Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 103 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5101 Cyclones 13-Paramount 1719 40-7 83% 13 IL
5102 Mana Toa 18-Mose 1719 28-7 80% 18 AL
5103 JET 12-Evers 1719 17-7 71% 12 TX
5104 Rockwood Thunder 12-Navy 1719 37-34 51% 12 MO
5105 Club 801 13-Club abby 1719 17-10 55% 13 UT
5106 HP Illinois 18 Select 1719 21-15 55% 18 MO
5107 Y Not 13-1 1719 20-5 80% 13 VA
5108 Illini Elite 17-White 1719 40-18 69% 17 IL
5109 Fairfield 14-Gold 1719 7-0 100% 14 CT
5110 House of Sports 13-Orange 1719 24-3 89% 13 NY
5111 WAVE 14 Stingrays 1719 33-5 87% 14 IN
5112 Net Force 14-1 elite 1719 20-4 83% 14 IA
5113 Team Mystic 13u Onyx 1719 54-9 83% 13 PA
5114 CLBRK 13-1 1719 12-3 80% 13 WI
5115 Net Force 13-1 elite 1719 22-6 76% 13 IA
5116 JVC 14-2 1719 21-7 75% 14 IN
5117 LCVBC 16 1719 23-8 74% 16 WA
5118 AVC 12-1 (NO) 1719 16-6 73% 12 MN
5119 Club One 18-Elite 1719 18-6 72% 18 MO
5120 A5 Gwinnett 15-Jt 1718 39-19 67% 15 GA
5121 Club SyrV 16-Premier 1718 46-17 72% 16 NY
5122 NLVC 12-National 1718 31-14 69% 12 TX
5123 NLV-Timberwolves 12u 1718 11-0 100% 12 IA
5124 Spiketown VBC 18-1 1718 16-11 59% 18 OH
5125 MoCo Jrs 13-Adidas 1718 22-6 79% 13 TX
5126 WAVE 15-Dianne 1718 33-14 70% 15 CA
5127 COA 12-Hurricane 1718 31-12 72% 12 IN
5128 Vital 15-1 gold 1718 27-42 39% 15 MN
5129 603 United VBC 14-Seacoast white 1718 19-13 59% 14 NH
5130 Impact 14-Al/jenna 1718 28-11 72% 14 MI
5131 AJ 13-Gold 1718 28-17 62% 13 LA
5132 305VBC 13-S ruben 1718 45-10 82% 13 FL
5133 USA South 18-Premier purp 1718 5-3 63% 18 FL
5134 Next Level 14-1 fonseca 1718 7-15 32% 14 PR
5135 OPVC 17-Ricketts 1718 24-40 38% 17 OH
5136 Mililani 14-S 1718 35-7 83% 14 HI
5137 DCVA 12-Hong 1718 17-14 55% 12 NM
5138 Impact Volleyball Club 17-1 1718 23-5 82% 17 MO
5139 Mavericks 14 Select 1718 25-2 93% 14 MI
5140 CV Starlings 16-Marissa 1718 6-1 86% 16 CA
5141 Wisconsin Elite 15-Red 1718 43-27 61% 15 WI
5142 East Texas 18-Black 1718 7-5 54% 18 TX
5143 OP2 16-2 national 1718 8-0 100% 16
5144 Aim High 15 Aim high Alicia / Lara 1718 9-2 82% 15
5145 Forest City 16-1 sequoia 1718 3-4 43% 16 ON
5146 Legit 13-G 1717 10-0 100% 13 IA
5147 RZVC 14-1 venom 1717 28-5 85% 14 TX
5148 Dynamite Adidas 14-1 1717 34-23 60% 14 MI
5149 Dynamite Adidas 15-1 1717 26-29 47% 15 MI
5150 Slainte 15-National 1717 17-8 68% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.