Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 116 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5751 CVC 15U National 1702 26-17 60% 15 KY
5752 UNION 16-Blue 1702 48-31 61% 16 IN
5753 Roanoke United 16-Blue 1702 23-5 82% 16 VA
5754 Shaka Juniors 12-Elite 1702 33-16 67% 12 AL
5755 adidas DYNASTY 14-4 1702 13-1 68% 14 KS
5756 Y Not 16-1 1702 21-2 91% 16 VA
5757 Ogden Untamed 14-Britanie 1702 17-2 71% 14 UT
5758 MWVC 10-Bobby 1702 19-6 76% 10 PR
5759 Eagan Juniors 13-S 1702 10-4 71% 13 MN
5760 NorCal 15-2 blue 1702 29-24 55% 15 CA
5761 Happy Volley 13 Elite 1702 27-10 73% 13 PA
5762 Red Storm 16 National 1702 40-22 65% 16 LA
5763 TAV 14-Stephenville 1702 23-5 79% 14 TX
5764 CROSSCOURT 15-Purple 1702 40-19 68% 15 PA
5765 Texas Mavericks 14 Elite 1702 35-12 74% 14 TX
5766 CSNS 12 1702 25-7 78% 12 SC
5767 Slam VBC 16-National 1702 24-4 86% 16 WI
5768 ACCEL 17-Black beasley 1702 21-17 51% 17 TX
5769 Cajun Elite 14-1 1702 5-2 71% 14 LA
5770 Sunshine 15-South bay 1702 26-25 51% 15 CA
5771 Country Fire 12-1 1702 17-11 61% 12 TX
5772 MOVA 15-M 1702 53-20 73% 15 OH
5773 Idaho ONE 17-Elite 1702 31-36 46% 17 ID
5774 SPVC 17-1 adidas 1702 9-5 64% 17 CA
5775 Rise 14-Purple 1702 29-23 56% 14 CO
5776 Roots 15-1 green 1702 28-31 47% 15 TX
5777 Rancho 16-Select maikel 1702 25-19 57% 16 CA
5778 TVVC 16-Teal 1702 22-3 88% 16 OR
5779 Delano 14-1 1702 14-2 88% 14 MN
5780 Hunter's 15U Black 1702 64-22 74% 15 FL
5781 SVE 15-1 1702 40-25 62% 15 GA
5782 Storm 16-Nationals 1701 25-6 81% 16
5783 MT NW 14-Elite 1701 18-14 55% 14 MT
5784 Peninsula Wild 18 Peninsula Wild Arctic 1701 16-5 76% 18 AK
5785 FWFIRE 16-1p 1701 19-13 56% 16 TX
5786 Tulsa Power 13-2 1701 36-12 73% 13 OK
5787 RISE 10-Callie 1701 19-9 68% 10 LA
5788 ID Crush TF 15 Taylor 1701 23-11 68% 15 ID
5789 JJVA Club 12-A 1701 22-7 76% 12 FL
5790 Wrecking Crew 14-B 1701 13-4 72% 14 TX
5791 LevelOne Albany 15-1 1701 25-11 69% 15 OR
5792 Main Beach 15-Elite 1701 22-15 59% 15 CA
5793 The RIDGE 14-Blue 1701 24-4 86% 14 AR
5794 High Performance Volleyball Academy 13-Huskies 1701 7-1 88% 13 MI
5795 Attack 13-Select 1701 12-12 50% 13 IL
5796 Monon 10-1e mako 1701 23-9 72% 10 IN
5797 CYDI 13-Blue 1701 22-4 76% 13 TX
5798 KNVBC 17-Lakers 1701 20-19 51% 17 KS
5799 Club Sol 16-Pink 1701 36-34 49% 16 UT
5800 HEAT 18-National ryan 1701 22-14 61% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.