Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 111 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5501 Ne Jrs 13-Black 1707 10-1 91% 13
5502 KIVA 18-White 1707 34-22 61% 18 KY
5503 SC Rockstar 18-Tawnee 1707 25-20 56% 18 CA
5504 Paramount VBC 11 Maureen 1707 28-15 61% 11 VA
5505 COLAVOL 15-Black 1707 24-12 67% 15 AL
5506 Reign 17-Black 1707 16-10 55% 17 FL
5507 Thunderbolt 12-Gold 1707 37-10 79% 12 MO
5508 MOJO Elite 15-Black 1707 51-28 65% 15 VA
5509 No Limits 17-Elite 1707 25-24 50% 17 FL
5510 Idaho ONE 17-Elite 1707 31-36 46% 17 ID
5511 PVA 16-National (PM) 1707 17-10 63% 16 SC
5512 Volitude 13-Black 1707 30-11 73% 13 CA
5513 Elevate 14-Silver 1707 30-25 49% 14 TX
5514 Next Level 17-1 1707 8-2 80% 17 CA
5515 207VBC 17-1 1707 29-5 85% 17 ME
5516 PCVC 16-Ansley 1707 22-12 65% 16 NC
5517 Mesa Juniors VBCO 14-Teal 1707 12-5 63% 14 CO
5518 TopSpin 12-Red 1707 22-10 69% 12 PR
5519 LV 12 Avoli 1707 41-21 66% 12 TX
5520 MARIN 12-Black 1707 32-30 52% 12 CA
5521 SBVC Girls 15 Molten 1707 41-20 67% 15 CA
5522 ID Crush 15-Gauna 1707 50-25 67% 15 ID
5523 NF PIRATES 16-Gold 1707 32-8 80% 16 FL
5524 JVC 14-2 1707 21-7 75% 14 IN
5525 EMV 12-National black ellen 1707 7-2 78% 12 TX
5526 TNT 14-Slammers 1707 29-6 78% 14 PA
5527 Iowa Select 14-Black 1707 30-8 75% 14 IA
5528 Blue Crab 15-Blue 1707 52-14 79% 15 LA
5529 ALL IN 18-1 1707 37-6 86% 18 NV
5530 Sin City Rebels 14 1707 6-0 100% 14 NV
5531 RVA G14-Pink 1707 47-24 66% 14 WI
5532 SF Elite 12 Nono 1707 16-16 50% 12 CA
5533 VEVA Fury 13-Blue 1707 33-11 75% 13 PA
5534 SRVC Waves 16 1707 54-20 73% 16
5535 SFSVC 16-1 shirley 1706 42-17 71% 16
5536 South Central NE 17-Black 1706 10-3 77% 17
5537 KS Renegades 15-1 1706 24-1 89% 15
5538 SCVC 13-1 gracie 1706 14-3 82% 13
5539 South Coast 18-1 1706 30-7 81% 18 OR
5540 East Texas 18-Black 1706 7-5 54% 18 TX
5541 Piedmont VBC 18-Retro 1706 17-17 50% 18 NC
5542 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 18-1 1706 6-1 86% 18 KS
5543 Club Solano 16-Maroon 1706 36-29 55% 16 CA
5544 Alliance 14 Local 1706 25-7 76% 14 TN
5545 Low Country 14 Katie 1706 27-12 69% 14 SC
5546 TX SPARKS 13-1 melissa 1706 26-7 74% 13 TX
5547 LV 14-Avoli 1706 31-20 61% 14 TX
5548 CAVC 15 Elite 1706 33-32 51% 15 VA
5549 Rhythm 15 Liz 1706 39-22 64% 15 TN
5550 Decatur Force 15 Teal 1706 35-14 71% 15 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.