Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 116 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5751 Salty 14-S 1702 18-16 53% 14 TX
5752 RVC 14-Relentless 1702 55-27 67% 14 TX
5753 AP 16-Black 1702 32-11 74% 16 TX
5754 MOVA 15-M 1702 53-20 73% 15 OH
5755 Iowa PowerPlex 13-Allen 1702 6-0 100% 13 IA
5756 WEVBC 16-1 1701 18-11 62% 16
5757 Sonora DRG 18 1701 9-2 82% 18
5758 Arsenal 16-Gold 1701 26-19 54% 16 TX
5759 MSVC 13-Adidas brooke 1701 39-20 66% 13 FL
5760 Madfrog 13-E green 1701 31-26 53% 13 TX
5761 Texas Mavericks 14 Elite 1701 35-12 74% 14 TX
5762 Titanas 15-1 1701 8-7 53% 15 PR
5763 Red Storm 13 National 1701 39-21 65% 13 LA
5764 1United 12-N black 1701 33-16 63% 12 TX
5765 VOLT 12-1 1701 48-25 66% 12 ND
5766 Mana Toa 13-Abby 1701 19-5 79% 13 AL
5767 SEC Elite 13-Howe 1701 8-0 100% 13 CO
5768 MW Blitz 18-1 1701 14-9 61% 18 KS
5769 MVC 18 Rach 1701 36-24 60% 18 OH
5770 OVBC 11-Purple 1701 22-6 79% 11 WI
5771 MVA 15-Natalia 1701 46-20 70% 15 FL
5772 SC Legends 14-Elite 1701 17-11 61% 14 CA
5773 Spiketown 14-1 national 1701 21-12 64% 14 OR
5774 Edge Elite 14-Gold 1701 12-5 71% 14 PA
5775 Rose City VBC 14-1 1701 15-6 71% 14 OR
5776 Stingray VBA 13 Adidas 1701 29-10 74% 13 OK
5777 ACCEL 17-Black beasley 1701 21-17 51% 17 TX
5778 BCS Skyline H 17 Royal 1701 29-28 51% 17 TX
5779 LEVBC 15-National 1701 42-38 51% 15 MD
5780 Victory 15-National green 1701 21-19 50% 15 TX
5781 Stars Columbia 15 Tyler 1701 23-32 42% 15 SC
5782 NVA 16-Black 1701 31-44 41% 16 PA
5783 MT NW 16 Elite 1701 24-17 53% 16 MT
5784 Areté 16-Navy 1701 8-7 53% 16 TX
5785 Laredo Infinity 12-Black 1701 18-6 75% 12 TX
5786 SoDak Juniors 12-Windom 1701 23-8 74% 12 SD
5787 City Beach 15-Black 1701 39-27 59% 15 CA
5788 Shaka Juniors 12-Elite 1701 33-16 67% 12 AL
5789 EVC 15-Jen 1701 5-3 63% 15 IL
5790 SERV 13 Select 1701 47-21 69% 13 VA
5791 Vision 16-Exv blue 1701 32-21 55% 16 CA
5792 NLV-Timberwolves 11u 1701 10-1 91% 11
5793 H. Skyline TW 16-2 1701 6-2 75% 16
5794 Idaho Peak IFJS BREAH/CAMI 13-S 1701 7-7 41% 13
5795 Premier 15-1 blue 1700 29-10 67% 15
5796 DE.NWAJRS 13-1 adidas 1700 6-3 55% 13
5797 Northern Lights 15-X 1700 52-14 79% 15 MN
5798 Ridgeland Reds-Red 12 1700 13-5 72% 12 WI
5799 Wrecking Crew 14-B 1700 13-4 72% 14 TX
5800 Laker JO 12-1 1700 13-1 93% 12 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.