2025-2026 Season — Page 106 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5251 | STEEL 17-Navy | 1714 | 12-7 | 63% | 17 | FL |
| 5252 | Rockwood Thunder 16-White | 1714 | 33-25 | 57% | 16 | MO |
| 5253 | New WaveS 16-Frankie | 1714 | 19-13 | 59% | 16 | FL |
| 5254 | MKE Sting 13-White | 1714 | 58-41 | 59% | 13 | WI |
| 5255 | Clarksville VBC 16 Liz | 1714 | 38-21 | 63% | 16 | TN |
| 5256 | HRVC Hurricanes 18-1 | 1714 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | ON |
| 5257 | Direction 14 Royal | 1714 | 39-13 | 75% | 14 | NC |
| 5258 | USA SOUTH 18-Premier purple | 1714 | 8-10 | 44% | 18 | FL |
| 5259 | MVBC 13-Red | 1714 | 30-10 | 75% | 13 | CA |
| 5260 | Xtreme 15-Usa cindy | 1714 | 27-10 | 73% | 15 | NJ |
| 5261 | DVC 14-Purple | 1714 | 20-3 | 87% | 14 | OH |
| 5262 | Club Fusion 14-Heat spring | 1714 | 12-1 | 92% | 14 | IL |
| 5263 | HVA Heat 14-Pink | 1714 | 31-15 | 67% | 14 | LA |
| 5264 | A5 Gwinnett 15-Jt | 1714 | 39-19 | 67% | 15 | GA |
| 5265 | 1United 13-N black | 1714 | 35-15 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 5266 | Monon 13-3r penguins | 1714 | 32-13 | 71% | 13 | IN |
| 5267 | Delta Valley 16-Blue | 1714 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 5268 | ND Elite 16-Gold | 1714 | 10-2 | 83% | 16 | ND |
| 5269 | Allegro 18-West | 1714 | 38-23 | 62% | 18 | NJ |
| 5270 | ACES 16 | 1714 | 9-1 | 90% | 16 | TX |
| 5271 | Sonics 16-1 | 1714 | 23-2 | 88% | 16 | MI |
| 5272 | Peake Volleyball Academy 16-Blue | 1714 | 8-0 | 100% | 16 | VA |
| 5273 | Seal Beach 15-Black | 1714 | 29-24 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 5274 | Princeton 18-Black | 1714 | 21-19 | 53% | 18 | NJ |
| 5275 | SoCal VBC 17-Beacons | 1714 | 30-31 | 49% | 17 | CA |
| 5276 | AZ REV 14 Elite | 1714 | 32-37 | 46% | 14 | AZ |
| 5277 | CTX Juniors 14-Mizuno | 1714 | 32-26 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 5278 | JET 14-Williams | 1714 | 27-23 | 54% | 14 | TX |
| 5279 | RIV 12-Black | 1714 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | |
| 5280 | Tstreet IE 12-Ali | 1714 | 24-20 | 55% | 12 | CA |
| 5281 | TOP NOTCH 12-Elite | 1714 | 26-7 | 76% | 12 | IL |
| 5282 | Omaha 18-Black | 1714 | 9-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 5283 | Shonto 16-S purple | 1714 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | |
| 5284 | SCVC 12-1 adam | 1713 | 19-1 | 95% | 12 | |
| 5285 | Northern Impact 14-Ua | 1713 | 21-2 | 91% | 14 | |
| 5286 | Aces Hawaii 18 | 1713 | 7-7 | 50% | 18 | HI |
| 5287 | Banzai 18-Select | 1713 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | NE |
| 5288 | Elevate 11-Blue | 1713 | 26-17 | 59% | 11 | TX |
| 5289 | Brazos Valley One 17 | 1713 | 27-14 | 66% | 17 | TX |
| 5290 | Arete 15-Navy ethos | 1713 | 20-13 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 5291 | LBK 17-1 | 1713 | 17-5 | 77% | 17 | OH |
| 5292 | MAVS KC 11-1 | 1713 | 6-1 | 86% | 11 | KS |
| 5293 | ROX 14 | 1713 | 25-7 | 78% | 14 | NC |
| 5294 | NC Coastal 18-Deshay | 1713 | 34-12 | 74% | 18 | NC |
| 5295 | Illini Elite 18-L red | 1713 | 18-6 | 75% | 18 | IL |
| 5296 | BW Wave 17 | 1713 | 35-11 | 76% | 17 | CA |
| 5297 | Clarksville VBC 17-Jenny r | 1713 | 35-21 | 61% | 17 | TN |
| 5298 | MADFROG 17-N black enri | 1713 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | TX |
| 5299 | MGA 17-South | 1713 | 38-18 | 68% | 17 | MA |
| 5300 | Miami Hype 15-Prime2 | 1713 | 53-33 | 62% | 15 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.