Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 93 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4601 FaR Out 14-Red 1733 38-10 79% 14 MI
4602 Passion 15 1733 41-10 80% 15 MI
4603 NSSC 15 Nike 1733 35-20 61% 15 MO
4604 Aces Volleyball Club 18-1 1733 15-4 71% 18 MT
4605 Rainier 15-Summit cmms 1733 43-24 64% 15 WA
4606 Tri-State Elite 16-Gray 1733 34-9 79% 16 KY
4607 LBK 16-1 1733 26-10 72% 16 OH
4608 Fusion 18 Nationals 1733 37-18 67% 18 WI
4609 Iowa Impact 17-1 elite 1733 25-29 46% 17 IA
4610 Triangle 15-White 1733 35-25 58% 15 NC
4611 Peninsula Wild 13 Peninsula Wild Borealis (AK) 1733 7-9 44% 13 AK
4612 SF Elite 12-Premier 1733 29-6 83% 12 CA
4613 BAE 16-1 oliver 1733 12-20 38% 16 CA
4614 Coast United 17 1733 49-58 46% 17 SC
4615 SG ELITE 17-Rosh lauyrn 1733 18-4 82% 17 CA
4616 ECJVC 13 National 1733 42-22 66% 13 NC
4617 RAGE 17 MAGGIE 1733 25-26 49% 17 CA
4618 T4VBC 14 Elite 1732 44-31 56% 14 TX
4619 ARIZONA STORM 16-Lightning 1732 21-46 31% 16 AZ
4620 League City Sharks 14 1732 20-8 71% 14 TX
4621 Manhattan Mamba 14-1 1732 23-8 74% 14 KS
4622 Club Net 14 Premier 1732 38-17 69% 14 AR
4623 JOMO G17-1 1732 11-2 69% 17 MO
4624 Wisconsin Blaze 14-Black 1732 29-8 78% 14 WI
4625 GCVC 16 Silver 1732 31-34 48% 16 OH
4626 AVA 16-Premier 1 1732 26-14 65% 16 NY
4627 575 17-Lpe izzy/jo 1732 36-38 49% 17 GA
4628 ENCORE 15-Red 1732 47-19 71% 15 CA
4629 Crushers 15 Navy 1732 32-7 82% 15 TN
4630 American 16-Red 1732 41-28 59% 16 VA
4631 Show 17-National wong 1732 25-16 61% 17 ID
4632 UNION 15-Green 1732 48-32 60% 15 IN
4633 PCVBC 11-Menninger 1732 15-3 83% 11 OH
4634 Mill City Volleyball Club 16 1732 26-25 51% 16 MA
4635 Tampa North 13-Black 1732 34-19 64% 13 FL
4636 Sideout 16-Black 1732 14-9 61% 16 WA
4637 CORE Girls 12-Platinum 1732 30-16 65% 12 NJ
4638 Iowa Elite 14-Even 1732 20-5 77% 14 IA
4639 Hype VB 13-Benson 1732 13-1 93% 13 MS
4640 Premier Nebraska 16-Silver 1732 26-19 58% 16 NE
4641 Mizuno M1 18-1 1732 46-19 71% 18 MN
4642 CJV 17-National navy 1732 28-35 44% 17 NC
4643 Columbia - MVC 15 1732 21-17 55% 15 ON
4644 Victory 13-East 1731 28-9 67% 13 TX
4645 C1VB 14-One grvl 1731 45-28 62% 14 SC
4646 Black Hills 17-Black 1731 30-10 75% 17 SD
4647 Royal Legends 14-Orange 1731 47-18 72% 14 PA
4648 573 Missouri Juniors 15-1 1731 5-1 71% 15 MO
4649 Onslow Freedom 12 1731 10-1 91% 12 NC
4650 Carolina Belles 14 1731 19-1 95% 14 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.