Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 96 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4751 Idaho ONE 15-Blue 1728 36-25 59% 15 ID
4752 FRVBC 15-Black 1728 23-15 61% 15 CO
4753 JVA 12-Black 1728 13-1 93% 12 FL
4754 Husky 17-National 1728 37-32 54% 17 CT
4755 Black Hills Juniors NH 16-1 1728 15-8 65% 16 SD
4756 Tampa North 13-Black 1728 34-19 64% 13 FL
4757 Ascent 17-1 1728 11-3 79% 17 AZ
4758 Lions Cityside 14-2 1728 24-20 55% 14 IL
4759 PacWest 17-Travis 1728 39-22 64% 17 CA
4760 Cajun Elite 17-1 1728 5-3 63% 17 LA
4761 SAVA 16-1 1728 12-5 71% 16 AL
4762 GO Volley VBC 17-1 1728 3-5 38% 17 VA
4763 PVA 13-Black 1728 26-6 81% 13 SC
4764 Reef VBC 16-National brendan 1728 9-1 90% 16 CA
4765 Victory 15-Nat'l green 1728 6-3 60% 15 TX
4766 SoCal Legends 12-Elite 1728 10-1 91% 12 CA
4767 McHenry C. Jr's 14-Select 1728 40-9 82% 14 IL
4768 Absolute 11-Black 1728 40-25 62% 11 CA
4769 Areté 14-Navy 1728 13-3 81% 14 TX
4770 LES 15 Madyson 1727 23-5 79% 15
4771 WB 18 National 1727 22-2 92% 18
4772 MAVS KC 14-4 1727 14-2 74% 14 KS
4773 ACCEL 14-Black keeling 1727 31-11 63% 14 TX
4774 T4VBC 14 Elite 1727 44-31 56% 14 TX
4775 ENCORE 15-Red 1727 47-19 71% 15 CA
4776 Horseshoe VBC 14-Black 1727 27-5 77% 14 PA
4777 Iowa Elite 14-Even 1727 20-5 77% 14 IA
4778 American 16-Red 1727 41-28 59% 16 VA
4779 CJV 16-National 1727 39-8 83% 16 AR
4780 Club Nine 18-1 1727 12-4 75% 18 KS
4781 ARVC 13-Red adidas 1727 28-20 58% 13 NM
4782 Boiler Jrs 15-E black 1727 54-32 63% 15 IN
4783 MN Select 16-Gray 1727 54-14 79% 16 MN
4784 NLVC 12-National 1727 31-14 69% 12 NJ
4785 NOVA Juniors 16-S gold 1727 30-26 54% 16 OH
4786 Silver Hammers VBC 17-1 1727 31-10 76% 17 NJ
4787 PVA 13-National 1727 33-32 51% 13 MO
4788 PJVBC 18 Power 1727 48-31 60% 18 WA
4789 Show 17-National wong 1727 25-16 61% 17 UT
4790 LIV 13-Royal andrii sierra 1727 29-23 56% 13 LA
4791 RZVC 14-1 venom 1727 28-5 85% 14 VA
4792 Black Swamp 18-1 1727 11-5 69% 18 OH
4793 JOMO G17-1 1727 11-2 69% 17 MO
4794 Lockdown VBC 13-Kiwis 1727 35-22 61% 13 MA
4795 LHVA 15-Purple national 1727 31-14 69% 15 NY
4796 Victory 13-East 1727 28-9 67% 13 TX
4797 Jammers 14-Black 1727 12-1 92% 14 NC
4798 Starlings Tucson 13-Blue 1727 8-0 100% 13 AZ
4799 Premier 18 Antare 1727 54-22 71% 18 OH
4800 L2 18-1 1727 20-23 47% 18 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.