Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 89 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4401 ACESH 18-1 1739 8-7 53% 18 HI
4402 Queen City 12-Red 1738 15-2 88% 12
4403 Crushers 15 Navy 1738 32-7 82% 15 OR
4404 Club Z 16-Shawn 1738 32-20 62% 16 TX
4405 Douglas Rebels 14-1 1738 27-17 61% 14
4406 Nordiques Jr 14-1 1738 3-2 60% 14
4407 360 15-Kaos black 1738 27-23 51% 15 TX
4408 HOU STELLAR 16-Premier 1738 40-26 61% 16 TX
4409 GSVC 13-Black 1738 10-12 45% 13 NH
4410 MVBC 16-Red 1738 40-17 70% 16 CA
4411 MARIN 16-Black 1738 51-25 67% 16 CA
4412 Mineral Area 12 Spark 1738 27-9 75% 12 MO
4413 Mater Dei Jr Cats 14-Poko 1738 16-4 80% 14 IN
4414 PEAK 11-1 elite 1738 32-14 70% 11 AZ
4415 Reign Volleyball 15-Gold 1738 26-14 65% 15 FL
4416 UP North Jr's DSN 15-Sel 1738 30-5 86% 15 WI
4417 Ultimate G18 Gold 1738 14-11 56% 18 IL
4418 Valley Juniors 16-Black 1738 24-13 65% 16 VA
4419 Kairos 15 Delta 1738 46-19 71% 15 SD
4420 Iowa Impact 17-1 elite 1738 25-29 46% 17 IA
4421 ID Crush IF 18 Brylee 1738 22-8 73% 18 UT
4422 808 Athletic Club 15-Tarann 1738 27-9 75% 15 HI
4423 Club V 14-Prodigy austin 1738 27-29 48% 14 UT
4424 South County 12-Erika 1738 11-10 44% 12 RI
4425 A4 Volley 14-Aaron 1738 28-17 62% 14 CA
4426 Rancho 17-Select 1738 31-17 65% 17 CA
4427 Buffalo Stampeders 12-1 1738 47-21 69% 12 FL
4428 Inside Out 16-Mizuno black 1738 27-20 57% 16 MI
4429 Alliance 18-Ren blue 1738 31-18 63% 18 TN
4430 LI Fury 15-1 1738 13-10 57% 15 NY
4431 VCN 13-Black 1738 12-5 71% 13 NE
4432 Tropics G 18-Elite kelli 1738 23-5 82% 18 FL
4433 United 14 National 1738 35-19 65% 14 AL
4434 Illini Elite 12-Joe 1738 13-3 81% 12 IL
4435 RAGE 12 FATIMA 1738 19-11 63% 12 CA
4436 Kulia 16-Gold 1738 51-12 81% 16 HI
4437 Rising Tide Oceans 14 1738 35-29 55% 14
4438 Storm 18-1 1738 10-6 63% 18
4439 Illini NW 12U Bronze 1738 13-1 93% 12 IL
4440 DuPage Elite 17 United 1738 51-18 74% 17 IL
4441 Absolute 12-Pink 1738 25-21 54% 12 CA
4442 Spartan Club 15 1737 14-1 93% 15
4443 WSRVC 14-Studards 1737 20-14 59% 14
4444 Tr1be Volleyball 14-Red 1737 11-8 58% 14
4445 KEVC 18-1 1737 21-11 66% 18
4446 Red Rock 14-Derick - walnut creek 1737 24-17 59% 14 CA
4447 NE Elite 14-Apex 1737 28-14 67% 14 NE
4448 Manhattan Mamba 14-1 1737 23-8 74% 14 KS
4449 COV Team FB 14-1 1737 28-13 68% 14 CA
4450 LIVEWIRE 14-Boost 1737 48-21 70% 14 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.