2025-2026 Season — Page 108 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5351 | GRV 13-Black | 1712 | 30-19 | 61% | 13 | IN |
| 5352 | Buffalo Stampeders 13-1 | 1712 | 46-21 | 69% | 13 | FL |
| 5353 | CG 16-Blue | 1712 | 20-11 | 65% | 16 | WA |
| 5354 | Vital 17-1 gold | 1712 | 28-43 | 39% | 17 | MN |
| 5355 | SF Elite 17 Rachael | 1712 | 24-27 | 47% | 17 | CA |
| 5356 | Victory 15-National green | 1712 | 21-19 | 50% | 15 | TX |
| 5357 | LBK 13-1 | 1712 | 29-9 | 76% | 13 | OH |
| 5358 | TVVC 18-Teal | 1712 | 21-4 | 84% | 18 | OR |
| 5359 | BSVBC 15-Blue | 1712 | 38-28 | 57% | 15 | IL |
| 5360 | PREVA 17-Angel | 1712 | 12-5 | 71% | 17 | PR |
| 5361 | Omaha 18-Black | 1712 | 9-0 | 100% | 18 | CA |
| 5362 | BW Wave 17 | 1712 | 35-11 | 76% | 17 | MI |
| 5363 | Summit 14-Royal elite | 1712 | 36-11 | 77% | 14 | IN |
| 5364 | NASA 12-Purple cierra | 1712 | 25-9 | 74% | 12 | AL |
| 5365 | SI Wave 14-Black | 1712 | 36-10 | 77% | 14 | MO |
| 5366 | Holy Trinity Cruisers 14 | 1712 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | IA |
| 5367 | United 15-Black (SO) | 1712 | 22-11 | 67% | 15 | AL |
| 5368 | PCVC 16-Ansley | 1712 | 22-12 | 65% | 16 | NC |
| 5369 | BTownVBC 16-Red | 1712 | 24-19 | 56% | 16 | IN |
| 5370 | KIVA 18-White | 1712 | 34-22 | 61% | 18 | KY |
| 5371 | SVC NGV 14-Bogdan | 1712 | 35-22 | 61% | 14 | GA |
| 5372 | WVC Suzanne Gold 16-S | 1711 | 38-11 | 72% | 16 | UT |
| 5373 | FRVBC 13-Black | 1711 | 19-10 | 66% | 13 | CO |
| 5374 | SCVC 12-1 adam | 1711 | 19-1 | 95% | 12 | TN |
| 5375 | Victory 15-Nat'l green | 1711 | 6-3 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 5376 | Kairos 15-White | 1711 | 41-14 | 75% | 15 | SD |
| 5377 | OVVC 14-Green | 1711 | 19-5 | 79% | 14 | OH |
| 5378 | Paradigm Ruckus 15-S | 1711 | 44-25 | 61% | 15 | NY |
| 5379 | Mesa Juniors VBCO 14-Teal | 1711 | 12-5 | 63% | 14 | CO |
| 5380 | ZTV 16-1 select | 1711 | 26-16 | 60% | 16 | MT |
| 5381 | Cheetah West 16 | 1711 | 10-1 | 91% | 16 | NY |
| 5382 | Alliance 15-Regionalblack | 1711 | 13-3 | 81% | 15 | TN |
| 5383 | X TEAM 12-Soldiers | 1711 | 29-13 | 69% | 12 | CA |
| 5384 | E SOLID ROCK 12 CARDINAL | 1711 | 17-5 | 77% | 12 | TX |
| 5385 | NJ RONIN 18 KATANA | 1711 | 36-18 | 65% | 18 | NJ |
| 5386 | SPARKS VBC 16-Navy | 1711 | 38-16 | 70% | 16 | PA |
| 5387 | AVBC 15-Elite red | 1711 | 38-24 | 61% | 15 | MI |
| 5388 | Octane Volleyball Club 16 PENN YORK POWER | 1711 | 19-16 | 54% | 16 | NY |
| 5389 | Fission 15-Elite 1 | 1711 | 41-15 | 73% | 15 | GA |
| 5390 | FORZA1 NORTH 12-National | 1711 | 38-9 | 81% | 12 | CA |
| 5391 | Elevation 16-Timberline black | 1711 | 20-10 | 67% | 16 | CO |
| 5392 | KS Rise 17-1 | 1711 | 26-6 | 76% | 17 | KS |
| 5393 | Roncalli Juniors 13-1 | 1711 | 17-5 | 77% | 13 | IN |
| 5394 | Rockwood Thunder 17-White | 1711 | 41-25 | 62% | 17 | MO |
| 5395 | WAVE 13-Jose | 1711 | 29-12 | 71% | 13 | CA |
| 5396 | ARVC 14-Blue adidas | 1711 | 34-12 | 71% | 14 | NM |
| 5397 | MoCo MAVS 14-Red | 1711 | 32-23 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 5398 | Alliance 15-Premier | 1711 | 43-21 | 67% | 15 | TN |
| 5399 | NNJ 17 Jason | 1711 | 25-37 | 40% | 17 | NV |
| 5400 | Synergy 13 Ignite | 1711 | 33-22 | 60% | 13 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.