Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 112 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5551 BAVC 15-National andre 1707 37-16 70% 15 CA
5552 H Skyline 11-Royal 1707 17-9 63% 11 TX
5553 Mizuno CNVBC 15-Coach ib 1707 16-26 38% 15 MO
5554 1st Alliance 16 Scarlet 1707 41-12 77% 16 IL
5555 Omni 17-N1 1707 36-40 47% 17 AZ
5556 Raptors 17-Kahea 1707 12-3 75% 17 UT
5557 HEVC 17-Allen 1707 37-14 73% 17 FL
5558 AEV 15-Club 1707 12-2 86% 15 TX
5559 SPARKS VBC 13-Navy 1707 39-12 76% 13 PA
5560 TopSpin 12-Red 1707 22-10 69% 12 KY
5561 Kansas Rise VBC C 12-1 1707 14-1 93% 12 KS
5562 Tribe 16-Premier cardinal 1707 36-33 52% 16 FL
5563 Blaze 13-Volleybombs 1707 9-1 90% 13 IL
5564 ATOM 13-Red 1707 43-20 68% 13 FL
5565 Blue Ridge 13-Orange 1707 35-10 78% 13 VA
5566 Lady Blue 12-1 1707 10-1 91% 12 NY
5567 CVBC 15-1s 1707 29-16 64% 15 IN
5568 FEVA 17-Elite 1707 33-13 72% 17 KY
5569 Sunshine 13 Valley 1707 44-18 71% 13 CA
5570 OP2 17-1 elite 1707 5-1 83% 17
5571 Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 18-1 1706 29-11 73% 18 MN
5572 AZ EVJ 15 Select 1706 34-25 58% 15 AZ
5573 VCNebraska 15-Black 1706 14-14 50% 15 NE
5574 Elevate 14-Silver 1706 30-25 49% 14 TX
5575 Greenwich Volleyball Club 14-Black 1706 22-26 46% 14 CT
5576 Club 909 15-1 1706 25-11 69% 15 CA
5577 Big Sky 17-2 1706 25-20 50% 17 MT
5578 Paramount VBC 11 Maureen 1706 28-15 61% 11 VA
5579 417 Juniors 16-1 1706 5-1 83% 16 MO
5580 Aleta 12-1 1706 5-1 83% 12 OH
5581 SPVC 18-1 adidas 1706 16-8 67% 18 CA
5582 Amarillo Xtreme 10 Thunder 1706 15-7 68% 10 TX
5583 Elevation 16-Timberline b 1706 18-17 51% 16 CO
5584 APV 14-National royal 1706 23-19 49% 14 TX
5585 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Legacy 1706 17-12 59% 14 TX
5586 SIVA 15-Black 1706 29-17 63% 15 ID
5587 MOVSelect 17-Black 1706 33-9 79% 17 OH
5588 Ethos 13 Pandas 1706 34-13 72% 13 TN
5589 TX SPARKS 13-1 melissa 1706 26-7 74% 13 TX
5590 HOU STELLAR 15-Premier 1706 39-27 59% 15 TX
5591 CSVC 15-1 stars 1706 36-14 72% 15 IN
5592 Texas Fury 17 Legacy 1706 37-28 57% 17 TX
5593 City Juniors 14 Navy 1706 31-12 72% 14 TX
5594 Club Solano 12 Maroon 1706 26-12 68% 12 CA
5595 Amarillo Xtreme 12-Outlaws 1706 21-6 78% 12 TX
5596 Illini Elite 18-L red 1706 18-6 75% 18 IL
5597 Elevation 12-Vh 1706 21-18 54% 12 OH
5598 HJV 13-Premier 1706 25-15 60% 13 TX
5599 Vernal Velocity 16-Pink julia 1706 4-3 57% 16 UT
5600 Memphis Metro 13-Elite black 1706 4-3 57% 13 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.