Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 113 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5601 EXCEL 18-National white 1705 23-29 44% 18 TX
5602 1W 18-1 elite 1705 31-24 56% 18 WI
5603 MT NW 14-Elite 1705 18-14 55% 14 MT
5604 Club Solano 12 Maroon 1705 26-12 68% 12 CA
5605 Blue Royals 16 Amber 1705 38-21 64% 16 WA
5606 WPVC 15-Armour orange 1705 50-26 66% 15 FL
5607 VC United 15-2 elite 1705 23-17 57% 15 IL
5608 Katy Stars 18 Elite 1705 37-17 69% 18 TX
5609 CSVC 15-1 stars 1705 36-14 72% 15 IN
5610 Husky 13-Red 1705 26-18 59% 13 CT
5611 Sideout 17-T savannah 1705 32-11 74% 17 NJ
5612 Blue 17-1 1705 27-13 68% 17 MI
5613 Gators 15-Black 1705 42-18 70% 15 MA
5614 Iowa One 15-Emma 1705 29-8 76% 15 IA
5615 Invicta 12-Lanie/ashton 1705 22-6 71% 12 UT
5616 DVA 16-Elite 1705 34-17 67% 16 PA
5617 Windthorst 12-Fusion 1705 33-9 75% 12 TX
5618 Tsunami 14-1n brian 1705 17-5 77% 14 GA
5619 Bay Area Eagles 14-1 1705 26-17 60% 14 CA
5620 CKYV 14-1 1705 26-8 76% 14 KY
5621 MoCo MAVS 14-Red 1705 32-23 58% 14 TX
5622 Northeast 14-2 1705 44-19 70% 14 CT
5623 Kairos 14-White 1705 40-15 73% 14 SD
5624 Ka Ulukoa 14 Micah 1705 27-9 75% 14 HI
5625 Impact 14-Al/jenna 1705 28-11 72% 14 MI
5626 Machine 14-1 1705 30-18 63% 14
5627 TriState Crusaders 14-1 1704 9-2 82% 14
5628 Club Sol 14-Pink 1704 36-30 53% 14
5629 Fission 15-Elite 1 1704 41-15 73% 15 GA
5630 S.A. STARS 18U ELITE 1704 32-6 82% 18 TX
5631 MSVB 18-National 1704 22-8 73% 18 AK
5632 VA APEX 18 1704 11-0 100% 18 VA
5633 Blue Ridge 16-Orange 1704 13-10 57% 16 VA
5634 Club Butte 17 1704 6-0 100% 17 MT
5635 FEVA 17-Elite 1704 33-13 72% 17 TN
5636 Munciana 16 Tigers 1704 39-32 55% 16 IN
5637 City Juniors 14 Navy 1704 31-12 72% 14 TX
5638 Happy Volley 13 Elite 1704 27-10 73% 13 PA
5639 417 Juniors 16-1 1704 5-1 83% 16 MO
5640 Integrity 13-Intense red 1704 24-16 53% 13 TX
5641 Impulse 18-Red 1704 24-7 77% 18 IL
5642 RRIV 15 Regional 1704 45-13 78% 15 ND
5643 Areté 15-Steel ethos 1704 12-4 75% 15 TX
5644 208 14-Elite 1704 60-22 73% 14 WA
5645 SKEVA 17-Blue 1704 26-18 59% 17 KY
5646 LIV 15-Black bhrycen 1704 30-11 73% 15 LA
5647 Shakopee 14-1 1704 24-6 80% 14 MN
5648 MiElite 16-Elite 1704 24-33 42% 16 MI
5649 Idaho LUV 17-Morgan 1704 12-12 50% 17 ID
5650 Vernal Velocity 16-Pink julia 1704 4-3 57% 16 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.