2025-2026 Season — Page 97 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4801 | WJVC 17-1 | 1727 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | |
| 4802 | MN Select 12-3 | 1727 | 50-17 | 75% | 12 | MN |
| 4803 | K1 Bayamon 14-9 | 1726 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | PR |
| 4804 | Atomic Force 14-1 | 1726 | 17-3 | 81% | 14 | AZ |
| 4805 | OK Charge 15-American | 1726 | 36-13 | 73% | 15 | OK |
| 4806 | Milwaukee Jr's 14-1 | 1726 | 44-31 | 59% | 14 | WI |
| 4807 | League City Sharks 14 | 1726 | 20-8 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 4808 | AJ 16-Red | 1726 | 21-5 | 81% | 16 | LA |
| 4809 | NPJ Seattle 13 National | 1726 | 44-23 | 66% | 13 | WA |
| 4810 | 360 13-Kaos black | 1726 | 31-12 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 4811 | Aspire NW 16-2 royal | 1726 | 35-15 | 70% | 16 | WA |
| 4812 | Club One AZ 16-Platinum | 1726 | 37-43 | 46% | 16 | AZ |
| 4813 | DVA UA 16 Elite | 1726 | 58-22 | 73% | 16 | IL |
| 4814 | MW Shock 13-Diamond | 1726 | 48-19 | 72% | 13 | MO |
| 4815 | NCWVBC 18-1 gold | 1726 | 18-14 | 56% | 18 | WA |
| 4816 | SVA 12 | 1726 | 16-4 | 80% | 12 | AZ |
| 4817 | SPVB 17 Marshall | 1726 | 22-26 | 46% | 17 | IL |
| 4818 | SRS 13-Blue | 1726 | 27-6 | 82% | 13 | SC |
| 4819 | SoCal VBC 15-Cardiff | 1726 | 26-19 | 58% | 15 | CA |
| 4820 | Alamo 17-Elite 1 | 1726 | 33-24 | 58% | 17 | TX |
| 4821 | Angelo Rise 11-1 | 1726 | 24-8 | 75% | 11 | TX |
| 4822 | Lanier 16-National katie | 1726 | 13-1 | 93% | 16 | GA |
| 4823 | 1st Alliance 15-Crimson | 1726 | 42-11 | 79% | 15 | IL |
| 4824 | Texas Diamonds 13-Black | 1726 | 21-6 | 78% | 13 | TX |
| 4825 | UVC 12-Maddy | 1726 | 13-4 | 76% | 12 | MA |
| 4826 | Viper Volleyball 15-Michael | 1726 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 4827 | NRG 15-Ampd blue | 1726 | 33-15 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 4828 | RRHEAT 12-1 liz | 1726 | 3-1 | 50% | 12 | UT |
| 4829 | TC ELITE 16-H | 1726 | 17-4 | 81% | 16 | LA |
| 4830 | Impact 16-1 (CE) | 1726 | 23-8 | 74% | 16 | OR |
| 4831 | McAllen Fierce 15-Lolo | 1726 | 18-19 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 4832 | Mizuno Northern Lights 16-R | 1726 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | |
| 4833 | ECVA 16-Teal | 1726 | 40-24 | 63% | 16 | NC |
| 4834 | FL HYPE 16-Smack | 1726 | 29-11 | 73% | 16 | FL |
| 4835 | Nebraska ONE 11-Chaos | 1726 | 17-0 | 100% | 11 | NE |
| 4836 | Club Attack 14 Lauren | 1725 | 14-2 | 88% | 14 | |
| 4837 | Downstate 15-Cobras | 1725 | 40-23 | 63% | 15 | |
| 4838 | FA Elite 15-1 | 1725 | 17-7 | 71% | 15 | |
| 4839 | Laurel Express 14-1 | 1725 | 31-8 | 74% | 14 | |
| 4840 | Steel City 16-1 | 1725 | 48-23 | 68% | 16 | |
| 4841 | Sky High Adidas 15-Onyx | 1725 | 38-22 | 63% | 15 | IL |
| 4842 | Big Sky 14-2 | 1725 | 46-23 | 64% | 14 | MT |
| 4843 | BTownVBC 14-Red | 1725 | 26-15 | 63% | 14 | IN |
| 4844 | Austin Skyline 14-Black | 1725 | 29-25 | 54% | 14 | TX |
| 4845 | K2 16-Redbacks | 1725 | 35-13 | 73% | 16 | TN |
| 4846 | BRVA 16-2 | 1725 | 21-8 | 70% | 16 | VA |
| 4847 | Carolina Vibe 15 Billy | 1725 | 18-2 | 90% | 15 | NC |
| 4848 | CI ELITE 14-RED | 1725 | 38-15 | 72% | 14 | IL |
| 4849 | EC Power KOP 16-Black | 1725 | 28-39 | 42% | 16 | PA |
| 4850 | Gulfside 18-Prime | 1725 | 16-15 | 52% | 18 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.