Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 104 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is TAV 16-Black yun with a 2270 Elo rating and 48-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5151 ASKYL 17-1 1644 6-2 75% 17
5152 DNVB 18-Red 1644 3-4 43% 18
5153 NIVA 13-WHITE 1644 28-14 67% 13 IN
5154 Boston United 13-National 1644 25-15 63% 13 MA
5155 Spa City 13-Aqua 1644 20-12 63% 13 NY
5156 SF TREMORS 13-Wolverines 1644 14-13 52% 13 CA
5157 OVBC 11-Purple 1644 26-8 76% 11 WI
5158 AZ REV 18 Elite 1644 19-34 36% 18 AZ
5159 MOVA UA 18-Gold 1644 39-13 72% 18 MO
5160 Galaxy 18 Patrick 1644 21-9 70% 18 NC
5161 Manhattan Mamba 18-1 1644 22-10 69% 18 KS
5162 Western Mass 16-Nala 1644 38-14 73% 16 MA
5163 Uno Girls 16 Elite 1644 21-17 55% 16 IL
5164 Club Sol 16-Pink 1644 25-22 53% 16 TX
5165 MoCo MAVS 15-Red 1644 18-17 51% 15 TX
5166 TVC 15 1644 13-13 50% 15 CA
5167 MAVS 816 12-1 1644 14-3 82% 12 KS
5168 TAV Houston 12 Royal 1644 19-5 76% 12 TX
5169 Elevate 12-Blue 1644 16-6 73% 12 TX
5170 NEVA 12-1 1644 12-4 75% 12 UT
5171 BSVBC 10-Black 1644 20-4 83% 10 IL
5172 Cape Coast 14 ATLANTIS 1644 25-10 71% 14 FL
5173 Fresno Heat HEAT 14-National ryan 1644 12-2 86% 14 CA
5174 Set'em Up! 14-2n 1644 20-5 80% 14 FL
5175 Big Sky 14-John 1644 6-3 60% 14 MT
5176 EVA 18 Gold 1644 24-11 69% 18 NJ
5177 Xtreme VBC 13 Adidas 1644 20-5 80% 13 CA
5178 Mana Toa 13-Abby 1644 19-5 79% 13 AL
5179 1United 13-N silver 1644 17-6 74% 13 TX
5180 KIVA 13-Grey 1644 26-9 74% 13 KY
5181 Ethos 13 Pandas 1644 29-12 71% 13 TN
5182 ADS Volleyball 11 Elite 1644 25-7 76% 11 TX
5183 LAVA 17 Matt 1644 21-4 84% 17 NC
5184 Vail Peak 17U Pink 1644 25-9 74% 17 CO
5185 DVA 17 Elite 1644 30-16 65% 17 PA
5186 Sandhills 17-Bri 1644 22-12 65% 17 NC
5187 USA South 17-Premier purple 1644 11-9 55% 17 FL
5188 SMASH 17-Focus 1644 23-22 51% 17 MA
5189 Skyline 17-Royal-ping 1644 3-4 43% 17 TX
5190 Apex 14-National red 1644 13-5 72% 14 MO
5191 Iowa Impact 14-1 elite 1644 26-25 51% 14 IA
5192 PI RAGE 14-1 gold 1644 22-6 79% 14 CA
5193 Shakopee 14-1 1644 22-6 79% 14 MN
5194 DR NET FORCE 14U 1643 11-1 92% 14
5195 MARIN 14-Green 1643 17-11 61% 14
5196 Downstate 15-Cobras 1643 29-18 62% 15
5197 HNLV 13-Black 1643 12-10 55% 13
5198 WVC Ashley Black 16-S 1643 19-3 86% 16
5199 FWFIRE 16-2 purple 1643 14-3 82% 16
5200 RVBC 14-White 1643 19-10 66% 14 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.