Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 99 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4901 Tsunami 15-1e aau andressa 1724 12-2 86% 15 GA
4902 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-8 1724 8-0 100% 16 KS
4903 Chi City Elite 18-1 1724 11-12 48% 18 IL
4904 Elevate VBC 17-Blue 1724 26-30 41% 17 TX
4905 ID ONE 12-White 1724 10-3 77% 12 ID
4906 Future G18-Elite 1724 45-13 78% 18 IL
4907 Ballyhoo 17-Black 1724 47-25 65% 17 PA
4908 CG 17-Blue 1724 24-15 62% 17 WA
4909 Carolina Vibe 15 Billy 1724 18-2 90% 15 NC
4910 NYC Juniors 14-Blue 1724 27-23 54% 14 NY
4911 SPIKEFORCE KERNDAWGS 16 1724 21-5 78% 16 ID
4912 Premier Nebraska 12-Silver 1724 19-8 70% 12 NE
4913 Angelo Rise 11-1 1724 24-8 75% 11 TX
4914 Rockwood Thunder 12-Elite 1724 42-41 49% 12 MO
4915 ESVC 14-Black 1724 24-10 71% 14 AL
4916 AVB Fire 14-1 black 1724 30-13 70% 14 MN
4917 GOLDENBULLS 17-G black 1724 8-7 53% 17 FL
4918 ECVA 16-Teal 1724 40-24 63% 16 NC
4919 O2VBC 15-White 1723 22-3 88% 15 NY
4920 Stars 17 Book 1723 42-24 64% 17 SC
4921 Deacon Flames 14-White 1723 36-10 78% 14 ND
4922 Vision 14-1 1723 41-10 80% 14 TX
4923 HNL Volleyball 13-Black 1723 4-5 44% 13 HI
4924 806 Volleyball Tammy 11-S 1723 17-3 85% 11 TX
4925 Set It Off 13-2 1723 12-1 92% 13 FL
4926 CUVC 11-Growl 1723 16-2 73% 11 NC
4927 All Set 14 Sela 1723 12-5 63% 14 AK
4928 Triangle 15-Blue 1723 24-32 43% 15 NC
4929 ROCK Volleyball 16-Sky 1723 31-37 46% 16 PA
4930 H. Prep 13 Mizuno 1723 33-14 70% 13 TX
4931 Club Four 16-Boost 1723 44-17 71% 16 MO
4932 MKE Sting 12-White 1723 35-13 73% 12 WI
4933 MAUNALANI RISE 15 1723 7-0 100% 15 HI
4934 Inspire CLE 12 Sunrise 1723 35-8 81% 12 OH
4935 Criollas 11-1 1723 17-2 89% 11 PR
4936 Advanced Ath 16-1 natl 1723 14-6 70% 16 TX
4937 Club V 18 Nicole 1723 27-16 63% 18 UT
4938 Hunters Creek Volleyball Academy 12 12 Hunters Creek 1723 37-9 80% 12 FL
4939 FC United 16-Black 1723 35-16 69% 16 MO
4940 JCVC 14-C 1723 22-6 79% 14 TN
4941 TOVC García 14 1723 9-10 47% 14 PR
4942 Podio Sports 16-S 1723 37-22 63% 16 WA
4943 Mill City 17-Orange 1723 25-17 60% 17 MA
4944 CVA 18-Black 1723 30-25 55% 18 CO
4945 CJVA 14-Black 1723 50-38 57% 14 NJ
4946 Edge Elite 18-Gold 1723 13-9 59% 18 PA
4947 ESO 15-Elite navy 1723 24-20 55% 15 OH
4948 Triangle 17-White 1723 36-29 55% 17 NC
4949 Lockdown VBC 13-Kiwis 1723 35-22 61% 13 MA
4950 MIDTN 16-BLACK 1723 36-21 63% 16 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.