2025-2026 Season — Page 104 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5151 | NSSC 11-Black | 1717 | 25-7 | 78% | 11 | MO |
| 5152 | LEVBC 18-National | 1717 | 27-16 | 60% | 18 | MD |
| 5153 | Xtreme 15-Usa cindy | 1717 | 27-10 | 73% | 15 | NJ |
| 5154 | Attack 15-Select | 1717 | 20-28 | 42% | 15 | IL |
| 5155 | NITRO 15-Blue | 1717 | 37-18 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 5156 | Dig This! VBC 13-Black | 1717 | 31-13 | 70% | 13 | NV |
| 5157 | SVA 12 | 1717 | 18-7 | 72% | 12 | NV |
| 5158 | Excel NW 18-2 gold | 1717 | 34-14 | 71% | 18 | WA |
| 5159 | H. Skyline TW 18-1 | 1717 | 7-8 | 47% | 18 | TX |
| 5160 | RIV 12-Black | 1717 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | WY |
| 5161 | Shaka 14-Elite | 1717 | 36-18 | 67% | 14 | AL |
| 5162 | QCA 15-Under armour black | 1717 | 18-11 | 62% | 15 | MS |
| 5163 | High Voltage 15-1 | 1717 | 23-7 | 77% | 15 | MN |
| 5164 | 501 Volley 11-2 regional | 1717 | 26-7 | 79% | 11 | AR |
| 5165 | MVVC 18-Black | 1717 | 44-19 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 5166 | South County 13-Penina | 1717 | 15-13 | 50% | 13 | UT |
| 5167 | KeAloha 14-1 jaws | 1717 | 31-7 | 82% | 14 | IN |
| 5168 | TeamLVC 17-Black | 1717 | 33-27 | 55% | 17 | NY |
| 5169 | HRVC 14-National green | 1717 | 36-11 | 77% | 14 | NC |
| 5170 | Downstate 14-Cobras | 1717 | 32-21 | 60% | 14 | NY |
| 5171 | AEV 11 American | 1717 | 20-5 | 80% | 11 | TX |
| 5172 | MAVS KC 14-4 | 1717 | 14-2 | 74% | 14 | KS |
| 5173 | BVA 15-1 | 1717 | 8-3 | 73% | 15 | MN |
| 5174 | Slainte 14-Nationals | 1717 | 22-11 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 5175 | MAVS KC 12-2 | 1717 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | KS |
| 5176 | NEVA 11-1 | 1717 | 20-6 | 77% | 11 | PR |
| 5177 | Nebraska Top Flight 15-1 monster | 1717 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | NE |
| 5178 | FA Elite 15-1 | 1717 | 17-7 | 71% | 15 | SD |
| 5179 | HEAT 15-Colin | 1717 | 43-8 | 84% | 15 | FL |
| 5180 | Academy 15 Jade | 1717 | 36-24 | 60% | 15 | NC |
| 5181 | Oak Creek K-Force 14 | 1716 | 35-11 | 74% | 14 | WI |
| 5182 | Concord 12-Stafford | 1716 | 7-0 | 100% | 12 | IN |
| 5183 | Red Rock 15-Jamie - walnut creek | 1716 | 31-24 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 5184 | Elevate 11-Blue | 1716 | 26-17 | 59% | 11 | TX |
| 5185 | SMV 14-3 silver | 1716 | 49-14 | 78% | 14 | MN |
| 5186 | Spirit 12-Teal | 1716 | 19-5 | 70% | 12 | IA |
| 5187 | Jammers 16-Eddie | 1716 | 27-26 | 51% | 16 | HI |
| 5188 | ETA1 15-Black | 1716 | 25-14 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 5189 | HPSTL 13-White | 1716 | 41-23 | 62% | 13 | MO |
| 5190 | Valley Heat 16-Black | 1716 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | NV |
| 5191 | Invasion 14-Black | 1716 | 27-12 | 69% | 14 | MO |
| 5192 | Princeton 18-Black | 1716 | 21-19 | 53% | 18 | NJ |
| 5193 | Elevation 14 Timberline | 1716 | 38-25 | 60% | 14 | CO |
| 5194 | CSDP Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1716 | 11-9 | 55% | 13 | MO |
| 5195 | TX432 15-Gold | 1716 | 34-15 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 5196 | OVBC 11-Purple | 1716 | 26-8 | 76% | 11 | WI |
| 5197 | SAND 12-Gold | 1716 | 25-7 | 78% | 12 | CA |
| 5198 | Tsunami 15-1e trina | 1716 | 30-25 | 55% | 15 | GA |
| 5199 | Club MVP 17-1 | 1716 | 47-17 | 72% | 17 | MO |
| 5200 | Club V 17 | 1716 | 4-2 | 67% | 17 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.