Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 100 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4951 Katy United 13-Adidas 1723 35-25 58% 13 TX
4952 NCWVBC 18-1 gold 1723 18-14 56% 18 WA
4953 NRG 15-Ampd blue 1723 33-15 61% 15 TX
4954 Defensa 18-Kp 1723 11-1 92% 18 ON
4955 HEAT 13-Red (BG) 1722 17-7 71% 13 WI
4956 High Line 13 Aspiring 1722 34-8 77% 13 PA
4957 AVA 14-N adams 1722 30-19 61% 14 OH
4958 RVBC 17-White 1722 31-6 84% 17 PA
4959 Alliance 14-Premier 1722 32-10 76% 14 TN
4960 FCA Clark 16-Force 1722 30-10 75% 16 OR
4961 Grandlake 16-Stucke 1722 6-0 100% 16 OH
4962 SCVC 14-Erika/roger 1722 7-1 88% 14 NV
4963 253 Elite 12-Elua 1722 36-13 73% 12 WA
4964 Notorious 14-Emily 1722 16-1 94% 14 CA
4965 FAV 15 Phoenix 1722 25-9 74% 15 CA
4966 WAJ Northside 13-Storm 1722 14-3 74% 13 AL
4967 1United 13-N silver 1722 30-9 71% 13 TX
4968 FEVA 15-Michael 1722 56-10 85% 15 FL
4969 Spartan Club 15 1722 14-1 93% 15 ID
4970 RVT 12-1 surf 1722 27-7 79% 12 NY
4971 South Central Select VBC 17 18 Travel (NO) 1722 32-10 76% 17 ND
4972 LBK 17-1 1722 17-5 77% 17 OH
4973 CUVC 16-N1 1722 29-17 63% 16 NC
4974 1st Alliance 15-Crimson 1722 42-11 79% 15 IL
4975 AZ 3 17-Goddard 1722 9-1 90% 17 AZ
4976 LVC 14-Pink 1722 17-3 77% 14 NY
4977 Jupiter Elite 11-E 1722 34-23 60% 11 FL
4978 NNJ 13 Braysen 1722 32-8 80% 13 NV
4979 949 14-Black 1722 32-23 58% 14 CA
4980 Athena 18-1 1722 17-3 85% 18 CA
4981 SERV 15-Select 1722 44-19 70% 15 VA
4982 DCVC 12-National 1722 36-14 71% 12 IA
4983 Husky 16-Northeast red 1722 21-16 57% 16 CT
4984 Gulfside 18-Prime 1722 16-15 52% 18 FL
4985 OPVC 14-Weller 1722 22-13 63% 14 OH
4986 SIVBC 17-Storm 1722 22-38 37% 17 WA
4987 Reign 17-Black 1722 16-10 55% 17 FL
4988 RCVC 17-1 1722 8-4 67% 17 AL
4989 LTX SELECT 12-Yellow 1722 18-8 69% 12 TX
4990 ATHENA VB 14-3 gold select 1722 33-16 67% 14 OR
4991 ID Crush 15-Gauna 1722 50-25 67% 15 ID
4992 FCA Volleyball 18-1 1722 19-12 61% 18 ME
4993 Adversity 15-Prpl adidas 1722 37-19 66% 15 IL
4994 Attack VBC 15-Mizuno lime 1722 37-19 66% 15 MI
4995 Club V CV 15-Jaicee 1722 10-9 53% 15 UT
4996 Vision 13-White 1722 34-17 67% 13 CA
4997 Elevation 16-Timberline red 1722 32-17 65% 16 CO
4998 NLVC 15-National 1722 25-20 56% 15 TX
4999 Lex United 16 Elite 1722 75-67 53% 16 KY
5000 NVA 16-Black 1722 31-44 41% 16 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.