Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 97 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4801 OK Charge 15-American 1727 36-13 73% 15 OK
4802 SKY Elite 15-Black 1727 21-21 50% 15 PA
4803 DVA UA 16 Elite 1727 58-22 73% 16 IL
4804 FL HYPE 16-Smack 1727 29-11 73% 16 FL
4805 AV 15-1 diamond 1727 6-2 75% 15 GA
4806 Miami Elite 13 1727 48-23 68% 13 FL
4807 Legacy 13-3 adidas 1727 35-20 64% 13 MI
4808 PVA 15-National summit 1727 28-28 50% 15 NY
4809 3DGE 17-2 gold 1727 27-32 46% 17 PA
4810 Reign Volleyball 15-Gold 1727 44-22 67% 15 FL
4811 Sports Academy VBC 15-Premier 1727 6-18 25% 15 CA
4812 RVJ 15-Nationals 1727 29-37 44% 15 VA
4813 Academy West 12 National 1727 40-57 41% 12 CA
4814 EC Power KOP 16-Black 1727 28-39 42% 16 PA
4815 UVC 12-Maddy 1726 13-4 76% 12 IL
4816 CMVBC 17 1726 13-4 76% 17 NE
4817 Mindset Premier 16-Red 1726 41-16 72% 16 IL
4818 EAA 15-BLUE 1726 40-11 78% 15 KY
4819 STL Crossfire 15 T1 1726 47-13 77% 15 MO
4820 Northern Lights 15-X 1726 58-14 81% 15 MN
4821 MEVC 14 National 1726 51-26 66% 14 MD
4822 Game Day 14-1 1726 29-18 62% 14 OR
4823 MVVC 15-Black 1726 41-21 66% 15 CA
4824 O2VBC 16-White 1726 29-8 78% 16 NY
4825 AAC 18-National 1726 45-15 75% 18 FL
4826 SAVA 16-1 1726 12-5 71% 16 AL
4827 WAVE 16-Maricris 1726 33-18 65% 16 CA
4828 1st Alliance 15 Onyx 1726 40-15 73% 15 IL
4829 Big Sky 14-2 1726 46-23 64% 14 MT
4830 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 18-Navy 1726 34-17 67% 18 CO
4831 Texas Diamonds 13-Black 1726 21-6 78% 13 TX
4832 603 United VBC 13-Seacoast white 1726 37-9 80% 13 NH
4833 FORZA1 14-One 1726 23-24 49% 14 CA
4834 Stars 12 Savannah 1726 53-14 79% 12 SC
4835 EXCEL 15-National gold 1726 38-20 61% 15 TX
4836 Inside Out 15-Mizuno black 1726 23-19 55% 15 MI
4837 FC Elite 15-Grey 1726 27-7 79% 15 WI
4838 Husky 15-Northeast 1726 41-17 71% 15 CT
4839 WVBA 15-Molten 1726 39-22 64% 15 WA
4840 Iowa Impact 16-1 premier 1726 26-12 68% 16 IA
4841 Nebraska ONE 11-Chaos 1726 17-0 100% 11 NE
4842 SVVC 17 1726 10-1 91% 17 KY
4843 TVC 14-1 1726 26-6 81% 14 AL
4844 TC ELITE 16-H 1726 17-4 81% 16 LA
4845 SG Elite 14-Elite leilani 1726 32-7 82% 14 CA
4846 Fusion 14-1 1726 23-5 82% 14 MN
4847 Blast Volleyball Club 17 17U Blast Black 1725 19-7 73% 17 PA
4848 Country Fire 15-1 1725 35-12 74% 15 TX
4849 Club Butte 17 1725 6-0 100% 17 ID
4850 KOKUA 14-1 1725 20-12 63% 14 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.