Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 120 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5951 Next Level 17-Lehua 1697 21-23 48% 17 NV
5952 Dallas Skyline 17-White 1697 24-17 56% 17 TX
5953 Sideout 14-Black 1697 9-6 60% 14 WA
5954 Lions 12 Navy 1697 18-8 69% 12 IL
5955 Mindset Premier 13-Red 1697 52-34 60% 13 IL
5956 Southern Alabama Volleyball Academy (SAVA) 16 SAVA Sixers 1697 20-10 67% 16 AL
5957 Lanier 16-Nat. katie 1697 16-6 73% 16 GA
5958 LAV 15-National white 1697 35-25 58% 15 AL
5959 NorthEast Volleyball Club 17-Blue 1697 27-11 71% 17 CT
5960 Low Country 14 Katie 1697 27-12 69% 14 SC
5961 Elevate 16-Grumpy giraffes 1697 49-27 64% 16 WI
5962 LAVBC 11-Black 1697 24-19 56% 11 CA
5963 Happy Volley 17 Elite 1697 22-16 58% 17 PA
5964 HP South 18 Premier 1697 22-21 50% 18 MO
5965 LVA 15-Elite white 1697 24-16 56% 15 TX
5966 Peak VA 14-Black 1697 29-11 73% 14 TX
5967 SASVBC 17-Andy 1697 30-19 61% 17 HI
5968 RVA 16-Hillegas 1697 20-17 54% 16 IA
5969 HEAT 15-Red 1697 17-6 74% 15 WI
5970 Idaho ONE 17-Blue 1697 45-28 62% 17 ID
5971 FaR Out 13-Red 1697 38-13 75% 13 MI
5972 Idaho Show 13-National pfefferle 1697 19-10 63% 13 ID
5973 SC Legends 13-Nike 1697 30-20 60% 13 CA
5974 RADD Elite 17-1 1697 25-13 66% 17 FL
5975 FW Fire 16-2 purple 1697 23-8 74% 16 TX
5976 314 VBC 14-Red 1697 39-21 63% 14 MO
5977 FCVBC 15-1 1697 22-9 71% 15 NM
5978 Pipeline 16-Adidas 1697 28-29 49% 16 CA
5979 BVC 13-National lance 1697 27-14 66% 13 AL
5980 Chi City Elite 17-1 1697 25-31 45% 17 IL
5981 Sky High Adidas 13-Silver 1697 32-13 71% 13 IL
5982 MVVC 15-White 1697 29-26 53% 15 CA
5983 LVA 15-Elite red 1697 24-18 52% 15 TX
5984 CPU CVB 15 1697 6-1 67% 15 IA
5985 Belle Plaine 17-1 1697 6-4 60% 17 MN
5986 Cajun Elite 16 Sara 1697 22-18 55% 16 LA
5987 TI Elite 14.2 1697 32-24 57% 14 IN
5988 K1 Bayamon 16-Wes 1697 3-5 38% 16 PR
5989 KNVBC 18-Kansas elite 1697 8-1 89% 18 KS
5990 913Athletics 15-2 1697 7-0 88% 15 KS
5991 ND Elite 16-Gold 1697 10-2 83% 16 ND
5992 MEVC 15-Black 1697 33-7 83% 15 SC
5993 TriState Crusaders 14-1 1697 9-2 82% 14 NE
5994 CSVC 12-1 pickles 1697 29-7 81% 12 IN
5995 IVC 15-Black 1697 16-4 80% 15 IA
5996 CSF 14-Black 1697 15-4 79% 14 NC
5997 Reach Elite 14-Black 1697 47-15 76% 14 FL
5998 Crush 16-S 1697 35-14 71% 16 CA
5999 Defensa 17-Evan 1697 4-6 40% 17 ON
6000 Next Level 14-Lehua 1696 20-13 61% 14 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.