2025-2026 Season — Page 103 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5101 | Cyclones 13-Paramount | 1719 | 40-7 | 83% | 13 | IL |
| 5102 | Mana Toa 18-Mose | 1719 | 28-7 | 80% | 18 | AL |
| 5103 | JET 12-Evers | 1719 | 17-7 | 71% | 12 | TX |
| 5104 | Rockwood Thunder 12-Navy | 1719 | 37-34 | 51% | 12 | MO |
| 5105 | Club 801 13-Club abby | 1719 | 17-10 | 55% | 13 | UT |
| 5106 | HP Illinois 18 Select | 1719 | 21-15 | 55% | 18 | MO |
| 5107 | Y Not 13-1 | 1719 | 20-5 | 80% | 13 | VA |
| 5108 | Illini Elite 17-White | 1719 | 40-18 | 69% | 17 | IL |
| 5109 | Fairfield 14-Gold | 1719 | 7-0 | 100% | 14 | CT |
| 5110 | House of Sports 13-Orange | 1719 | 24-3 | 89% | 13 | NY |
| 5111 | WAVE 14 Stingrays | 1719 | 33-5 | 87% | 14 | IN |
| 5112 | Net Force 14-1 elite | 1719 | 20-4 | 83% | 14 | IA |
| 5113 | Team Mystic 13u Onyx | 1719 | 54-9 | 83% | 13 | PA |
| 5114 | CLBRK 13-1 | 1719 | 12-3 | 80% | 13 | WI |
| 5115 | Net Force 13-1 elite | 1719 | 22-6 | 76% | 13 | IA |
| 5116 | JVC 14-2 | 1719 | 21-7 | 75% | 14 | IN |
| 5117 | LCVBC 16 | 1719 | 23-8 | 74% | 16 | WA |
| 5118 | AVC 12-1 (NO) | 1719 | 16-6 | 73% | 12 | MN |
| 5119 | Club One 18-Elite | 1719 | 18-6 | 72% | 18 | MO |
| 5120 | A5 Gwinnett 15-Jt | 1718 | 39-19 | 67% | 15 | GA |
| 5121 | Club SyrV 16-Premier | 1718 | 46-17 | 72% | 16 | NY |
| 5122 | NLVC 12-National | 1718 | 31-14 | 69% | 12 | TX |
| 5123 | NLV-Timberwolves 12u | 1718 | 11-0 | 100% | 12 | IA |
| 5124 | Spiketown VBC 18-1 | 1718 | 16-11 | 59% | 18 | OH |
| 5125 | MoCo Jrs 13-Adidas | 1718 | 22-6 | 79% | 13 | TX |
| 5126 | WAVE 15-Dianne | 1718 | 33-14 | 70% | 15 | CA |
| 5127 | COA 12-Hurricane | 1718 | 31-12 | 72% | 12 | IN |
| 5128 | Vital 15-1 gold | 1718 | 27-42 | 39% | 15 | MN |
| 5129 | 603 United VBC 14-Seacoast white | 1718 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | NH |
| 5130 | Impact 14-Al/jenna | 1718 | 28-11 | 72% | 14 | MI |
| 5131 | AJ 13-Gold | 1718 | 28-17 | 62% | 13 | LA |
| 5132 | 305VBC 13-S ruben | 1718 | 45-10 | 82% | 13 | FL |
| 5133 | USA South 18-Premier purp | 1718 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | FL |
| 5134 | Next Level 14-1 fonseca | 1718 | 7-15 | 32% | 14 | PR |
| 5135 | OPVC 17-Ricketts | 1718 | 24-40 | 38% | 17 | OH |
| 5136 | Mililani 14-S | 1718 | 35-7 | 83% | 14 | HI |
| 5137 | DCVA 12-Hong | 1718 | 17-14 | 55% | 12 | NM |
| 5138 | Impact Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1718 | 23-5 | 82% | 17 | MO |
| 5139 | Mavericks 14 Select | 1718 | 25-2 | 93% | 14 | MI |
| 5140 | CV Starlings 16-Marissa | 1718 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | CA |
| 5141 | Wisconsin Elite 15-Red | 1718 | 43-27 | 61% | 15 | WI |
| 5142 | East Texas 18-Black | 1718 | 7-5 | 54% | 18 | TX |
| 5143 | OP2 16-2 national | 1718 | 8-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 5144 | Aim High 15 Aim high Alicia / Lara | 1718 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | |
| 5145 | Forest City 16-1 sequoia | 1718 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | ON |
| 5146 | Legit 13-G | 1717 | 10-0 | 100% | 13 | IA |
| 5147 | RZVC 14-1 venom | 1717 | 28-5 | 85% | 14 | TX |
| 5148 | Dynamite Adidas 14-1 | 1717 | 34-23 | 60% | 14 | MI |
| 5149 | Dynamite Adidas 15-1 | 1717 | 26-29 | 47% | 15 | MI |
| 5150 | Slainte 15-National | 1717 | 17-8 | 68% | 15 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.