2025-2026 Season — Page 96 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4751 | Idaho ONE 15-Blue | 1728 | 36-25 | 59% | 15 | ID |
| 4752 | FRVBC 15-Black | 1728 | 23-15 | 61% | 15 | CO |
| 4753 | JVA 12-Black | 1728 | 13-1 | 93% | 12 | FL |
| 4754 | Husky 17-National | 1728 | 37-32 | 54% | 17 | CT |
| 4755 | Black Hills Juniors NH 16-1 | 1728 | 15-8 | 65% | 16 | SD |
| 4756 | Tampa North 13-Black | 1728 | 34-19 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 4757 | Ascent 17-1 | 1728 | 11-3 | 79% | 17 | AZ |
| 4758 | Lions Cityside 14-2 | 1728 | 24-20 | 55% | 14 | IL |
| 4759 | PacWest 17-Travis | 1728 | 39-22 | 64% | 17 | CA |
| 4760 | Cajun Elite 17-1 | 1728 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | LA |
| 4761 | SAVA 16-1 | 1728 | 12-5 | 71% | 16 | AL |
| 4762 | GO Volley VBC 17-1 | 1728 | 3-5 | 38% | 17 | VA |
| 4763 | PVA 13-Black | 1728 | 26-6 | 81% | 13 | SC |
| 4764 | Reef VBC 16-National brendan | 1728 | 9-1 | 90% | 16 | CA |
| 4765 | Victory 15-Nat'l green | 1728 | 6-3 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 4766 | SoCal Legends 12-Elite | 1728 | 10-1 | 91% | 12 | CA |
| 4767 | McHenry C. Jr's 14-Select | 1728 | 40-9 | 82% | 14 | IL |
| 4768 | Absolute 11-Black | 1728 | 40-25 | 62% | 11 | CA |
| 4769 | Areté 14-Navy | 1728 | 13-3 | 81% | 14 | TX |
| 4770 | LES 15 Madyson | 1727 | 23-5 | 79% | 15 | |
| 4771 | WB 18 National | 1727 | 22-2 | 92% | 18 | |
| 4772 | MAVS KC 14-4 | 1727 | 14-2 | 74% | 14 | KS |
| 4773 | ACCEL 14-Black keeling | 1727 | 31-11 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 4774 | T4VBC 14 Elite | 1727 | 44-31 | 56% | 14 | TX |
| 4775 | ENCORE 15-Red | 1727 | 47-19 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 4776 | Horseshoe VBC 14-Black | 1727 | 27-5 | 77% | 14 | PA |
| 4777 | Iowa Elite 14-Even | 1727 | 20-5 | 77% | 14 | IA |
| 4778 | American 16-Red | 1727 | 41-28 | 59% | 16 | VA |
| 4779 | CJV 16-National | 1727 | 39-8 | 83% | 16 | AR |
| 4780 | Club Nine 18-1 | 1727 | 12-4 | 75% | 18 | KS |
| 4781 | ARVC 13-Red adidas | 1727 | 28-20 | 58% | 13 | NM |
| 4782 | Boiler Jrs 15-E black | 1727 | 54-32 | 63% | 15 | IN |
| 4783 | MN Select 16-Gray | 1727 | 54-14 | 79% | 16 | MN |
| 4784 | NLVC 12-National | 1727 | 31-14 | 69% | 12 | NJ |
| 4785 | NOVA Juniors 16-S gold | 1727 | 30-26 | 54% | 16 | OH |
| 4786 | Silver Hammers VBC 17-1 | 1727 | 31-10 | 76% | 17 | NJ |
| 4787 | PVA 13-National | 1727 | 33-32 | 51% | 13 | MO |
| 4788 | PJVBC 18 Power | 1727 | 48-31 | 60% | 18 | WA |
| 4789 | Show 17-National wong | 1727 | 25-16 | 61% | 17 | UT |
| 4790 | LIV 13-Royal andrii sierra | 1727 | 29-23 | 56% | 13 | LA |
| 4791 | RZVC 14-1 venom | 1727 | 28-5 | 85% | 14 | VA |
| 4792 | Black Swamp 18-1 | 1727 | 11-5 | 69% | 18 | OH |
| 4793 | JOMO G17-1 | 1727 | 11-2 | 69% | 17 | MO |
| 4794 | Lockdown VBC 13-Kiwis | 1727 | 35-22 | 61% | 13 | MA |
| 4795 | LHVA 15-Purple national | 1727 | 31-14 | 69% | 15 | NY |
| 4796 | Victory 13-East | 1727 | 28-9 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 4797 | Jammers 14-Black | 1727 | 12-1 | 92% | 14 | NC |
| 4798 | Starlings Tucson 13-Blue | 1727 | 8-0 | 100% | 13 | AZ |
| 4799 | Premier 18 Antare | 1727 | 54-22 | 71% | 18 | OH |
| 4800 | L2 18-1 | 1727 | 20-23 | 47% | 18 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.