Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 94 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4651 757 16-Black 1731 37-25 60% 16 VA
4652 Texas Elite 16-Gold 1731 30-18 63% 16 TX
4653 Rockwood Thunder 12-Elite 1731 42-41 49% 12 MO
4654 ESO 16-Elite 1731 37-20 65% 16 OH
4655 Club GSL 15-Elect - jeremiah 1731 41-22 65% 15 UT
4656 HHVBC 10-1 1731 9-0 100% 10 IA
4657 OT 15-J antonella 1731 14-38 27% 15 FL
4658 FORZA1 17-One 1731 23-39 37% 17 CA
4659 Arsenal 14-14 1 1731 6-0 100% 14 TX
4660 OPVC 14-Weller 1731 22-13 63% 14 OH
4661 PVA 14-National summit 1731 18-23 44% 14 PA
4662 Rancho Valley 17-Premier 1731 9-10 47% 17 CA
4663 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-F damarys 1731 4-3 57% 16 PR
4664 FH 17-Ikaika-andy 1731 12-5 67% 17 TX
4665 Sideout 16-Black 1731 14-9 61% 16 WA
4666 SF Elite 12-Premier 1731 29-6 83% 12 CA
4667 Fury Elite 18-1 1730 19-7 73% 18
4668 FWFIRE 16-2p 1730 16-7 62% 16 TX
4669 FTL 15-Fusion sidney 1730 34-21 62% 15 FL
4670 Iowa Rockets 15-1 1730 48-24 66% 15 IA
4671 Alpha Select 12-S 1730 22-5 81% 12 AR
4672 Club Unite 14-Lw blue 1730 36-9 80% 14 TN
4673 HBJ 14-Halee/anna 1730 33-5 87% 14 AR
4674 Mineral Area 14 Elite 1730 35-17 67% 14 MO
4675 RAGE 17 MAGGIE 1730 25-26 49% 17 CA
4676 SAND 15-Gold 1730 24-15 62% 15 UT
4677 WAVE 16-Maricris 1730 33-18 65% 16 CA
4678 ZTV 13-1 select 1730 24-13 62% 13 MT
4679 Kairos 18-Beta 1730 25-10 71% 18 SD
4680 HRVC 14-National green 1730 36-11 77% 14 NC
4681 LV 13-Thunder 1730 34-9 76% 13 TX
4682 Top Notch 10-Elite 1730 21-6 78% 10 IL
4683 BORINQUEN COQUI 10-1f 1730 7-3 70% 10 PR
4684 X TEAM 14 1730 28-13 68% 14 CA
4685 Volitude 18-Black 1730 26-5 84% 18 CA
4686 Tampa North 15-Black 1730 34-23 60% 15 FL
4687 Girls 12 1730 17-0 100% 12 CA
4688 McAllen Fierce 12-1 1730 26-14 65% 12 TX
4689 PVA 15-National summit 1730 28-28 50% 15 PA
4690 PVA 17-Gray - top guns 1730 19-3 86% 17 MO
4691 Spiketown VBC 14-1 1730 12-8 60% 14 OH
4692 NVA 13-Elite ricardo 1730 53-13 80% 13 FL
4693 NVA 12-Elite fernando 1730 49-14 78% 12 FL
4694 PEAK 13-2 1730 37-20 65% 13 AZ
4695 Rapid Fire 17-Black 1730 17-9 65% 17 IL
4696 South Texas STVA 17-1 jordan 1730 3-6 33% 17
4697 Valley Heat 12-Black 1730 8-0 100% 12
4698 Mizuno M1 18-1 1730 46-19 71% 18 MN
4699 NSSC 15 Nike 1730 35-20 61% 15 MO
4700 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-8 1730 8-0 100% 16 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.