Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 113 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5601 JET 12-Saunders 1706 18-2 86% 12 TX
5602 SPVB 13 Elite 1706 25-27 48% 13 IL
5603 Twisters 16-Teri 1706 37-15 71% 16 CA
5604 Prime Volleyball Club 13-Adidas 1706 31-18 63% 13 CA
5605 Madtown 15-1 select 1706 38-15 72% 15 WI
5606 I AM VBC 12-Black 1706 39-15 72% 12 WI
5607 Landshark 12-Black 1706 11-4 73% 12 KS
5608 1United 13-N black 1706 35-15 67% 13 TX
5609 208 13-Elite 1706 42-21 67% 13 ID
5610 DYNASTY 13 Gold 1706 29-25 54% 13 KS
5611 Synergy 13-Flash 1706 39-13 75% 13 PA
5612 AVA Texas 15-Attack 1706 8-1 89% 15 NV
5613 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 16-1 1706 7-5 58% 16 TX
5614 Coulee Region Power 12-S 1705 13-2 87% 12 WI
5615 Flyers 12-Usa-charlie 1705 30-23 53% 12 TX
5616 Prime 15-Adidas o 1705 24-22 52% 15 CA
5617 The Shore 17-Premier 1705 43-21 67% 17 MI
5618 Rival 17-Black 1705 28-26 52% 17 NY
5619 VolleyFX 15 Chant 1705 34-25 57% 15 NY
5620 Netforce 14-Lacey 1705 20-4 74% 14 AL
5621 ICA 12-Colibri 1705 27-7 79% 12 CA
5622 EMV 12-National black ellen 1705 7-2 78% 12 TX
5623 Madtown 11-1 select 1705 30-8 79% 11 WI
5624 RVC Impact 12 1705 98-50 64% 12 TX
5625 DVA 16-Elite 1705 34-17 67% 16 PA
5626 AAVA 14-1 storm 1705 26-27 49% 14 OR
5627 NLVC 13-National 1705 38-19 67% 13 TX
5628 Cape Coast 10-Exporer 1705 12-2 86% 10 FL
5629 Xtreme VBC 14 Adidas 1705 30-12 71% 14 WI
5630 CVVC 12-1 1705 20-6 69% 12 MT
5631 LV 12 Avoli 1705 41-21 66% 12 TX
5632 VCN 12-Elite 1705 5-3 63% 12 NE
5633 Rose City VBC 14-1 1705 15-6 71% 14 OR
5634 VC United 15-2 elite 1705 23-17 57% 15 IL
5635 Impact 15-Red ashley 1705 33-20 62% 15 NV
5636 BAVA 13 Thunder 1705 43-18 66% 13 MD
5637 NJ RONIN 17-Lotus 1705 15-4 79% 17 NJ
5638 Rocks 11-Grenda 1705 16-4 80% 11 IN
5639 Impulse 18-Red 1705 24-7 77% 18 IN
5640 Memphis Metro 16-Elite black 1705 3-4 43% 16 TN
5641 TW Skyline 16-Black 1705 24-19 56% 16 TX
5642 Net Force 12-1 elite 1705 26-9 67% 12 IA
5643 TNT 14-Slammers 1705 29-6 78% 14 MA
5644 Tsunami 15-1e andressa 1705 33-22 60% 15 GA
5645 ProPlay 15 Zoe 1705 30-20 60% 15 CA
5646 TopSpin 13-Red 1705 22-8 73% 13 KY
5647 Herederas 15-1 rickie 1705 8-7 53% 15 PR
5648 FPVC 15-Ren girls 1705 12-6 67% 15 CA
5649 IconVBC 16 Adidas 1705 36-13 73% 16 CA
5650 Cajun Elite 13-Caroline/terri 1705 27-11 69% 13 LA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.