Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 110 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5451 Crossfire 16-1 1709 32-43 43% 16 MN
5452 RVA 16-Hillegas 1709 20-17 54% 16 IA
5453 Momentum Volleyball 16-Allison 1709 25-10 71% 16 CO
5454 SA MAGIC 14 SHOWCASE 1709 35-15 69% 14 TX
5455 BAVC 15-National andre 1709 37-16 70% 15 CA
5456 Husky 15-New england black 1709 24-10 71% 15 CT
5457 Sideout 14-T kaitlyn 1709 30-13 70% 14 NJ
5458 Monon 10-1e mako 1709 23-9 72% 10 IN
5459 Reef 16-National brendan 1709 39-16 71% 16 CA
5460 RVA 13U Navy 1709 51-21 71% 13 WI
5461 Sunshine 13 Valley 1709 44-18 71% 13 CA
5462 Legacy 12-Premier 1709 24-7 77% 12 NY
5463 Kansas Rise VBC C 12-1 1709 14-1 93% 12
5464 NASA 12-Purple cierra 1709 25-9 74% 12 AL
5465 BVC 12-Black 1709 33-10 70% 12 MN
5466 SAND 12-Gold 1709 25-7 78% 12 UT
5467 LAVB 16 1709 31-12 72% 16
5468 SVC Club 334 15-Sellers 1709 10-9 53% 15
5469 H Skyline 11-Royal 1708 17-9 63% 11 TX
5470 EVA 13-White 1708 29-6 83% 13 AR
5471 Blaze 13-Volleybombs 1708 9-1 90% 13 IA
5472 AVBC 15-Elite red 1708 38-24 61% 15 AZ
5473 OK Charge 13 National 1708 41-19 67% 13 OK
5474 Omni 17-N1 1708 36-40 47% 17 AZ
5475 OCVC 15 Slunks 1708 36-25 59% 15 KY
5476 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Legacy 1708 17-12 59% 14 TX
5477 LevelOne Albany 14-1 1708 22-11 67% 14 OR
5478 H Skyline 13-Black 1708 18-22 45% 13 TX
5479 Storm 13 1708 19-1 86% 13 NY
5480 Libero 12 Huskies 1708 40-18 69% 12 VA
5481 Coastal VBC 12 Navy 1708 18-2 90% 12 MD
5482 WAVE 14 Stingrays 1708 33-5 87% 14 IN
5483 Club Fusion 16-2 national 1708 37-21 64% 16 IL
5484 OVA 18-G legacy 1708 29-33 47% 18 FL
5485 BTownVBC 16-Red 1708 24-19 56% 16 IN
5486 NYC Juniors 13-Travel 1708 40-27 60% 13 NY
5487 SMV 18-1 black 1708 37-18 67% 18 MN
5488 SPORTING EDGE 17-Armour 1708 27-13 68% 17 TX
5489 Ogden Untamed 14-Britanie 1708 17-2 71% 14 UT
5490 Mana Toa 18-Mose 1708 28-7 80% 18 AL
5491 CPVC 18-Black 1708 30-7 81% 18 NC
5492 Stars 15 Tonja 1708 52-22 70% 15 SC
5493 South County 15-Aspen 1708 26-6 76% 15 RI
5494 Mililani 14-S 1708 35-7 83% 14 HI
5495 VoltageVB 13-Blue 1708 12-3 80% 13 FL
5496 WAVE 13-Jose 1708 29-12 71% 13 CA
5497 Mizuno Northern Lights 12-1 1708 5-1 83% 12
5498 Five Starz 12-Black suji 1708 25-9 74% 12 CA
5499 PBEVC SVT 12-1 1708 25-7 76% 12
5500 Nebraska Jrs 17-Black 1708 9-7 56% 17
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.