Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 111 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5501 Mojo Volleyball Utah 16-National 1708 3-4 43% 16 UT
5502 AV 14-1 diamond 1708 6-2 75% 14 GA
5503 Hitt 12 Dale 1708 9-3 75% 12 MI
5504 Club Solano 14-Maroon 1708 22-20 52% 14 CA
5505 AVA 12-Elite 1708 34-22 61% 12 NY
5506 Niagara Frontier 16 Navy 1708 30-27 51% 16 NY
5507 South County 15-Aspen 1708 26-6 76% 15 UT
5508 ClubRedVB WI 14-Red 1708 24-10 71% 14 WI
5509 CALI 16-Blue 1708 37-27 58% 16 NY
5510 Upontop 12-National black 1708 28-6 82% 12 FL
5511 Sunshine 13-South bay 1708 27-34 44% 13 CA
5512 COLAVOL 15-Black 1708 24-12 67% 15 GA
5513 Idaho LUV 17-Morgan 1708 12-12 50% 17 ID
5514 No Limits 17-Elite 1708 25-24 50% 17 TX
5515 Coastal VBC 12 Navy 1708 18-2 90% 12 DE
5516 Pacific Rim Volleyball Academy 14 PRVA Surf 1708 22-4 85% 14 CA
5517 Crank It 17-Black 1708 40-10 80% 17 MI
5518 SCVC 13-1 gracie 1708 14-3 82% 13 TN
5519 Machine 14-1 1708 30-18 63% 14 CA
5520 PBEVC SVT 12-1 1708 25-7 76% 12 TX
5521 LIKVBC 16 1708 35-15 70% 16 NY
5522 SA MAGIC 14 SHOWCASE 1708 35-15 69% 14 TX
5523 OPVC 12-Sedgwick 1708 18-8 69% 12 OH
5524 VoltageVB 13-Blue 1708 12-3 80% 13 FL
5525 Temecula Viper 15-1 michael/luci 1708 28-15 65% 15 CA
5526 Ignite 16 Elite 1708 28-36 44% 16 IN
5527 207VBC 17-1 1708 29-5 85% 17 ME
5528 NorthEast Volleyball Club 14-2 1708 44-19 70% 14 CT
5529 SERV 13 Select 1708 47-21 69% 13 VA
5530 First Flight VB 15-1 1708 30-9 77% 15 NC
5531 United 16-Bhm national 1707 25-18 58% 16 AL
5532 EXCEL 18-National white 1707 23-29 44% 18 TX
5533 SMV 18-1 black 1707 37-18 67% 18 MN
5534 Xtreme 18-National deb 1707 20-4 83% 18 NJ
5535 ND Elite 18-Goschen 1707 25-3 81% 18 ND
5536 Central Kansas Rampage 14-1 1707 12-1 86% 14 KS
5537 FAUCONS BLACK 15 1707 5-2 71% 15 MA
5538 EVA 13-White 1707 29-6 83% 13 AR
5539 WSRVC 16-Fink 1707 23-7 77% 16 WY
5540 RockCity 14 N2 1707 49-14 78% 14 OH
5541 Jr Vikings 14-Blue 1707 37-10 79% 14 WI
5542 Red Storm 12 Elite 1707 28-13 67% 12 LA
5543 Wichita Legacy 18-1 1707 12-6 52% 18 KS
5544 Sin City Rebels 14 1707 6-0 100% 14 NV
5545 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 14-Silver 1707 38-15 72% 14 CO
5546 HOV 13 Navy 1707 32-6 84% 13 VA
5547 NSVBC 14-Select blue 1707 13-3 81% 14 WI
5548 Monon 14-4r fireball 1707 39-9 81% 14 IN
5549 TVC 13-Royal 1707 20-13 61% 13 OH
5550 Katy United 16 Molten 1707 37-18 65% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.