Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 98 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4851 Aspire NW 16-2 royal 1725 35-15 70% 16 OR
4852 CTX Juniors 15-Mizuno 1725 37-29 56% 15 TX
4853 STVA 16-Navy 1725 52-16 76% 16 TX
4854 BAVC 12-Premier reza 1725 29-11 73% 12 CA
4855 Amarillo Xtreme 13-Surge 1725 15-10 60% 13 TX
4856 FH 14-Alaka'i-ray 1725 37-12 69% 14 TX
4857 South Shore Slam 16 South Shore Slam16s-Nat 1725 11-5 69% 16 WI
4858 Sunshine 14-Elite 1725 21-22 49% 14 CA
4859 Downstate 15-Cobras 1725 40-23 63% 15 NY
4860 Invicta 15-Brooklynn 1725 37-26 59% 15 UT
4861 GRIT 13-Green 1725 23-4 82% 13 IN
4862 ESVC 16-Black 1725 31-9 78% 16 AL
4863 FTL 15-Fusion sidney 1725 34-21 62% 15 FL
4864 Club Cactus 16-Silver 1725 30-12 71% 16 AZ
4865 Juggernaut 13-Regional1 1725 38-18 68% 13 CO
4866 MDJRS 18 Elite 1725 30-22 57% 18 MD
4867 SC Legends 11-Elite 1725 49-15 77% 11 CA
4868 DVA 14 Elite 1725 32-15 68% 14 PA
4869 Alpha Select 14-S 1725 32-6 84% 14 AR
4870 Husky 17-National 1725 37-32 54% 17 CT
4871 PITSTOP 13-99 1725 8-1 89% 13 CA
4872 UPVBC 15-Elite 1725 40-22 65% 15 OK
4873 360 13-Kaos black 1725 31-12 63% 13 TX
4874 MW Shock 13-Diamond 1725 48-19 72% 13 MO
4875 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 17-N artem 1725 29-26 53% 17 NJ
4876 San Antonio Empire 16-Apex red 1725 4-3 57% 16 TX
4877 Northeast 15-Blue 1725 22-8 73% 15 CT
4878 Dunes 14-Black 1725 47-30 61% 14 IN
4879 Fresno Heat HEAT 14-National amanda 1725 34-16 68% 14 CA
4880 SMV 14-1 black 1725 51-23 69% 14 MN
4881 NorthEast Volleyball Club 18-2 1725 29-18 62% 18 CT
4882 MGA VBC 17-South 1725 30-17 64% 17 MA
4883 YYC Eagles 18 1725 8-2 80% 18 AB
4884 MoCo Volleyball Club 14 MOCO Magic (CH) 1724 40-25 61% 14
4885 Cincy Crush 13-1 1724 32-22 59% 13 OH
4886 NWAJS 17-Adidas 1724 10-6 63% 17 NE
4887 Zero Gravity 18-Orange 1724 21-4 84% 18 OH
4888 LV 16 Avoli 1724 37-22 63% 16 TX
4889 Idaho Show Sports 13 13's National Pfefferle 1724 19-7 73% 13 ID
4890 Ka Ulukoa 13 Tatiana 1724 29-12 71% 13 HI
4891 HVVC 14-Blue 1724 45-19 70% 14 MI
4892 SVC 14-U tiger sharks 1724 31-10 76% 14 SC
4893 TEAM Kiwi 18 Graphite 1724 47-17 73% 18 FL
4894 GO Volley VBC 17-1 1724 3-5 38% 17 VA
4895 ACCEL 14-Black keeling 1724 31-11 63% 14 TX
4896 Elite Alliance 15-1 1724 11-3 79% 15 SD
4897 SoCal VBC 15-Cardiff 1724 26-19 58% 15 CA
4898 Innerlight VC 15-Gold 1724 32-26 55% 15 TN
4899 Laurel Express 14-1 1724 31-8 74% 14 MT
4900 NorCal Supreme 14-Blue 1724 18-4 82% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.