Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 92 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4551 CVH SELECT 14-1 1734 9-11 45% 14 PR
4552 SMVA 12-1 1734 24-5 77% 12 AL
4553 LBK 12-1 1734 36-11 77% 12 OH
4554 ARSEL 16-1 johanna 1734 13-4 76% 16 PR
4555 TOVC 14-Yeye 1734 10-5 67% 14 CA
4556 Team Colorado 15-N1 1734 40-15 73% 15 CO
4557 DaKine 17-National navy 1734 49-28 62% 17 WA
4558 Huskies 18-Premier 1734 7-9 44% 18 CT
4559 Legacy One 15-1 1734 30-21 59% 15 CA
4560 575 17-Lpe izzy/jo 1734 36-38 49% 17 GA
4561 CYVBC Surge 15-Black 1734 24-21 53% 15 OH
4562 NKYVC 13-3 typhoon 1734 29-18 62% 13 KY
4563 Apex 12-National navy 1734 9-2 75% 12 MO
4564 TAV 11-Black 1734 30-14 67% 11 TX
4565 Impact 15-1 1734 61-51 54% 15 TX
4566 Border West 14-1 1734 11-0 92% 14 MN
4567 Topeka Saints 16-1 1734 5-1 83% 16 KS
4568 Rancho Valley 13-Premier 1734 5-4 56% 13 CA
4569 Illini Elite 15-Black 1734 33-35 49% 15 IL
4570 PNW VBC 17-1 national 1734 23-24 49% 17 WA
4571 TIV 16-Black 1734 19-14 58% 16 TX
4572 RTV 16-Ravens 1733 30-4 86% 16
4573 SWMVB 14-1 1733 6-3 46% 14
4574 BAVA 17 Riptide 1733 42-28 59% 17 MD
4575 Tamales 15-1 1733 21-8 72% 15 MO
4576 Eastview Lightning 14-1 1733 35-7 83% 14 MN
4577 FaR Out 15 Steel 1733 36-9 80% 15 MI
4578 GRIT 16-Green 1733 40-23 63% 16 AL
4579 ND Elite 18-Winter dalziel 1733 17-3 85% 18 ND
4580 RVT 15-1 surf 1733 35-22 61% 15 NY
4581 RSVBC 13-1 1733 41-21 66% 13 WA
4582 VC United 15-1 elite 1733 21-31 40% 15 IL
4583 LMVC 15-Elite sean 1733 47-24 66% 15 SC
4584 Prodigy 12-Red 1733 33-16 67% 12 NY
4585 BAVC 14-National liz 1733 23-8 74% 14 CA
4586 Set It Off 13-2 1733 12-1 92% 13 IA
4587 OT 14-T veronika 1733 32-29 52% 14 FL
4588 RVT 14-2 swim 1733 32-13 71% 14 NY
4589 NYC Juniors 15-Blue 1733 39-26 60% 15 NY
4590 The Shore 12-Black 1733 22-5 81% 12 MI
4591 AVA 16-Premier 1 1733 26-14 65% 16 NY
4592 Elevate 12-Blue 1733 37-31 53% 12 TX
4593 United 15 Tristan 1733 32-13 71% 15 CO
4594 Beach South 17-1 1733 9-0 100% 17 NC
4595 Instinct 12-Wild gold 1733 27-8 69% 12 TX
4596 NRG 12-Ampd navy 1733 25-17 52% 12 TX
4597 Reach Elite 12-Black 1733 48-16 75% 12 FL
4598 Fort Worth Fire 12-Purple 1733 8-2 80% 12
4599 OYA 13-Prime 1733 36-8 82% 13 CA
4600 SIVBC 17-Storm 1733 22-38 37% 17 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.