2025-2026 Season — Page 101 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5001 | TVS 10 Sophie | 1722 | 12-2 | 86% | 10 | TX |
| 5002 | Huskies 14-Premier | 1722 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | SK |
| 5003 | TAV 18-Blue | 1721 | 26-15 | 62% | 18 | TX |
| 5004 | AP 17 Baden | 1721 | 31-29 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 5005 | Apex Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1721 | 5-1 | 71% | 14 | MO |
| 5006 | MN North 14-1 navy | 1721 | 60-24 | 71% | 14 | MN |
| 5007 | CJV 16-National | 1721 | 39-8 | 83% | 16 | AR |
| 5008 | AVC 11-Navy | 1721 | 18-9 | 60% | 11 | FL |
| 5009 | Ultimate 12-Gold | 1721 | 33-17 | 66% | 12 | IL |
| 5010 | Alamo 17-Elite 1 | 1721 | 33-24 | 58% | 17 | TX |
| 5011 | Club 1 14-Skronkstrong | 1721 | 26-18 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 5012 | Amarillo Xtreme 14-Premier | 1721 | 18-5 | 78% | 14 | TX |
| 5013 | GSVC 13-Black | 1721 | 10-12 | 45% | 13 | NH |
| 5014 | Pgh Elite 12-Black | 1721 | 6-5 | 55% | 12 | PA |
| 5015 | MODE 14 National | 1721 | 35-20 | 64% | 14 | WA |
| 5016 | Texas Serve 16-S gold | 1721 | 41-13 | 76% | 16 | TX |
| 5017 | WB 18 National | 1721 | 22-2 | 92% | 18 | MO |
| 5018 | Minnesota Iron Impact 15 | 1721 | 5-0 | 100% | 15 | MN |
| 5019 | EPIC FLB 17 | 1721 | 10-0 | 91% | 17 | OH |
| 5020 | NPJ Seattle 15-National | 1721 | 43-37 | 54% | 15 | WA |
| 5021 | MVSA 16 Shockwave | 1721 | 47-20 | 68% | 16 | MD |
| 5022 | Shonto 16-S pink | 1721 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | CA |
| 5023 | Trivolley 11-1trinidad | 1721 | 11-6 | 65% | 11 | PR |
| 5024 | SPARKS VBC 15 NAVY | 1721 | 40-14 | 74% | 15 | PA |
| 5025 | REFINE 17 Refine Sheats (SO) | 1721 | 12-1 | 80% | 17 | AL |
| 5026 | NPJ Portland 14 National | 1721 | 37-30 | 55% | 14 | OR |
| 5027 | Dead Frog 13-Devin | 1721 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | MI |
| 5028 | Rapid Fire 17-Black | 1721 | 17-9 | 65% | 17 | IL |
| 5029 | Dynasty 15-Gray | 1721 | 25-18 | 58% | 15 | KS |
| 5030 | Elevation 18-Bp | 1721 | 27-14 | 66% | 18 | OH |
| 5031 | 501 Volley 18-1 national | 1721 | 32-18 | 64% | 18 | AR |
| 5032 | GRV 17-Black | 1721 | 34-30 | 53% | 17 | IN |
| 5033 | Eastside 12-Steven | 1721 | 26-6 | 81% | 12 | NC |
| 5034 | Sky High 15-Alderson | 1721 | 11-1 | 92% | 15 | IL |
| 5035 | Latitude 41 Volleyball Club 12 12 Elite (OV) | 1721 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | OH |
| 5036 | Battle Volleyball Club 14-Jason and laura | 1721 | 62-27 | 68% | 14 | VA |
| 5037 | ENCORE 14-White | 1721 | 45-12 | 79% | 14 | CA |
| 5038 | Sandhills 15-Amber | 1721 | 29-16 | 64% | 15 | NC |
| 5039 | NASA BHM 17-PURPLE | 1721 | 28-29 | 49% | 17 | AL |
| 5040 | 949 949 15-Black | 1721 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | NV |
| 5041 | L2 15-3 | 1721 | 48-17 | 74% | 15 | MI |
| 5042 | C2 16-2 regional blue | 1720 | 36-14 | 72% | 16 | TN |
| 5043 | SCP 17-Corey | 1720 | 47-13 | 78% | 17 | SC |
| 5044 | RVC 16 Zonal | 1720 | 51-20 | 72% | 16 | VA |
| 5045 | Impact 14-Black | 1720 | 36-17 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 5046 | VEVA 15 Elite | 1720 | 43-17 | 72% | 15 | FL |
| 5047 | Mana Toa 15-Nichole | 1720 | 19-9 | 68% | 15 | AL |
| 5048 | MOJO Elite Volleyball 15-Black | 1720 | 41-16 | 72% | 15 | VA |
| 5049 | GCVC 13-Blue | 1720 | 25-7 | 78% | 13 | OH |
| 5050 | JVA 12-Black | 1720 | 13-1 | 93% | 12 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.