Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 104 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5151 NSSC 11-Black 1717 25-7 78% 11 MO
5152 LEVBC 18-National 1717 27-16 60% 18 MD
5153 Xtreme 15-Usa cindy 1717 27-10 73% 15 NJ
5154 Attack 15-Select 1717 20-28 42% 15 IL
5155 NITRO 15-Blue 1717 37-18 67% 15 TX
5156 Dig This! VBC 13-Black 1717 31-13 70% 13 NV
5157 SVA 12 1717 18-7 72% 12 NV
5158 Excel NW 18-2 gold 1717 34-14 71% 18 WA
5159 H. Skyline TW 18-1 1717 7-8 47% 18 TX
5160 RIV 12-Black 1717 9-1 90% 12 WY
5161 Shaka 14-Elite 1717 36-18 67% 14 AL
5162 QCA 15-Under armour black 1717 18-11 62% 15 MS
5163 High Voltage 15-1 1717 23-7 77% 15 MN
5164 501 Volley 11-2 regional 1717 26-7 79% 11 AR
5165 MVVC 18-Black 1717 44-19 70% 18 CA
5166 South County 13-Penina 1717 15-13 50% 13 UT
5167 KeAloha 14-1 jaws 1717 31-7 82% 14 IN
5168 TeamLVC 17-Black 1717 33-27 55% 17 NY
5169 HRVC 14-National green 1717 36-11 77% 14 NC
5170 Downstate 14-Cobras 1717 32-21 60% 14 NY
5171 AEV 11 American 1717 20-5 80% 11 TX
5172 MAVS KC 14-4 1717 14-2 74% 14 KS
5173 BVA 15-1 1717 8-3 73% 15 MN
5174 Slainte 14-Nationals 1717 22-11 67% 14 CA
5175 MAVS KC 12-2 1717 7-1 88% 12 KS
5176 NEVA 11-1 1717 20-6 77% 11 PR
5177 Nebraska Top Flight 15-1 monster 1717 8-1 89% 15 NE
5178 FA Elite 15-1 1717 17-7 71% 15 SD
5179 HEAT 15-Colin 1717 43-8 84% 15 FL
5180 Academy 15 Jade 1717 36-24 60% 15 NC
5181 Oak Creek K-Force 14 1716 35-11 74% 14 WI
5182 Concord 12-Stafford 1716 7-0 100% 12 IN
5183 Red Rock 15-Jamie - walnut creek 1716 31-24 56% 15 CA
5184 Elevate 11-Blue 1716 26-17 59% 11 TX
5185 SMV 14-3 silver 1716 49-14 78% 14 MN
5186 Spirit 12-Teal 1716 19-5 70% 12 IA
5187 Jammers 16-Eddie 1716 27-26 51% 16 HI
5188 ETA1 15-Black 1716 25-14 61% 15 TX
5189 HPSTL 13-White 1716 41-23 62% 13 MO
5190 Valley Heat 16-Black 1716 7-1 88% 16 NV
5191 Invasion 14-Black 1716 27-12 69% 14 MO
5192 Princeton 18-Black 1716 21-19 53% 18 NJ
5193 Elevation 14 Timberline 1716 38-25 60% 14 CO
5194 CSDP Volleyball Club 13-1 1716 11-9 55% 13 MO
5195 TX432 15-Gold 1716 34-15 67% 15 TX
5196 OVBC 11-Purple 1716 26-8 76% 11 WI
5197 SAND 12-Gold 1716 25-7 78% 12 CA
5198 Tsunami 15-1e trina 1716 30-25 55% 15 GA
5199 Club MVP 17-1 1716 47-17 72% 17 MO
5200 Club V 17 1716 4-2 67% 17 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.