2025-2026 Season — Page 95 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4701 | 808AC 15-Gannon | 1730 | 19-17 | 53% | 15 | HI |
| 4702 | NJ 14-Gold | 1729 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | |
| 4703 | Titans Omega 14 | 1729 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | |
| 4704 | Texas Tornados 15-National | 1729 | 31-15 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 4705 | No Limits 16-Navy | 1729 | 44-28 | 61% | 16 | FL |
| 4706 | BBE Blaze 17-S | 1729 | 10-1 | 91% | 17 | MN |
| 4707 | ESVBC 15-Ice national | 1729 | 36-31 | 54% | 15 | MD |
| 4708 | H. Prep 13 Mizuno | 1729 | 33-14 | 70% | 13 | TX |
| 4709 | DR NET FORCE 14U | 1729 | 11-1 | 92% | 14 | TX |
| 4710 | FaR Out 15-Red | 1729 | 28-12 | 70% | 15 | MI |
| 4711 | GRV 11-Green | 1729 | 33-7 | 83% | 11 | IN |
| 4712 | MOD Elite 18-Blue | 1729 | 16-7 | 70% | 18 | IL |
| 4713 | NSVBC 14-Select blue | 1729 | 13-3 | 81% | 14 | WI |
| 4714 | Southland 13-Black | 1729 | 32-6 | 80% | 13 | LA |
| 4715 | UPVBC 15-Elite | 1729 | 40-22 | 65% | 15 | OK |
| 4716 | UNION 15-Green | 1729 | 48-32 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 4717 | Wisconsin Blaze 14-Black | 1729 | 29-8 | 78% | 14 | WI |
| 4718 | 314 VBC 15-Red | 1729 | 52-21 | 71% | 15 | MO |
| 4719 | A4 Volley 18-Cassie | 1729 | 32-22 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 4720 | Ultimate 12-Gold | 1729 | 33-17 | 66% | 12 | IL |
| 4721 | Coastal 16-Elite | 1729 | 44-24 | 65% | 16 | FL |
| 4722 | ACT 17-Ca | 1729 | 44-17 | 72% | 17 | CA |
| 4723 | TEAM Kiwi 16-Graphite | 1729 | 50-23 | 68% | 16 | FL |
| 4724 | WVBA 15-Molten | 1729 | 39-22 | 64% | 15 | WA |
| 4725 | ONE Volleyball 13-2 | 1729 | 53-12 | 82% | 13 | GA |
| 4726 | 573 Missouri Juniors 15-1 | 1729 | 5-1 | 71% | 15 | MO |
| 4727 | Pohaku Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1729 | 8-0 | 100% | 16 | KS |
| 4728 | HIC 13-Sarah | 1729 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | UT |
| 4729 | Miami Elite 13 | 1729 | 48-23 | 68% | 13 | FL |
| 4730 | Defensa 18-Kp | 1729 | 11-1 | 92% | 18 | |
| 4731 | NSSC 11 Nike | 1729 | 31-14 | 69% | 11 | MO |
| 4732 | VEVA Brave 17-Blue | 1729 | 53-20 | 73% | 17 | PA |
| 4733 | O2VBC 16-White | 1729 | 29-8 | 78% | 16 | NY |
| 4734 | BAE 16-1 oliver | 1729 | 12-20 | 38% | 16 | CA |
| 4735 | Fresno Heat HEAT 14-National amanda | 1729 | 15-9 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 4736 | PCVBC 11-Menninger | 1729 | 15-3 | 83% | 11 | OH |
| 4737 | Vision 14-1 | 1729 | 41-10 | 80% | 14 | TX |
| 4738 | StarsTJ 12 10 | 1728 | 8-2 | 80% | 10 | |
| 4739 | Chadron Elite 17 | 1728 | 12-7 | 63% | 17 | |
| 4740 | CVA 17-Black | 1728 | 35-29 | 55% | 17 | |
| 4741 | WE 15-1 | 1728 | 21-7 | 75% | 15 | |
| 4742 | StarsTJ 14 12 | 1728 | 9-2 | 82% | 12 | |
| 4743 | Triangle 15-White | 1728 | 35-25 | 58% | 15 | NC |
| 4744 | IMPACT 16-1 alaska | 1728 | 19-16 | 51% | 16 | AK |
| 4745 | Iowa United 12-1 elite | 1728 | 40-18 | 69% | 12 | IA |
| 4746 | NWVBC 15-1 | 1728 | 13-1 | 93% | 15 | WI |
| 4747 | GCVC 16 Silver | 1728 | 31-34 | 48% | 16 | OH |
| 4748 | Munciana In 14 Dragons | 1728 | 41-24 | 63% | 14 | IN |
| 4749 | TX432 13-Gold | 1728 | 17-13 | 57% | 13 | TX |
| 4750 | TVC 14-1 | 1728 | 26-6 | 81% | 14 | AL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.