Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 119 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5901 Club One AZ 12-Titanium 1698 42-25 63% 12 AZ
5902 PEAK 17-2 1698 32-19 63% 17 OK
5903 PAO Southside 16-Rda lal 1698 36-18 64% 16 MO
5904 ROX 13 1698 24-5 83% 13 NC
5905 QVA 12-Hydrogen 1698 40-14 74% 12 FL
5906 Spartan Select 12 1698 15-5 75% 12 IN
5907 Southern Elite 15-National 1698 29-20 59% 15 LA
5908 Texas Legacy Volleyball Club 15-National 1698 30-21 59% 15 TX
5909 Texas Storm 12-Black 1698 18-5 72% 12 TX
5910 Texas Storm 11-Black 1698 18-4 75% 11 TX
5911 MDJRS 11 Elite 1698 25-6 69% 11 MD
5912 Iowa Rockets 14-Black 1698 38-11 76% 14 IA
5913 Areté 14-Navy 1698 34-18 60% 14 TX
5914 Madtown 10-1 select 1698 18-4 78% 10 WI
5915 CSV 14-1 maroon 1698 6-2 75% 14 WA
5916 Mountain1 18-1 bailey 1698 24-13 60% 18 MT
5917 Bama Elite 14-N narwhals 1698 50-14 78% 14 AL
5918 Illini Elite 14-Black 1698 19-13 59% 14 IL
5919 Reef 15-National erika 1698 41-20 67% 15 CA
5920 575 15-Derek pcvc 1698 6-2 75% 15 GA
5921 LA6 13-Jenny 1698 23-10 66% 13 LA
5922 SKEVA 17-Blue 1698 26-18 59% 17 KY
5923 Peninsula Wild 13 Peninsula Wild Extreme 1698 8-5 62% 13 AK
5924 FC Elite 17-Black 1698 26-11 70% 17 WI
5925 513VB 13-1 1698 32-17 65% 13 OH
5926 915 16-Cesar 1698 35-30 54% 16 TX
5927 Empire 13 National 1698 31-23 57% 13 CA
5928 Sandhills 13-Tay-jay 1698 21-7 75% 13 NC
5929 Aleta 14-1 1698 12-4 75% 14 OH
5930 Invicta 12-Lanie/ashton 1698 22-6 71% 12 UT
5931 FVA 15-2 1698 43-20 64% 15 MO
5932 Vibe 14-Havoc 1698 28-14 67% 14 CA
5933 LI Fury 18-Cj 1698 13-5 72% 18 NY
5934 Molten 18-Red (nani) 1698 24-13 65% 18 AZ
5935 Ozark Juniors 11-Blue 1698 31-8 79% 11 AR
5936 Synergy 13U 1698 27-7 79% 13 IA
5937 Architects Volleyball Club 18-Black 1698 13-4 76% 18 TX
5938 Tstreet 14-Nick 1698 25-18 58% 14 CA
5939 Hammerin Hawks 14-1 1698 11-1 85% 14 IA
5940 MVC 16 Britt 1698 30-26 54% 16 OH
5941 Integrity 13-Intense red 1698 24-16 53% 13 TX
5942 MSVB 14-R kayla/camryn 1698 9-6 53% 14 AK
5943 Integrity 16-Intense red 1698 27-20 53% 16 TX
5944 Princeton 16-Black 1698 21-20 51% 16 NJ
5945 Austin Skyline 16-Black-ellie 1698 2-1 50% 16 TX
5946 Husky 13-Red 1697 26-18 59% 13 CT
5947 CCVA 12-Elite 1697 7-0 100% 12 CA
5948 VAQUERAS 10-F jose 1697 20-7 74% 10 PR
5949 Metro Volleyball Club 18-North 1697 32-15 68% 18 DC
5950 HVA Heat 15-Pink 1697 30-15 67% 15 LA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.