Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 89 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4401 Jax Pursuit 16 1739 11-3 79% 16 FL
4402 Douglas Rebels 14-1 1739 27-17 61% 14 WY
4403 GP 18 Premier 1739 29-12 71% 18 FL
4404 Rize 13-Kate 1739 4-4 50% 13 UT
4405 Platinum 17-Power 1739 36-30 55% 17 UT
4406 FVC 13-Tigers 1739 10-0 100% 13 NE
4407 LIVEWIRE 14-Boost 1739 48-21 70% 14 AZ
4408 PVA 13-Black 1739 26-6 81% 13 SC
4409 Tr1be Volleyball 14-Red 1739 11-8 58% 14 WY
4410 RSVBC 13-1 1739 41-21 66% 13 WA
4411 MVP 13-Gold 1739 29-22 57% 13 SC
4412 EVA 18 Gold 1739 24-11 69% 18 NJ
4413 Empowered 15-Elite black 1739 39-17 70% 15 IN
4414 757 14-Black 1739 37-27 58% 14 VA
4415 EVA 12-Green 1739 30-7 81% 12 KY
4416 Millennium 14-Troike 1739 44-13 77% 14 OH
4417 KW Revolution 16-Elite 1739 28-22 56% 16 TX
4418 Team Atlantis 17 Team Atlantis Dammeyer 1739 16-7 70% 17 OH
4419 Tri-State Elite 11-Blue 1739 20-6 77% 11 KY
4420 Katy Stars 18 Elite 1739 37-17 69% 18 TX
4421 Vibe 12-Elevate 1739 48-19 72% 12 CA
4422 PEAK 12-3 1739 18-5 78% 12 OK
4423 Legacy One 15-1 1739 30-21 59% 15 CA
4424 603 United 17-Seacoast black 1739 22-20 52% 17 NH
4425 Netforce 14-Kelly 1739 27-4 87% 14 AL
4426 Iowa Rockets 12-Black 1739 42-17 70% 12 IA
4427 Empire 17-National 1739 33-22 60% 17 CA
4428 PEAK 11-1 elite 1739 32-14 70% 11 OK
4429 SC Rockstar 16-Tim 1739 29-26 53% 16 CA
4430 RAGE 12 FATIMA 1739 19-11 63% 12 CA
4431 OT 14-T veronika 1739 32-29 52% 14 FL
4432 Clarksville VBC 16 Liz 1739 38-21 63% 16 TN
4433 Idaho Peak KATELYN NATIONAL 17-S 1739 7-3 70% 17 UT
4434 Mater Dei Jr Cats 14-Poko 1739 16-4 80% 14 IN
4435 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 14 Split Mountain Chelsea & Krista 1739 14-2 88% 14 UT
4436 KC Power 12-1 1739 32-26 55% 12 KS
4437 EXCEL 12-National gold 1739 23-11 55% 12 TX
4438 Barrie Elites 16 Barrie Elites Hurricanes 1739 4-5 44% 16 ON
4439 Impact Volleyball Club 16-1 1738 40-10 80% 16
4440 Idaho ONE 18-White 1738 39-13 75% 18 ID
4441 WAVE 18-Bobbie jo 1738 31-24 56% 18 CA
4442 PC Elite 14 1738 22-10 59% 14 TX
4443 Illini NW 12U Bronze 1738 13-1 93% 12 IL
4444 LBK 12-1 1738 36-11 77% 12 OH
4445 Eagles Select Fusion Elite 14 1738 5-2 71% 14 IA
4446 DuPage Elite 17 United 1738 51-18 74% 17 IL
4447 Venom 11-Black 1738 53-26 67% 11 AZ
4448 Balance 16-White 1738 33-34 49% 16 IL
4449 LMVC 15-Elite sean 1738 47-24 66% 15 SC
4450 TX SPARKS 14-1 jene 1738 24-4 86% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.