2025-2026 Season — Page 96 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4751 | Vegas United G16-Black | 1729 | 25-26 | 49% | 16 | NV |
| 4752 | Skyline 15-Silver | 1729 | 36-12 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 4753 | NVA 13-Elite ricardo | 1729 | 53-13 | 80% | 13 | FL |
| 4754 | TC 16-Gold kaipo | 1729 | 23-13 | 61% | 16 | UT |
| 4755 | DR NET FORCE 14U | 1729 | 11-1 | 92% | 14 | TX |
| 4756 | PVA 13-National | 1729 | 33-32 | 51% | 13 | MO |
| 4757 | Rancho 17-Select | 1729 | 43-25 | 63% | 17 | CA |
| 4758 | FPVC 15-Ren national | 1729 | 8-0 | 100% | 15 | CA |
| 4759 | Legacy Girls 14-Elite | 1728 | 18-15 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 4760 | Lions 14 Navy | 1728 | 51-32 | 61% | 14 | IL |
| 4761 | CLUB STEEL 17-Navy | 1728 | 39-21 | 65% | 17 | FL |
| 4762 | ONE Volleyball 11-1 | 1728 | 20-3 | 87% | 11 | GA |
| 4763 | GRV 11-Green | 1728 | 33-7 | 83% | 11 | IN |
| 4764 | PVBC 15-1 | 1728 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | WA |
| 4765 | Club One AZ 16-Platinum | 1728 | 37-43 | 46% | 16 | AZ |
| 4766 | Top Flight 13-National bl | 1728 | 13-9 | 59% | 13 | NV |
| 4767 | OCVBC 14-1 | 1728 | 31-11 | 70% | 14 | MO |
| 4768 | WJVC 17-1 | 1728 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | NV |
| 4769 | SKEVA 16-Blue | 1728 | 31-20 | 61% | 16 | KY |
| 4770 | Ridge Volleyball 13 Ridge Volleyball | 1728 | 8-5 | 50% | 13 | UT |
| 4771 | Elevate VBC 15-Blue | 1728 | 10-11 | 48% | 15 | TX |
| 4772 | BTownVBC 14-Red | 1728 | 26-15 | 63% | 14 | IN |
| 4773 | ATOMIC 17-Smack elite | 1728 | 46-29 | 61% | 17 | AZ |
| 4774 | Sky High Adidas 15-Onyx | 1728 | 38-22 | 63% | 15 | IL |
| 4775 | PVA 16-National (PM) | 1728 | 26-18 | 59% | 16 | SC |
| 4776 | TX432 13-Black | 1728 | 21-24 | 47% | 13 | TX |
| 4777 | Dunes 12-Black | 1728 | 46-17 | 73% | 12 | IN |
| 4778 | Diggersz 12-Black-liz | 1728 | 21-2 | 88% | 12 | IL |
| 4779 | 414 15-Elite | 1728 | 41-31 | 57% | 15 | WI |
| 4780 | Sky High 13-Black | 1728 | 46-18 | 70% | 13 | IL |
| 4781 | Huskies 18-Premier | 1728 | 7-9 | 44% | 18 | SK |
| 4782 | SCBandits 16-1 | 1728 | 10-6 | 63% | 16 | ON |
| 4783 | VV U18 | 1727 | 28-13 | 68% | 18 | VA |
| 4784 | Club Unite 14-Lw blue | 1727 | 36-9 | 80% | 14 | TN |
| 4785 | SW Pursuit Volleyball 16-1 | 1727 | 21-4 | 81% | 16 | MO |
| 4786 | FWFIRE 16-2p | 1727 | 16-7 | 62% | 16 | TX |
| 4787 | Legend 16 | 1727 | 33-25 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 4788 | MOJO Volleyball Academy 15-Black | 1727 | 10-12 | 45% | 15 | MD |
| 4789 | So. PHX Rebels 12-S | 1727 | 64-15 | 81% | 12 | AZ |
| 4790 | MN Select 16-Gray | 1727 | 54-14 | 79% | 16 | MN |
| 4791 | AZ Sky 12-Gold | 1727 | 38-35 | 52% | 12 | AZ |
| 4792 | GO Volley 16-N | 1727 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | VA |
| 4793 | ATHENA VB 16-2 black national | 1727 | 50-29 | 63% | 16 | OR |
| 4794 | CI ELITE 14-RED | 1727 | 38-15 | 72% | 14 | IL |
| 4795 | HBJ 14-Halee/anna | 1727 | 33-5 | 87% | 14 | AR |
| 4796 | Munciana In 14 Dragons | 1727 | 41-24 | 63% | 14 | IN |
| 4797 | L2 18-1 | 1727 | 20-23 | 47% | 18 | MI |
| 4798 | Starlings Tucson 13-Blue | 1727 | 8-0 | 100% | 13 | CA |
| 4799 | TI Elite 13-Short season | 1727 | 26-10 | 72% | 13 | IN |
| 4800 | NC Coastal 18-Deshay | 1727 | 34-12 | 74% | 18 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.