2025-2026 Season — Page 97 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4801 | OK Charge 15-American | 1727 | 36-13 | 73% | 15 | OK |
| 4802 | SKY Elite 15-Black | 1727 | 21-21 | 50% | 15 | PA |
| 4803 | DVA UA 16 Elite | 1727 | 58-22 | 73% | 16 | IL |
| 4804 | FL HYPE 16-Smack | 1727 | 29-11 | 73% | 16 | FL |
| 4805 | AV 15-1 diamond | 1727 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | GA |
| 4806 | Miami Elite 13 | 1727 | 48-23 | 68% | 13 | FL |
| 4807 | Legacy 13-3 adidas | 1727 | 35-20 | 64% | 13 | MI |
| 4808 | PVA 15-National summit | 1727 | 28-28 | 50% | 15 | NY |
| 4809 | 3DGE 17-2 gold | 1727 | 27-32 | 46% | 17 | PA |
| 4810 | Reign Volleyball 15-Gold | 1727 | 44-22 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 4811 | Sports Academy VBC 15-Premier | 1727 | 6-18 | 25% | 15 | CA |
| 4812 | RVJ 15-Nationals | 1727 | 29-37 | 44% | 15 | VA |
| 4813 | Academy West 12 National | 1727 | 40-57 | 41% | 12 | CA |
| 4814 | EC Power KOP 16-Black | 1727 | 28-39 | 42% | 16 | PA |
| 4815 | UVC 12-Maddy | 1726 | 13-4 | 76% | 12 | IL |
| 4816 | CMVBC 17 | 1726 | 13-4 | 76% | 17 | NE |
| 4817 | Mindset Premier 16-Red | 1726 | 41-16 | 72% | 16 | IL |
| 4818 | EAA 15-BLUE | 1726 | 40-11 | 78% | 15 | KY |
| 4819 | STL Crossfire 15 T1 | 1726 | 47-13 | 77% | 15 | MO |
| 4820 | Northern Lights 15-X | 1726 | 58-14 | 81% | 15 | MN |
| 4821 | MEVC 14 National | 1726 | 51-26 | 66% | 14 | MD |
| 4822 | Game Day 14-1 | 1726 | 29-18 | 62% | 14 | OR |
| 4823 | MVVC 15-Black | 1726 | 41-21 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 4824 | O2VBC 16-White | 1726 | 29-8 | 78% | 16 | NY |
| 4825 | AAC 18-National | 1726 | 45-15 | 75% | 18 | FL |
| 4826 | SAVA 16-1 | 1726 | 12-5 | 71% | 16 | AL |
| 4827 | WAVE 16-Maricris | 1726 | 33-18 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 4828 | 1st Alliance 15 Onyx | 1726 | 40-15 | 73% | 15 | IL |
| 4829 | Big Sky 14-2 | 1726 | 46-23 | 64% | 14 | MT |
| 4830 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 18-Navy | 1726 | 34-17 | 67% | 18 | CO |
| 4831 | Texas Diamonds 13-Black | 1726 | 21-6 | 78% | 13 | TX |
| 4832 | 603 United VBC 13-Seacoast white | 1726 | 37-9 | 80% | 13 | NH |
| 4833 | FORZA1 14-One | 1726 | 23-24 | 49% | 14 | CA |
| 4834 | Stars 12 Savannah | 1726 | 53-14 | 79% | 12 | SC |
| 4835 | EXCEL 15-National gold | 1726 | 38-20 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 4836 | Inside Out 15-Mizuno black | 1726 | 23-19 | 55% | 15 | MI |
| 4837 | FC Elite 15-Grey | 1726 | 27-7 | 79% | 15 | WI |
| 4838 | Husky 15-Northeast | 1726 | 41-17 | 71% | 15 | CT |
| 4839 | WVBA 15-Molten | 1726 | 39-22 | 64% | 15 | WA |
| 4840 | Iowa Impact 16-1 premier | 1726 | 26-12 | 68% | 16 | IA |
| 4841 | Nebraska ONE 11-Chaos | 1726 | 17-0 | 100% | 11 | NE |
| 4842 | SVVC 17 | 1726 | 10-1 | 91% | 17 | KY |
| 4843 | TVC 14-1 | 1726 | 26-6 | 81% | 14 | AL |
| 4844 | TC ELITE 16-H | 1726 | 17-4 | 81% | 16 | LA |
| 4845 | SG Elite 14-Elite leilani | 1726 | 32-7 | 82% | 14 | CA |
| 4846 | Fusion 14-1 | 1726 | 23-5 | 82% | 14 | MN |
| 4847 | Blast Volleyball Club 17 17U Blast Black | 1725 | 19-7 | 73% | 17 | PA |
| 4848 | Country Fire 15-1 | 1725 | 35-12 | 74% | 15 | TX |
| 4849 | Club Butte 17 | 1725 | 6-0 | 100% | 17 | ID |
| 4850 | KOKUA 14-1 | 1725 | 20-12 | 63% | 14 | WA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.