Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 102 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5051 Mill City 17-Orange 1720 25-17 60% 17 MA
5052 TAV 18-Blue 1720 26-15 62% 18 TX
5053 OPVC 17-Ricketts 1720 24-40 38% 17 OH
5054 1United 13-N silver 1720 30-9 71% 13 TX
5055 RCVC 17-1 1720 8-4 67% 17 AL
5056 Northern Lights 16-W 1720 48-20 71% 16 MN
5057 AVC 11-Navy 1720 18-9 60% 11 VA
5058 H Skyline 18-Black 1720 23-21 52% 18 TX
5059 DG Warriors 15-Gold 1720 48-16 75% 15 OH
5060 OK PEAK 14-1 1720 5-3 63% 14
5061 Henderson Maniacs 15 1720 10-1 91% 15
5062 Shonto 16-S pink 1720 6-1 86% 16
5063 FIELU 13 1720 21-5 81% 13
5064 FAV 15 Phoenix 1720 25-9 74% 15 CA
5065 OT 11-T cici 1720 33-18 65% 11 FL
5066 Slainte 14-Nationals 1720 22-11 67% 14 CA
5067 Blue Banner BBV 15-Harry & angie 1720 7-1 88% 15 CA
5068 Sky High 15-Alderson 1720 11-1 92% 15 IL
5069 NITRO 15-Blue 1719 37-18 67% 15
5070 SVVC 17 1719 10-1 91% 17
5071 GVC 14-Black 1719 28-28 50% 14
5072 CUVC 16-N1 1719 29-17 63% 16 NC
5073 SERV 14-Select 1719 33-9 79% 14 VA
5074 Alliance 14-Premier 1719 32-10 76% 14 TN
5075 Seal Beach 14-Blue 1719 26-12 68% 14 CA
5076 SI Wave 14-Black 1719 36-10 77% 14 IL
5077 Rocky Elite 14 National 1719 51-24 68% 14 CO
5078 ClubRedVB WI 14-Red 1719 24-10 71% 14 WI
5079 NPJ Portland 14 National 1719 37-30 55% 14 OR
5080 SG Elite 14-Excel 1719 30-16 65% 14 CA
5081 KOKUA 14-1 1719 20-12 63% 14 WA
5082 DCVA 16-Cali 1719 24-19 56% 16 NM
5083 ATHENA VB 16-2 black national 1719 50-29 63% 16 OR
5084 Cape Coast 12 CASSINI 1719 30-25 55% 12 FL
5085 COVC 17-Nationals 1719 10-17 37% 17 OR
5086 COA 12-Hurricane 1719 31-12 72% 12 IN
5087 High Line 13 Aspiring 1719 34-8 77% 13 PA
5088 ROCK Volleyball 16-Sky 1719 31-37 46% 16 PA
5089 RVC 16 Zonal 1719 51-20 72% 16 VA
5090 TVVC 18-Teal 1719 21-4 84% 18 OR
5091 VEVA 15 Elite 1719 43-17 72% 15 FL
5092 Academy North 16-National 1719 31-35 47% 16 CA
5093 Rockwood Thunder 12-Navy 1719 37-34 51% 12 MO
5094 LEVBC 18-National 1719 27-16 60% 18 MD
5095 NEVA 12-1 1719 12-4 75% 12 UT
5096 Big Sky 16-3 1719 37-14 65% 16 MT
5097 JET 12-Evers 1719 17-7 71% 12 TX
5098 Husky 16-Northeast red 1719 21-16 57% 16 CT
5099 Legacy 13-3 adidas 1719 35-20 64% 13 MI
5100 Kulia 16-S 1719 8-3 73% 16 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.