Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 90 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4451 ARIZONA STORM 13-Lightning 1737 33-42 44% 13 AZ
4452 Cajun Elite 13 Beau 1737 33-16 67% 13 LA
4453 Empowered 15-Elite black 1737 39-17 70% 15 IN
4454 DSVC 15-National blue 1737 34-18 65% 15 AL
4455 Dunes 13-Black 1737 37-22 63% 13 IN
4456 Hobcab VBC 16-1 1737 37-7 84% 16 KY
4457 TX SPARKS 12-1 audrey 1737 25-5 81% 12 TX
4458 WPVC 16-Armour orange 1737 45-28 62% 16 FL
4459 Dunes 12-Black 1737 46-17 73% 12 IN
4460 Iowa Impact 12-1 elite 1737 41-21 66% 12 IA
4461 LBK 16-1 1737 26-10 72% 16 OH
4462 Rockwood Thunder 11-Elite 1737 28-25 48% 11 MO
4463 Houston Hazard 14-Black 1737 23-6 79% 14 TX
4464 Balance 16-White 1737 33-34 49% 16 IL
4465 Emerald Coast 16-National - wayne 1737 8-4 67% 16 FL
4466 AVA 13-Premier 2 1737 28-6 82% 13 NY
4467 EVA 18 Gold 1737 24-11 69% 18 NJ
4468 Sky High 16-Black 1737 38-42 46% 16 IL
4469 NVA 15-White 1737 36-20 64% 15 PA
4470 PEAK 12-3 1737 18-5 78% 12 AZ
4471 CMASS EDGE 16-Black 1737 25-37 40% 16 MA
4472 DNVB 16-Red 1737 2-5 29% 16
4473 MVVC G 12-Black 1737 34-19 64% 12 CA
4474 NWAJS 17-Adidas 1736 10-6 63% 17
4475 Blue Heat 10 1736 14-1 82% 10 MO
4476 NNJ 15-Katy 1736 24-19 56% 15 NV
4477 CGSV 14-Hutson 1736 20-3 87% 14 OH
4478 FCA Force 14-1 jennifer 1736 23-10 70% 14 NC
4479 26 SoV 14-1 1736 35-13 73% 14 WA
4480 TDV 14-Elite 1736 24-15 62% 14 OH
4481 Madfrog 14-E green 1736 31-15 62% 14 TX
4482 OVA 14-National peyton 1736 29-9 76% 14 FL
4483 Royal Legends 14-Orange 1736 47-18 72% 14 PA
4484 WSRVC 12-Henriksen 1736 18-3 86% 12
4485 Dime 11-Premier 1736 34-15 69% 11 CA
4486 TFVC 15-1 1736 22-16 58% 15 TN
4487 FaR Out 15 Maroon 1736 38-6 86% 15 MI
4488 Manhattan Mamba 18-1 1736 36-15 67% 18 KS
4489 Platform 10-Navy 1736 13-1 93% 10 IA
4490 SC Elite 17-Blue-teneo 1736 24-36 40% 17 SC
4491 Southern Storm 17 Ice 1736 42-12 78% 17 MS
4492 United VBA 17-Purple 1736 44-22 67% 17 TX
4493 KW Revolution 16-Elite 1736 28-22 56% 16 TX
4494 808 Athletic Club 12-Dayne 1736 31-6 84% 12 HI
4495 CCVA 13-Elite 1736 17-4 81% 13 CA
4496 FEVA 15-Michael 1736 56-10 85% 15 FL
4497 Coastal 17-Elite joe 1736 39-38 51% 17 FL
4498 CALI 18-Black 1736 23-28 45% 18 NY
4499 Jupiter Elite 11-E 1736 34-23 60% 11 FL
4500 adidas DYNASTY 12-2 1736 7-1 88% 12 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.