Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 96 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4751 Vegas United G16-Black 1729 25-26 49% 16 NV
4752 Skyline 15-Silver 1729 36-12 72% 15 TX
4753 NVA 13-Elite ricardo 1729 53-13 80% 13 FL
4754 TC 16-Gold kaipo 1729 23-13 61% 16 UT
4755 DR NET FORCE 14U 1729 11-1 92% 14 TX
4756 PVA 13-National 1729 33-32 51% 13 MO
4757 Rancho 17-Select 1729 43-25 63% 17 CA
4758 FPVC 15-Ren national 1729 8-0 100% 15 CA
4759 Legacy Girls 14-Elite 1728 18-15 55% 14 CA
4760 Lions 14 Navy 1728 51-32 61% 14 IL
4761 CLUB STEEL 17-Navy 1728 39-21 65% 17 FL
4762 ONE Volleyball 11-1 1728 20-3 87% 11 GA
4763 GRV 11-Green 1728 33-7 83% 11 IN
4764 PVBC 15-1 1728 6-1 86% 15 WA
4765 Club One AZ 16-Platinum 1728 37-43 46% 16 AZ
4766 Top Flight 13-National bl 1728 13-9 59% 13 NV
4767 OCVBC 14-1 1728 31-11 70% 14 MO
4768 WJVC 17-1 1728 6-2 75% 17 NV
4769 SKEVA 16-Blue 1728 31-20 61% 16 KY
4770 Ridge Volleyball 13 Ridge Volleyball 1728 8-5 50% 13 UT
4771 Elevate VBC 15-Blue 1728 10-11 48% 15 TX
4772 BTownVBC 14-Red 1728 26-15 63% 14 IN
4773 ATOMIC 17-Smack elite 1728 46-29 61% 17 AZ
4774 Sky High Adidas 15-Onyx 1728 38-22 63% 15 IL
4775 PVA 16-National (PM) 1728 26-18 59% 16 SC
4776 TX432 13-Black 1728 21-24 47% 13 TX
4777 Dunes 12-Black 1728 46-17 73% 12 IN
4778 Diggersz 12-Black-liz 1728 21-2 88% 12 IL
4779 414 15-Elite 1728 41-31 57% 15 WI
4780 Sky High 13-Black 1728 46-18 70% 13 IL
4781 Huskies 18-Premier 1728 7-9 44% 18 SK
4782 SCBandits 16-1 1728 10-6 63% 16 ON
4783 VV U18 1727 28-13 68% 18 VA
4784 Club Unite 14-Lw blue 1727 36-9 80% 14 TN
4785 SW Pursuit Volleyball 16-1 1727 21-4 81% 16 MO
4786 FWFIRE 16-2p 1727 16-7 62% 16 TX
4787 Legend 16 1727 33-25 57% 16 CA
4788 MOJO Volleyball Academy 15-Black 1727 10-12 45% 15 MD
4789 So. PHX Rebels 12-S 1727 64-15 81% 12 AZ
4790 MN Select 16-Gray 1727 54-14 79% 16 MN
4791 AZ Sky 12-Gold 1727 38-35 52% 12 AZ
4792 GO Volley 16-N 1727 18-26 41% 16 VA
4793 ATHENA VB 16-2 black national 1727 50-29 63% 16 OR
4794 CI ELITE 14-RED 1727 38-15 72% 14 IL
4795 HBJ 14-Halee/anna 1727 33-5 87% 14 AR
4796 Munciana In 14 Dragons 1727 41-24 63% 14 IN
4797 L2 18-1 1727 20-23 47% 18 MI
4798 Starlings Tucson 13-Blue 1727 8-0 100% 13 CA
4799 TI Elite 13-Short season 1727 26-10 72% 13 IN
4800 NC Coastal 18-Deshay 1727 34-12 74% 18 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.