2025-2026 Season — Page 106 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5251 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 12-N rob | 1714 | 25-9 | 74% | 12 | NJ |
| 5252 | Momentous VBC 15-Taylor | 1714 | 28-22 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 5253 | Texas Fury 15-Impact | 1714 | 31-18 | 63% | 15 | TX |
| 5254 | BEVBC 15 Navy | 1714 | 42-22 | 64% | 15 | MD |
| 5255 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1714 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | KS |
| 5256 | CUVC 14 National | 1714 | 42-27 | 61% | 14 | NC |
| 5257 | Shakopee 14-1 | 1714 | 24-6 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 5258 | FVA 13-Ember - m | 1714 | 11-3 | 79% | 13 | AK |
| 5259 | Vision 12-Regional blue | 1714 | 13-2 | 76% | 12 | CA |
| 5260 | Utah Ice Volleyball Club 16 Utah Ice Mike | 1714 | 5-0 | 100% | 16 | UT |
| 5261 | TOP NOTCH 12-Elite | 1714 | 26-7 | 76% | 12 | MO |
| 5262 | Cap City 18-Reg diamonds | 1714 | 12-10 | 50% | 18 | MT |
| 5263 | Cajun Elite 18-S mya | 1714 | 12-5 | 71% | 18 | LA |
| 5264 | Monon 13-3r penguins | 1714 | 32-13 | 71% | 13 | IN |
| 5265 | Northern Lights 14-X | 1714 | 43-15 | 74% | 14 | MN |
| 5266 | GRV 12-Black | 1714 | 32-14 | 70% | 12 | IN |
| 5267 | Prime Volleyball 13 Prime SILVER | 1714 | 4-0 | 80% | 13 | UT |
| 5268 | AVA Texas 18-Adidas | 1714 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | NV |
| 5269 | MVBC 13-Red | 1714 | 30-10 | 75% | 13 | NJ |
| 5270 | MVP 15-Platinum | 1714 | 24-4 | 86% | 15 | OH |
| 5271 | Laker JO 15-S | 1714 | 21-6 | 78% | 15 | MN |
| 5272 | Uno Girls 17 Elite | 1714 | 28-23 | 55% | 17 | IL |
| 5273 | Brazos Valley One 17 | 1714 | 27-14 | 66% | 17 | TX |
| 5274 | Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 16-National | 1714 | 19-10 | 66% | 16 | ME |
| 5275 | Big Sky 16-3 | 1714 | 37-14 | 65% | 16 | MT |
| 5276 | HOVA 17 Nationals | 1714 | 46-18 | 72% | 17 | OH |
| 5277 | Rogue 12 GO | 1714 | 33-20 | 62% | 12 | OH |
| 5278 | OK Charge 14-American | 1714 | 29-13 | 69% | 14 | OK |
| 5279 | YQL SELECTS 16 | 1714 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | MT |
| 5280 | IVC 12 Home | 1714 | 9-8 | 50% | 12 | AK |
| 5281 | Mississippi MATRIX Volleyball 18-Elite | 1714 | 30-9 | 77% | 18 | AL |
| 5282 | Rice Lake Aces 14 Rice Lake Aces (BG) | 1714 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 5283 | USA SOUTH 18-Premier purple | 1714 | 8-10 | 44% | 18 | FL |
| 5284 | Rockwood Thunder 16-White | 1714 | 33-25 | 57% | 16 | MO |
| 5285 | AVC CLE 13-Red | 1714 | 25-42 | 37% | 13 | OH |
| 5286 | MN Royals 12-1 | 1714 | 10-2 | 83% | 12 | MN |
| 5287 | Next Level 16-Lehua | 1714 | 28-17 | 62% | 16 | NV |
| 5288 | Anthracite 18-Toni | 1714 | 12-0 | 100% | 18 | PA |
| 5289 | RISE 712-16-1 | 1714 | 20-6 | 77% | 16 | IA |
| 5290 | Dead Frog 14-Black | 1714 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | MI |
| 5291 | LBK 18-1 | 1713 | 15-9 | 63% | 18 | OH |
| 5292 | Yuba Elite VBC 14-Pink | 1713 | 48-18 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 5293 | MVA 16-Elite | 1713 | 25-13 | 57% | 16 | MT |
| 5294 | Paradigm Volleyball Club 16 Paradigm Rebellion | 1713 | 9-5 | 64% | 16 | NY |
| 5295 | Clarksville VBC 17-Jenny r | 1713 | 35-21 | 61% | 17 | TN |
| 5296 | CVA 10 | 1713 | 19-3 | 83% | 10 | LA |
| 5297 | Red Storm 13 National | 1713 | 39-21 | 65% | 13 | LA |
| 5298 | Aces Hawaii 18 | 1713 | 7-7 | 50% | 18 | HI |
| 5299 | Lady Strikers 14-Yellow | 1713 | 29-14 | 67% | 14 | CO |
| 5300 | REPUBLIC VC 14-1 | 1713 | 35-17 | 66% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.