Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 106 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5251 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 12-N rob 1714 25-9 74% 12 NJ
5252 Momentous VBC 15-Taylor 1714 28-22 56% 15 CA
5253 Texas Fury 15-Impact 1714 31-18 63% 15 TX
5254 BEVBC 15 Navy 1714 42-22 64% 15 MD
5255 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 18-1 1714 6-1 86% 18 KS
5256 CUVC 14 National 1714 42-27 61% 14 NC
5257 Shakopee 14-1 1714 24-6 80% 14 MN
5258 FVA 13-Ember - m 1714 11-3 79% 13 AK
5259 Vision 12-Regional blue 1714 13-2 76% 12 CA
5260 Utah Ice Volleyball Club 16 Utah Ice Mike 1714 5-0 100% 16 UT
5261 TOP NOTCH 12-Elite 1714 26-7 76% 12 MO
5262 Cap City 18-Reg diamonds 1714 12-10 50% 18 MT
5263 Cajun Elite 18-S mya 1714 12-5 71% 18 LA
5264 Monon 13-3r penguins 1714 32-13 71% 13 IN
5265 Northern Lights 14-X 1714 43-15 74% 14 MN
5266 GRV 12-Black 1714 32-14 70% 12 IN
5267 Prime Volleyball 13 Prime SILVER 1714 4-0 80% 13 UT
5268 AVA Texas 18-Adidas 1714 6-0 100% 18 NV
5269 MVBC 13-Red 1714 30-10 75% 13 NJ
5270 MVP 15-Platinum 1714 24-4 86% 15 OH
5271 Laker JO 15-S 1714 21-6 78% 15 MN
5272 Uno Girls 17 Elite 1714 28-23 55% 17 IL
5273 Brazos Valley One 17 1714 27-14 66% 17 TX
5274 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 16-National 1714 19-10 66% 16 ME
5275 Big Sky 16-3 1714 37-14 65% 16 MT
5276 HOVA 17 Nationals 1714 46-18 72% 17 OH
5277 Rogue 12 GO 1714 33-20 62% 12 OH
5278 OK Charge 14-American 1714 29-13 69% 14 OK
5279 YQL SELECTS 16 1714 4-1 80% 16 MT
5280 IVC 12 Home 1714 9-8 50% 12 AK
5281 Mississippi MATRIX Volleyball 18-Elite 1714 30-9 77% 18 AL
5282 Rice Lake Aces 14 Rice Lake Aces (BG) 1714 11-4 73% 14 WI
5283 USA SOUTH 18-Premier purple 1714 8-10 44% 18 FL
5284 Rockwood Thunder 16-White 1714 33-25 57% 16 MO
5285 AVC CLE 13-Red 1714 25-42 37% 13 OH
5286 MN Royals 12-1 1714 10-2 83% 12 MN
5287 Next Level 16-Lehua 1714 28-17 62% 16 NV
5288 Anthracite 18-Toni 1714 12-0 100% 18 PA
5289 RISE 712-16-1 1714 20-6 77% 16 IA
5290 Dead Frog 14-Black 1714 25-18 58% 14 MI
5291 LBK 18-1 1713 15-9 63% 18 OH
5292 Yuba Elite VBC 14-Pink 1713 48-18 73% 14 CA
5293 MVA 16-Elite 1713 25-13 57% 16 MT
5294 Paradigm Volleyball Club 16 Paradigm Rebellion 1713 9-5 64% 16 NY
5295 Clarksville VBC 17-Jenny r 1713 35-21 61% 17 TN
5296 CVA 10 1713 19-3 83% 10 LA
5297 Red Storm 13 National 1713 39-21 65% 13 LA
5298 Aces Hawaii 18 1713 7-7 50% 18 HI
5299 Lady Strikers 14-Yellow 1713 29-14 67% 14 CO
5300 REPUBLIC VC 14-1 1713 35-17 66% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.