Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 107 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5301 Ka Ulukoa 14 Micah 1713 27-9 75% 14 HI
5302 Bay Area Eagles 14-1 1713 26-17 60% 14 CA
5303 GJ 11 SELECT 1713 45-17 73% 11 FL
5304 1st Alliance 17 Crimson 1713 35-13 73% 17 IL
5305 Little Red Volleyball Club 14 Little Red Blaze (XL) 1713 16-1 84% 14 NY
5306 SRS 13-Blue 1713 27-6 82% 13 SC
5307 Mill City 18-Orange 1713 20-19 51% 18 MA
5308 OCVC 15 Slunks 1713 36-25 59% 15 CA
5309 Lions 14 Indigo 1713 31-9 78% 14 IL
5310 SBVC Girls 13 Molten 1713 29-12 71% 13 CA
5311 MAVS 816 13-3 1713 12-3 67% 13 KS
5312 Sky High 14-Black 1713 36-38 48% 14 IL
5313 Victory 13-National black 1713 21-16 53% 13 TX
5314 MADFROG 17-N black enri 1713 6-4 60% 17 TX
5315 MAVS KC 11-1 1713 6-1 86% 11 KS
5316 SoCal VBC 17-Beacons 1713 30-31 49% 17 CA
5317 McAllen Fierce 18-1 1713 14-5 74% 18 TX
5318 SC Midlands 18-National r 1713 27-20 57% 18 SC
5319 Platinum 18 Apex 1713 22-14 61% 18 UT
5320 ACES 16 1713 9-1 90% 16 OK
5321 Shonto 16-S purple 1713 5-3 63% 16 CA
5322 ClubOne Volleyball 17-Gold 1713 38-10 79% 17 CO
5323 New WaveS 13-Madison 1713 43-13 77% 13 FL
5324 OK Charge 13 National 1713 41-19 67% 13 OK
5325 BBE Blaze 17-S 1713 10-1 91% 17 MN
5326 SA Elite 14-1 navy 1713 39-29 57% 14 TX
5327 Club Velocity 17-1 1713 25-16 61% 17 MN
5328 Montana Project Spikers 12 PROJECT SPIKERS BLACK (RM) 1712 17-5 65% 12
5329 SRVC Waves 16 1712 54-20 73% 16 MD
5330 Temecula Viper 16-1 jolynn/hannah 1712 26-11 70% 16 CA
5331 HHVC 14-1 1712 18-4 82% 14 CT
5332 SF Elite 12 Nono 1712 19-21 48% 12 CA
5333 McHenry C. Jr's 14-Select 1712 40-9 82% 14 IL
5334 Rockwall Heat 14-National 1712 5-4 56% 14 TX
5335 Five:1 12-Black 1712 26-15 63% 12 MI
5336 Mt. Hood 12-1 timberline 1712 32-12 73% 12 OR
5337 H Skyline 13-Black 1712 18-22 45% 13 TX
5338 adidas DYNASTY 15-2 1712 4-2 67% 15 KS
5339 MARIN 12-Black 1712 32-30 52% 12 CA
5340 LHV Girls 15-1 viragos 1712 29-24 55% 15 MA
5341 St. Croix Select 14 SC Select Navy (BG) 1712 22-2 92% 14 WI
5342 ABC Apollo 18-1 purple 1712 27-6 82% 18 OR
5343 417 MoJrs 15-Nat black 1712 34-15 69% 15 MO
5344 Fox Valley Performance 17 FVP G17/18u Midwest 1712 29-8 78% 17 WI
5345 SC Rockstar 18-Tawnee 1712 25-20 56% 18 CA
5346 Prospects VBA 11-Premier 1712 30-8 79% 11 IL
5347 Club Solano 16-Maroon 1712 36-29 55% 16 CA
5348 LV 14-Avoli 1712 31-20 61% 14 TX
5349 CTX Juniors 14-Mizuno 1712 32-26 55% 14 TX
5350 ROX 14 1712 25-7 78% 14 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.