Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 117 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5801 CCJRS 13 National 1700 20-5 80% 13 AL
5802 NLVC 13-National 1700 38-19 67% 13 NJ
5803 Club 909 15-1 1700 25-11 69% 15 CA
5804 Synergy 13U 1700 27-7 79% 13 IA
5805 Buffalo Stampeders 17-1 1700 6-1 86% 17 FL
5806 PAO Southside 16-Rda lal 1700 36-18 64% 16 MO
5807 SMV 14-3 silver 1700 49-14 78% 14 MN
5808 Club Solano 14-Maroon 1700 22-20 52% 14 CA
5809 Attack VBC 15-Mizuno lime 1700 37-19 66% 15 TX
5810 575 15-Derek pcvc 1700 6-2 75% 15 GA
5811 ID Crush TF 15 Taylor 1700 23-11 68% 15 UT
5812 TEJAS 14-Black carrie 1700 31-24 53% 14 TX
5813 Arete 11-Navy 1700 23-8 62% 11 TX
5814 CPVBC 16-Blue 1700 40-23 63% 16 PA
5815 TNT 16-Platinum 1700 16-15 52% 16 PA
5816 Cheetah West 15 1700 6-0 100% 15 NY
5817 Elevation 16-Timberline b 1700 18-17 51% 16 CO
5818 Momentum 14-Gray 1700 29-8 78% 14 CO
5819 VA Elite 13 1700 51-37 57% 13 VA
5820 STORM 14-Evie/ryan 1700 27-18 60% 14 CA
5821 55 South VBC 11U 1700 26-10 68% 11 MO
5822 WPVC 12-Armour orange 1700 56-26 68% 12 FL
5823 Mean Green 14-1 1700 20-4 83% 14 TX
5824 Texas Storm 12-Black 1700 18-5 72% 12 TX
5825 Aspire NW 18-1 vancouver 1700 6-1 86% 18 WA
5826 Red Rock 17-Salomon - redwood city 1700 36-15 71% 17 CA
5827 Elevation 16-Timberline black 1700 20-10 67% 16 CO
5828 OK Charge 14-1 west 1700 28-5 85% 14 OK
5829 LAV 15-National white 1700 35-25 58% 15 AL
5830 CVC 15U National 1700 26-17 60% 15 TX
5831 RVBC 13-White 1700 28-10 74% 13 PA
5832 Red Storm 14 National 1700 41-27 60% 14 LA
5833 TX432 15-Gold 1700 28-12 70% 15 TX
5834 ESCAED 12-1 1700 6-1 86% 12 PR
5835 208 13-Elite 1700 42-21 67% 13 WA
5836 Prior Lake Extreme 11-1 1700 15-2 88% 11
5837 Hallsville VC 13-Black 1700 13-3 72% 13
5838 Defensa 17-Evan 1700 4-6 40% 17
5839 Horizonvbc 17-1 1700 39-11 78% 17 CA
5840 FCVBC 15-1 1699 22-9 71% 15
5841 CSNS 12 1699 25-7 78% 12 SC
5842 Diablo 13-1 black 1699 32-12 73% 13 CA
5843 TAV South 12-Royal 1699 12-8 57% 12 TX
5844 SPVC 18-1 adidas 1699 16-8 67% 18 CA
5845 LevelOne Albany 15-1 1699 25-11 69% 15 OR
5846 Louisiana Legends 13 1699 20-5 80% 13 LA
5847 SPVC 16-Adidas mak 1699 33-18 65% 16 CA
5848 Va Wave 15 Tsunami 1699 36-15 71% 15 VA
5849 Hammerin Hawks 14-1 1699 11-1 85% 14 IA
5850 GSI 17-Green venice 1699 10-17 37% 17 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.