Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 87 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4301 Vision 16-Blue 1742 35-27 56% 16 CA
4302 I AM VBC 18-Red 1742 38-21 64% 18 WI
4303 LevelOne Albany 18-1 1742 19-14 58% 18 OR
4304 JJVA 15 Teal 1742 32-49 40% 15 FL
4305 Mo Mighty Piranhas 15-1 1742 20-1 91% 15 MO
4306 Platinum 17-Power 1742 36-30 55% 17 UT
4307 MINOI 17-Grey 1742 31-22 58% 17 UT
4308 Diablo 14-1 black 1742 32-20 62% 14 CA
4309 NYC VBA 16-Broadway 1742 49-37 57% 16 NY
4310 Cajun Elite 12-Matt 1742 34-6 85% 12 LA
4311 SCVB 14-Mike 1742 23-17 57% 14 RI
4312 Empire 17-National 1742 33-22 60% 17 CA
4313 Adversity 15-Adidas 1742 26-40 39% 15 IL
4314 603 United 13-Seacoast white 1742 40-11 78% 13 NH
4315 Mindset Premier 16-Red 1742 40-12 77% 16 IL
4316 Revolution CBURG 16-White 1742 37-23 62% 16 PA
4317 NOLA Drew/Caroline 16 1742 33-26 56% 16
4318 SOVC Ridenour 18-R 1742 13-2 87% 18 OH
4319 Mighty Mo 12-Hunter 1741 15-7 58% 12
4320 MAVS 816 12-National 1741 24-15 62% 12 KS
4321 ARIZONA STORM 11-Thunder 1741 49-21 70% 11 AZ
4322 Club Integrity 15-1 1741 42-16 72% 15 PA
4323 Colorado Skyline 13-Royal 1741 36-17 68% 13 CO
4324 DCVA 14-Katie 1741 15-17 47% 14 NM
4325 Club Solano 11 Maroon 1741 41-25 62% 11 CA
4326 Club Net 14 Premier 1741 38-17 69% 14 AR
4327 FC United 13-Black 1741 34-17 65% 13 MO
4328 M2 Volleyball 16-E2 1741 52-25 68% 16 GA
4329 Mid-Michigan ACES 16 Natalie 1741 16-1 94% 16 MI
4330 Tstreet 14-Taylor 1741 19-38 33% 14 CA
4331 West E 14-Purple 1741 27-6 79% 14 PA
4332 414 15-Elite 1741 41-31 57% 15 WI
4333 Alamo 16-Elite 2 1741 36-20 64% 16 TX
4334 Ka Ulukoa 16-Taylor 1741 48-34 59% 16 HI
4335 Katy United 12-Adidas 1741 35-15 70% 12 TX
4336 MWVC 11-Janet 1741 17-5 77% 11 CA
4337 Carolina Belles 14 1741 19-1 95% 14 SC
4338 A5 13-Kacey 1741 42-32 57% 13 GA
4339 DIG 13-Black - britt 1741 25-11 63% 13 TX
4340 BVC 15 Judy 1741 19-16 54% 15 CA
4341 SoCal Legends 16-Elite 1741 11-22 33% 16 CA
4342 Club V CV 13-Tierney 1741 8-5 62% 13 UT
4343 AVC Red 12-2 1741 9-3 69% 12 TX
4344 Mizuno Northern Lights 15-R 1741 4-1 80% 15
4345 AV IMPACT 16-Shock 1741 34-12 74% 16 CA
4346 COV Team FB 13-S 1741 27-12 69% 13 CA
4347 Club SyrV 15U Premier 1740 53-17 74% 15 NY
4348 CVC 15 ROYAL 1740 41-14 75% 15 OH
4349 CVC 15-BLUE 1740 29-29 50% 15 OH
4350 APEX1 16-Black 1740 33-26 56% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.