Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 118 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5851 Five:1 18-Black 1700 18-25 42% 18 MI
5852 SEVC 16 National 1700 46-10 82% 16 WA
5853 MemphisVBAcademy 15-Pink 1700 35-13 73% 15 MS
5854 Mean Green 14-1 1700 20-4 83% 14 TX
5855 Horizonvbc 17-1 1700 39-11 78% 17 CA
5856 CCJRS 13 National 1700 20-5 80% 13 AL
5857 Ridgetop VBC 15 1700 9-2 82% 15 PA
5858 WEVBC 17-1 1700 42-18 70% 17 GA
5859 LIV 15-Black bhrycen 1700 30-11 73% 15 CA
5860 Vibe VBC 15-1 1700 9-4 69% 15 CA
5861 SVC JVC 16-Jing 1700 10-9 53% 16 GA
5862 HVA 14-RED 1700 31-12 70% 14 TX
5863 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-1 1700 7-1 88% 13 KS
5864 A5 Volleyball Club 17-South 1700 8-1 89% 17 GA
5865 Hallsville VC 13-Black 1700 13-3 72% 13
5866 Carolina CHAOS 16 Royal 1700 38-32 54% 16 NC
5867 APEX Volleyball Club 16-Elite 1700 6-0 100% 16 BC
5868 Momentum 14-Gray 1699 29-8 78% 14 CO
5869 Diablo 13-1 black 1699 32-12 73% 13 CA
5870 SynergyForce 12-1 natl 1699 20-27 43% 12 CA
5871 STMA 14-1 1699 24-7 77% 14 MN
5872 DE.NWAJRS 13-1 adidas 1699 6-3 55% 13 AR
5873 Club Fusion 12-Black 1699 27-11 71% 12 IL
5874 SF Elite 15-Manalo 1699 25-19 57% 15 CA
5875 Sharks 16-Navy 1699 35-26 57% 16 AL
5876 clubSAV 18 Mizuno 1699 8-12 40% 18 GA
5877 NVA 11-Junior willie 1699 37-20 65% 11 FL
5878 Mid-Michigan ACES 15 Lauren 1699 14-2 88% 15 MI
5879 Junior BIsons 15-Gold 1699 6-2 75% 15 KY
5880 CC Evolution 15-1 1699 23-22 51% 15 TX
5881 Spiketown 14-1 national 1699 21-12 64% 14 OH
5882 CinciVB Acad 16-2 1699 31-27 53% 16 OH
5883 501 Volley 12-2 reg plus 1699 28-8 78% 12 AR
5884 Colorado Impact 18-S 1699 36-18 67% 18 CO
5885 Mill City Volleyball Club 16-Royal 1699 40-21 66% 16 MA
5886 BVA Davie 15-National andres 1699 6-3 67% 15 MN
5887 SOVC Davis 16-A 1699 4-1 80% 16 OH
5888 TKVBC 17-Outlaws elite 2 1699 45-33 58% 17 GA
5889 Core STL 13 Carolina 1699 35-17 65% 13 MO
5890 Tsunami 14-1n brian 1699 17-5 77% 14 GA
5891 FDL Fusion 17-Purple 1699 17-6 74% 17 WI
5892 KCV 15 NATIONAL 1699 35-21 63% 15 TX
5893 Vaqueras 16-F lewis 1699 26-11 70% 16 PR
5894 Ne Jrs 15-Gray 1699 15-3 83% 15 NE
5895 Stingray VBA 13 Adidas 1699 29-10 74% 13 OK
5896 FRVBC 12-1 black 1699 14-9 61% 12 CO
5897 All Set 16 Ana 1699 9-6 60% 16 AK
5898 Decatur Force 14 Aqua 1699 24-10 71% 14 IN
5899 Laker JO 12-1 1698 13-1 93% 12 MN
5900 Royal Legends 16-Orange 1698 22-21 51% 16 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.