Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 101 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
5001 TVS 10 Sophie 1722 12-2 86% 10 TX
5002 Huskies 14-Premier 1722 6-1 86% 14 SK
5003 TAV 18-Blue 1721 26-15 62% 18 TX
5004 AP 17 Baden 1721 31-29 52% 17 TX
5005 Apex Volleyball Club 14-1 1721 5-1 71% 14 MO
5006 MN North 14-1 navy 1721 60-24 71% 14 MN
5007 CJV 16-National 1721 39-8 83% 16 AR
5008 AVC 11-Navy 1721 18-9 60% 11 FL
5009 Ultimate 12-Gold 1721 33-17 66% 12 IL
5010 Alamo 17-Elite 1 1721 33-24 58% 17 TX
5011 Club 1 14-Skronkstrong 1721 26-18 59% 14 IL
5012 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Premier 1721 18-5 78% 14 TX
5013 GSVC 13-Black 1721 10-12 45% 13 NH
5014 Pgh Elite 12-Black 1721 6-5 55% 12 PA
5015 MODE 14 National 1721 35-20 64% 14 WA
5016 Texas Serve 16-S gold 1721 41-13 76% 16 TX
5017 WB 18 National 1721 22-2 92% 18 MO
5018 Minnesota Iron Impact 15 1721 5-0 100% 15 MN
5019 EPIC FLB 17 1721 10-0 91% 17 OH
5020 NPJ Seattle 15-National 1721 43-37 54% 15 WA
5021 MVSA 16 Shockwave 1721 47-20 68% 16 MD
5022 Shonto 16-S pink 1721 6-1 86% 16 CA
5023 Trivolley 11-1trinidad 1721 11-6 65% 11 PR
5024 SPARKS VBC 15 NAVY 1721 40-14 74% 15 PA
5025 REFINE 17 Refine Sheats (SO) 1721 12-1 80% 17 AL
5026 NPJ Portland 14 National 1721 37-30 55% 14 OR
5027 Dead Frog 13-Devin 1721 6-0 100% 13 MI
5028 Rapid Fire 17-Black 1721 17-9 65% 17 IL
5029 Dynasty 15-Gray 1721 25-18 58% 15 KS
5030 Elevation 18-Bp 1721 27-14 66% 18 OH
5031 501 Volley 18-1 national 1721 32-18 64% 18 AR
5032 GRV 17-Black 1721 34-30 53% 17 IN
5033 Eastside 12-Steven 1721 26-6 81% 12 NC
5034 Sky High 15-Alderson 1721 11-1 92% 15 IL
5035 Latitude 41 Volleyball Club 12 12 Elite (OV) 1721 9-1 90% 12 OH
5036 Battle Volleyball Club 14-Jason and laura 1721 62-27 68% 14 VA
5037 ENCORE 14-White 1721 45-12 79% 14 CA
5038 Sandhills 15-Amber 1721 29-16 64% 15 NC
5039 NASA BHM 17-PURPLE 1721 28-29 49% 17 AL
5040 949 949 15-Black 1721 5-4 56% 15 NV
5041 L2 15-3 1721 48-17 74% 15 MI
5042 C2 16-2 regional blue 1720 36-14 72% 16 TN
5043 SCP 17-Corey 1720 47-13 78% 17 SC
5044 RVC 16 Zonal 1720 51-20 72% 16 VA
5045 Impact 14-Black 1720 36-17 68% 14 TX
5046 VEVA 15 Elite 1720 43-17 72% 15 FL
5047 Mana Toa 15-Nichole 1720 19-9 68% 15 AL
5048 MOJO Elite Volleyball 15-Black 1720 41-16 72% 15 VA
5049 GCVC 13-Blue 1720 25-7 78% 13 OH
5050 JVA 12-Black 1720 13-1 93% 12 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.