Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 105 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5201 KNVBC 18-1 shazam 1716 7-2 78% 18 KS
5202 Upontop 11-S 1716 6-6 50% 11 FL
5203 YQL SELECTS 16 1715 4-1 80% 16
5204 CSDP Volleyball Club 13-1 1715 11-9 55% 13
5205 ND Elite 17 Winter 1715 14-4 78% 17 ND
5206 GRIT 15-GREEN 1715 24-7 77% 15 AL
5207 Dinos 18-1 1715 5-8 38% 18 AB
5208 Alliance 12-Molten 1715 30-6 83% 12 TN
5209 C2 14-2 reg blue wes 1715 22-8 73% 14 TN
5210 C2 Sports 13 Crown 1715 30-12 71% 13 TN
5211 HOVA 17 Nationals 1715 46-18 72% 17 OH
5212 GRV 17-Black 1715 34-30 53% 17 IN
5213 Pickens Impact 13-1 1715 22-7 76% 13 SC
5214 SC Legends 15-Nike 1715 26-15 63% 15 CA
5215 Rogue 12 GO 1715 33-20 62% 12 OH
5216 SC Midlands 18-National r 1715 27-20 57% 18 SC
5217 SMV 16-2 silver 1715 52-18 74% 16 MN
5218 Wisconsin Ice 15 National 1715 40-25 62% 15 WI
5219 949 G16-Black 1715 37-22 63% 16 CA
5220 Kairos 15-White 1715 41-14 75% 15 SD
5221 SCP 17-Corey 1715 47-13 78% 17 SC
5222 RISE 712-16-1 1715 20-6 77% 16 IA
5223 Laker JO 15-S 1715 21-6 78% 15 MN
5224 Heat 14-Black 1715 25-5 83% 14 WI
5225 OT 17-O emily 1715 43-35 55% 17 FL
5226 NPJ Seattle 16-Premier 1715 50-24 68% 16 WA
5227 Next Level 18-1 1715 8-1 89% 18 CA
5228 Mill City 18-Orange 1715 20-19 51% 18 MA
5229 Next Level 12-1 1715 6-3 67% 12 CA
5230 NPJ Seattle 15-National 1715 43-37 54% 15 WA
5231 MVA 16-Elite 1715 25-13 57% 16 FL
5232 Spa City 12-Aqua 1715 27-8 77% 12 NY
5233 MN Royals 12-1 1715 10-2 83% 12 MN
5234 VCNebraska 15-Black 1715 14-14 50% 15 NE
5235 Club V 17 1715 4-2 67% 17 UT
5236 Shaka 14-Elite 1715 36-18 67% 14
5237 SVC 18-1 (NV) 1715 13-3 81% 18
5238 Impact 15-Red ashley 1715 33-20 62% 15 NV
5239 Wisconsin Elite 15-Red 1715 43-27 61% 15 WI
5240 MoCo Jrs 13-Adidas 1715 22-6 79% 13 TX
5241 Tropical Touch 15-Teine matalasi 1715 44-14 76% 15 CA
5242 TeamLVC 17-Black 1715 33-27 55% 17 NY
5243 Slainte 15-National 1715 17-8 68% 15 CA
5244 Wichita Legacy 18-1 1714 12-6 52% 18
5245 Clarksville VBC 16 Liz 1714 38-21 63% 16 TN
5246 Sonics 16-1 1714 23-2 88% 16 MI
5247 Amarillo Xtreme 11-Wild cards 1714 20-7 74% 11 TX
5248 M1 14-Blue 1714 42-24 64% 14 TN
5249 AZ REV 14 Elite 1714 32-37 46% 14 AZ
5250 CTX Juniors 14-Mizuno 1714 32-26 55% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.