Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 114 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5651 NorthShore 14-Kali 1704 21-8 72% 14 OH
5652 JJVA Club 12-A 1704 22-7 76% 12 FL
5653 Amarillo Xtreme 12 Blazers 1704 26-4 87% 12 TX
5654 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 16-1 1704 7-5 58% 16 TX
5655 SSVBC 16-1 1704 24-27 47% 16 NH
5656 Y Not 16-1 1704 21-2 91% 16 VA
5657 Tribe 16-Premier cardinal 1704 36-33 52% 16 FL
5658 Southern Elite 15-National 1704 29-20 59% 15 LA
5659 Attack 15-Select 1704 20-28 42% 15 IL
5660 EMV 15-National black marquise 1704 3-4 43% 15 TX
5661 TeamLVC 14-Black 1704 34-29 54% 14 NY
5662 APV 14-National royal 1704 23-19 49% 14 TX
5663 CYDI 13-Blue 1704 22-4 76% 13 TX
5664 Grandlake 13-Evans 1704 11-1 92% 13 OH
5665 RockCity 14 N2 1704 49-14 78% 14 OH
5666 Synergy 13-Flash 1704 39-13 75% 13 CA
5667 H. Skyline TW 18-1 1704 7-8 47% 18
5668 NYCLBVC 12-Blue 1704 23-13 64% 12 NY
5669 ProPlay 15 Zoe 1704 30-20 60% 15 CA
5670 VCNebraska 14-Blue 1704 13-6 68% 14 NE
5671 Eclipse 13 Solar 1704 25-13 66% 13 WI
5672 Husky 15-Northeast 1704 41-17 71% 15 CT
5673 Northern Lights 14-X 1704 37-15 71% 14 MN
5674 United 15-Black (SO) 1704 22-11 67% 15 AL
5675 Prime 13 adidas 1704 31-18 63% 13 CA
5676 Eagan Juniors 13-S 1704 10-4 71% 13 MN
5677 Oiler Attack 14-Black 1704 19-9 68% 14 OH
5678 Club Unite 18 National 1704 32-13 71% 18 TN
5679 Illini NW 18U Maroon 1704 17-0 89% 18 IL
5680 AVA Texas 15-Attack 1704 8-1 89% 15 TX
5681 Lady Blue 12-1 1704 10-1 91% 12
5682 SCVBC 15-National 1704 14-4 78% 15
5683 Mountain1 18-1 bailey 1703 24-13 60% 18
5684 AV 16-1 diamond 1703 4-3 57% 16
5685 Elevation 12-Vh 1703 21-18 54% 12 OH
5686 FORZA1 NORTH 11-One 1703 25-17 60% 11 CA
5687 FORZA1 NORTH 12-National 1703 38-9 81% 12 CA
5688 HVC TEISA 17 1703 14-7 67% 17 HI
5689 FC Elite 10 Navy 1703 11-2 85% 10 WI
5690 Red Storm 12 Elite 1703 28-13 67% 12 LA
5691 CVVC 12-1 1703 20-6 69% 12 MT
5692 513VB 13-1 1703 32-17 65% 13 OH
5693 Club 1 12-Skronkstrong 1703 26-7 79% 12 IL
5694 Club Sand 17-Kaniela 1703 22-23 49% 17 UT
5695 Decatur Force 14 Aqua 1703 24-10 71% 14 IN
5696 Athlete HQ 17-Encalado 1703 32-28 53% 17 OH
5697 Lady Strikers 14-Yellow 1703 29-14 67% 14 CO
5698 NNJ 14-Kuna 1703 22-17 56% 14 NV
5699 United 16-Bhm national 1703 25-18 58% 16 AL
5700 Colorado Skyline 16 Royal 1703 28-23 55% 16 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.