Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 103 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5101 Grandlake 16-Stucke 1719 6-0 100% 16 OH
5102 CV Starlings 16-Marissa 1719 6-1 86% 16 CA
5103 Quicksets 14-Pink 1719 10-1 91% 14 HI
5104 Titans Atlas 16 1719 3-2 60% 16
5105 ESO 15-Elite navy 1719 24-20 55% 15 OH
5106 GCVC 13-Blue 1719 25-7 78% 13 OH
5107 Central Kansas Rampage 14-1 1719 12-1 86% 14 KS
5108 Ne Jrs 14-Gold 1718 12-7 63% 14
5109 NDVBC Wildfire 11 1718 8-1 73% 11
5110 CVA 18-Black 1718 30-25 55% 18
5111 AVC 12-1 (NO) 1718 16-6 73% 12
5112 Club SyrV 16-Premier 1718 46-17 72% 16 NY
5113 Eastside 12-Steven 1718 26-6 81% 12 NC
5114 MCV 13-Elliott 1718 30-9 77% 13 NC
5115 Southwest 16-N courtney 1718 32-27 54% 16 OH
5116 TNT 15 Mambas 1718 17-25 40% 15 PA
5117 ABC Apollo 18-1 purple 1718 27-6 82% 18 OR
5118 Next Level 14-1 fonseca 1718 7-15 32% 14 CA
5119 Athena 18-1 1718 13-3 81% 18 OR
5120 RVJ 15-Nationals 1718 29-37 44% 15 VA
5121 305VBC 13-S ruben 1718 45-10 82% 13 FL
5122 Spa City 13-Aqua 1718 28-17 62% 13 NY
5123 VCN 15-Blue 1718 12-3 80% 15 NE
5124 Club MVP 17-1 1718 47-17 72% 17 MO
5125 MVP 15-Platinum 1718 24-4 86% 15 OH
5126 McAllen Fierce 18-1 1718 14-5 74% 18 TX
5127 ATOM 13-Red 1718 43-20 68% 13 FL
5128 Five:1 12-Black 1718 26-15 63% 12 MI
5129 OP2 16-2 national 1718 8-0 100% 16
5130 AZ REV 15 Elite (LA) 1718 6-1 86% 15
5131 NLV-Timberwolves 12u 1718 11-0 100% 12
5132 Roots 17-1 green 1718 33-27 55% 17 IA
5133 HOS 13-Orange 1718 28-4 88% 13 NY
5134 Mizuno Northern Lights 14-R 1717 6-0 100% 14
5135 MADFROG 12-Elite green 1717 4-5 44% 12 TX
5136 Northern Lights 14-W 1717 36-16 69% 14 MN
5137 Excel NW 18-2 gold 1717 34-14 71% 18 WA
5138 AZ Sky 12-Gold 1717 38-35 52% 12 AZ
5139 Blue Royals 13 Ruby 1717 37-25 60% 13 WA
5140 DCVA 12-Hong 1717 17-14 55% 12 NM
5141 High Voltage 15-1 1717 23-7 77% 15 MN
5142 NASA BHM 17-PURPLE 1717 28-29 49% 17 AL
5143 PAO Elevate 16-1 elijah 1717 21-6 78% 16 CA
5144 SVBC Blazers 14 Parker 1717 46-14 77% 14 SC
5145 Vision 17-Blue 1717 29-35 45% 17 CA
5146 501 Volley 11-2 regional 1717 26-7 79% 11 AR
5147 Kairos 13 Beta 1717 38-21 64% 13 SD
5148 Inspire CLE 12 Sunrise 1717 35-8 81% 12 OH
5149 Amarillo Xtreme 13-Surge 1717 15-10 60% 13 TX
5150 TN Elite 14-Black 1717 13-4 76% 14 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.