Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 93 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4601 Vision 14-Exv blue 1733 30-18 56% 14 CA
4602 Sportime 16-Gold 1732 30-26 54% 16 NY
4603 NET 14-Red 1732 25-10 69% 14 TX
4604 Black Hills 17-Black 1732 30-10 75% 17 SD
4605 ECJVC 13 National 1732 42-22 66% 13 NC
4606 EAA 15-BLUE 1732 40-11 78% 15 MN
4607 Excel NW 18-1 lux 1732 32-28 53% 18 WA
4608 Game Day 17-1 1732 28-16 64% 17 OR
4609 MVSA 16 Starz 1732 47-19 69% 16 MD
4610 MVP 60450 12U Black 1732 28-5 85% 12 IL
4611 Momentum 18 Jen 1732 16-13 55% 18 CO
4612 Ozark Juniors 15-Elite 1732 62-26 70% 15 AR
4613 Quandomania Girls 15-1 1732 32-13 71% 15 NJ
4614 SMV 14-2 silver 1732 53-15 78% 14 MN
4615 Stars 12 Savannah 1732 53-14 79% 12 SC
4616 TNT 15-Platinum 1732 19-11 63% 15 PA
4617 3DGE 17-2 gold 1732 27-32 46% 17 PA
4618 Kairos 15 Beta 1732 29-36 45% 15 SD
4619 FRVBC 14-Black 1732 30-20 60% 14 CO
4620 3N1 12-Teal 1732 42-22 66% 12 WA
4621 863 Elite 16-1 black 1732 39-18 68% 16 FL
4622 Spirit 12-Teal 1732 12-2 71% 12 OH
4623 NNJ Volleyball 18-Kuna 1732 14-2 88% 18 NV
4624 ONE Volleyball 11-1 1732 20-3 87% 11 GA
4625 Edge Elite 18-Gold 1732 13-9 59% 18 PA
4626 Alpha Omega Volleyball 15-1 1732 12-3 71% 15 MO
4627 Tsunami 16-1e cade 1732 39-12 76% 16 GA
4628 SVC 18-1 1732 54-21 71% 18 AZ
4629 TopFlight 15-National red 1732 15-9 63% 15 NV
4630 Chatham Blaze 12-Black 1732 10-1 91% 12 IL
4631 MVA 13-Julio 1732 2-3 40% 13 FL
4632 MVVC 17-Black 1732 47-23 67% 17 CA
4633 Vancouver VBC 14-1 1732 17-4 81% 14 BC
4634 SWI3D 18-Black 1731 20-5 80% 18
4635 MVSA 17 Storm 1731 54-13 76% 17 MD
4636 SC Elite 14-White-jonathan 1731 25-15 63% 14 SC
4637 ATOMIC 17-Smack elite 1731 46-29 61% 17 MI
4638 Millennium 12-Orzech 1731 28-5 85% 12 OH
4639 ARIZONA STORM 16-Lightning 1731 21-46 31% 16 AZ
4640 Dallas Skyline 18-White 1731 22-14 61% 18 TX
4641 Empire 15-National 1731 49-21 70% 15 CA
4642 Molten 16-Red (ry) 1731 8-0 100% 16 AZ
4643 Munciana In 13 Cyclones 1731 31-34 48% 13 IN
4644 SC Rockstar 16-Tim 1731 29-26 53% 16 CA
4645 1 Flight 17-1 national 1731 27-30 47% 17 OR
4646 Texas United 15-Red 1731 30-27 53% 15 TX
4647 1st Alliance 16 Crimson 1731 38-16 70% 16 IL
4648 Zero Gravity 18-Orange 1731 21-4 84% 18 OH
4649 Cyclones 13-Paramount 1731 40-7 83% 13 IL
4650 Academy 15-E vipers 1731 42-41 51% 15 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.