Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 90 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4451 DNVB 15-Black 1738 5-4 56% 15 MA
4452 Dig It VBC 15-1 1738 18-2 90% 15 IL
4453 WSRVC 14-Studards 1738 20-14 59% 14 WY
4454 Iowa United 17-1 premier 1738 25-26 49% 17 IA
4455 TNT 15-Platinum 1738 19-11 63% 15 PA
4456 Club Sand 17-S 1738 14-5 74% 17 UT
4457 Emerald Coast 16-National - wayne 1738 8-4 67% 16 FL
4458 EMV 17-Black sadie 1738 27-19 56% 17 TX
4459 MOD Elite 18-Blue 1737 16-7 70% 18 IL
4460 Prime Time 18-Blue 1737 30-9 77% 18 IL
4461 FaR Out 15 Maroon 1737 38-6 86% 15 MI
4462 Border West 14-1 1737 11-0 92% 14 MN
4463 FSVC 14-Nike 1737 46-29 61% 14 FL
4464 JVC 17-1 1737 11-5 69% 17 PR
4465 MVVC 14-Black 1737 41-31 57% 14 CA
4466 Madtown 17-1 national 1737 25-35 42% 17 WI
4467 SEIVB 16-Elite 1737 27-10 73% 16 IN
4468 Northern Lights 16-W 1737 53-21 72% 16 MN
4469 Club Velocity 16-1 1737 18-9 67% 16 MN
4470 MPV 14-National green 1737 43-32 56% 14 UT
4471 TOVC 12-1 1737 5-2 71% 12 PR
4472 Vaqueras 13-F roberto 1737 13-10 57% 13 PR
4473 Sky High 16-Black 1737 38-42 46% 16 IL
4474 SWMVB 12-1 1737 6-3 43% 12 MT
4475 CVH SELECT 14-1 1737 9-11 45% 14 PR
4476 Nordiques Jr 14-1 1737 3-2 60% 14 PA
4477 Spiketown VBC 18-1a 1737 25-3 89% 18 OH
4478 MAVS KC 15-Premier 1737 30-18 63% 15 KS
4479 VCN 13-Black 1737 12-5 71% 13 NE
4480 Rising Tide Oceans 14 1737 35-29 55% 14 SC
4481 WBVBC 17-1 brett 1737 43-13 77% 17 OH
4482 BCS Skyline H 17 Royal 1737 29-28 51% 17 TX
4483 TX SPARKS 12-1 audrey 1737 25-5 81% 12 TX
4484 CVC 15-BLUE 1737 29-29 50% 15 OH
4485 Ultimate G18 Gold 1737 14-11 56% 18 IL
4486 Mineral Area 12 Spark 1737 27-9 75% 12 MO
4487 Hobcab VBC 16-1 1737 37-7 84% 16 KY
4488 Blue Heat 10 1736 14-1 82% 10 MO
4489 Mighty Mo 12-Hunter 1736 15-7 58% 12 MT
4490 TIV 16-Black 1736 19-14 58% 16 TX
4491 SC Elite 17-Blue-teneo 1736 24-36 40% 17 SC
4492 Club V 14-Prodigy austin 1736 27-29 48% 14 UT
4493 TOVC 14-Yeye 1736 10-5 67% 14 PR
4494 Rockwood Thunder 11-Elite 1736 28-25 48% 11 MO
4495 Northern Lights 14-W 1736 41-17 71% 14 MN
4496 Platform 10-Navy 1736 13-1 93% 10 IA
4497 Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 12 12 Lightning 1736 25-5 83% 12 WV
4498 TAV 11-Black 1736 30-14 67% 11 TX
4499 Millennium 11-Kuns 1736 26-5 84% 11 OH
4500 LAVA 14-Sheila 1736 24-5 83% 14 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.