Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 108 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5351 GRV 13-Black 1712 30-19 61% 13 IN
5352 Buffalo Stampeders 13-1 1712 46-21 69% 13 FL
5353 CG 16-Blue 1712 20-11 65% 16 WA
5354 Vital 17-1 gold 1712 28-43 39% 17 MN
5355 SF Elite 17 Rachael 1712 24-27 47% 17 CA
5356 Victory 15-National green 1712 21-19 50% 15 TX
5357 LBK 13-1 1712 29-9 76% 13 OH
5358 TVVC 18-Teal 1712 21-4 84% 18 OR
5359 BSVBC 15-Blue 1712 38-28 57% 15 IL
5360 PREVA 17-Angel 1712 12-5 71% 17 PR
5361 Omaha 18-Black 1712 9-0 100% 18 CA
5362 BW Wave 17 1712 35-11 76% 17 MI
5363 Summit 14-Royal elite 1712 36-11 77% 14 IN
5364 NASA 12-Purple cierra 1712 25-9 74% 12 AL
5365 SI Wave 14-Black 1712 36-10 77% 14 MO
5366 Holy Trinity Cruisers 14 1712 6-0 100% 14 IA
5367 United 15-Black (SO) 1712 22-11 67% 15 AL
5368 PCVC 16-Ansley 1712 22-12 65% 16 NC
5369 BTownVBC 16-Red 1712 24-19 56% 16 IN
5370 KIVA 18-White 1712 34-22 61% 18 KY
5371 SVC NGV 14-Bogdan 1712 35-22 61% 14 GA
5372 WVC Suzanne Gold 16-S 1711 38-11 72% 16 UT
5373 FRVBC 13-Black 1711 19-10 66% 13 CO
5374 SCVC 12-1 adam 1711 19-1 95% 12 TN
5375 Victory 15-Nat'l green 1711 6-3 60% 15 TX
5376 Kairos 15-White 1711 41-14 75% 15 SD
5377 OVVC 14-Green 1711 19-5 79% 14 OH
5378 Paradigm Ruckus 15-S 1711 44-25 61% 15 NY
5379 Mesa Juniors VBCO 14-Teal 1711 12-5 63% 14 CO
5380 ZTV 16-1 select 1711 26-16 60% 16 MT
5381 Cheetah West 16 1711 10-1 91% 16 NY
5382 Alliance 15-Regionalblack 1711 13-3 81% 15 TN
5383 X TEAM 12-Soldiers 1711 29-13 69% 12 CA
5384 E SOLID ROCK 12 CARDINAL 1711 17-5 77% 12 TX
5385 NJ RONIN 18 KATANA 1711 36-18 65% 18 NJ
5386 SPARKS VBC 16-Navy 1711 38-16 70% 16 PA
5387 AVBC 15-Elite red 1711 38-24 61% 15 MI
5388 Octane Volleyball Club 16 PENN YORK POWER 1711 19-16 54% 16 NY
5389 Fission 15-Elite 1 1711 41-15 73% 15 GA
5390 FORZA1 NORTH 12-National 1711 38-9 81% 12 CA
5391 Elevation 16-Timberline black 1711 20-10 67% 16 CO
5392 KS Rise 17-1 1711 26-6 76% 17 KS
5393 Roncalli Juniors 13-1 1711 17-5 77% 13 IN
5394 Rockwood Thunder 17-White 1711 41-25 62% 17 MO
5395 WAVE 13-Jose 1711 29-12 71% 13 CA
5396 ARVC 14-Blue adidas 1711 34-12 71% 14 NM
5397 MoCo MAVS 14-Red 1711 32-23 58% 14 TX
5398 Alliance 15-Premier 1711 43-21 67% 15 TN
5399 NNJ 17 Jason 1711 25-37 40% 17 NV
5400 Synergy 13 Ignite 1711 33-22 60% 13 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.