Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 118 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5851 Xtreme 17-Usa deb 1699 37-14 73% 17 NJ
5852 Mid-Michigan ACES 15 Lauren 1699 14-2 88% 15 MI
5853 Main Beach 15-Elite 1699 22-15 59% 15 CA
5854 1st Alliance 16 Scarlet 1699 41-12 77% 16 IL
5855 SEVC 16 National 1699 46-10 82% 16 WA
5856 Lions 12 Navy 1699 18-8 69% 12 IL
5857 MVA 18-Elite 1699 31-11 67% 18 FL
5858 Texas Storm 11-Black 1699 18-4 75% 11 TX
5859 Ascent 12-1 1699 21-12 55% 12 AZ
5860 E2 12-1 1699 12-2 86% 12 KY
5861 ICA 12-Colibri 1699 27-7 79% 12 TX
5862 CCVA 12-Elite 1699 7-0 100% 12 CA
5863 Limitless 18-Heat 1699 32-11 74% 18 PA
5864 KeAloha 16-1 cloudbreak 1699 34-17 67% 16 IN
5865 KNVBC 17-Lakers 1699 20-19 51% 17 KS
5866 ATOM 15-Red 1699 48-30 62% 15 FL
5867 Show Time 11u 1699 23-7 70% 11
5868 SA GRIZZLIES 15-1 1699 7-7 50% 15
5869 Summit 14-Royal elite 1699 36-11 77% 14 IN
5870 Niagara Frontier 16 Navy 1699 30-27 51% 16 NY
5871 Royal Legends 16-Orange 1699 22-21 51% 16 PA
5872 ECVC 12-BLACK 1699 29-12 71% 12 VA
5873 Iowa Rockets 12 Silver 1699 19-8 70% 12 IA
5874 LAVA North 18 Molten 1699 31-16 66% 18 CA
5875 HOVA 14-A red elite 1699 39-22 64% 14 OH
5876 SWVBC G17-Blue 1699 44-27 62% 17 WI
5877 Club Four 14-Boost 1699 31-19 62% 14 IL
5878 915 16-Cesar 1699 35-30 54% 16 TX
5879 Ignite 16 Elite 1699 28-36 44% 16 IN
5880 clubSAV 18 Mizuno 1699 8-12 40% 18 GA
5881 Southside 16 1698 33-11 75% 16
5882 Empire 13 National 1698 31-23 57% 13 CA
5883 MVC 16 Britt 1698 30-26 54% 16 OH
5884 808AC 13-Keahi 1698 8-4 67% 13 HI
5885 Platinum 18 Apex 1698 22-14 61% 18 UT
5886 VolleyFX 18 Mystery 1698 24-12 65% 18 NY
5887 Rhythm 12 Jackie 1698 36-18 65% 12 TN
5888 BAVA 13 Thunder 1698 43-18 66% 13 MD
5889 PEAK 17-2 1698 32-19 63% 17 AZ
5890 SKEVA EAST 15-1 1698 23-4 85% 15 KY
5891 Coulee Region Power 12-S 1698 13-2 87% 12 WI
5892 Country Fire 12-1 1698 17-11 61% 12 TX
5893 Ridgetop VBC 15 1698 9-2 82% 15 PA
5894 NE Elite 17-Surge 1698 29-15 66% 17 NE
5895 FC United 11-Black 1698 17-5 77% 11 MO
5896 QVA 12-Hydrogen 1698 40-14 74% 12 FL
5897 Clarence VBC 17-1 1698 19-3 73% 17 NY
5898 CLUB STEEL 17-Navy 1698 27-14 66% 17 FL
5899 LIVBC Girls 14-Red 1698 18-6 75% 14 NY
5900 Aleta 14-1 1698 12-4 75% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.