Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 109 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5401 Madison 13-Chris 1711 9-15 33% 13 UT
5402 Spa City 12-Aqua 1711 27-8 77% 12 NY
5403 Cutthroat 14-1 1711 14-7 54% 14 MT
5404 SVBC Blazers 14 Parker 1711 46-14 77% 14 SC
5405 Alliance 12-Molten 1711 30-6 83% 12 TN
5406 Xcel VB 17-1 adidas 1711 38-25 60% 17 TX
5407 SFSVC 16-1 shirley 1711 42-17 71% 16 NM
5408 SOINE 14-1 1711 29-21 58% 14 KY
5409 PAEVA 18-Maroon 1710 38-16 70% 18 PA
5410 Inside Out 18-Mizuno black 1710 22-18 55% 18 MI
5411 HPRIME 18-Gold 1710 41-12 77% 18 TX
5412 OK Charge 18-Ua 1710 24-13 65% 18 OK
5413 Piedmont VBC 18-Retro 1710 17-17 50% 18 NC
5414 C2 14-2 regional blue wes 1710 11-5 69% 14 TN
5415 Balance 17-White 1710 34-36 49% 17 IL
5416 ACT 17-Henry 1710 34-27 56% 17 CA
5417 Stars Columbia 15 Tyler 1710 23-32 42% 15 SC
5418 MVA 15-Dayanna 1710 31-6 84% 15 FL
5419 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 15-National 1710 31-15 67% 15 ME
5420 SVC 18-1 (NV) 1710 13-3 81% 18 NV
5421 Synergy 14 Hurricane 1710 32-34 48% 14 PA
5422 Pohaku 15-1 1710 27-26 51% 15 KS
5423 Spa City 13-Aqua 1710 28-17 62% 13 NY
5424 Tropical Touch 15-Teine matalasi 1710 44-14 76% 15 CA
5425 Tenacity 14-1 1710 9-7 56% 14 MO
5426 TCVA 12-Green adidas 1710 35-16 69% 12 TX
5427 WPVC 17-Armour orange 1710 42-43 49% 17 FL
5428 SoCal Legends 16-Elite 1710 23-37 38% 16 CA
5429 WF Elite 18-Black 1710 7-4 58% 18 TX
5430 Red Storm 14 National 1710 41-27 60% 14 LA
5431 Legacy 12-2 adidas 1710 28-26 52% 12 MI
5432 WAVE 14-Hayden 1710 25-16 61% 14 CA
5433 AZ SKY 13-Blue 1710 41-38 52% 13 AZ
5434 Five Starz 12-Black suji 1710 25-9 74% 12 CA
5435 Laredo Premier 13-Force 1710 20-5 80% 13 TX
5436 FLIGHT 15-Cole 1710 24-12 67% 15 MI
5437 Mountain View Volleyball Club 12 MVVC Youth G 6-Spring 1710 7-1 88% 12 CA
5438 MADFROG 12-Elite green 1710 4-5 44% 12 TX
5439 Rhythm 12 Jackie 1710 36-18 65% 12 TN
5440 Arsenal 16-Gold 1710 26-19 54% 16 TX
5441 L2 16-1 1710 14-52 21% 16 MI
5442 Sunshine 16-South bay 1710 33-19 63% 16 CA
5443 SERV 14-Select 1710 33-9 79% 14 VA
5444 Heat 14-Black 1710 25-5 83% 14 WI
5445 LevelOne Sherwood 14-1 1710 48-16 75% 14 OR
5446 Madtown 17-1 select 1710 36-13 73% 17 WI
5447 EKJV 17-National 1710 10-5 67% 17 KY
5448 O4G Lights Out 17 1710 18-14 56% 17 TX
5449 GSI 17-Green venice 1710 10-17 37% 17 FL
5450 Shockwave 18 1709 23-10 70% 18 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.