Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 91 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4501 Onslow Freedom 12 1736 10-1 91% 12 NC
4502 Leaside 15-1 dash 1736 2-5 29% 15 ON
4503 Storm 12-Black 1736 67-26 70% 12 CO
4504 DCVA 14-N1 1735 5-2 71% 14 NM
4505 Millennium 14-Troike 1735 44-13 77% 14 OH
4506 FeVA 14 (BG) 1735 61-22 73% 14 WI
4507 LAVA 14-Sheila 1735 24-5 83% 14 NC
4508 360 14-Kaos black 1735 21-18 49% 14 TX
4509 DBQ Insanity 12-1 1735 27-17 61% 12 IA
4510 Colorado Skyline 17 Royal 1735 27-30 47% 17 CO
4511 CJV 17-National navy 1735 28-35 44% 17 NC
4512 MAVS KC 15-Premier 1735 30-18 63% 15 KS
4513 Hobcab VBC 13-1 1735 24-5 83% 13 KY
4514 MJVA 13-Elite black 1735 39-18 68% 13 TN
4515 Millennium 11-Kuns 1735 26-5 84% 11 OH
4516 Prime Time 18-Blue 1735 30-9 77% 18 IL
4517 RockCity 15 N2 1735 58-19 75% 15 OH
4518 TX432 13-Black 1735 21-24 47% 13 TX
4519 WAVE 18-Bobbie jo 1735 31-24 56% 18 CA
4520 WD Nation 13-Blue 1735 48-16 75% 13 LA
4521 Jax Pursuit 16 1735 11-3 79% 16 FL
4522 GRIT 12-Elite 1735 28-6 80% 12 AL
4523 LA South 12-S jessica 1735 41-8 84% 12 LA
4524 Idaho ONE 18-White 1735 39-13 75% 18 ID
4525 MPV 14-National green 1735 43-32 56% 14 UT
4526 Apex 13 1735 15-5 71% 13 SC
4527 FORZA1 14-One 1735 23-24 49% 14 CA
4528 Rainier 15-Summit cmms 1735 43-24 64% 15 WA
4529 Reign Volleyball 11-Black 1735 21-3 88% 11 FL
4530 Tri-State Elite 16-Gray 1735 34-9 79% 16 OH
4531 TSUNAMI 14-1 1735 18-2 90% 14 OR
4532 Skyline 16-White david 1735 26-23 48% 16 TX
4533 RVT 12-1 surf 1735 27-7 79% 12 NY
4534 MGA 16-South 1735 41-15 73% 16 MA
4535 PVA 16-National (GA) 1735 9-8 53% 16
4536 SynergyForce 15-Black 1735 35-16 69% 15 CA
4537 SW Pursuit Volleyball 16-1 1735 21-4 81% 16 MO
4538 SCVC 18-1 christopher 1734 24-3 89% 18
4539 Fusion 18 Nationals 1734 37-18 67% 18 WI
4540 CORE Girls 12-Platinum 1734 30-16 65% 12 CA
4541 Black Swamp 14-1 1734 14-11 56% 14 OH
4542 Alpha Select 14-S 1734 32-6 84% 14 AR
4543 Elevation 13-Timberline 1734 40-24 63% 13 CO
4544 Empowered 18-Elite black 1734 31-26 54% 18 IN
4545 FaR Out 14-Red 1734 38-10 79% 14 MI
4546 FSVC 14-Nike 1734 46-29 61% 14 CA
4547 TXP 13-Black ashley 1734 33-15 67% 13 TX
4548 WBVBC 17-1 brett 1734 43-13 77% 17 OH
4549 305VBC 18-E sebastian 1734 21-14 60% 18 FL
4550 Actyve 15-Adidas 1734 33-18 65% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.