2025-2026 Season — Page 115 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5701 | Caspian Volleyball Club 17 Caspian Surge | 1704 | 8-5 | 62% | 17 | ON |
| 5702 | VEVA 17 Elite | 1703 | 32-24 | 57% | 17 | FL |
| 5703 | MVC 18 Rach | 1703 | 36-24 | 60% | 18 | OH |
| 5704 | VolleyFX 18 Mystery | 1703 | 24-12 | 65% | 18 | NY |
| 5705 | LAVA North 18 Molten | 1703 | 31-16 | 66% | 18 | CA |
| 5706 | S.A. STARS 18U ELITE | 1703 | 32-6 | 82% | 18 | TX |
| 5707 | Ne Jrs 18-Black | 1703 | 12-7 | 63% | 18 | NE |
| 5708 | NF PIRATES 16-Gold | 1703 | 32-8 | 80% | 16 | FL |
| 5709 | FRVBC 17-Rahul | 1703 | 23-10 | 70% | 17 | CO |
| 5710 | Legacy 12-Premier | 1703 | 24-7 | 77% | 12 | NY |
| 5711 | Iron VC 14-1 | 1703 | 16-3 | 84% | 14 | AL |
| 5712 | CUVC 15 Premier | 1703 | 31-36 | 46% | 15 | NC |
| 5713 | Next Level 13-Lehua | 1703 | 27-17 | 61% | 13 | NV |
| 5714 | City Beach 15-Black | 1703 | 39-27 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 5715 | MVA 16-Stephania | 1703 | 47-28 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 5716 | Pulse 17-Select | 1703 | 19-7 | 73% | 17 | MI |
| 5717 | Athlete HQ 17-Encalado | 1703 | 32-28 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 5718 | Grandlake 13-Bergman | 1703 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | OH |
| 5719 | NYS All Stars 11 | 1703 | 10-2 | 83% | 11 | CA |
| 5720 | Club Ace Long Island 13-Blue | 1703 | 38-8 | 81% | 13 | NY |
| 5721 | STORM 14-Evie/ryan | 1703 | 27-18 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 5722 | RVC 14-Relentless | 1703 | 55-27 | 67% | 14 | CO |
| 5723 | LEVBC 15-National | 1703 | 42-38 | 51% | 15 | MD |
| 5724 | BC 16-1 | 1703 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | LA |
| 5725 | Alliance 14 Local | 1703 | 25-7 | 76% | 14 | TN |
| 5726 | Blacktooth Volleyball Club 12-Black | 1703 | 14-3 | 82% | 12 | WY |
| 5727 | NOALL 14-Teal | 1703 | 10-2 | 83% | 14 | ND |
| 5728 | Direction 14 Royal | 1703 | 39-13 | 75% | 14 | NC |
| 5729 | Mililani 15 | 1703 | 15-1 | 75% | 15 | HI |
| 5730 | LAVB 16 | 1703 | 31-12 | 72% | 16 | LA |
| 5731 | Red Rock 17-Salomon - redwood city | 1703 | 36-15 | 71% | 17 | CA |
| 5732 | DVA 15 Elite | 1703 | 27-19 | 59% | 15 | PA |
| 5733 | Columbus 14-1 | 1703 | 22-15 | 49% | 14 | MT |
| 5734 | SAVBC 17-1 | 1703 | 17-18 | 49% | 17 | CA |
| 5735 | OK Premier 14-Diamonds | 1703 | 36-8 | 82% | 14 | OK |
| 5736 | Vision 16-Exv blue | 1703 | 32-21 | 55% | 16 | TX |
| 5737 | MVP 12-National | 1703 | 30-13 | 68% | 12 | TX |
| 5738 | KS Renegades 15-1 | 1703 | 24-1 | 89% | 15 | KS |
| 5739 | Xtreme 17-Usa deb | 1703 | 37-14 | 73% | 17 | NJ |
| 5740 | Gators 15-Black | 1703 | 42-18 | 70% | 15 | MA |
| 5741 | Titanas 15-1 | 1702 | 8-7 | 53% | 15 | PR |
| 5742 | CPVC 18-Black | 1702 | 30-7 | 81% | 18 | NC |
| 5743 | Stanly Extreme 18 Carl | 1702 | 18-3 | 86% | 18 | NC |
| 5744 | 808AC 18-Dayne | 1702 | 16-5 | 76% | 18 | HI |
| 5745 | HOU STELLAR 18 ELITE | 1702 | 30-23 | 57% | 18 | TX |
| 5746 | CMASS EDGE 18-Blue | 1702 | 31-20 | 61% | 18 | MA |
| 5747 | Shockers Volleyball 13 Shockers Volleyball (BY) | 1702 | 33-13 | 69% | 13 | LA |
| 5748 | Hobcab VBC 13-1 | 1702 | 24-5 | 83% | 13 | KY |
| 5749 | Next Level 12-1 | 1702 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | PR |
| 5750 | TNT 16-Electric | 1702 | 40-27 | 60% | 16 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.