2025-2026 Season — Page 119 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5901 | Club One AZ 12-Titanium | 1698 | 42-25 | 63% | 12 | AZ |
| 5902 | PEAK 17-2 | 1698 | 32-19 | 63% | 17 | OK |
| 5903 | PAO Southside 16-Rda lal | 1698 | 36-18 | 64% | 16 | MO |
| 5904 | ROX 13 | 1698 | 24-5 | 83% | 13 | NC |
| 5905 | QVA 12-Hydrogen | 1698 | 40-14 | 74% | 12 | FL |
| 5906 | Spartan Select 12 | 1698 | 15-5 | 75% | 12 | IN |
| 5907 | Southern Elite 15-National | 1698 | 29-20 | 59% | 15 | LA |
| 5908 | Texas Legacy Volleyball Club 15-National | 1698 | 30-21 | 59% | 15 | TX |
| 5909 | Texas Storm 12-Black | 1698 | 18-5 | 72% | 12 | TX |
| 5910 | Texas Storm 11-Black | 1698 | 18-4 | 75% | 11 | TX |
| 5911 | MDJRS 11 Elite | 1698 | 25-6 | 69% | 11 | MD |
| 5912 | Iowa Rockets 14-Black | 1698 | 38-11 | 76% | 14 | IA |
| 5913 | Areté 14-Navy | 1698 | 34-18 | 60% | 14 | TX |
| 5914 | Madtown 10-1 select | 1698 | 18-4 | 78% | 10 | WI |
| 5915 | CSV 14-1 maroon | 1698 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | WA |
| 5916 | Mountain1 18-1 bailey | 1698 | 24-13 | 60% | 18 | MT |
| 5917 | Bama Elite 14-N narwhals | 1698 | 50-14 | 78% | 14 | AL |
| 5918 | Illini Elite 14-Black | 1698 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 5919 | Reef 15-National erika | 1698 | 41-20 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 5920 | 575 15-Derek pcvc | 1698 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | GA |
| 5921 | LA6 13-Jenny | 1698 | 23-10 | 66% | 13 | LA |
| 5922 | SKEVA 17-Blue | 1698 | 26-18 | 59% | 17 | KY |
| 5923 | Peninsula Wild 13 Peninsula Wild Extreme | 1698 | 8-5 | 62% | 13 | AK |
| 5924 | FC Elite 17-Black | 1698 | 26-11 | 70% | 17 | WI |
| 5925 | 513VB 13-1 | 1698 | 32-17 | 65% | 13 | OH |
| 5926 | 915 16-Cesar | 1698 | 35-30 | 54% | 16 | TX |
| 5927 | Empire 13 National | 1698 | 31-23 | 57% | 13 | CA |
| 5928 | Sandhills 13-Tay-jay | 1698 | 21-7 | 75% | 13 | NC |
| 5929 | Aleta 14-1 | 1698 | 12-4 | 75% | 14 | OH |
| 5930 | Invicta 12-Lanie/ashton | 1698 | 22-6 | 71% | 12 | UT |
| 5931 | FVA 15-2 | 1698 | 43-20 | 64% | 15 | MO |
| 5932 | Vibe 14-Havoc | 1698 | 28-14 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 5933 | LI Fury 18-Cj | 1698 | 13-5 | 72% | 18 | NY |
| 5934 | Molten 18-Red (nani) | 1698 | 24-13 | 65% | 18 | AZ |
| 5935 | Ozark Juniors 11-Blue | 1698 | 31-8 | 79% | 11 | AR |
| 5936 | Synergy 13U | 1698 | 27-7 | 79% | 13 | IA |
| 5937 | Architects Volleyball Club 18-Black | 1698 | 13-4 | 76% | 18 | TX |
| 5938 | Tstreet 14-Nick | 1698 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 5939 | Hammerin Hawks 14-1 | 1698 | 11-1 | 85% | 14 | IA |
| 5940 | MVC 16 Britt | 1698 | 30-26 | 54% | 16 | OH |
| 5941 | Integrity 13-Intense red | 1698 | 24-16 | 53% | 13 | TX |
| 5942 | MSVB 14-R kayla/camryn | 1698 | 9-6 | 53% | 14 | AK |
| 5943 | Integrity 16-Intense red | 1698 | 27-20 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 5944 | Princeton 16-Black | 1698 | 21-20 | 51% | 16 | NJ |
| 5945 | Austin Skyline 16-Black-ellie | 1698 | 2-1 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 5946 | Husky 13-Red | 1697 | 26-18 | 59% | 13 | CT |
| 5947 | CCVA 12-Elite | 1697 | 7-0 | 100% | 12 | CA |
| 5948 | VAQUERAS 10-F jose | 1697 | 20-7 | 74% | 10 | PR |
| 5949 | Metro Volleyball Club 18-North | 1697 | 32-15 | 68% | 18 | DC |
| 5950 | HVA Heat 15-Pink | 1697 | 30-15 | 67% | 15 | LA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.