Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 101 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5001 LTX SELECT 12-Yellow 1721 18-8 69% 12 TX
5002 Tstreet LV 14-Jenn 1721 28-25 53% 14 NV
5003 SMASH 13-S 1721 22-23 49% 13 MA
5004 FCA Volleyball 18-1 1721 19-12 61% 18 CO
5005 Country Fire 15-1 1721 35-12 74% 15 TX
5006 NYC Juniors 14-Blue 1721 27-23 54% 14 NY
5007 Elevate 15-Silver 1721 27-20 50% 15 TX
5008 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Premier 1721 18-5 78% 14 TX
5009 Texas One 14-Royal 1721 28-18 61% 14 TX
5010 HEAT 15-Colin 1721 43-8 84% 15 FL
5011 Sports Academy VBC 15-Premier 1721 6-18 25% 15 CA
5012 Sky High 14-Black 1721 36-38 48% 14 IL
5013 Tsunami 15-1e aau andressa 1721 12-2 86% 15 GA
5014 Tsunami 17-1e aau trung 1721 9-3 75% 17 GA
5015 NDVBC Shockwave 13 1721 22-4 85% 13
5016 PVBC 15-1 1721 6-1 86% 15
5017 PITSTOP 13-99 1721 8-1 89% 13
5018 WAJ Northside 13-Storm 1721 14-3 74% 13
5019 CG 16-Blue 1721 13-4 76% 16 TX
5020 SCVC 14-Erika/roger 1720 7-1 88% 14
5021 Junior BIsons 15-Gold 1720 6-2 75% 15
5022 South Central NE 12-Black 1720 14-5 74% 12
5023 Victory 16-National black 1720 23-25 46% 16 TX
5024 Sky High Adidas 18 Elite 1720 18-19 49% 18 IL
5025 Club V 18 Nicole 1720 27-16 63% 18 UT
5026 ARVC 12-Black 1720 26-14 65% 12 NC
5027 Club Serve 15-1 1720 9-1 90% 15 TX
5028 CJVA 14-Black 1720 50-38 57% 14 NJ
5029 ESVC 16-Black 1720 31-9 78% 16 AL
5030 GRV 13-Black 1720 30-19 61% 13 IN
5031 MVSA 16 Shockwave 1720 47-20 68% 16 MD
5032 Mavericks 14 Select 1720 25-2 93% 14 MI
5033 PEPVB 14-Purple 1720 35-17 67% 14 GA
5034 SC Legends 11-Elite 1720 36-14 72% 11 CA
5035 Stars 17 Book 1720 42-24 64% 17 SC
5036 Synergy 18 Kryptonium 1720 33-25 57% 18 CA
5037 TVS 11 Mel 1720 14-1 82% 11 TX
5038 TX LEGACY 17-Elite 1720 37-22 63% 17 TX
5039 Academy North 14-National 1720 18-35 34% 14 CA
5040 Drive Nation 17-Black 1720 10-11 48% 17 TX
5041 417 MoJrs 15-Elite 1720 19-11 63% 15 MO
5042 Juggernaut 13-Regional1 1720 38-18 68% 13 CO
5043 JCVC 14-C 1720 22-6 79% 14 TN
5044 Elevation 16-Timberline red 1720 32-17 65% 16 CO
5045 Vision 13-White 1720 34-17 67% 13 CA
5046 SG Elite 14-Elite leilani 1720 32-7 82% 14 CA
5047 C1VB 16-One 1720 7-7 50% 16 SC
5048 Elite Alliance 15-1 1720 11-3 79% 15 SD
5049 GO Volley 16-N 1720 18-26 41% 16 VA
5050 SCBandits 16-1 1720 10-6 63% 16 ON
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.