Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 94 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4651 Arete 12-Navy ethos 1731 32-25 52% 12 TX
4652 United 15 GW 1731 32-13 71% 15 CO
4653 Volitude 18-Black 1731 26-5 84% 18 CA
4654 Niagara Frontier 16-Red 1731 31-15 67% 16 NY
4655 Kairos 18-Beta 1731 25-10 71% 18 SD
4656 Austin Skyline 14-Black 1731 29-25 54% 14 TX
4657 BORINQUEN COQUI 10-1f 1731 7-3 70% 10 PR
4658 Odessa 4G VBC 12 O4G UNSTOPPABLE 1731 16-2 89% 12 TX
4659 314 VBC 15-Red 1731 52-21 71% 15 MO
4660 Prodigy 16-1 premier 1731 45-35 56% 16 NY
4661 LA South 12-S jessica 1731 41-8 84% 12 LA
4662 Maryland Volleyball Program 12-Black 1731 31-9 76% 12 MD
4663 Ozark Juniors 15-Elite 1731 62-26 70% 15 AR
4664 NVA 12-Elite fernando 1731 49-14 78% 12 FL
4665 MVA 13-Julio 1731 2-3 40% 13 FL
4666 Game Day 17-1 1731 28-16 64% 17 OR
4667 Fernandez Volleyball academy 13-1 1731 12-1 92% 13 FL
4668 863 Elite 16-1 black 1731 39-18 68% 16 FL
4669 X TEAM 14 1731 28-13 68% 14 CA
4670 OK PEAK 14-1 1731 5-3 63% 14 OK
4671 Coastal 16-Elite 1731 44-24 65% 16 FL
4672 Fusion Volleyball Club - Minnesota 12-Blue 1731 29-6 83% 12 MN
4673 Eastside 14-A boswell 1731 34-7 83% 14 OH
4674 PVA 17-Gray - top guns 1731 19-3 86% 17 MO
4675 FAV 17 Maverick 1731 31-13 70% 17 CA
4676 808 Athletic Club 16 Matt 1731 37-17 69% 16 HI
4677 Arsenal 14-14 1 1731 6-0 100% 14 TX
4678 ARSEL 16-1 johanna 1731 13-4 76% 16 PR
4679 NSSC 11 Nike 1731 31-14 69% 11 MO
4680 No Limits 16-Navy 1731 44-28 61% 16 FL
4681 Alpha Omega Volleyball 15-1 1731 12-3 71% 15 MO
4682 ACT 17-Ca 1731 44-17 72% 17 CA
4683 NEVA 12-1 1731 12-4 75% 12 PR
4684 SAND 15-Gold 1731 24-15 62% 15 CA
4685 Dallas Skyline 18-White 1731 22-14 61% 18 TX
4686 417 MoJrs 15-Elite 1731 19-11 63% 15 MO
4687 CLVC 17-Black 1731 33-21 61% 17 NC
4688 Long Island Legacy Volleyball Club 15 Long Island Legacy Blue 1731 8-4 67% 15 NY
4689 Kairos 13 Beta 1730 38-21 64% 13 SD
4690 Chadron Elite 17 1730 12-7 63% 17 WY
4691 757 16-Black 1730 37-25 60% 16 VA
4692 TEAM Kiwi 16-Graphite 1730 50-23 68% 16 FL
4693 MN Select 12-3 1730 50-17 75% 12 MN
4694 Buffalo Stampeders 12-1 1730 47-21 69% 12 FL
4695 Excel NW 18-1 lux 1730 32-28 53% 18 WA
4696 K2 16-Redbacks 1730 35-13 73% 16 TN
4697 Roots 17-1 green 1730 33-27 55% 17 TX
4698 SC Elite 14-White-jonathan 1730 25-15 63% 14 SC
4699 LIV Volleyball Club 13-Royal andrii sierra 1730 29-23 56% 13 CA
4700 Top Notch 10-Elite 1730 21-6 78% 10 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.