2025-2026 Season — Page 115 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5701 | River City Jrs 15-White | 1703 | 30-12 | 71% | 15 | NE |
| 5702 | L2 16-1 | 1703 | 14-52 | 21% | 16 | MI |
| 5703 | Carolina CHAOS 16 Royal | 1703 | 38-32 | 54% | 16 | NC |
| 5704 | Club Fusion 12-Black | 1703 | 27-11 | 71% | 12 | IL |
| 5705 | Epic United 16 National | 1703 | 30-18 | 63% | 16 | IN |
| 5706 | Twisters 16-Teri | 1703 | 37-15 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 5707 | JJVA Club 14-A | 1703 | 18-7 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 5708 | LBVC 12-1 | 1703 | 44-16 | 73% | 12 | LA |
| 5709 | Xtreme 18-National deb | 1703 | 20-4 | 83% | 18 | NJ |
| 5710 | COAST 18-3 brittani | 1703 | 34-11 | 76% | 18 | CA |
| 5711 | LI Fury 18-Cj | 1703 | 13-5 | 72% | 18 | NY |
| 5712 | IconVBC 16 Adidas | 1703 | 36-13 | 73% | 16 | CA |
| 5713 | Memphis Metro 16-Elite black | 1703 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | |
| 5714 | SJVC 13-Royals | 1703 | 7-1 | 88% | 13 | FL |
| 5715 | StarsTJ 13 11 | 1702 | 9-3 | 75% | 11 | |
| 5716 | MVA 15-National (EV) | 1702 | 23-13 | 57% | 15 | |
| 5717 | NDVBC Black Ice 15 | 1702 | 20-6 | 77% | 15 | |
| 5718 | SoCal Legends 18-Elite | 1702 | 10-12 | 45% | 18 | CA |
| 5719 | NorthShore 12-Katrina | 1702 | 14-3 | 82% | 12 | OH |
| 5720 | BORINQUEN COQUI 13-2f | 1702 | 11-3 | 79% | 13 | PR |
| 5721 | Iowa PowerPlex 13-Allen | 1702 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | IA |
| 5722 | MOVA 15-M | 1702 | 53-20 | 73% | 15 | OH |
| 5723 | LA6 13-Jenny | 1702 | 23-10 | 66% | 13 | LA |
| 5724 | VOLT 13-1 | 1702 | 44-30 | 59% | 13 | ND |
| 5725 | Cut Shot VBC 13-1 | 1702 | 34-12 | 74% | 13 | CA |
| 5726 | HJV 13-Premier | 1702 | 25-15 | 60% | 13 | TX |
| 5727 | SA Elite 14-1 navy | 1702 | 39-29 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 5728 | Eagles VBC 13 | 1702 | 7-0 | 78% | 13 | MI |
| 5729 | SMV 13-1 | 1702 | 12-2 | 86% | 13 | MN |
| 5730 | AAVA 14-1 storm | 1702 | 26-27 | 49% | 14 | OR |
| 5731 | AP 16-Black | 1702 | 32-11 | 74% | 16 | TX |
| 5732 | Mana Toa 15-Nichole | 1702 | 19-9 | 68% | 15 | AL |
| 5733 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 14-Silver | 1702 | 28-9 | 76% | 14 | CO |
| 5734 | TAV 14-Stephenville | 1702 | 23-5 | 79% | 14 | TX |
| 5735 | Mizuno CNVBC 15-Coach ib | 1702 | 16-26 | 38% | 15 | MO |
| 5736 | Momentum 17-Gold | 1702 | 9-12 | 43% | 17 | FL |
| 5737 | TVVC 16-Teal | 1702 | 22-3 | 88% | 16 | OR |
| 5738 | Pulse 17-Select | 1702 | 19-7 | 73% | 17 | CA |
| 5739 | FWFIRE 16-1p | 1702 | 19-13 | 56% | 16 | TX |
| 5740 | Mindset Premier 15-Black | 1702 | 39-7 | 85% | 15 | IL |
| 5741 | Core St. Louis 15-1 | 1702 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | MO |
| 5742 | Honu 16-Aloha | 1702 | 21-30 | 41% | 16 | FL |
| 5743 | MDJRS 11 Elite | 1702 | 25-6 | 69% | 11 | MD |
| 5744 | Eclipse 14-1 (CH) | 1702 | 24-17 | 55% | 14 | MD |
| 5745 | FEVER 15U | 1702 | 22-6 | 79% | 15 | AZ |
| 5746 | CALI 16-Blue | 1702 | 37-27 | 58% | 16 | NY |
| 5747 | RVC 14-Relentless | 1702 | 55-27 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 5748 | Salty 14-S | 1702 | 18-16 | 53% | 14 | TX |
| 5749 | Attak VBC 14-1 | 1702 | 22-8 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 5750 | Cape Coast 14 ATLANTIS | 1702 | 40-16 | 71% | 14 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.