Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 98 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4851 Fusion 14-1 1725 23-5 82% 14 IL
4852 STL Crossfire 15 T1 1725 47-13 77% 15 MO
4853 Texas Serve 16-S gold 1725 41-13 76% 16 TX
4854 TX432 14-Black 1725 16-17 48% 14 TX
4855 AAC 18-National 1725 45-15 75% 18 FL
4856 ADS Volleyball 11 Elite 1725 25-7 76% 11 TX
4857 JET 12-Saunders 1725 18-2 86% 12 TX
4858 LBK 18-1 1725 15-9 63% 18 OH
4859 Innerlight VC 15-Gold 1725 32-26 55% 15 TN
4860 Podio Sports 16-S 1725 37-22 63% 16 WA
4861 Deacon Flames 14-White 1725 36-10 78% 14 ND
4862 Zona 16-Black 1725 7-5 58% 16 AZ
4863 Passion 15 1725 41-10 80% 15 MI
4864 Premier Nebraska 12-Silver 1725 19-8 70% 12 NE
4865 808 Athletic Club 16 Matt 1725 37-17 69% 16 HI
4866 BVC 18-1 blast 1725 9-6 60% 18 DE
4867 Dig This! VBC 17-Black national 1725 6-1 86% 17 NV
4868 Sky High 13-Black 1725 46-18 70% 13 IL
4869 HNL Volleyball 13-Black 1725 4-5 44% 13 HI
4870 Five:1 14-Black 1725 39-27 59% 14 MI
4871 Apex 18-1 1725 17-5 77% 18 SC
4872 MAUNALANI RISE 15 1725 7-0 100% 15
4873 Houston Stellar 15-Elite 1725 4-3 57% 15
4874 TC 16-Gold kaipo 1725 23-13 61% 16
4875 Austin Performance 12-Adidas 1725 3-4 43% 12
4876 501 Volley 18-1 national 1725 32-18 64% 18 AR
4877 Forest City 16-1 sequoia 1725 3-4 43% 16 ON
4878 Premier Nebraska 16-Silver 1725 26-19 58% 16 NE
4879 Legacy Girls 14-Elite 1725 18-15 55% 14 CA
4880 EMV 17-Black sadie 1725 27-19 56% 17 TX
4881 EMV 12-Black ellen 1725 28-11 68% 12 TX
4882 Rize 13-Kate 1724 4-4 50% 13
4883 AV 14-1 diamond 1724 6-2 75% 14
4884 TLVC 14-1 1724 7-5 58% 14
4885 YYC Eagles 18 1724 8-2 80% 18
4886 Club Velocity 12-1 1724 39-12 76% 12 AR
4887 AVC 18-1 1724 50-23 67% 18 VA
4888 TEAM Kiwi 18 Graphite 1724 47-17 73% 18 FL
4889 CVBC Express 14 1724 25-7 74% 14 IA
4890 EP Elite 11-Smack 1724 25-13 61% 11 TX
4891 ENCORE 14-White 1724 45-12 79% 14 CA
4892 MSVB 13-R rachel/keira 1724 12-6 67% 13 AK
4893 FCA Clark 16-Force 1724 30-10 75% 16 OR
4894 Dynamite Adidas 14-1 1724 34-23 60% 14 MI
4895 FORZA1 16 ONE 1724 30-31 49% 16 CA
4896 FC Elite 15-Grey 1724 27-7 79% 15 WI
4897 Future G18-Elite 1724 45-13 78% 18 IL
4898 Mindset Premier 14-Black 1724 38-8 83% 14 IL
4899 Mill City 16 1724 29-29 50% 16 MA
4900 SMASH 15 1724 16-24 38% 15 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.