Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 91 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4501 AVC Red 12-2 1736 9-3 69% 12 TX
4502 ECVBA 14-1 1736 28-16 64% 14 CA
4503 Quandomania Girls 15-1 1736 32-13 71% 15 NJ
4504 TNT 15 Mambas 1736 17-25 40% 15 PA
4505 Coast VA 14-1 1736 45-23 66% 14 VA
4506 Absolute 11-Black 1736 40-25 62% 11 CA
4507 SPVB 17 Marshall 1736 22-26 46% 17 IL
4508 NET 14-Red 1736 25-10 69% 14 AR
4509 Rose City Netters Volleyball Club 14-1 1736 19-9 59% 14 MT
4510 Coastal 17-Elite joe 1736 39-38 51% 17 FL
4511 McAllen Fierce 12-1 1736 26-14 65% 12 TX
4512 Amarillo Xtreme 11-Intensity 1736 29-19 60% 11 TX
4513 MVSA 17 Storm 1736 54-13 76% 17 MD
4514 Dime 11-Premier 1736 34-15 69% 11 CA
4515 Club Xtreme 14-Black 1736 9-6 60% 14 MI
4516 PROJECT SPIKERS 14-1 1735 28-8 70% 14
4517 Tamales 15-1 1735 21-8 72% 15 MO
4518 HOVA 17-1 1735 4-3 57% 17 OH
4519 SF JRS White 11-2 1735 9-3 75% 11 CA
4520 NYC Juniors 15-Blue 1735 39-26 60% 15 NY
4521 Carolina ICE 15-Nat blue 1735 35-18 66% 15 SC
4522 PVA 14-National summit 1735 18-23 44% 14 NY
4523 SVC 18-1 1735 54-21 71% 18 AZ
4524 CVA 17-Black 1735 35-29 55% 17 CO
4525 RTV 16-Ravens 1735 30-4 86% 16 IL
4526 DIG 13-Black - britt 1735 25-11 63% 13 TX
4527 SMV 14-2 silver 1735 53-15 78% 14 MN
4528 KEVC 18-1 1735 21-11 66% 18 MN
4529 BAVA 17 Riptide 1735 42-28 59% 17 MD
4530 United VBA 17-Purple 1735 44-22 67% 17 TX
4531 OYA 13-Prime 1735 36-8 82% 13 CA
4532 OT 15-J antonella 1735 14-38 27% 15 FL
4533 ESVBC 15-Ice national 1735 36-31 54% 15 IA
4534 Premier 18 Antare 1735 54-22 71% 18 OH
4535 WSRVC 12-Henriksen 1735 21-4 84% 12 WY
4536 Tropics G 18-Elite kelli 1735 23-5 82% 18 FL
4537 PNW VBC 17-1 national 1735 23-24 49% 17 OR
4538 ACESH 18-1 1735 8-7 53% 18 HI
4539 Texas Elite 16-Gold 1735 30-18 63% 16 TX
4540 NRG 12-Ampd navy 1735 25-17 52% 12 TX
4541 Colorado Juniors 14-Steve 1735 42-33 56% 14 CO
4542 BRYC 15 Royal 1735 38-24 59% 15 VA
4543 SWMVB 14-1 1735 6-3 46% 14 MT
4544 26 SoV 14-1 1735 35-13 73% 14 WA
4545 Blacktooth Volleyball Club 14-Black 1735 17-8 68% 14 WY
4546 Fury Elite 18-1 1735 19-7 73% 18 TX
4547 Vancouver VBC 14-1 1734 17-4 81% 14 OR
4548 Five:1 14-Black 1734 39-27 59% 14 MI
4549 3N1 12-Teal 1734 42-22 66% 12 WA
4550 SMVA 12-1 1734 24-5 77% 12 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.