Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 107 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5301 Momentous VBC 15-Taylor 1713 28-22 56% 15 CA
5302 Adversity 15-Prpl adidas 1713 37-19 66% 15 IL
5303 ETA1 15-Black 1713 25-14 61% 15 TX
5304 Colorado Juniors 14-Steve 1713 24-19 56% 14 CO
5305 WAVE 15-Dianne 1713 33-14 70% 15 CA
5306 Buffalo Stampeders 13-1 1713 46-21 69% 13 FL
5307 JJVA Club 13-A 1713 18-6 75% 13 FL
5308 LHV Girls 15-1 viragos 1713 29-24 55% 15 MA
5309 High Tide 15-Elite 1713 28-26 52% 15 FL
5310 AZ SKY 13-Blue 1713 41-38 52% 13 AZ
5311 Ballyhoo 17-Black 1713 47-25 65% 17 PA
5312 TCVA 12-Green adidas 1713 35-16 69% 12 CO
5313 NYC Juniors 12-Blue 1713 29-15 66% 12 NY
5314 MVP 12-National 1713 30-13 68% 12 TX
5315 AVA 12-Elite 1713 34-22 61% 12 NY
5316 Lincoln Athletic Position 16 1713 11-0 100% 16
5317 ND Elite 18-Goschen 1712 25-3 81% 18 ND
5318 Princeton 14-Black 1712 22-19 54% 14 NJ
5319 PREVA 17-Angel 1712 12-5 71% 17 PR
5320 HOU STELLAR 15-Premier 1712 36-22 62% 15 TX
5321 Alliance 15-Premier 1712 43-21 67% 15 TN
5322 TVC 13-Royal 1712 20-13 61% 13 OH
5323 Rockwood Thunder 17-White 1712 41-25 62% 17 MO
5324 Momentum Volleyball 18-Jen 1712 17-9 65% 18 CO
5325 EXCEL 16-National blue 1712 27-16 56% 16 TX
5326 Rise 16 National 1712 41-34 55% 16 CA
5327 HPRIME 18-Gold 1712 41-12 77% 18 TX
5328 Pohaku 15-1 1712 26-22 54% 15 KS
5329 Next Level 16-Lehua 1712 28-17 62% 16 CA
5330 Madison 13-Chris 1712 9-15 33% 13 CA
5331 Victory 13-National black 1712 21-16 53% 13 TX
5332 Zona VBC 17-Red 1712 20-14 59% 17 AZ
5333 MAVA 15-Elite 1712 55-32 63% 15 KY
5334 Jammers 16-Eddie 1712 27-26 51% 16 HI
5335 FRVBC 13-Black 1712 19-10 66% 13 CO
5336 501 Volley 13-2 national 1712 43-24 64% 13 AR
5337 MAVS 816 13-3 1712 12-3 67% 13 KS
5338 HPSTL 13-White 1712 41-23 62% 13 MO
5339 AEV 15-Club 1712 12-2 86% 15 TX
5340 AVA Texas 18-Adidas 1712 6-0 100% 18 TX
5341 Prospects VBA 11-Premier 1712 30-8 79% 11 IL
5342 Landshark 12-Black 1712 11-4 73% 12 KS
5343 Mt. Hood 12-1 timberline 1712 32-12 73% 12 OR
5344 Lions 12-Red 1712 23-15 61% 12 IL
5345 Upontop 12-National black 1712 28-6 82% 12 FL
5346 Hitt 12 Dale 1712 9-3 75% 12 MI
5347 Austin Velocity 16-2 emerald 1712 7-1 88% 16
5348 TI Elite 14-Ss allison 1712 26-11 70% 14
5349 Winman 18-1 1711 10-0 91% 18
5350 Iron VC 14-1 1711 16-3 84% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.