Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 100 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4951 Pgh Elite 12-Black 1723 6-5 55% 12 PA
4952 Falcon Fire 17-1 1722 23-6 74% 17
4953 PROJECT SPIKERS 14-1 1722 28-8 70% 14
4954 NNJ 13 Braysen 1722 32-8 80% 13 NV
4955 H Skyline 14-White 1722 20-14 57% 14 TX
4956 Club 1 14-Skronkstrong 1722 26-18 59% 14 IL
4957 C2 16-2 regional blue 1722 36-14 72% 16 TN
4958 Triangle 15-Blue 1722 24-32 43% 15 NC
4959 CTX Juniors 15-Mizuno 1722 37-29 56% 15 TX
4960 EPIC FLB 17 1722 10-0 91% 17 OH
4961 Game Day 14-1 1722 29-18 62% 14 OR
4962 GRV 12-Black 1722 32-14 70% 12 IN
4963 SKY Elite 15-Black 1722 21-21 50% 15 PA
4964 Triangle 17-White 1722 36-29 55% 17 NC
4965 253 Elite 12-Elua 1722 36-13 73% 12 WA
4966 NLVC 15-National 1722 25-20 56% 15 NJ
4967 CLBRK 13-1 1722 12-3 80% 13 WI
4968 Prodigy 16-1 premier 1722 45-35 56% 16 NY
4969 DCVC 12-National 1722 36-14 71% 12 IA
4970 South County 13-Penina 1722 15-13 50% 13 RI
4971 HVVC 14-Blue 1722 45-19 70% 14 MI
4972 LI Fury 16-Jenna/sarah 1722 13-6 68% 16 NY
4973 1United 14-N black 1722 29-22 55% 14 TX
4974 Elevate 17-Pandamonium 1722 52-22 70% 17 WI
4975 Viper 17-Michelle 1722 3-4 43% 17 CA
4976 FH 14-Alaka'i-ray 1722 37-12 69% 14 TX
4977 Team Mystic 13u Onyx 1722 54-9 83% 13 PA
4978 South Phoenix Rebels 12-S 1722 7-1 88% 12
4979 Elevation 14 Timberline 1722 38-25 60% 14 CO
4980 MVVC 15-Black 1722 41-21 66% 15 CA
4981 Royal Legends 15-Orange 1722 42-16 72% 15 PA
4982 O2VBC 15-White 1722 22-3 88% 15 NY
4983 LCVBC 16 1721 23-8 74% 16
4984 NDVBC Thunder 14 1721 12-3 75% 14
4985 Aspire NW 14-1 beaverton 1721 33-19 63% 14 WA
4986 AP 17 Baden 1721 31-29 52% 17 TX
4987 FC United 16-Black 1721 35-16 69% 16 MO
4988 Elevate 15-Blue 1721 33-37 47% 15 TX
4989 Fearless Elite 12-1 1721 31-7 79% 12 AR
4990 ESVC 14-Black 1721 24-10 71% 14 AL
4991 MDJRS 18 Elite 1721 30-22 57% 18 MD
4992 MEVC 14 National 1721 51-26 66% 14 MD
4993 TEMPO 11-1 1721 16-1 94% 11 WI
4994 1st Alliance 17 Crimson 1721 35-13 73% 17 IL
4995 1st Alliance 15 Onyx 1721 40-15 73% 15 IL
4996 Xcel VB 17-1 adidas 1721 33-22 60% 17 TX
4997 LV 16 Avoli 1721 37-22 63% 16 TX
4998 MKE Sting 12-White 1721 35-13 73% 12 WI
4999 SERV 15-Select 1721 44-19 70% 15 VA
5000 KeAloha 14-1 jaws 1721 31-7 82% 14 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.