Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 88 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4351 Iowa Rockets 12-Black 1740 42-17 70% 12 IA
4352 DSVC 14 NATIONAL 1740 33-16 67% 14 AL
4353 Hartford VBC 18-1 1740 31-10 76% 18 WI
4354 ECVC 18-Black 1740 22-13 63% 18 VA
4355 SA Juniors 15-National 1740 41-28 59% 15 TX
4356 TEV 17-Patrick/joe 1740 29-4 88% 17 TN
4357 UVC 13-Evren/damon 1740 36-23 61% 13 MA
4358 C1VB 14-One grvl 1740 41-20 67% 14 SC
4359 Vaqueras 17-F julio 1740 16-18 47% 17 PR
4360 603 United 17-Seacoast black 1740 22-20 52% 17 NH
4361 AVC Red 15-2 1740 13-5 72% 15 TX
4362 Integrity 11-Intense blue 1740 27-12 64% 11 PA
4363 PC Elite 14 1740 22-10 59% 14 TX
4364 SynergyForce 17-2 natl 1740 33-25 57% 17 CA
4365 Canuck 14-2 1739 7-3 70% 14
4366 Manhattan Mayhem 16-P 1739 7-7 50% 16
4367 KC Power 12-1 1739 32-26 55% 12 KS
4368 NorStar 14-Teal 1739 30-21 59% 14 CA
4369 CLVC 17-Black 1739 33-21 61% 17 NC
4370 Madtown 17-1 national 1739 25-35 42% 17 WI
4371 Munciana 18 Mustangs 1739 37-24 61% 18 IN
4372 Northern Attack 17-1 1739 33-13 72% 17 WI
4373 MVSA 13 Xtreme 1739 52-17 73% 13 MD
4374 TX SPARKS 14-1 jene 1739 24-4 86% 14 TX
4375 Spiketown VBC 18-1a 1739 25-3 89% 18 OH
4376 Vibe 12-Elevate 1739 48-19 72% 12 CA
4377 Top Select 12-Top blue 1739 43-25 63% 12 FL
4378 Tsunami 17-1e trung 1739 27-23 54% 17 GA
4379 VCNebraska 18-Black 1739 11-10 52% 18 NE
4380 Unified 15-1 1739 30-34 47% 15 MI
4381 3DGE 15-2 gold 1739 39-25 61% 15 PA
4382 Academy 17-E riptide 1739 45-40 53% 17 IN
4383 Vaqueras 13-F roberto 1739 13-10 57% 13 PR
4384 MN Select 14-1 1739 31-41 43% 14 MN
4385 Carolina ICE 15-Nat blue 1739 27-11 71% 15 SC
4386 NHouston Elite 11-Premier 1739 18-6 75% 11 TX
4387 Sportime 15-Black 1739 37-23 62% 15 NY
4388 Tri-State Elite 11-Blue 1739 20-6 77% 11 OH
4389 Anthem United 13-Navy 1739 10-0 100% 13 GA
4390 GVA 16-Black 1739 10-7 59% 16 PR
4391 Invasion Volleyball Club 13-1 1739 7-1 88% 13 MO
4392 BVC 14-Kim 1739 24-18 57% 14 CA
4393 Legacy 10-1 adidas 1739 42-10 81% 10 MI
4394 Skyline 10-Royal 1739 28-19 56% 10 TX
4395 HEAT 13-Red (BG) 1739 17-7 71% 13 WI
4396 Mid City VBC 12-1 1739 11-1 92% 12 CA
4397 RAGE 14-Nicole 1739 26-16 62% 14 CA
4398 Eagles Select Fusion Elite 14 1739 5-2 71% 14
4399 Wasatch United 15 1739 20-2 87% 15
4400 Galena Chaos 13U 1739 15-2 88% 13
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.