Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 98 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is TAV 16-Black yun with a 2270 Elo rating and 48-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4851 Delaware United 12-Navy 1650 25-11 69% 12 DE
4852 863 Elite 12-1 black 1650 20-10 67% 12 FL
4853 Apex 12-1 girls 1650 20-4 83% 12 MO
4854 ECVC 12-BLACK 1650 22-9 71% 12 FL
4855 MoCo MAVS 17-Red 1650 25-20 56% 17 TX
4856 Victorium 17 UA 1650 18-26 41% 17 AZ
4857 Fission 17-Elite 1 1650 29-10 74% 17 GA
4858 Inside Out 17-Mizuno black 1650 19-8 70% 17 MI
4859 TOVC 17-García 1650 7-4 64% 17 CA
4860 575 VB 17-Lpe izzy/jo 1650 10-5 67% 17 GA
4861 Prospects VBA 11-Premier 1650 14-1 93% 11 IL
4862 AEV 11 American 1650 20-5 80% 11 TX
4863 SF TREMORS 11 CHEETAHS 1650 18-10 64% 11 CA
4864 CVA 10 1650 19-3 83% 10 LA
4865 Blue Heat 10 1650 14-1 82% 10 MO
4866 Metro 14 North 1650 23-12 62% 14 DC
4867 PNW VBC 14-3 white 1650 29-8 78% 14 WA
4868 LIVEWIRE 14-Boost 1650 32-13 71% 14 AZ
4869 SMASH 14 1650 15-8 65% 14 MA
4870 Pgh Elite 14-Premier 1650 20-12 63% 14 PA
4871 Club Z 14-Kelsie 1650 19-14 56% 14 TX
4872 Sideout 14-T kaitlyn 1650 27-11 71% 14 NJ
4873 Rancho Valley 18 Premier 1650 7-1 88% 18
4874 SUPERIOR 12-Adidas 1650 23-6 77% 12
4875 MAVA 18-Select 1650 23-27 46% 18 KY
4876 FH 12-1 ikaika marcus 1650 6-2 75% 12 TX
4877 SMASH 12-S 1650 21-8 72% 12 MA
4878 SVC NGV 12 Nikki 1650 13-5 72% 12 GA
4879 A3 13-X 1650 38-10 79% 13 TN
4880 MVBC 13-Red 1650 20-8 71% 13 CA
4881 OK Charge 13 National 1650 29-11 71% 13 OK
4882 MAVA 13-Select 1650 28-26 52% 13 KY
4883 HOU PVA 14-Mizuno 1649 13-3 81% 14
4884 Stayton Athletics 14-1 1649 30-6 77% 14
4885 HVVC 14-Blue 1649 17-6 74% 14
4886 SPARKS VBC 16-Navy 1649 34-15 69% 16
4887 MWP 16-Purple 1649 19-10 66% 16
4888 HVC Shoji 16 1649 13-7 65% 16
4889 London Elite 18-Blue 1649 20-11 65% 18 OH
4890 Premier 18-1 blue 1649 26-8 72% 18 OH
4891 ECVC 18-Black 1649 22-13 63% 18 FL
4892 HJV 16-National 1649 22-9 71% 16 TX
4893 HNL Volleyball 16-Black 1649 10-3 77% 16 HI
4894 A4 Volley 18-Cassie 1649 29-18 62% 18 CA
4895 SoCal VBC 16-Beacons 1649 22-12 65% 16 CA
4896 CGSV 16-Harris 1649 13-2 87% 16 OH
4897 RVA 16-Hillegas 1649 18-11 62% 16 IA
4898 575 VB 16-Ws andres 1649 10-6 63% 16 GA
4899 GSEVC 16-Premier 1649 22-28 44% 16 NJ
4900 Sanford Sports 16-Black 1649 27-19 59% 16 SD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.