2025-2026 Season — Page 95 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4701 | NPJ Seattle 13 National | 1730 | 44-23 | 66% | 13 | WA |
| 4702 | Munciana In 13 Cyclones | 1730 | 31-34 | 48% | 13 | IN |
| 4703 | MVSA 16 Starz | 1730 | 47-19 | 69% | 16 | MD |
| 4704 | Dinos 18-1 | 1730 | 5-8 | 38% | 18 | WA |
| 4705 | RRHEAT 12-1 liz | 1730 | 3-1 | 50% | 12 | UT |
| 4706 | Delta Valley 16-Blue | 1730 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 4707 | Silver Hammers VBC 17-1 | 1730 | 31-10 | 76% | 17 | NJ |
| 4708 | LV 13-Thunder | 1730 | 34-9 | 76% | 13 | TX |
| 4709 | ARIZONA STORM 13-Lightning | 1730 | 33-42 | 44% | 13 | AZ |
| 4710 | FRVBC 15-Black | 1730 | 23-15 | 61% | 15 | CO |
| 4711 | Show Time 11u | 1730 | 23-7 | 70% | 11 | TX |
| 4712 | Idaho ONE 15-Blue | 1730 | 36-25 | 59% | 15 | ID |
| 4713 | Elevate 17-Pandamonium | 1730 | 52-22 | 70% | 17 | WI |
| 4714 | LHVA 15-Purple national | 1730 | 31-14 | 69% | 15 | NY |
| 4715 | FVA 13-Blaze - a | 1730 | 20-7 | 67% | 13 | AK |
| 4716 | Sky High Adidas 18 Elite | 1730 | 18-19 | 49% | 18 | IL |
| 4717 | ONE Volleyball 13-2 | 1730 | 53-12 | 82% | 13 | GA |
| 4718 | SoCal Legends 17-Elite | 1730 | 34-28 | 55% | 17 | CA |
| 4719 | Decatur Force 15 Teal | 1730 | 35-14 | 71% | 15 | IN |
| 4720 | Prodigy 12-Red | 1730 | 33-16 | 67% | 12 | KY |
| 4721 | Spiketown VBC 14-1 | 1730 | 12-8 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 4722 | CYVBC Surge 15-Black | 1730 | 24-21 | 53% | 15 | OH |
| 4723 | PEAK 13-2 | 1730 | 37-20 | 65% | 13 | OK |
| 4724 | DCVA 16-Cali | 1730 | 24-19 | 56% | 16 | NM |
| 4725 | TVS 11 Mel | 1730 | 14-1 | 82% | 11 | TX |
| 4726 | FIELU 13 | 1730 | 21-5 | 81% | 13 | MX |
| 4727 | LES 15 Madyson | 1730 | 23-5 | 79% | 15 | AL |
| 4728 | Storm 13 | 1729 | 19-1 | 86% | 13 | NY |
| 4729 | NTX Pressure Volleyball Club 16 16AMP | 1729 | 16-3 | 84% | 16 | |
| 4730 | 1st Alliance 16 Crimson | 1729 | 38-16 | 70% | 16 | IL |
| 4731 | PJVBC 18 Power | 1729 | 48-31 | 60% | 18 | WA |
| 4732 | Boiler Jrs 15-E black | 1729 | 54-32 | 63% | 15 | IN |
| 4733 | Colorado Juniors 18-Trevor | 1729 | 30-15 | 67% | 18 | CO |
| 4734 | Jammers 14-Black | 1729 | 12-1 | 92% | 14 | NC |
| 4735 | Wisconsin Ice 15 National | 1729 | 40-25 | 62% | 15 | WI |
| 4736 | Iowa Impact 12-1 premier | 1729 | 27-7 | 79% | 12 | IA |
| 4737 | DBQ Insanity 12-1 | 1729 | 27-17 | 61% | 12 | IA |
| 4738 | Iowa United 12-1 elite | 1729 | 40-18 | 69% | 12 | IA |
| 4739 | Texas Tornados 15-National | 1729 | 31-15 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 4740 | Tstreet LV 14-Jenn | 1729 | 28-25 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 4741 | RVC Impact 13 | 1729 | 52-25 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 4742 | Empire 15-National | 1729 | 49-21 | 70% | 15 | CA |
| 4743 | FaR Out 15-Red | 1729 | 28-12 | 70% | 15 | MI |
| 4744 | Tampa North 15-Black | 1729 | 34-23 | 60% | 15 | FL |
| 4745 | LI Fury 15-1 | 1729 | 13-10 | 57% | 15 | NY |
| 4746 | SynergyForce 15-Black | 1729 | 35-16 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 4747 | MOJO Volleyball Academy 17-Black | 1729 | 22-18 | 55% | 17 | MD |
| 4748 | Millennium 12-Orzech | 1729 | 28-5 | 85% | 12 | OH |
| 4749 | Chatham Blaze 12-Black | 1729 | 10-1 | 91% | 12 | IL |
| 4750 | ARVC 13-Red adidas | 1729 | 28-20 | 58% | 13 | NM |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.