Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 95 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4701 808AC 15-Gannon 1730 19-17 53% 15 HI
4702 NJ 14-Gold 1729 3-1 75% 14
4703 Titans Omega 14 1729 3-2 60% 14
4704 Texas Tornados 15-National 1729 31-15 67% 15 TX
4705 No Limits 16-Navy 1729 44-28 61% 16 FL
4706 BBE Blaze 17-S 1729 10-1 91% 17 MN
4707 ESVBC 15-Ice national 1729 36-31 54% 15 MD
4708 H. Prep 13 Mizuno 1729 33-14 70% 13 TX
4709 DR NET FORCE 14U 1729 11-1 92% 14 TX
4710 FaR Out 15-Red 1729 28-12 70% 15 MI
4711 GRV 11-Green 1729 33-7 83% 11 IN
4712 MOD Elite 18-Blue 1729 16-7 70% 18 IL
4713 NSVBC 14-Select blue 1729 13-3 81% 14 WI
4714 Southland 13-Black 1729 32-6 80% 13 LA
4715 UPVBC 15-Elite 1729 40-22 65% 15 OK
4716 UNION 15-Green 1729 48-32 60% 15 CA
4717 Wisconsin Blaze 14-Black 1729 29-8 78% 14 WI
4718 314 VBC 15-Red 1729 52-21 71% 15 MO
4719 A4 Volley 18-Cassie 1729 32-22 59% 18 CA
4720 Ultimate 12-Gold 1729 33-17 66% 12 IL
4721 Coastal 16-Elite 1729 44-24 65% 16 FL
4722 ACT 17-Ca 1729 44-17 72% 17 CA
4723 TEAM Kiwi 16-Graphite 1729 50-23 68% 16 FL
4724 WVBA 15-Molten 1729 39-22 64% 15 WA
4725 ONE Volleyball 13-2 1729 53-12 82% 13 GA
4726 573 Missouri Juniors 15-1 1729 5-1 71% 15 MO
4727 Pohaku Volleyball Club 16-1 1729 8-0 100% 16 KS
4728 HIC 13-Sarah 1729 4-1 80% 13 UT
4729 Miami Elite 13 1729 48-23 68% 13 FL
4730 Defensa 18-Kp 1729 11-1 92% 18
4731 NSSC 11 Nike 1729 31-14 69% 11 MO
4732 VEVA Brave 17-Blue 1729 53-20 73% 17 PA
4733 O2VBC 16-White 1729 29-8 78% 16 NY
4734 BAE 16-1 oliver 1729 12-20 38% 16 CA
4735 Fresno Heat HEAT 14-National amanda 1729 15-9 63% 14 CA
4736 PCVBC 11-Menninger 1729 15-3 83% 11 OH
4737 Vision 14-1 1729 41-10 80% 14 TX
4738 StarsTJ 12 10 1728 8-2 80% 10
4739 Chadron Elite 17 1728 12-7 63% 17
4740 CVA 17-Black 1728 35-29 55% 17
4741 WE 15-1 1728 21-7 75% 15
4742 StarsTJ 14 12 1728 9-2 82% 12
4743 Triangle 15-White 1728 35-25 58% 15 NC
4744 IMPACT 16-1 alaska 1728 19-16 51% 16 AK
4745 Iowa United 12-1 elite 1728 40-18 69% 12 IA
4746 NWVBC 15-1 1728 13-1 93% 15 WI
4747 GCVC 16 Silver 1728 31-34 48% 16 OH
4748 Munciana In 14 Dragons 1728 41-24 63% 14 IN
4749 TX432 13-Gold 1728 17-13 57% 13 TX
4750 TVC 14-1 1728 26-6 81% 14 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.