2025-2026 Season — Page 88 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4351 | JAG VBC 13-1 national | 1741 | 55-16 | 77% | 13 | WI |
| 4352 | South County 12-Erika | 1741 | 11-10 | 44% | 12 | UT |
| 4353 | RVT 15-1 surf | 1741 | 35-22 | 61% | 15 | NY |
| 4354 | VCNebraska 18-Black | 1741 | 11-10 | 52% | 18 | NE |
| 4355 | Red Rock 14-Derick - walnut creek | 1741 | 24-17 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 4356 | SCVB 14-Mike | 1741 | 23-17 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 4357 | IA Juniors 14-Black | 1741 | 39-21 | 65% | 14 | IA |
| 4358 | ECVC 18-Black | 1741 | 22-13 | 63% | 18 | VA |
| 4359 | OPU 14-2 | 1741 | 30-14 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 4360 | Big Sky 15-Eastside | 1741 | 5-0 | 71% | 15 | MT |
| 4361 | Horseshoe 16-Red | 1741 | 24-13 | 65% | 16 | PA |
| 4362 | DaKine 17-National navy | 1741 | 49-28 | 62% | 17 | WA |
| 4363 | Topeka Saints 16-1 | 1741 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | KS |
| 4364 | CMASS EDGE 16-Black | 1741 | 25-37 | 40% | 16 | MA |
| 4365 | Black Hills Juniors NH 16-1 | 1741 | 15-8 | 65% | 16 | WY |
| 4366 | Vaqueras 17-F julio | 1741 | 16-18 | 47% | 17 | PR |
| 4367 | Sunshine 17-Westside | 1741 | 29-38 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 4368 | MIDTN Volleyball 13-Black | 1741 | 39-15 | 72% | 13 | TN |
| 4369 | Cajun Elite 17-1 | 1741 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | LA |
| 4370 | Diablo 14-1 black | 1741 | 32-20 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 4371 | FC Elite 12-White | 1740 | 18-3 | 86% | 12 | WI |
| 4372 | ESVC 12-Black | 1740 | 32-7 | 82% | 12 | AL |
| 4373 | Anthem United 12-Agape | 1740 | 26-4 | 87% | 12 | GA |
| 4374 | Skyline 10-Royal | 1740 | 28-19 | 56% | 10 | TX |
| 4375 | MVVC 17-Black | 1740 | 47-23 | 67% | 17 | CA |
| 4376 | VC United 15-1 elite | 1740 | 21-31 | 40% | 15 | IL |
| 4377 | Munciana 18 Mustangs | 1740 | 37-24 | 61% | 18 | IN |
| 4378 | SOVC Ridenour 18-R | 1740 | 13-2 | 87% | 18 | OH |
| 4379 | NHouston Elite 11-Premier | 1740 | 18-6 | 75% | 11 | TX |
| 4380 | Viper Volleyball 15-Michael | 1740 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | NV |
| 4381 | MVA 15-Anthony | 1740 | 50-22 | 69% | 15 | FL |
| 4382 | Black Swamp 14-1 | 1740 | 14-11 | 56% | 14 | OH |
| 4383 | SCVC 18-1 christopher | 1740 | 24-3 | 89% | 18 | TN |
| 4384 | NNJ 15-Katy | 1740 | 30-20 | 60% | 15 | NV |
| 4385 | Omni 15-N2 | 1740 | 38-33 | 54% | 15 | AZ |
| 4386 | Top Select 12-Top blue | 1740 | 43-25 | 63% | 12 | FL |
| 4387 | AJ 16-Red | 1740 | 21-5 | 81% | 16 | LA |
| 4388 | DCVA 14-Katie | 1740 | 15-17 | 47% | 14 | NM |
| 4389 | Tsunami 17-1e aau trung | 1740 | 9-3 | 75% | 17 | GA |
| 4390 | FC Elite 14-White | 1740 | 24-22 | 52% | 14 | WI |
| 4391 | Mo Mighty Piranhas 15-1 | 1740 | 20-1 | 91% | 15 | MO |
| 4392 | UP North Jr's DSN 15-Sel | 1740 | 30-5 | 86% | 15 | WI |
| 4393 | Wasatch United 15 | 1740 | 20-2 | 87% | 15 | UT |
| 4394 | Storm 18-1 | 1740 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | IA |
| 4395 | Revolution CBURG 16-White | 1739 | 37-23 | 62% | 16 | PA |
| 4396 | MAVS 816 12-National | 1739 | 24-15 | 62% | 12 | KS |
| 4397 | Tsunami 17-1e trung | 1739 | 27-23 | 54% | 17 | GA |
| 4398 | C2 15-2 regional blue kym | 1739 | 16-2 | 89% | 15 | TN |
| 4399 | Northern Attack 17-1 | 1739 | 33-13 | 72% | 17 | MN |
| 4400 | MJVA 13-Elite black | 1739 | 39-18 | 68% | 13 | TN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.