Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 120 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5951 SBVC Girls 13 Molten 1697 29-12 71% 13 CA
5952 501 Volley 16-3 reg plus 1697 30-7 81% 16 AR
5953 TAV Houston 12 Royal 1697 26-10 70% 12 TX
5954 CSV 14-1 maroon 1697 6-2 75% 14
5955 LAVBC 11-Black 1697 24-19 56% 11 CA
5956 Sierra Club 15-Mark 1696 18-4 82% 15
5957 VEVA 17 Elite 1696 32-24 57% 17 FL
5958 I AM VBC 12-Black 1696 39-15 72% 12 WI
5959 APV 13-1 1696 4-3 57% 13 TX
5960 Red Storm 16 National 1696 40-22 65% 16 LA
5961 ForceVC 10-1 1696 9-1 90% 10 OH
5962 Vibe 15-Sylvia 1696 5-3 63% 15 CA
5963 Next Level 14-Lehua 1696 20-13 61% 14 CA
5964 AJ 14-Red 1696 33-10 77% 14 LA
5965 Iowa Elite 16-Even 1696 18-6 75% 16 IA
5966 OR Performance 13-A 1696 7-5 58% 13 PR
5967 Pulse 15-Black 1696 29-18 62% 15 CA
5968 Hunter's 15U Black 1696 64-22 74% 15 FL
5969 GG 15-1 monster 1696 34-11 76% 15 NY
5970 NKYVC 11-1 tsunami 1696 24-12 67% 11 KY
5971 OPVC 11-Young 1696 27-9 75% 11 OH
5972 Capitanas 15-1 1696 4-2 67% 15 PR
5973 NYS All Stars 11 1696 10-2 83% 11 CA
5974 KNVBC 18-Kansas elite 1696 8-1 89% 18 KS
5975 Austin Skyline 16-Black-ellie 1696 2-1 50% 16 TX
5976 Dallas Skyline 17-White 1696 24-17 56% 17 TX
5977 Vegas United G16-Black 1696 10-18 36% 16 NV
5978 TKVBC 17-Outlaws elite 2 1696 45-33 58% 17 GA
5979 Arsenal PR 17-1 noel 1696 5-2 71% 17 MI
5980 BSVBC 15-White 1696 35-18 64% 15 IL
5981 Synergy 16-Inferno 1696 27-39 41% 16 CA
5982 Aces 14-Purple 1696 10-2 83% 14 TX
5983 Augusta 4:12 13-Jakeman 1696 15-2 88% 13 VA
5984 ROX 13 1696 24-5 83% 13 NC
5985 BRYC 17-White 1696 44-14 72% 17 VA
5986 MBTV 10-Red 1696 9-1 90% 10 OH
5987 CJV 15-Select navy 1696 28-10 74% 15 NC
5988 Dunes 12-Lakeshore 1696 22-14 61% 12 IN
5989 Sunshine 15-South bay 1696 26-25 51% 15 CA
5990 ARVC 15-Red adidas 1696 22-19 54% 15 NM
5991 GG 12-1 1696 28-11 72% 12 NY
5992 CROSSCOURT 15-Purple 1696 40-19 68% 15 PA
5993 Zona 17-Black 1696 5-1 83% 17 AZ
5994 Eastlake 14-Natalia 1696 5-3 63% 14
5995 TI Elite 14.2 1696 32-24 57% 14
5996 Houston Stellar 14-Elite 1696 4-4 50% 14
5997 Cutthroat 14-1 1695 14-7 54% 14
5998 Storm 16-Nationals 1695 25-6 81% 16
5999 rising all stars 14 1695 6-0 100% 14
6000 HVVC 12-1 1695 28-9 74% 12 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.