Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 97 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4801 WJVC 17-1 1727 6-2 75% 17
4802 MN Select 12-3 1727 50-17 75% 12 MN
4803 K1 Bayamon 14-9 1726 5-1 83% 14 PR
4804 Atomic Force 14-1 1726 17-3 81% 14 AZ
4805 OK Charge 15-American 1726 36-13 73% 15 OK
4806 Milwaukee Jr's 14-1 1726 44-31 59% 14 WI
4807 League City Sharks 14 1726 20-8 71% 14 TX
4808 AJ 16-Red 1726 21-5 81% 16 LA
4809 NPJ Seattle 13 National 1726 44-23 66% 13 WA
4810 360 13-Kaos black 1726 31-12 63% 13 TX
4811 Aspire NW 16-2 royal 1726 35-15 70% 16 WA
4812 Club One AZ 16-Platinum 1726 37-43 46% 16 AZ
4813 DVA UA 16 Elite 1726 58-22 73% 16 IL
4814 MW Shock 13-Diamond 1726 48-19 72% 13 MO
4815 NCWVBC 18-1 gold 1726 18-14 56% 18 WA
4816 SVA 12 1726 16-4 80% 12 AZ
4817 SPVB 17 Marshall 1726 22-26 46% 17 IL
4818 SRS 13-Blue 1726 27-6 82% 13 SC
4819 SoCal VBC 15-Cardiff 1726 26-19 58% 15 CA
4820 Alamo 17-Elite 1 1726 33-24 58% 17 TX
4821 Angelo Rise 11-1 1726 24-8 75% 11 TX
4822 Lanier 16-National katie 1726 13-1 93% 16 GA
4823 1st Alliance 15-Crimson 1726 42-11 79% 15 IL
4824 Texas Diamonds 13-Black 1726 21-6 78% 13 TX
4825 UVC 12-Maddy 1726 13-4 76% 12 MA
4826 Viper Volleyball 15-Michael 1726 6-3 67% 15 CA
4827 NRG 15-Ampd blue 1726 33-15 61% 15 TX
4828 RRHEAT 12-1 liz 1726 3-1 50% 12 UT
4829 TC ELITE 16-H 1726 17-4 81% 16 LA
4830 Impact 16-1 (CE) 1726 23-8 74% 16 OR
4831 McAllen Fierce 15-Lolo 1726 18-19 49% 15 TX
4832 Mizuno Northern Lights 16-R 1726 3-2 60% 16
4833 ECVA 16-Teal 1726 40-24 63% 16 NC
4834 FL HYPE 16-Smack 1726 29-11 73% 16 FL
4835 Nebraska ONE 11-Chaos 1726 17-0 100% 11 NE
4836 Club Attack 14 Lauren 1725 14-2 88% 14
4837 Downstate 15-Cobras 1725 40-23 63% 15
4838 FA Elite 15-1 1725 17-7 71% 15
4839 Laurel Express 14-1 1725 31-8 74% 14
4840 Steel City 16-1 1725 48-23 68% 16
4841 Sky High Adidas 15-Onyx 1725 38-22 63% 15 IL
4842 Big Sky 14-2 1725 46-23 64% 14 MT
4843 BTownVBC 14-Red 1725 26-15 63% 14 IN
4844 Austin Skyline 14-Black 1725 29-25 54% 14 TX
4845 K2 16-Redbacks 1725 35-13 73% 16 TN
4846 BRVA 16-2 1725 21-8 70% 16 VA
4847 Carolina Vibe 15 Billy 1725 18-2 90% 15 NC
4848 CI ELITE 14-RED 1725 38-15 72% 14 IL
4849 EC Power KOP 16-Black 1725 28-39 42% 16 PA
4850 Gulfside 18-Prime 1725 16-15 52% 18 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.