2025-2026 Season — Page 99 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4901 | ZTV 16-1 select | 1724 | 25-10 | 69% | 16 | MT |
| 4902 | Dunes 14-Black | 1724 | 47-30 | 61% | 14 | IN |
| 4903 | Iowa Impact 16-1 premier | 1724 | 26-12 | 68% | 16 | IA |
| 4904 | Advanced Ath 16-1 natl | 1724 | 14-6 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 4905 | Katy United 13-Adidas | 1724 | 35-25 | 58% | 13 | TX |
| 4906 | GOLDENBULLS 17-G black | 1724 | 8-7 | 53% | 17 | FL |
| 4907 | Northeast 15-Blue | 1724 | 22-8 | 73% | 15 | CT |
| 4908 | C2 14-2 regional blue wes | 1724 | 11-5 | 69% | 14 | TN |
| 4909 | FW Fire 12-Purple | 1724 | 11-5 | 65% | 12 | TX |
| 4910 | Dead Frog 13-Devin | 1724 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | MI |
| 4911 | HEAT 14-National ryan | 1724 | 21-9 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 4912 | SVC 14-U tiger sharks | 1724 | 31-10 | 76% | 14 | SC |
| 4913 | Top Flight 13-National bl | 1724 | 13-9 | 59% | 13 | NV |
| 4914 | Northeast 18-2 | 1724 | 29-18 | 62% | 18 | CT |
| 4915 | TI Elite 13-Short season | 1724 | 26-10 | 72% | 13 | |
| 4916 | 2026 Nola Julie/Briley 12-S | 1724 | 25-9 | 74% | 12 | |
| 4917 | Fairfield 14-Gold | 1723 | 7-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 4918 | TOVC García 14 | 1723 | 9-10 | 47% | 14 | |
| 4919 | Ne Jrs 18-Black | 1723 | 12-7 | 63% | 18 | |
| 4920 | Criollas 11-1 | 1723 | 17-2 | 89% | 11 | PR |
| 4921 | NorCal Supreme 14-Blue | 1723 | 18-4 | 82% | 14 | CA |
| 4922 | Club One 18-Elite | 1723 | 18-6 | 72% | 18 | HI |
| 4923 | Chi City Elite 18-1 | 1723 | 11-12 | 48% | 18 | IL |
| 4924 | AVA 14-N adams | 1723 | 30-19 | 61% | 14 | OH |
| 4925 | AVB Fire 14-1 black | 1723 | 30-13 | 70% | 14 | MN |
| 4926 | Piedmont VBC 16-Nike | 1723 | 38-26 | 59% | 16 | NC |
| 4927 | Club Cactus 16-Silver | 1723 | 30-12 | 71% | 16 | AZ |
| 4928 | CVC 12-Blue | 1723 | 30-19 | 61% | 12 | OH |
| 4929 | Dynasty 15-Gray | 1723 | 25-18 | 58% | 15 | KS |
| 4930 | Mindset Premier 13-Red | 1723 | 37-17 | 69% | 13 | IL |
| 4931 | MN North 14-1 navy | 1723 | 60-24 | 71% | 14 | MN |
| 4932 | SKEVA 16-Blue | 1723 | 31-20 | 61% | 16 | KY |
| 4933 | SVC Summit 15-1 | 1723 | 30-6 | 83% | 15 | GA |
| 4934 | Elevation 18-Bp | 1723 | 27-14 | 66% | 18 | OH |
| 4935 | Amarillo Xtreme 11-Intensity | 1723 | 29-19 | 60% | 11 | TX |
| 4936 | Cincy Crush 13-1 | 1723 | 32-22 | 59% | 13 | OH |
| 4937 | RVBC 17-White | 1723 | 31-6 | 84% | 17 | PA |
| 4938 | Trivolley 11-1trinidad | 1723 | 11-6 | 65% | 11 | PR |
| 4939 | Club Four 16-Boost | 1723 | 44-17 | 71% | 16 | IL |
| 4940 | ECVBA 14-1 | 1723 | 28-16 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 4941 | Inside Out 15-Mizuno black | 1723 | 23-19 | 55% | 15 | MI |
| 4942 | CUVC 11-Growl | 1723 | 16-2 | 73% | 11 | NC |
| 4943 | adidas DYNASTY 14-4 | 1723 | 13-1 | 68% | 14 | KS |
| 4944 | Apex Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1723 | 5-1 | 71% | 14 | MO |
| 4945 | ESVC 18 | 1723 | 23-9 | 72% | 18 | AL |
| 4946 | Diggersz 12-Black-liz | 1723 | 21-2 | 88% | 12 | IL |
| 4947 | Sandhills 15-Amber | 1723 | 29-16 | 64% | 15 | NC |
| 4948 | FAV 17 Maverick | 1723 | 31-13 | 70% | 17 | CA |
| 4949 | Performance Juniors 16-1 | 1723 | 58-18 | 76% | 16 | NY |
| 4950 | 806 Volleyball Tammy 11-S | 1723 | 17-3 | 85% | 11 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.