Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 117 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5801 TAV 10-1 1701 7-5 58% 10 TX
5802 X-Factor Volleyball 14 1701 27-10 71% 14 VA
5803 TVVC 14-Teal 1701 18-4 82% 14 OR
5804 MN North 12-1 navy 1701 35-14 71% 12 MN
5805 Putnam VBC 15 Putnam VBC - Fire 1701 26-8 76% 15 OH
5806 VolleyFX 12 Wish 1701 33-7 77% 12 NY
5807 Madfrog 13-E green 1701 31-26 53% 13 TX
5808 Premier Volleyball 14 Premier Attack 1701 16-3 84% 14 DE
5809 Club Unite 18 National 1701 32-13 71% 18 TN
5810 FEVER 15U 1701 22-6 79% 15 IN
5811 JJVA Club 14-A 1701 18-7 72% 14 FL
5812 SPVC 16-Adidas mak 1701 33-18 65% 16 CA
5813 MiElite 16-Elite 1701 24-33 42% 16 MI
5814 Mem Metro 15-Elite red 1701 42-18 70% 15 TN
5815 BEVBC 17 Navy 1701 45-26 63% 17 MD
5816 Iron Impact 16-1 1701 38-15 72% 16 MN
5817 MVA 15-Natalia 1701 46-20 70% 15 FL
5818 ATOM 15-Red 1701 48-30 62% 15 FL
5819 Honu 16-Aloha 1701 21-30 41% 16 FL
5820 Lehigh Valley Juniors 14-S 1701 44-17 72% 14 PA
5821 Club Fusion 16-2 national 1701 37-21 64% 16 IL
5822 SEC Elite 13-Howe 1701 8-0 100% 13 CO
5823 CT STARS 13-1 1701 6-1 86% 13 CT
5824 BRYC 14 Royal 1701 44-21 68% 14 VA
5825 BSVBC 15-White 1701 35-18 64% 15 IL
5826 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 15 Weber Elite Cary 1701 12-3 75% 15 UT
5827 Summit Volleyball Club 13 13U Orange 1700 23-5 82% 13
5828 CVVC 11-1 1700 18-0 86% 11 MT
5829 Munciana 16 Tigers 1700 39-32 55% 16 IN
5830 SKEVA EAST 15-1 1700 23-4 85% 15 KY
5831 Vision 14-Regional blue 1700 19-5 76% 14 TX
5832 Club V 15-Keleni 1700 24-9 73% 15 UT
5833 Siouxland VC 13-National 1700 25-12 68% 13 IA
5834 TNT 16-Platinum 1700 16-15 52% 16 PA
5835 Cut Shot VBC 13-1 1700 34-12 74% 13 CA
5836 Amarillo Xtreme 12 Blazers 1700 26-4 87% 12 TX
5837 RVBC 13-White 1700 28-10 74% 13 PA
5838 C2 14-2 reg blue wes 1700 22-8 73% 14 TN
5839 NorthShore 12-Katrina 1700 14-3 82% 12 OH
5840 Attak VBC 14-1 1700 22-8 73% 14 TX
5841 Pipeline 17.1 1700 31-21 60% 17 CA
5842 Club Four 14-Boost 1700 31-19 62% 14 MO
5843 1United 12-N black 1700 33-16 63% 12 TX
5844 FC United 11-Black 1700 17-5 77% 11 MO
5845 55 South VBC 11U 1700 26-10 68% 11 MO
5846 VUVC 17-Black 1700 29-24 55% 17 NV
5847 GSVC 17-Black 1700 12-5 71% 17 NH
5848 Four1Nine Xtreme 12 12-Brown (OV) 1700 6-0 100% 12 OH
5849 Next Level 18 Lehua 1700 30-19 61% 18 NV
5850 Arete 11-Navy 1700 23-8 62% 11 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.