | 13 | WA |
| 6016 | NKJV 13-Blue | 1696 | 26-22 | 54% | 13 | KY |
| 6017 | CUVC 14 Premier | 1696 | 35-35 | 50% | 14 | NC |
| 6018 | Cape Coast 14 ATLANTIS | 1696 | 40-16 | 71% | 14 | FL |
| 6019 | GSEVC 17-Premier | 1696 | 26-35 | 43% | 17 | NJ |
| 6020 | VOLT 12-1 | 1696 | 48-25 | 66% | 12 | ND |
| 6021 | ForceVC 10-1 | 1696 | 9-1 | 90% | 10 | OH |
| 6022 | Mizuno M1 16-2 | 1696 | 49-27 | 64% | 16 | MN |
| 6023 | VVB 14-Ted | 1696 | 32-19 | 63% | 14 | GA |
| 6024 | Eastlake 14-Natalia | 1696 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 6025 | Prodigy 16-Red | 1696 | 30-11 | 73% | 16 | KY |
| 6026 | Surge 17 Surge | 1696 | 12-4 | 75% | 17 | LA |
| 6027 | Twisters 14-Cooper | 1696 | 25-13 | 66% | 14 | CA |
| 6028 | Capitanas 15-1 | 1696 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | PR |
| 6029 | Idaho ONE 16 Navy | 1696 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | ID |
| 6030 | OR Performance 13-A | 1696 | 7-5 | 58% | 13 | PR |
| 6031 | VCNebraska 14-Blue | 1696 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | NE |
| 6032 | Bay Area Eagles 12-1 | 1696 | 21-22 | 49% | 12 | CA |
| 6033 | OK Charge 13-1 stillwater | 1696 | 23-14 | 57% | 13 | OK |
| 6034 | Arsenal PR 17-1 noel | 1696 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | PR |
| 6035 | MBTV 10-Red | 1696 | 9-1 | 90% | 10 | OH |
| 6036 | SJVC 13-Royals | 1695 | 7-1 | 88% | 13 | FL |
| 6037 | 863 Elite 14-1 black | 1695 | 38-20 | 66% | 14 | FL |
| 6038 | MSVC 13-Adidas brooke | 1695 | 39-20 | 66% | 13 | FL |
| 6039 | Tsunami 16-2e noni | 1695 | 41-21 | 66% | 16 | GA |
| 6040 | Salty 14-S | 1695 | 18-16 | 53% | 14 | IA |
| 6041 | Black Swamp 12-1 | 1695 | 14-7 | 67% | 12 | OH |
| 6042 | SMASH 16-2 | 1695 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | MA |
| 6043 | MiElite 12 Mizuno | 1695 | 31-29 | 52% | 12 | MI |
| 6044 | Alamo 13-Gold 1 | 1695 | 40-16 | 71% | 13 | TX |
| 6045 | Club V 15-Prodigy jolana | 1695 | 28-36 | 44% | 15 | UT |
| 6046 | GSVC 14-White | 1695 | 37-9 | 80% | 14 | NH |
| 6047 | Niagara Frontier 15 Navy | 1695 | 29-27 | 52% | 15 | NY |
| 6048 | SynergyForce 16-Gold | 1695 | 29-25 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 6049 | GSEVC 16-Premier | 1695 | 29-28 | 51% | 16 | NJ |
| 6050 | NNJ 14-Kuna | 1695 | 22-17 | 56% | 14 | NV |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.