2025-2026 Season — Page 105 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5201 | KNVBC 18-1 shazam | 1716 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | KS |
| 5202 | Upontop 11-S | 1716 | 6-6 | 50% | 11 | FL |
| 5203 | YQL SELECTS 16 | 1715 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | |
| 5204 | CSDP Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1715 | 11-9 | 55% | 13 | |
| 5205 | ND Elite 17 Winter | 1715 | 14-4 | 78% | 17 | ND |
| 5206 | GRIT 15-GREEN | 1715 | 24-7 | 77% | 15 | AL |
| 5207 | Dinos 18-1 | 1715 | 5-8 | 38% | 18 | AB |
| 5208 | Alliance 12-Molten | 1715 | 30-6 | 83% | 12 | TN |
| 5209 | C2 14-2 reg blue wes | 1715 | 22-8 | 73% | 14 | TN |
| 5210 | C2 Sports 13 Crown | 1715 | 30-12 | 71% | 13 | TN |
| 5211 | HOVA 17 Nationals | 1715 | 46-18 | 72% | 17 | OH |
| 5212 | GRV 17-Black | 1715 | 34-30 | 53% | 17 | IN |
| 5213 | Pickens Impact 13-1 | 1715 | 22-7 | 76% | 13 | SC |
| 5214 | SC Legends 15-Nike | 1715 | 26-15 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 5215 | Rogue 12 GO | 1715 | 33-20 | 62% | 12 | OH |
| 5216 | SC Midlands 18-National r | 1715 | 27-20 | 57% | 18 | SC |
| 5217 | SMV 16-2 silver | 1715 | 52-18 | 74% | 16 | MN |
| 5218 | Wisconsin Ice 15 National | 1715 | 40-25 | 62% | 15 | WI |
| 5219 | 949 G16-Black | 1715 | 37-22 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 5220 | Kairos 15-White | 1715 | 41-14 | 75% | 15 | SD |
| 5221 | SCP 17-Corey | 1715 | 47-13 | 78% | 17 | SC |
| 5222 | RISE 712-16-1 | 1715 | 20-6 | 77% | 16 | IA |
| 5223 | Laker JO 15-S | 1715 | 21-6 | 78% | 15 | MN |
| 5224 | Heat 14-Black | 1715 | 25-5 | 83% | 14 | WI |
| 5225 | OT 17-O emily | 1715 | 43-35 | 55% | 17 | FL |
| 5226 | NPJ Seattle 16-Premier | 1715 | 50-24 | 68% | 16 | WA |
| 5227 | Next Level 18-1 | 1715 | 8-1 | 89% | 18 | CA |
| 5228 | Mill City 18-Orange | 1715 | 20-19 | 51% | 18 | MA |
| 5229 | Next Level 12-1 | 1715 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | CA |
| 5230 | NPJ Seattle 15-National | 1715 | 43-37 | 54% | 15 | WA |
| 5231 | MVA 16-Elite | 1715 | 25-13 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 5232 | Spa City 12-Aqua | 1715 | 27-8 | 77% | 12 | NY |
| 5233 | MN Royals 12-1 | 1715 | 10-2 | 83% | 12 | MN |
| 5234 | VCNebraska 15-Black | 1715 | 14-14 | 50% | 15 | NE |
| 5235 | Club V 17 | 1715 | 4-2 | 67% | 17 | UT |
| 5236 | Shaka 14-Elite | 1715 | 36-18 | 67% | 14 | |
| 5237 | SVC 18-1 (NV) | 1715 | 13-3 | 81% | 18 | |
| 5238 | Impact 15-Red ashley | 1715 | 33-20 | 62% | 15 | NV |
| 5239 | Wisconsin Elite 15-Red | 1715 | 43-27 | 61% | 15 | WI |
| 5240 | MoCo Jrs 13-Adidas | 1715 | 22-6 | 79% | 13 | TX |
| 5241 | Tropical Touch 15-Teine matalasi | 1715 | 44-14 | 76% | 15 | CA |
| 5242 | TeamLVC 17-Black | 1715 | 33-27 | 55% | 17 | NY |
| 5243 | Slainte 15-National | 1715 | 17-8 | 68% | 15 | CA |
| 5244 | Wichita Legacy 18-1 | 1714 | 12-6 | 52% | 18 | |
| 5245 | Clarksville VBC 16 Liz | 1714 | 38-21 | 63% | 16 | TN |
| 5246 | Sonics 16-1 | 1714 | 23-2 | 88% | 16 | MI |
| 5247 | Amarillo Xtreme 11-Wild cards | 1714 | 20-7 | 74% | 11 | TX |
| 5248 | M1 14-Blue | 1714 | 42-24 | 64% | 14 | TN |
| 5249 | AZ REV 14 Elite | 1714 | 32-37 | 46% | 14 | AZ |
| 5250 | CTX Juniors 14-Mizuno | 1714 | 32-26 | 55% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.