Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 109 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5401 RISE 10-Callie 1710 19-9 68% 10 CA
5402 Cape Coast 10-Exporer 1710 12-2 86% 10 FL
5403 MM Aces 16-Adi s26 1710 22-1 96% 16 MI
5404 Big Sky 17-2 1710 25-20 50% 17 MT
5405 FLIGHT 15-Cole 1710 24-12 67% 15 MI
5406 TW Skyline 18 Royal 1710 18-15 55% 18 TX
5407 SVC NGV 14-Bogdan 1710 35-22 61% 14 GA
5408 Dig This! VBC 18-Ohana 1710 17-4 81% 18 NV
5409 All Set 14 Sela 1710 12-5 63% 14 AK
5410 BVC 14-1 1710 49-35 58% 14 MN
5411 808 Athletic Club 18-S dayne 1710 23-11 68% 18 HI
5412 808 Athletic Club 15-Gannon 1710 23-11 68% 15 HI
5413 417 MoJrs 15-Nat black 1710 34-15 69% 15 MO
5414 adidas DYNASTY 15-2 1710 4-2 67% 15 KS
5415 Mem Metro 15-Elite red 1710 42-18 70% 15 TN
5416 BVA 15-1 1710 8-3 73% 15 CA
5417 DVA 14 Elite 1710 32-15 68% 14 PA
5418 NVA 15-Premier luis 1710 58-17 77% 15 FL
5419 All In 15 Regional 1710 33-10 77% 15 AL
5420 WGVC 13-1 elite blue 1710 29-12 71% 13 FL
5421 Temecula Viper 16-1 jolynn/hannah 1710 21-8 72% 16 CA
5422 MATRIX 18 Elite 1710 30-9 77% 18 CA
5423 NSSC 11-Black 1710 25-7 78% 11 MO
5424 A-10 Black 15-Girls 1710 39-22 64% 15 PA
5425 SF Elite 17 Rachael 1710 24-27 47% 17 CA
5426 South County 12-Morgan 1710 17-13 50% 12 RI
5427 Iowa Impact 12-1 premier 1710 27-7 79% 12 IA
5428 X TEAM 12-Soldiers 1710 29-13 69% 12 CA
5429 LIKVBC 16 1710 35-15 70% 16 NY
5430 TUV 11-Blue 1709 8-0 89% 11
5431 Netforce 14-Lacey 1709 20-4 74% 14
5432 Dynamite Adidas 15-1 1709 26-29 47% 15 MI
5433 Legacy 12-2 adidas 1709 28-26 52% 12 MI
5434 DYNASTY 13 Gold 1709 29-25 54% 13 KS
5435 FVA 13-Ember - m 1709 11-3 79% 13 AK
5436 Flyers 12-Usa-charlie 1709 30-23 53% 12 TX
5437 Vaqueras 13-F roberto c 1709 20-7 74% 13 PR
5438 Prime 15-Adidas orange 1709 7-1 88% 15 CA
5439 Balance 17-White 1709 34-36 49% 17 IL
5440 First Flight VB 15-1 1709 30-9 77% 15 NC
5441 Ethos 13 Pandas 1709 34-13 72% 13 TN
5442 Spirit 14-Elite 1709 7-1 78% 14 OH
5443 Club Velocity 17-1 1709 25-16 61% 17 AR
5444 South County 17-Gio 1709 33-22 60% 17 RI
5445 Iowa Vibe 14-1 nike 1709 9-3 75% 14 IA
5446 BSVBC 15-Blue 1709 38-28 57% 15 IL
5447 AZ EVJ 15 Select 1709 34-25 58% 15 AZ
5448 SVA 14-Carmen 1709 40-23 63% 14 AZ
5449 WPVC 17-Armour orange 1709 42-43 49% 17 FL
5450 Synergy 14 Hurricane 1709 32-34 48% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.