Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 105 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5201 ARVC 12-Black 1716 26-14 65% 12 NC
5202 Stars 17 Emma 1716 57-15 79% 17 SC
5203 Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 13 1716 51-37 57% 13 VA
5204 SVBC 14-Elite 1716 30-14 67% 14 IA
5205 CAVC 15 Elite 1716 33-32 51% 15 VA
5206 MCV 13-Elliott 1716 30-9 77% 13 NC
5207 Aus Velocity 16-2 emerald 1716 41-18 69% 16 TX
5208 EXCEL 16-National blue 1716 27-16 56% 16 TX
5209 CSVC 16-Blue 1716 34-10 77% 16 NC
5210 Illini Elite Tournaments 16 Athletic Position 1716 11-0 100% 16
5211 Hatillo Volleyball Club by Vaqueros 14 Hatillo Volleybal Club by Vaqueras 1716 3-4 43% 14
5212 PEPVB 14-Purple 1716 35-17 67% 14 GA
5213 High Tide 15-Elite 1715 28-26 52% 15 FL
5214 HVA Heat 14-Pink 1715 31-15 67% 14 LA
5215 Piedmont VBC 16-Nike 1715 38-26 59% 16 NC
5216 Pickens Impact 13-1 1715 22-7 76% 13 SC
5217 Crown City Sports Academy 13-Crown 1715 30-12 71% 13 CA
5218 MAVA 15-Elite 1715 55-32 63% 15 KY
5219 Titanas Morovis 12 Titanas Javier 1715 5-5 50% 12 PR
5220 NPJ Seattle 16-Premier 1715 50-24 68% 16 WA
5221 Manhattan Mayhem 16-1p 1715 7-2 78% 16 KS
5222 Sanford Sports 18-Red 1715 37-22 63% 18 SD
5223 ENCORE 11-Janet 1715 8-0 100% 11 CA
5224 Kali 11-F josé 1715 5-1 83% 11 PR
5225 Pulse 15-Black 1715 29-18 62% 15 CA
5226 Amarillo Xtreme 11-Wild cards 1715 20-7 74% 11 TX
5227 Club 1 12-Skronkstrong 1715 26-7 79% 12 IL
5228 UVC 14-Mehdi/farhad 1715 36-20 64% 14 CA
5229 SBVC Girls 15 Molten 1715 41-20 67% 15 CA
5230 JET 14-Williams 1715 27-23 54% 14 TX
5231 Renegades 18-1 1715 26-5 84% 18 VA
5232 CALI 17-Black 1715 23-31 43% 17 NY
5233 Pride Volleyball Academy 14-National 1715 31-17 65% 14 SC
5234 OK Charge 16-Nat'l tulsa 1715 32-14 70% 16 OK
5235 Mana Toa 13-Abby 1715 19-5 79% 13 AL
5236 Princeton 14-Black 1715 22-19 54% 14 NJ
5237 Rise Volleyball Club 16-National 1715 41-34 55% 16 CA
5238 NorCal 14-2 blue 1715 24-24 50% 14 CA
5239 Allegro 18-West 1715 38-23 62% 18 NJ
5240 SWMN 16-1 1715 3-0 100% 16 MN
5241 PAO Elevate 16-1 elijah 1715 21-6 78% 16 CA
5242 Winman 18-1 1715 10-0 91% 18
5243 MM Aces 16-Adi s26 1715 22-1 96% 16 MI
5244 Crossfire Volleyball 15-1 1715 36-28 56% 15 MN
5245 Colorado Skyline 16 Royal 1715 28-23 55% 16 CO
5246 Club Attack 14 Lauren 1714 14-2 88% 14
5247 New WaveS 16-Frankie 1714 19-13 59% 16 FL
5248 WGVC 13-1 elite blue 1714 29-12 71% 13 FL
5249 South County 12-Morgan 1714 17-13 50% 12 UT
5250 704 Volleyball Club 13 1714 17-3 85% 13 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.