Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 87 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4301 HP Illinois 13-Select 1743 34-10 77% 13 MO
4302 ARMOR 15 Lima 1743 23-24 49% 15 SC
4303 Atlas Volleyball club 17 Atlas Force 1743 36-15 69% 17 PA
4304 NKYVC 17-2 tide 1743 35-31 53% 17 KY
4305 TDV 14-Elite 1743 24-15 62% 14 OH
4306 Jax Skyline 14-White 1743 48-18 73% 14 FL
4307 808 Athletic Club 12-S 1743 32-13 71% 12 HI
4308 ND Elite 18-Winter dalziel 1743 17-3 85% 18 ND
4309 FeVA 13 (BG) 1743 35-11 76% 13 WI
4310 MAVA 12-S 1743 5-0 100% 12 MN
4311 RAGE 14-Nicole 1743 26-16 62% 14 CA
4312 FORZA1 17-One 1743 23-39 37% 17 CA
4313 Miami Elite 14 1743 40-34 54% 14 FL
4314 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 16-Navy 1742 48-28 63% 16 CO
4315 Integrity 11-Intense blue 1742 27-12 64% 11 PA
4316 414 14-Elite 1742 43-27 61% 14 WI
4317 Club GSL 15-Elect - jeremiah 1742 41-22 65% 15 UT
4318 High Performance Volleyball Academy 12-Huskies 1742 9-0 100% 12 MI
4319 SPVB 16-Red 1742 32-23 58% 16 IL
4320 MAVS 816 11-National 1742 13-10 57% 11 KS
4321 IMPACT 16-1 alaska 1742 19-16 51% 16 AK
4322 Dunes 13-Black 1742 37-22 63% 13 IN
4323 Club Four 12-Boost 1742 24-9 73% 12 MO
4324 FeVA 14 (BG) 1742 61-22 73% 14 WI
4325 Vision 12-Exv black 1742 24-11 65% 12 TX
4326 London Elite 15-American 1742 9-2 82% 15 OH
4327 Alliance 15-Regional 1742 23-4 85% 15 TN
4328 Southern Storm 17 Ice 1742 42-12 78% 17 TN
4329 MWVC 11-Janet 1742 17-5 77% 11 PR
4330 TXP 14-Black alonso 1742 26-14 65% 14 TX
4331 Viper 17-Michelle 1742 3-4 43% 17 NV
4332 Kairos 15 Delta 1742 46-19 71% 15 SD
4333 Unified 15-1 1742 30-34 47% 15 MI
4334 Canuck 14-2 1742 7-3 70% 14 WA
4335 OPVBC 16 National 1742 42-15 74% 16 WA
4336 Rancho Valley 13-Premier 1742 24-19 56% 13 CA
4337 Katy United 12-Adidas 1742 35-15 70% 12 TX
4338 A5 13-Kacey 1742 42-32 57% 13 GA
4339 Victory 14-National black 1742 25-26 47% 14 TX
4340 AVBC 15-A zuchowski 1741 27-8 77% 15 OH
4341 Legacy 10-1 adidas 1741 42-10 81% 10 MI
4342 HIC 13-Sarah 1741 4-1 80% 13 UT
4343 OVA 14-National peyton 1741 29-9 76% 14 CA
4344 AVC Red 15-2 1741 13-5 72% 15 TX
4345 Advantage 18-Teal 1741 21-18 54% 18 NC
4346 Lanier 16-National katie 1741 13-1 93% 16 GA
4347 HOU STELLAR 16-Premier 1741 40-26 61% 16 TX
4348 SynergyForce 17-2 natl 1741 33-25 57% 17 CA
4349 Skyline 16-White david 1741 26-23 48% 16 TX
4350 CALI 18-Black 1741 23-28 45% 18 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.