Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 115 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5701 Caspian Volleyball Club 17 Caspian Surge 1704 8-5 62% 17 ON
5702 VEVA 17 Elite 1703 32-24 57% 17 FL
5703 MVC 18 Rach 1703 36-24 60% 18 OH
5704 VolleyFX 18 Mystery 1703 24-12 65% 18 NY
5705 LAVA North 18 Molten 1703 31-16 66% 18 CA
5706 S.A. STARS 18U ELITE 1703 32-6 82% 18 TX
5707 Ne Jrs 18-Black 1703 12-7 63% 18 NE
5708 NF PIRATES 16-Gold 1703 32-8 80% 16 FL
5709 FRVBC 17-Rahul 1703 23-10 70% 17 CO
5710 Legacy 12-Premier 1703 24-7 77% 12 NY
5711 Iron VC 14-1 1703 16-3 84% 14 AL
5712 CUVC 15 Premier 1703 31-36 46% 15 NC
5713 Next Level 13-Lehua 1703 27-17 61% 13 NV
5714 City Beach 15-Black 1703 39-27 59% 15 CA
5715 MVA 16-Stephania 1703 47-28 63% 16 FL
5716 Pulse 17-Select 1703 19-7 73% 17 MI
5717 Athlete HQ 17-Encalado 1703 32-28 53% 17 OH
5718 Grandlake 13-Bergman 1703 6-0 100% 13 OH
5719 NYS All Stars 11 1703 10-2 83% 11 CA
5720 Club Ace Long Island 13-Blue 1703 38-8 81% 13 NY
5721 STORM 14-Evie/ryan 1703 27-18 60% 14 CA
5722 RVC 14-Relentless 1703 55-27 67% 14 CO
5723 LEVBC 15-National 1703 42-38 51% 15 MD
5724 BC 16-1 1703 5-3 63% 16 LA
5725 Alliance 14 Local 1703 25-7 76% 14 TN
5726 Blacktooth Volleyball Club 12-Black 1703 14-3 82% 12 WY
5727 NOALL 14-Teal 1703 10-2 83% 14 ND
5728 Direction 14 Royal 1703 39-13 75% 14 NC
5729 Mililani 15 1703 15-1 75% 15 HI
5730 LAVB 16 1703 31-12 72% 16 LA
5731 Red Rock 17-Salomon - redwood city 1703 36-15 71% 17 CA
5732 DVA 15 Elite 1703 27-19 59% 15 PA
5733 Columbus 14-1 1703 22-15 49% 14 MT
5734 SAVBC 17-1 1703 17-18 49% 17 CA
5735 OK Premier 14-Diamonds 1703 36-8 82% 14 OK
5736 Vision 16-Exv blue 1703 32-21 55% 16 TX
5737 MVP 12-National 1703 30-13 68% 12 TX
5738 KS Renegades 15-1 1703 24-1 89% 15 KS
5739 Xtreme 17-Usa deb 1703 37-14 73% 17 NJ
5740 Gators 15-Black 1703 42-18 70% 15 MA
5741 Titanas 15-1 1702 8-7 53% 15 PR
5742 CPVC 18-Black 1702 30-7 81% 18 NC
5743 Stanly Extreme 18 Carl 1702 18-3 86% 18 NC
5744 808AC 18-Dayne 1702 16-5 76% 18 HI
5745 HOU STELLAR 18 ELITE 1702 30-23 57% 18 TX
5746 CMASS EDGE 18-Blue 1702 31-20 61% 18 MA
5747 Shockers Volleyball 13 Shockers Volleyball (BY) 1702 33-13 69% 13 LA
5748 Hobcab VBC 13-1 1702 24-5 83% 13 KY
5749 Next Level 12-1 1702 6-3 67% 12 PR
5750 TNT 16-Electric 1702 40-27 60% 16 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.