Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 108 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5351 HHVC 14-1 1711 18-4 82% 14
5352 Uno Girls 17 Elite 1711 28-23 55% 17 IL
5353 Madtown 11-1 select 1711 27-6 82% 11 WI
5354 Sunshine 16-South bay 1711 33-19 63% 16 CA
5355 SG ELITE 17-Rosh lauyrn 1711 18-4 82% 17 CA
5356 Rancho Valley 17-Select 1711 12-8 60% 17 CA
5357 704 Volleyball Club 13 1711 17-3 85% 13 NC
5358 Stars 17 Emma 1711 57-15 79% 17 SC
5359 AVC CLE 13-Red 1711 25-42 37% 13 OH
5360 Fearless Elite 13-1 1711 34-9 79% 13 AR
5361 2026 Nola Katherine/Bob 13-S 1711 41-19 68% 13 LA
5362 CT STARS 13-1 1711 6-1 86% 13 CT
5363 Advantage 18-Teal 1711 21-18 54% 18 NC
5364 ECVC 18-National - scott 1711 8-5 62% 18 VA
5365 MAVS KC 18-Elite 1711 4-4 50% 18 KS
5366 HP Illinois 18 Select 1711 21-15 55% 18 IL
5367 Anthem United 13-Agape 1711 14-8 64% 13 GA
5368 NJ RONIN 18 KATANA 1711 36-18 65% 18 NJ
5369 Net Force 14-1 elite 1711 20-4 83% 14 IL
5370 Sanford Sports 18-Red 1711 37-22 63% 18 SD
5371 UNION 16-Blue 1711 48-31 61% 16 CA
5372 Alliance 15-Regionalblack 1711 13-3 81% 15 TN
5373 Dead Frog 14-Black 1711 25-18 58% 14 MI
5374 HEAT 14 NATIONAL 1711 44-26 60% 14 OK
5375 949 14-Black 1711 32-23 58% 14 CA
5376 South County 14-Hallie 1711 15-10 50% 14 RI
5377 Impact 14-Black 1711 36-17 68% 14 TX
5378 LBK 13-1 1711 29-9 76% 13 OH
5379 BRYC 14 Royal 1711 44-21 68% 14 VA
5380 Roncalli Juniors 13-1 1711 17-5 77% 13 IN
5381 Madtown 17-1 select 1711 36-13 73% 17 WI
5382 Iowa United 15-1 premier 1711 24-6 75% 15 IA
5383 ClubOne 17 Gold 1711 38-10 79% 17 AZ
5384 Invasion 14-Black 1711 27-12 69% 14 MO
5385 CVBC 15-1s 1711 29-16 64% 15 VA
5386 Niagara Frontier 16-Red 1711 31-15 67% 16 NY
5387 Sideout 12-N rob 1711 29-10 74% 12 NJ
5388 Vision 12-Regional blue 1711 13-2 76% 12 CA
5389 ENCORE 12-Jeanette 1711 12-0 100% 12 CA
5390 MWS 12-Black 1711 27-7 79% 12 IL
5391 BAVC 12-Premier reza 1711 29-11 73% 12 CA
5392 OPVC 12-Sedgwick 1711 18-8 69% 12 OH
5393 1United 12-Elite blue 1711 34-12 68% 12 TX
5394 FAUCONS BLACK 15 1711 5-2 71% 15
5395 USA MI RunBird 16 1711 36-9 80% 16 MI
5396 Eleu 14-1 1710 12-12 50% 14
5397 AV 15-1 diamond 1710 6-2 75% 15
5398 GJ 11 SELECT 1710 45-17 73% 11 FL
5399 Laredo Premier 13-Force 1710 20-5 80% 13 TX
5400 Jr Vikings 14-Blue 1710 37-10 79% 14 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.