2025-2026 Season — Page 120 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5951 | SBVC Girls 13 Molten | 1697 | 29-12 | 71% | 13 | CA |
| 5952 | 501 Volley 16-3 reg plus | 1697 | 30-7 | 81% | 16 | AR |
| 5953 | TAV Houston 12 Royal | 1697 | 26-10 | 70% | 12 | TX |
| 5954 | CSV 14-1 maroon | 1697 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | |
| 5955 | LAVBC 11-Black | 1697 | 24-19 | 56% | 11 | CA |
| 5956 | Sierra Club 15-Mark | 1696 | 18-4 | 82% | 15 | |
| 5957 | VEVA 17 Elite | 1696 | 32-24 | 57% | 17 | FL |
| 5958 | I AM VBC 12-Black | 1696 | 39-15 | 72% | 12 | WI |
| 5959 | APV 13-1 | 1696 | 4-3 | 57% | 13 | TX |
| 5960 | Red Storm 16 National | 1696 | 40-22 | 65% | 16 | LA |
| 5961 | ForceVC 10-1 | 1696 | 9-1 | 90% | 10 | OH |
| 5962 | Vibe 15-Sylvia | 1696 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 5963 | Next Level 14-Lehua | 1696 | 20-13 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 5964 | AJ 14-Red | 1696 | 33-10 | 77% | 14 | LA |
| 5965 | Iowa Elite 16-Even | 1696 | 18-6 | 75% | 16 | IA |
| 5966 | OR Performance 13-A | 1696 | 7-5 | 58% | 13 | PR |
| 5967 | Pulse 15-Black | 1696 | 29-18 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 5968 | Hunter's 15U Black | 1696 | 64-22 | 74% | 15 | FL |
| 5969 | GG 15-1 monster | 1696 | 34-11 | 76% | 15 | NY |
| 5970 | NKYVC 11-1 tsunami | 1696 | 24-12 | 67% | 11 | KY |
| 5971 | OPVC 11-Young | 1696 | 27-9 | 75% | 11 | OH |
| 5972 | Capitanas 15-1 | 1696 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | PR |
| 5973 | NYS All Stars 11 | 1696 | 10-2 | 83% | 11 | CA |
| 5974 | KNVBC 18-Kansas elite | 1696 | 8-1 | 89% | 18 | KS |
| 5975 | Austin Skyline 16-Black-ellie | 1696 | 2-1 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 5976 | Dallas Skyline 17-White | 1696 | 24-17 | 56% | 17 | TX |
| 5977 | Vegas United G16-Black | 1696 | 10-18 | 36% | 16 | NV |
| 5978 | TKVBC 17-Outlaws elite 2 | 1696 | 45-33 | 58% | 17 | GA |
| 5979 | Arsenal PR 17-1 noel | 1696 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | MI |
| 5980 | BSVBC 15-White | 1696 | 35-18 | 64% | 15 | IL |
| 5981 | Synergy 16-Inferno | 1696 | 27-39 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 5982 | Aces 14-Purple | 1696 | 10-2 | 83% | 14 | TX |
| 5983 | Augusta 4:12 13-Jakeman | 1696 | 15-2 | 88% | 13 | VA |
| 5984 | ROX 13 | 1696 | 24-5 | 83% | 13 | NC |
| 5985 | BRYC 17-White | 1696 | 44-14 | 72% | 17 | VA |
| 5986 | MBTV 10-Red | 1696 | 9-1 | 90% | 10 | OH |
| 5987 | CJV 15-Select navy | 1696 | 28-10 | 74% | 15 | NC |
| 5988 | Dunes 12-Lakeshore | 1696 | 22-14 | 61% | 12 | IN |
| 5989 | Sunshine 15-South bay | 1696 | 26-25 | 51% | 15 | CA |
| 5990 | ARVC 15-Red adidas | 1696 | 22-19 | 54% | 15 | NM |
| 5991 | GG 12-1 | 1696 | 28-11 | 72% | 12 | NY |
| 5992 | CROSSCOURT 15-Purple | 1696 | 40-19 | 68% | 15 | PA |
| 5993 | Zona 17-Black | 1696 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | AZ |
| 5994 | Eastlake 14-Natalia | 1696 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | |
| 5995 | TI Elite 14.2 | 1696 | 32-24 | 57% | 14 | |
| 5996 | Houston Stellar 14-Elite | 1696 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | |
| 5997 | Cutthroat 14-1 | 1695 | 14-7 | 54% | 14 | |
| 5998 | Storm 16-Nationals | 1695 | 25-6 | 81% | 16 | |
| 5999 | rising all stars 14 | 1695 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 6000 | HVVC 12-1 | 1695 | 28-9 | 74% | 12 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.