Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 104 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5151 Next Level 17-1 johjans 1717 6-10 38% 17 CA
5152 Invicta 18-Kendzee 1717 40-17 69% 18 UT
5153 ID ONE 12-White 1717 10-3 77% 12 ID
5154 Temecula Viper 18-1 kurstan/natalie 1717 17-20 46% 18 CA
5155 SC Legends 12-Elite 1717 29-20 59% 12 CA
5156 OK Charge 18-Ua 1717 24-13 65% 18 OK
5157 Inside Out 18-Mizuno black 1717 22-18 55% 18 MI
5158 Mililani 15 1717 15-1 75% 15 HI
5159 MAVS KC 12-2 1717 7-1 88% 12 KS
5160 Holy Trinity Cruisers 14 1717 6-0 100% 14 IA
5161 TOVC 12-1 1717 5-2 71% 12 CA
5162 Rockwall Heat 14-National 1717 5-4 56% 14 TX
5163 AZ 3 17-Goddard 1717 9-1 90% 17 AZ
5164 Red Rock 15-Jamie - walnut creek 1717 31-24 56% 15 CA
5165 Downstate 14-Cobras 1716 32-21 60% 14
5166 Manhattan Mayhem 16-1p 1716 7-2 78% 16
5167 Iron Impact 16-1 1716 36-12 75% 16
5168 Cap City 18-Reg diamonds 1716 12-10 50% 18
5169 GRIT 13-Green 1716 23-4 82% 13 AL
5170 BRYC 15 Royal 1716 38-24 59% 15 VA
5171 CJVA 16-Black 1716 39-34 53% 16 NJ
5172 ATHENA VB 14-3 gold select 1716 33-16 67% 14 OR
5173 Impact 14-Al/jenna 1716 28-11 72% 14 MI
5174 OK Charge 16-Nat'l tulsa 1716 32-14 70% 16 OK
5175 ARVC 14-Blue adidas 1716 34-12 71% 14 NM
5176 Flight 16-1 black 1716 29-10 74% 16 MI
5177 FCA Force 17-1 laney 1716 25-13 66% 17 NC
5178 STVA 16-Navy 1716 52-16 76% 16 TX
5179 SMV 14-1 black 1716 51-23 69% 14 MN
5180 AEV 11 American 1716 20-5 80% 11 TX
5181 Legend 16 1716 33-25 57% 16 CA
5182 Ka Ulukoa 13 Tatiana 1716 29-12 71% 13 HI
5183 Invicta 15-Brooklynn 1716 37-26 59% 15 UT
5184 CMVBC 17 1716 13-4 76% 17 MO
5185 Sunshine 14-Elite 1716 21-22 49% 14 CA
5186 New WaveS 13-Madison 1716 43-13 77% 13 FL
5187 Academy 15 Jade 1716 36-24 60% 15 NC
5188 L2 15-3 1716 48-17 74% 15 MI
5189 CLUB STEEL 14-Navy 1716 24-12 67% 14 FL
5190 Club V CV 15-Jaicee 1716 10-9 53% 15 UT
5191 EXCEL 15-National gold 1716 38-20 61% 15 TX
5192 WF Elite 18-Black 1716 7-4 58% 18 TX
5193 Net Force 13-1 elite 1716 22-6 76% 13 IL
5194 Raptors 17-Kahea 1716 12-3 75% 17
5195 949 949 15-Black 1716 5-4 56% 15
5196 SWMN 16-1 1716 3-0 100% 16
5197 Starlings COLA 16-Blue 1716 6-1 86% 16
5198 Legit 13-G 1716 10-0 100% 13
5199 Concord 12-Stafford 1716 7-0 100% 12
5200 CUVC 14 National 1716 42-27 61% 14 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.