Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 119 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5901 FEVA 14-Jenna 1698 44-16 73% 14 FL
5902 NJ RONIN 17-Lotus 1698 15-4 79% 17 NJ
5903 ID ONE 14 North 1698 13-3 81% 14 ID
5904 Black Hills Juniors 16-Green 1698 9-2 82% 16 SD
5905 Crush 16-S 1698 35-14 71% 16 TX
5906 Pipeline 17.1 1698 31-21 60% 17 CA
5907 BVA Davie 15-National andres 1698 6-3 67% 15 FL
5908 MVA 16-Stephania 1698 47-28 63% 16 FL
5909 FVA 13-Blaze - a 1698 20-7 67% 13 AK
5910 Rival 17-Black 1698 28-26 52% 17 FL
5911 603 United 14-Seacoast white 1698 23-14 62% 14 NH
5912 Crank It 17-Black 1698 40-10 80% 17 MI
5913 Tulsa Power 13-2 1698 36-12 73% 13 OK
5914 SA LADY GRIZZLIES 15-1 1698 35-9 80% 15 TX
5915 CWVC 17-Black 1698 18-6 75% 17 WI
5916 Maine Jrs 15-National 1698 35-18 66% 15 ME
5917 LevelUp 13-1 1698 12-2 86% 13 MI
5918 WVC Suzanne Gold 16-S 1698 22-7 73% 16
5919 Idaho Peak BILLIE NATIONAL 17-S 1698 6-4 60% 17
5920 LVC 14-Pink 1698 17-3 77% 14 NY
5921 NorCal 14-2 blue 1698 24-24 50% 14 CA
5922 TAV 10-1 1697 7-5 58% 10 TX
5923 Boss CLE 13-2 1697 34-18 65% 13 OH
5924 Northeast 17-Blue 1697 27-11 71% 17 CT
5925 Black Swamp 12-1 1697 14-7 67% 12 OH
5926 OK Elevate 15-1 1697 35-14 70% 15 OK
5927 Reach Elite 14-Black 1697 47-15 76% 14 FL
5928 TW Skyline 16-Black 1697 24-19 56% 16 TX
5929 Mill City 16 Royal 1697 45-24 65% 16 MA
5930 NC Coastal 14 Jacob 1697 43-23 65% 14 NC
5931 Northern Attack 16-Black 1697 24-5 83% 16 WI
5932 Ozark Juniors 11-Blue 1697 31-8 79% 11 AR
5933 AVB Fire 17-1 1697 29-11 73% 17 MN
5934 Five:1 18-Black 1697 18-25 42% 18 MI
5935 TX LEGACY 11-Purple 1697 11-1 85% 11 TX
5936 Mass Impact 16-Libby 1697 20-6 77% 16 MA
5937 Club One AZ 12-Titanium 1697 42-25 63% 12 AZ
5938 MemphisVBAcademy 15-Pink 1697 35-13 73% 15 MS
5939 Prime 15-Adidas o 1697 24-22 52% 15 CA
5940 Club Velocity 15-1 1697 41-18 69% 15 AR
5941 Vision 14-Regional blue 1697 19-5 76% 14 CA
5942 Twisters 14-Cooper 1697 25-13 66% 14 TX
5943 SPARKS VBC 16-Navy 1697 38-16 70% 16 PA
5944 Texas Fury 17 Legacy 1697 37-28 57% 17 TX
5945 IVC 15-Black 1697 16-4 80% 15 IA
5946 A5 Calhoun 15-Red 1697 41-15 73% 15 GA
5947 Networks Acad 12-1 1697 12-1 71% 12 AL
5948 Sideout 14-Black 1697 9-6 60% 14 WA
5949 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-1 1697 7-1 88% 13 KS
5950 RRVBC 13-National 1697 30-15 67% 13 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.