2025-2026 Season — Page 91 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4501 | AVC Red 12-2 | 1736 | 9-3 | 69% | 12 | TX |
| 4502 | ECVBA 14-1 | 1736 | 28-16 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 4503 | Quandomania Girls 15-1 | 1736 | 32-13 | 71% | 15 | NJ |
| 4504 | TNT 15 Mambas | 1736 | 17-25 | 40% | 15 | PA |
| 4505 | Coast VA 14-1 | 1736 | 45-23 | 66% | 14 | VA |
| 4506 | Absolute 11-Black | 1736 | 40-25 | 62% | 11 | CA |
| 4507 | SPVB 17 Marshall | 1736 | 22-26 | 46% | 17 | IL |
| 4508 | NET 14-Red | 1736 | 25-10 | 69% | 14 | AR |
| 4509 | Rose City Netters Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1736 | 19-9 | 59% | 14 | MT |
| 4510 | Coastal 17-Elite joe | 1736 | 39-38 | 51% | 17 | FL |
| 4511 | McAllen Fierce 12-1 | 1736 | 26-14 | 65% | 12 | TX |
| 4512 | Amarillo Xtreme 11-Intensity | 1736 | 29-19 | 60% | 11 | TX |
| 4513 | MVSA 17 Storm | 1736 | 54-13 | 76% | 17 | MD |
| 4514 | Dime 11-Premier | 1736 | 34-15 | 69% | 11 | CA |
| 4515 | Club Xtreme 14-Black | 1736 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | MI |
| 4516 | PROJECT SPIKERS 14-1 | 1735 | 28-8 | 70% | 14 | |
| 4517 | Tamales 15-1 | 1735 | 21-8 | 72% | 15 | MO |
| 4518 | HOVA 17-1 | 1735 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | OH |
| 4519 | SF JRS White 11-2 | 1735 | 9-3 | 75% | 11 | CA |
| 4520 | NYC Juniors 15-Blue | 1735 | 39-26 | 60% | 15 | NY |
| 4521 | Carolina ICE 15-Nat blue | 1735 | 35-18 | 66% | 15 | SC |
| 4522 | PVA 14-National summit | 1735 | 18-23 | 44% | 14 | NY |
| 4523 | SVC 18-1 | 1735 | 54-21 | 71% | 18 | AZ |
| 4524 | CVA 17-Black | 1735 | 35-29 | 55% | 17 | CO |
| 4525 | RTV 16-Ravens | 1735 | 30-4 | 86% | 16 | IL |
| 4526 | DIG 13-Black - britt | 1735 | 25-11 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 4527 | SMV 14-2 silver | 1735 | 53-15 | 78% | 14 | MN |
| 4528 | KEVC 18-1 | 1735 | 21-11 | 66% | 18 | MN |
| 4529 | BAVA 17 Riptide | 1735 | 42-28 | 59% | 17 | MD |
| 4530 | United VBA 17-Purple | 1735 | 44-22 | 67% | 17 | TX |
| 4531 | OYA 13-Prime | 1735 | 36-8 | 82% | 13 | CA |
| 4532 | OT 15-J antonella | 1735 | 14-38 | 27% | 15 | FL |
| 4533 | ESVBC 15-Ice national | 1735 | 36-31 | 54% | 15 | IA |
| 4534 | Premier 18 Antare | 1735 | 54-22 | 71% | 18 | OH |
| 4535 | WSRVC 12-Henriksen | 1735 | 21-4 | 84% | 12 | WY |
| 4536 | Tropics G 18-Elite kelli | 1735 | 23-5 | 82% | 18 | FL |
| 4537 | PNW VBC 17-1 national | 1735 | 23-24 | 49% | 17 | OR |
| 4538 | ACESH 18-1 | 1735 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | HI |
| 4539 | Texas Elite 16-Gold | 1735 | 30-18 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 4540 | NRG 12-Ampd navy | 1735 | 25-17 | 52% | 12 | TX |
| 4541 | Colorado Juniors 14-Steve | 1735 | 42-33 | 56% | 14 | CO |
| 4542 | BRYC 15 Royal | 1735 | 38-24 | 59% | 15 | VA |
| 4543 | SWMVB 14-1 | 1735 | 6-3 | 46% | 14 | MT |
| 4544 | 26 SoV 14-1 | 1735 | 35-13 | 73% | 14 | WA |
| 4545 | Blacktooth Volleyball Club 14-Black | 1735 | 17-8 | 68% | 14 | WY |
| 4546 | Fury Elite 18-1 | 1735 | 19-7 | 73% | 18 | TX |
| 4547 | Vancouver VBC 14-1 | 1734 | 17-4 | 81% | 14 | OR |
| 4548 | Five:1 14-Black | 1734 | 39-27 | 59% | 14 | MI |
| 4549 | 3N1 12-Teal | 1734 | 42-22 | 66% | 12 | WA |
| 4550 | SMVA 12-1 | 1734 | 24-5 | 77% | 12 | AL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.