2025-2026 Season — Page 87 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4301 | HP Illinois 13-Select | 1743 | 34-10 | 77% | 13 | MO |
| 4302 | ARMOR 15 Lima | 1743 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | SC |
| 4303 | Atlas Volleyball club 17 Atlas Force | 1743 | 36-15 | 69% | 17 | PA |
| 4304 | NKYVC 17-2 tide | 1743 | 35-31 | 53% | 17 | KY |
| 4305 | TDV 14-Elite | 1743 | 24-15 | 62% | 14 | OH |
| 4306 | Jax Skyline 14-White | 1743 | 48-18 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 4307 | 808 Athletic Club 12-S | 1743 | 32-13 | 71% | 12 | HI |
| 4308 | ND Elite 18-Winter dalziel | 1743 | 17-3 | 85% | 18 | ND |
| 4309 | FeVA 13 (BG) | 1743 | 35-11 | 76% | 13 | WI |
| 4310 | MAVA 12-S | 1743 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | MN |
| 4311 | RAGE 14-Nicole | 1743 | 26-16 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 4312 | FORZA1 17-One | 1743 | 23-39 | 37% | 17 | CA |
| 4313 | Miami Elite 14 | 1743 | 40-34 | 54% | 14 | FL |
| 4314 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 16-Navy | 1742 | 48-28 | 63% | 16 | CO |
| 4315 | Integrity 11-Intense blue | 1742 | 27-12 | 64% | 11 | PA |
| 4316 | 414 14-Elite | 1742 | 43-27 | 61% | 14 | WI |
| 4317 | Club GSL 15-Elect - jeremiah | 1742 | 41-22 | 65% | 15 | UT |
| 4318 | High Performance Volleyball Academy 12-Huskies | 1742 | 9-0 | 100% | 12 | MI |
| 4319 | SPVB 16-Red | 1742 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | IL |
| 4320 | MAVS 816 11-National | 1742 | 13-10 | 57% | 11 | KS |
| 4321 | IMPACT 16-1 alaska | 1742 | 19-16 | 51% | 16 | AK |
| 4322 | Dunes 13-Black | 1742 | 37-22 | 63% | 13 | IN |
| 4323 | Club Four 12-Boost | 1742 | 24-9 | 73% | 12 | MO |
| 4324 | FeVA 14 (BG) | 1742 | 61-22 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 4325 | Vision 12-Exv black | 1742 | 24-11 | 65% | 12 | TX |
| 4326 | London Elite 15-American | 1742 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | OH |
| 4327 | Alliance 15-Regional | 1742 | 23-4 | 85% | 15 | TN |
| 4328 | Southern Storm 17 Ice | 1742 | 42-12 | 78% | 17 | TN |
| 4329 | MWVC 11-Janet | 1742 | 17-5 | 77% | 11 | PR |
| 4330 | TXP 14-Black alonso | 1742 | 26-14 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 4331 | Viper 17-Michelle | 1742 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | NV |
| 4332 | Kairos 15 Delta | 1742 | 46-19 | 71% | 15 | SD |
| 4333 | Unified 15-1 | 1742 | 30-34 | 47% | 15 | MI |
| 4334 | Canuck 14-2 | 1742 | 7-3 | 70% | 14 | WA |
| 4335 | OPVBC 16 National | 1742 | 42-15 | 74% | 16 | WA |
| 4336 | Rancho Valley 13-Premier | 1742 | 24-19 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 4337 | Katy United 12-Adidas | 1742 | 35-15 | 70% | 12 | TX |
| 4338 | A5 13-Kacey | 1742 | 42-32 | 57% | 13 | GA |
| 4339 | Victory 14-National black | 1742 | 25-26 | 47% | 14 | TX |
| 4340 | AVBC 15-A zuchowski | 1741 | 27-8 | 77% | 15 | OH |
| 4341 | Legacy 10-1 adidas | 1741 | 42-10 | 81% | 10 | MI |
| 4342 | HIC 13-Sarah | 1741 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | UT |
| 4343 | OVA 14-National peyton | 1741 | 29-9 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 4344 | AVC Red 15-2 | 1741 | 13-5 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 4345 | Advantage 18-Teal | 1741 | 21-18 | 54% | 18 | NC |
| 4346 | Lanier 16-National katie | 1741 | 13-1 | 93% | 16 | GA |
| 4347 | HOU STELLAR 16-Premier | 1741 | 40-26 | 61% | 16 | TX |
| 4348 | SynergyForce 17-2 natl | 1741 | 33-25 | 57% | 17 | CA |
| 4349 | Skyline 16-White david | 1741 | 26-23 | 48% | 16 | TX |
| 4350 | CALI 18-Black | 1741 | 23-28 | 45% | 18 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.