Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 102 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5051 Vaqueras 13-F roberto c 1720 20-7 74% 13 PR
5052 Club Serve 15-1 1720 9-1 90% 15 MO
5053 Rocky Elite 14 National 1720 51-24 68% 14 CO
5054 SWI3D 18-Black 1720 20-5 80% 18 NE
5055 FaR Out 15 Steel 1720 36-9 80% 15 MI
5056 Seal Beach 14-Blue 1720 26-12 68% 14 CA
5057 Performance Juniors 16-1 1720 58-18 76% 16 VA
5058 Club Velocity 12-1 1720 39-12 76% 12 MN
5059 CVC 12-Blue 1720 30-19 61% 12 OH
5060 H Skyline 14-White 1720 20-14 57% 14 TX
5061 Fearless Elite 12-1 1720 31-7 79% 12 AR
5062 EMV 12-Black ellen 1720 28-11 68% 12 TX
5063 Beach South 17-1 1720 9-0 100% 17 GA
5064 Texas One 14-Royal 1720 28-18 61% 14 TX
5065 H Skyline 18-Black 1720 23-21 52% 18 TX
5066 Quicksets 14-Pink 1720 10-1 91% 14 HI
5067 South Central NE 12-Black 1720 14-5 74% 12 NE
5068 ESVC 18 1720 23-9 72% 18 AL
5069 Royal Legends 15-Orange 1720 42-16 72% 15 PA
5070 Invicta 18-Kendzee 1720 40-17 69% 18 UT
5071 FCA Force 17-1 laney 1720 25-13 66% 17 NC
5072 NE Elite 17-Surge 1720 29-15 66% 17 NE
5073 BVC 16-1 1720 21-12 64% 16 MN
5074 Aspire NW 14-1 beaverton 1720 33-19 63% 14 OR
5075 949 G16-Black 1720 37-22 63% 16 CA
5076 Synergy 18 Kryptonium 1720 33-25 57% 18 PA
5077 1United 14-N black 1720 29-22 55% 14 TX
5078 Seal Beach 15-Black 1720 29-24 55% 15 CA
5079 SAND 16-Gold 1720 21-18 54% 16 CA
5080 Upontop 11-S 1720 6-6 50% 11 FL
5081 FORZA1 16 ONE 1720 30-31 49% 16 CA
5082 Victory 16-National black 1720 23-25 46% 16 TX
5083 COVC 17-Nationals 1720 10-17 37% 17 OR
5084 MKE Sting 13-White 1719 58-41 59% 13 WI
5085 Core St. Louis 15-1 1719 6-2 75% 15 MO
5086 Tstreet IE 12-Ali 1719 24-20 55% 12 CA
5087 Next Level 17-1 johjans 1719 6-10 38% 17 PR
5088 WEVBC 15-1 1719 38-18 68% 15 GA
5089 Kokoro Volleyball 14-2 1719 66-37 64% 14 MN
5090 Flight 16-1 black 1719 29-10 74% 16 MI
5091 Blue Banner BBV 15-Harry & angie 1719 7-1 88% 15 CA
5092 OT 11-T cici 1719 33-18 65% 11 FL
5093 SPORTING EDGE 17-Armour 1719 36-18 67% 17 TX
5094 Blue Royals 13 Ruby 1719 37-25 60% 13 WA
5095 Vision 17-Blue 1719 29-35 45% 17 CA
5096 Southwest 16-N courtney 1719 32-27 54% 16 OH
5097 MGA VBC 16-South 1719 31-15 67% 16 MA
5098 SG Elite 14-Excel 1719 30-16 65% 14 CA
5099 OT 17-O emily 1719 43-35 55% 17 FL
5100 Miami Hype 15-Prime2 1719 53-33 62% 15 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.