Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 121 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6001 Areté 15-Steel ethos 1696 33-18 59% 15 TX
6002 Kairos 14-White 1696 40-15 73% 14 SD
6003 APV 13-1 1696 4-3 57% 13 TX
6004 Synergy 16-Inferno 1696 27-39 41% 16 PA
6005 Midwest Penguins 15-N 1696 51-27 65% 15 WI
6006 SMV 13-1 1696 12-2 86% 13 MN
6007 Cheetah West 15 1696 8-2 80% 15 NY
6008 FVA 18 Inferno 1696 21-13 62% 18 AK
6009 Mass Impact 16-Libby 1696 20-6 77% 16 MA
6010 ENCORE 12-Jeanette 1696 12-0 100% 12 CA
6011 Vibe 15-Sylvia 1696 5-3 63% 15 CA
6012 Idaho Peak IFJS BREAH/CAMI 13-S 1696 12-14 41% 13 ID
6013 NWVBC 15-1 1696 13-1 93% 15 WI
6014 NKYVC 11-1 tsunami 1696 24-12 67% 11 KY
6015 WVBA 13 Regional 1696 33-25 57% 13 WA
6016 NKJV 13-Blue 1696 26-22 54% 13 KY
6017 CUVC 14 Premier 1696 35-35 50% 14 NC
6018 Cape Coast 14 ATLANTIS 1696 40-16 71% 14 FL
6019 GSEVC 17-Premier 1696 26-35 43% 17 NJ
6020 VOLT 12-1 1696 48-25 66% 12 ND
6021 ForceVC 10-1 1696 9-1 90% 10 OH
6022 Mizuno M1 16-2 1696 49-27 64% 16 MN
6023 VVB 14-Ted 1696 32-19 63% 14 GA
6024 Eastlake 14-Natalia 1696 5-3 63% 14 CA
6025 Prodigy 16-Red 1696 30-11 73% 16 KY
6026 Surge 17 Surge 1696 12-4 75% 17 LA
6027 Twisters 14-Cooper 1696 25-13 66% 14 CA
6028 Capitanas 15-1 1696 4-2 67% 15 PR
6029 Idaho ONE 16 Navy 1696 36-26 58% 16 ID
6030 OR Performance 13-A 1696 7-5 58% 13 PR
6031 VCNebraska 14-Blue 1696 13-6 68% 14 NE
6032 Bay Area Eagles 12-1 1696 21-22 49% 12 CA
6033 OK Charge 13-1 stillwater 1696 23-14 57% 13 OK
6034 Arsenal PR 17-1 noel 1696 5-2 71% 17 PR
6035 MBTV 10-Red 1696 9-1 90% 10 OH
6036 SJVC 13-Royals 1695 7-1 88% 13 FL
6037 863 Elite 14-1 black 1695 38-20 66% 14 FL
6038 MSVC 13-Adidas brooke 1695 39-20 66% 13 FL
6039 Tsunami 16-2e noni 1695 41-21 66% 16 GA
6040 Salty 14-S 1695 18-16 53% 14 IA
6041 Black Swamp 12-1 1695 14-7 67% 12 OH
6042 SMASH 16-2 1695 8-1 89% 16 MA
6043 MiElite 12 Mizuno 1695 31-29 52% 12 MI
6044 Alamo 13-Gold 1 1695 40-16 71% 13 TX
6045 Club V 15-Prodigy jolana 1695 28-36 44% 15 UT
6046 GSVC 14-White 1695 37-9 80% 14 NH
6047 Niagara Frontier 15 Navy 1695 29-27 52% 15 NY
6048 SynergyForce 16-Gold 1695 29-25 54% 16 CA
6049 GSEVC 16-Premier 1695 29-28 51% 16 NJ
6050 NNJ 14-Kuna 1695 22-17 56% 14 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.