Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 106 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5251 STEEL 17-Navy 1714 12-7 63% 17 FL
5252 Rockwood Thunder 16-White 1714 33-25 57% 16 MO
5253 New WaveS 16-Frankie 1714 19-13 59% 16 FL
5254 MKE Sting 13-White 1714 58-41 59% 13 WI
5255 Clarksville VBC 16 Liz 1714 38-21 63% 16 TN
5256 HRVC Hurricanes 18-1 1714 3-5 38% 18 ON
5257 Direction 14 Royal 1714 39-13 75% 14 NC
5258 USA SOUTH 18-Premier purple 1714 8-10 44% 18 FL
5259 MVBC 13-Red 1714 30-10 75% 13 CA
5260 Xtreme 15-Usa cindy 1714 27-10 73% 15 NJ
5261 DVC 14-Purple 1714 20-3 87% 14 OH
5262 Club Fusion 14-Heat spring 1714 12-1 92% 14 IL
5263 HVA Heat 14-Pink 1714 31-15 67% 14 LA
5264 A5 Gwinnett 15-Jt 1714 39-19 67% 15 GA
5265 1United 13-N black 1714 35-15 67% 13 TX
5266 Monon 13-3r penguins 1714 32-13 71% 13 IN
5267 Delta Valley 16-Blue 1714 26-20 57% 16 CA
5268 ND Elite 16-Gold 1714 10-2 83% 16 ND
5269 Allegro 18-West 1714 38-23 62% 18 NJ
5270 ACES 16 1714 9-1 90% 16 TX
5271 Sonics 16-1 1714 23-2 88% 16 MI
5272 Peake Volleyball Academy 16-Blue 1714 8-0 100% 16 VA
5273 Seal Beach 15-Black 1714 29-24 55% 15 CA
5274 Princeton 18-Black 1714 21-19 53% 18 NJ
5275 SoCal VBC 17-Beacons 1714 30-31 49% 17 CA
5276 AZ REV 14 Elite 1714 32-37 46% 14 AZ
5277 CTX Juniors 14-Mizuno 1714 32-26 55% 14 TX
5278 JET 14-Williams 1714 27-23 54% 14 TX
5279 RIV 12-Black 1714 9-1 90% 12
5280 Tstreet IE 12-Ali 1714 24-20 55% 12 CA
5281 TOP NOTCH 12-Elite 1714 26-7 76% 12 IL
5282 Omaha 18-Black 1714 9-0 100% 18
5283 Shonto 16-S purple 1714 5-3 63% 16
5284 SCVC 12-1 adam 1713 19-1 95% 12
5285 Northern Impact 14-Ua 1713 21-2 91% 14
5286 Aces Hawaii 18 1713 7-7 50% 18 HI
5287 Banzai 18-Select 1713 6-0 100% 18 NE
5288 Elevate 11-Blue 1713 26-17 59% 11 TX
5289 Brazos Valley One 17 1713 27-14 66% 17 TX
5290 Arete 15-Navy ethos 1713 20-13 53% 15 TX
5291 LBK 17-1 1713 17-5 77% 17 OH
5292 MAVS KC 11-1 1713 6-1 86% 11 KS
5293 ROX 14 1713 25-7 78% 14 NC
5294 NC Coastal 18-Deshay 1713 34-12 74% 18 NC
5295 Illini Elite 18-L red 1713 18-6 75% 18 IL
5296 BW Wave 17 1713 35-11 76% 17 CA
5297 Clarksville VBC 17-Jenny r 1713 35-21 61% 17 TN
5298 MADFROG 17-N black enri 1713 6-4 60% 17 TX
5299 MGA 17-South 1713 38-18 68% 17 MA
5300 Miami Hype 15-Prime2 1713 53-33 62% 15 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.