Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 115 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5701 River City Jrs 15-White 1703 30-12 71% 15 NE
5702 L2 16-1 1703 14-52 21% 16 MI
5703 Carolina CHAOS 16 Royal 1703 38-32 54% 16 NC
5704 Club Fusion 12-Black 1703 27-11 71% 12 IL
5705 Epic United 16 National 1703 30-18 63% 16 IN
5706 Twisters 16-Teri 1703 37-15 71% 16 TX
5707 JJVA Club 14-A 1703 18-7 72% 14 FL
5708 LBVC 12-1 1703 44-16 73% 12 LA
5709 Xtreme 18-National deb 1703 20-4 83% 18 NJ
5710 COAST 18-3 brittani 1703 34-11 76% 18 CA
5711 LI Fury 18-Cj 1703 13-5 72% 18 NY
5712 IconVBC 16 Adidas 1703 36-13 73% 16 CA
5713 Memphis Metro 16-Elite black 1703 3-4 43% 16
5714 SJVC 13-Royals 1703 7-1 88% 13 FL
5715 StarsTJ 13 11 1702 9-3 75% 11
5716 MVA 15-National (EV) 1702 23-13 57% 15
5717 NDVBC Black Ice 15 1702 20-6 77% 15
5718 SoCal Legends 18-Elite 1702 10-12 45% 18 CA
5719 NorthShore 12-Katrina 1702 14-3 82% 12 OH
5720 BORINQUEN COQUI 13-2f 1702 11-3 79% 13 PR
5721 Iowa PowerPlex 13-Allen 1702 6-0 100% 13 IA
5722 MOVA 15-M 1702 53-20 73% 15 OH
5723 LA6 13-Jenny 1702 23-10 66% 13 LA
5724 VOLT 13-1 1702 44-30 59% 13 ND
5725 Cut Shot VBC 13-1 1702 34-12 74% 13 CA
5726 HJV 13-Premier 1702 25-15 60% 13 TX
5727 SA Elite 14-1 navy 1702 39-29 57% 14 TX
5728 Eagles VBC 13 1702 7-0 78% 13 MI
5729 SMV 13-1 1702 12-2 86% 13 MN
5730 AAVA 14-1 storm 1702 26-27 49% 14 OR
5731 AP 16-Black 1702 32-11 74% 16 TX
5732 Mana Toa 15-Nichole 1702 19-9 68% 15 AL
5733 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 14-Silver 1702 28-9 76% 14 CO
5734 TAV 14-Stephenville 1702 23-5 79% 14 TX
5735 Mizuno CNVBC 15-Coach ib 1702 16-26 38% 15 MO
5736 Momentum 17-Gold 1702 9-12 43% 17 FL
5737 TVVC 16-Teal 1702 22-3 88% 16 OR
5738 Pulse 17-Select 1702 19-7 73% 17 CA
5739 FWFIRE 16-1p 1702 19-13 56% 16 TX
5740 Mindset Premier 15-Black 1702 39-7 85% 15 IL
5741 Core St. Louis 15-1 1702 6-2 75% 15 MO
5742 Honu 16-Aloha 1702 21-30 41% 16 FL
5743 MDJRS 11 Elite 1702 25-6 69% 11 MD
5744 Eclipse 14-1 (CH) 1702 24-17 55% 14 MD
5745 FEVER 15U 1702 22-6 79% 15 AZ
5746 CALI 16-Blue 1702 37-27 58% 16 NY
5747 RVC 14-Relentless 1702 55-27 67% 14 TX
5748 Salty 14-S 1702 18-16 53% 14 TX
5749 Attak VBC 14-1 1702 22-8 73% 14 TX
5750 Cape Coast 14 ATLANTIS 1702 40-16 71% 14 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.