2025-2026 Season — Page 113 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5601 | EXCEL 18-National white | 1705 | 23-29 | 44% | 18 | TX |
| 5602 | 1W 18-1 elite | 1705 | 31-24 | 56% | 18 | WI |
| 5603 | MT NW 14-Elite | 1705 | 18-14 | 55% | 14 | MT |
| 5604 | Club Solano 12 Maroon | 1705 | 26-12 | 68% | 12 | CA |
| 5605 | Blue Royals 16 Amber | 1705 | 38-21 | 64% | 16 | WA |
| 5606 | WPVC 15-Armour orange | 1705 | 50-26 | 66% | 15 | FL |
| 5607 | VC United 15-2 elite | 1705 | 23-17 | 57% | 15 | IL |
| 5608 | Katy Stars 18 Elite | 1705 | 37-17 | 69% | 18 | TX |
| 5609 | CSVC 15-1 stars | 1705 | 36-14 | 72% | 15 | IN |
| 5610 | Husky 13-Red | 1705 | 26-18 | 59% | 13 | CT |
| 5611 | Sideout 17-T savannah | 1705 | 32-11 | 74% | 17 | NJ |
| 5612 | Blue 17-1 | 1705 | 27-13 | 68% | 17 | MI |
| 5613 | Gators 15-Black | 1705 | 42-18 | 70% | 15 | MA |
| 5614 | Iowa One 15-Emma | 1705 | 29-8 | 76% | 15 | IA |
| 5615 | Invicta 12-Lanie/ashton | 1705 | 22-6 | 71% | 12 | UT |
| 5616 | DVA 16-Elite | 1705 | 34-17 | 67% | 16 | PA |
| 5617 | Windthorst 12-Fusion | 1705 | 33-9 | 75% | 12 | TX |
| 5618 | Tsunami 14-1n brian | 1705 | 17-5 | 77% | 14 | GA |
| 5619 | Bay Area Eagles 14-1 | 1705 | 26-17 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 5620 | CKYV 14-1 | 1705 | 26-8 | 76% | 14 | KY |
| 5621 | MoCo MAVS 14-Red | 1705 | 32-23 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 5622 | Northeast 14-2 | 1705 | 44-19 | 70% | 14 | CT |
| 5623 | Kairos 14-White | 1705 | 40-15 | 73% | 14 | SD |
| 5624 | Ka Ulukoa 14 Micah | 1705 | 27-9 | 75% | 14 | HI |
| 5625 | Impact 14-Al/jenna | 1705 | 28-11 | 72% | 14 | MI |
| 5626 | Machine 14-1 | 1705 | 30-18 | 63% | 14 | |
| 5627 | TriState Crusaders 14-1 | 1704 | 9-2 | 82% | 14 | |
| 5628 | Club Sol 14-Pink | 1704 | 36-30 | 53% | 14 | |
| 5629 | Fission 15-Elite 1 | 1704 | 41-15 | 73% | 15 | GA |
| 5630 | S.A. STARS 18U ELITE | 1704 | 32-6 | 82% | 18 | TX |
| 5631 | MSVB 18-National | 1704 | 22-8 | 73% | 18 | AK |
| 5632 | VA APEX 18 | 1704 | 11-0 | 100% | 18 | VA |
| 5633 | Blue Ridge 16-Orange | 1704 | 13-10 | 57% | 16 | VA |
| 5634 | Club Butte 17 | 1704 | 6-0 | 100% | 17 | MT |
| 5635 | FEVA 17-Elite | 1704 | 33-13 | 72% | 17 | TN |
| 5636 | Munciana 16 Tigers | 1704 | 39-32 | 55% | 16 | IN |
| 5637 | City Juniors 14 Navy | 1704 | 31-12 | 72% | 14 | TX |
| 5638 | Happy Volley 13 Elite | 1704 | 27-10 | 73% | 13 | PA |
| 5639 | 417 Juniors 16-1 | 1704 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | MO |
| 5640 | Integrity 13-Intense red | 1704 | 24-16 | 53% | 13 | TX |
| 5641 | Impulse 18-Red | 1704 | 24-7 | 77% | 18 | IL |
| 5642 | RRIV 15 Regional | 1704 | 45-13 | 78% | 15 | ND |
| 5643 | Areté 15-Steel ethos | 1704 | 12-4 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 5644 | 208 14-Elite | 1704 | 60-22 | 73% | 14 | WA |
| 5645 | SKEVA 17-Blue | 1704 | 26-18 | 59% | 17 | KY |
| 5646 | LIV 15-Black bhrycen | 1704 | 30-11 | 73% | 15 | LA |
| 5647 | Shakopee 14-1 | 1704 | 24-6 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 5648 | MiElite 16-Elite | 1704 | 24-33 | 42% | 16 | MI |
| 5649 | Idaho LUV 17-Morgan | 1704 | 12-12 | 50% | 17 | ID |
| 5650 | Vernal Velocity 16-Pink julia | 1704 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.