2025-2026 Season — Page 99 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4901 | Tsunami 15-1e aau andressa | 1724 | 12-2 | 86% | 15 | GA |
| 4902 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-8 | 1724 | 8-0 | 100% | 16 | KS |
| 4903 | Chi City Elite 18-1 | 1724 | 11-12 | 48% | 18 | IL |
| 4904 | Elevate VBC 17-Blue | 1724 | 26-30 | 41% | 17 | TX |
| 4905 | ID ONE 12-White | 1724 | 10-3 | 77% | 12 | ID |
| 4906 | Future G18-Elite | 1724 | 45-13 | 78% | 18 | IL |
| 4907 | Ballyhoo 17-Black | 1724 | 47-25 | 65% | 17 | PA |
| 4908 | CG 17-Blue | 1724 | 24-15 | 62% | 17 | WA |
| 4909 | Carolina Vibe 15 Billy | 1724 | 18-2 | 90% | 15 | NC |
| 4910 | NYC Juniors 14-Blue | 1724 | 27-23 | 54% | 14 | NY |
| 4911 | SPIKEFORCE KERNDAWGS 16 | 1724 | 21-5 | 78% | 16 | ID |
| 4912 | Premier Nebraska 12-Silver | 1724 | 19-8 | 70% | 12 | NE |
| 4913 | Angelo Rise 11-1 | 1724 | 24-8 | 75% | 11 | TX |
| 4914 | Rockwood Thunder 12-Elite | 1724 | 42-41 | 49% | 12 | MO |
| 4915 | ESVC 14-Black | 1724 | 24-10 | 71% | 14 | AL |
| 4916 | AVB Fire 14-1 black | 1724 | 30-13 | 70% | 14 | MN |
| 4917 | GOLDENBULLS 17-G black | 1724 | 8-7 | 53% | 17 | FL |
| 4918 | ECVA 16-Teal | 1724 | 40-24 | 63% | 16 | NC |
| 4919 | O2VBC 15-White | 1723 | 22-3 | 88% | 15 | NY |
| 4920 | Stars 17 Book | 1723 | 42-24 | 64% | 17 | SC |
| 4921 | Deacon Flames 14-White | 1723 | 36-10 | 78% | 14 | ND |
| 4922 | Vision 14-1 | 1723 | 41-10 | 80% | 14 | TX |
| 4923 | HNL Volleyball 13-Black | 1723 | 4-5 | 44% | 13 | HI |
| 4924 | 806 Volleyball Tammy 11-S | 1723 | 17-3 | 85% | 11 | TX |
| 4925 | Set It Off 13-2 | 1723 | 12-1 | 92% | 13 | FL |
| 4926 | CUVC 11-Growl | 1723 | 16-2 | 73% | 11 | NC |
| 4927 | All Set 14 Sela | 1723 | 12-5 | 63% | 14 | AK |
| 4928 | Triangle 15-Blue | 1723 | 24-32 | 43% | 15 | NC |
| 4929 | ROCK Volleyball 16-Sky | 1723 | 31-37 | 46% | 16 | PA |
| 4930 | H. Prep 13 Mizuno | 1723 | 33-14 | 70% | 13 | TX |
| 4931 | Club Four 16-Boost | 1723 | 44-17 | 71% | 16 | MO |
| 4932 | MKE Sting 12-White | 1723 | 35-13 | 73% | 12 | WI |
| 4933 | MAUNALANI RISE 15 | 1723 | 7-0 | 100% | 15 | HI |
| 4934 | Inspire CLE 12 Sunrise | 1723 | 35-8 | 81% | 12 | OH |
| 4935 | Criollas 11-1 | 1723 | 17-2 | 89% | 11 | PR |
| 4936 | Advanced Ath 16-1 natl | 1723 | 14-6 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 4937 | Club V 18 Nicole | 1723 | 27-16 | 63% | 18 | UT |
| 4938 | Hunters Creek Volleyball Academy 12 12 Hunters Creek | 1723 | 37-9 | 80% | 12 | FL |
| 4939 | FC United 16-Black | 1723 | 35-16 | 69% | 16 | MO |
| 4940 | JCVC 14-C | 1723 | 22-6 | 79% | 14 | TN |
| 4941 | TOVC García 14 | 1723 | 9-10 | 47% | 14 | PR |
| 4942 | Podio Sports 16-S | 1723 | 37-22 | 63% | 16 | WA |
| 4943 | Mill City 17-Orange | 1723 | 25-17 | 60% | 17 | MA |
| 4944 | CVA 18-Black | 1723 | 30-25 | 55% | 18 | CO |
| 4945 | CJVA 14-Black | 1723 | 50-38 | 57% | 14 | NJ |
| 4946 | Edge Elite 18-Gold | 1723 | 13-9 | 59% | 18 | PA |
| 4947 | ESO 15-Elite navy | 1723 | 24-20 | 55% | 15 | OH |
| 4948 | Triangle 17-White | 1723 | 36-29 | 55% | 17 | NC |
| 4949 | Lockdown VBC 13-Kiwis | 1723 | 35-22 | 61% | 13 | MA |
| 4950 | MIDTN 16-BLACK | 1723 | 36-21 | 63% | 16 | TN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.