2025-2026 Season — Page 117 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5801 | TAV 10-1 | 1701 | 7-5 | 58% | 10 | TX |
| 5802 | X-Factor Volleyball 14 | 1701 | 27-10 | 71% | 14 | VA |
| 5803 | TVVC 14-Teal | 1701 | 18-4 | 82% | 14 | OR |
| 5804 | MN North 12-1 navy | 1701 | 35-14 | 71% | 12 | MN |
| 5805 | Putnam VBC 15 Putnam VBC - Fire | 1701 | 26-8 | 76% | 15 | OH |
| 5806 | VolleyFX 12 Wish | 1701 | 33-7 | 77% | 12 | NY |
| 5807 | Madfrog 13-E green | 1701 | 31-26 | 53% | 13 | TX |
| 5808 | Premier Volleyball 14 Premier Attack | 1701 | 16-3 | 84% | 14 | DE |
| 5809 | Club Unite 18 National | 1701 | 32-13 | 71% | 18 | TN |
| 5810 | FEVER 15U | 1701 | 22-6 | 79% | 15 | IN |
| 5811 | JJVA Club 14-A | 1701 | 18-7 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 5812 | SPVC 16-Adidas mak | 1701 | 33-18 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 5813 | MiElite 16-Elite | 1701 | 24-33 | 42% | 16 | MI |
| 5814 | Mem Metro 15-Elite red | 1701 | 42-18 | 70% | 15 | TN |
| 5815 | BEVBC 17 Navy | 1701 | 45-26 | 63% | 17 | MD |
| 5816 | Iron Impact 16-1 | 1701 | 38-15 | 72% | 16 | MN |
| 5817 | MVA 15-Natalia | 1701 | 46-20 | 70% | 15 | FL |
| 5818 | ATOM 15-Red | 1701 | 48-30 | 62% | 15 | FL |
| 5819 | Honu 16-Aloha | 1701 | 21-30 | 41% | 16 | FL |
| 5820 | Lehigh Valley Juniors 14-S | 1701 | 44-17 | 72% | 14 | PA |
| 5821 | Club Fusion 16-2 national | 1701 | 37-21 | 64% | 16 | IL |
| 5822 | SEC Elite 13-Howe | 1701 | 8-0 | 100% | 13 | CO |
| 5823 | CT STARS 13-1 | 1701 | 6-1 | 86% | 13 | CT |
| 5824 | BRYC 14 Royal | 1701 | 44-21 | 68% | 14 | VA |
| 5825 | BSVBC 15-White | 1701 | 35-18 | 64% | 15 | IL |
| 5826 | Weber Elite Volleyball Club 15 Weber Elite Cary | 1701 | 12-3 | 75% | 15 | UT |
| 5827 | Summit Volleyball Club 13 13U Orange | 1700 | 23-5 | 82% | 13 | |
| 5828 | CVVC 11-1 | 1700 | 18-0 | 86% | 11 | MT |
| 5829 | Munciana 16 Tigers | 1700 | 39-32 | 55% | 16 | IN |
| 5830 | SKEVA EAST 15-1 | 1700 | 23-4 | 85% | 15 | KY |
| 5831 | Vision 14-Regional blue | 1700 | 19-5 | 76% | 14 | TX |
| 5832 | Club V 15-Keleni | 1700 | 24-9 | 73% | 15 | UT |
| 5833 | Siouxland VC 13-National | 1700 | 25-12 | 68% | 13 | IA |
| 5834 | TNT 16-Platinum | 1700 | 16-15 | 52% | 16 | PA |
| 5835 | Cut Shot VBC 13-1 | 1700 | 34-12 | 74% | 13 | CA |
| 5836 | Amarillo Xtreme 12 Blazers | 1700 | 26-4 | 87% | 12 | TX |
| 5837 | RVBC 13-White | 1700 | 28-10 | 74% | 13 | PA |
| 5838 | C2 14-2 reg blue wes | 1700 | 22-8 | 73% | 14 | TN |
| 5839 | NorthShore 12-Katrina | 1700 | 14-3 | 82% | 12 | OH |
| 5840 | Attak VBC 14-1 | 1700 | 22-8 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 5841 | Pipeline 17.1 | 1700 | 31-21 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 5842 | Club Four 14-Boost | 1700 | 31-19 | 62% | 14 | MO |
| 5843 | 1United 12-N black | 1700 | 33-16 | 63% | 12 | TX |
| 5844 | FC United 11-Black | 1700 | 17-5 | 77% | 11 | MO |
| 5845 | 55 South VBC 11U | 1700 | 26-10 | 68% | 11 | MO |
| 5846 | VUVC 17-Black | 1700 | 29-24 | 55% | 17 | NV |
| 5847 | GSVC 17-Black | 1700 | 12-5 | 71% | 17 | NH |
| 5848 | Four1Nine Xtreme 12 12-Brown (OV) | 1700 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | OH |
| 5849 | Next Level 18 Lehua | 1700 | 30-19 | 61% | 18 | NV |
| 5850 | Arete 11-Navy | 1700 | 23-8 | 62% | 11 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.