2025-2026 Season — Page 86 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4251 | Team Yakima 12-Summit | 1745 | 22-5 | 81% | 12 | WA |
| 4252 | ARIZONA STORM 11-Thunder | 1745 | 49-21 | 70% | 11 | AZ |
| 4253 | #951 Elite 14-1 | 1745 | 26-14 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 4254 | Dinamite 14-Casey | 1745 | 7-0 | 100% | 14 | CA |
| 4255 | Wisconsin Ice 18 National | 1745 | 40-15 | 73% | 18 | WI |
| 4256 | Alliance 18-Ren blue | 1745 | 31-18 | 63% | 18 | TN |
| 4257 | McAllen Fierce 11-1 | 1745 | 25-12 | 68% | 11 | TX |
| 4258 | BVA - Lions 13-Elite | 1745 | 22-16 | 58% | 13 | IL |
| 4259 | LOBOS 17-Black | 1745 | 33-16 | 67% | 17 | CO |
| 4260 | Arete 13-Navy | 1745 | 30-17 | 56% | 13 | TX |
| 4261 | FRVBC 14-Black | 1745 | 30-20 | 60% | 14 | CO |
| 4262 | M2 Volleyball 16-E2 | 1745 | 52-25 | 68% | 16 | GA |
| 4263 | SPVB 14-C-fed | 1745 | 31-23 | 57% | 14 | IL |
| 4264 | NOVA Juniors 16-S gold | 1745 | 30-26 | 54% | 16 | OH |
| 4265 | DSVC 14 NATIONAL | 1745 | 33-16 | 67% | 14 | AL |
| 4266 | Hatillo Volleyball Club by Vaqueros 16 Hatillo Volleyball Club By Vaqueros Charlie | 1745 | 9-8 | 53% | 16 | |
| 4267 | APEX Volleyball Club 18-Elite | 1745 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | BC |
| 4268 | WAJ 15-Purple storm purple | 1744 | 21-4 | 81% | 15 | AL |
| 4269 | NYC Volleyball Academy 16-Broadway | 1744 | 46-33 | 58% | 16 | NY |
| 4270 | Club One AZ 13-Titanium | 1744 | 40-25 | 62% | 13 | AZ |
| 4271 | AVA TX 13-Adidas | 1744 | 27-16 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 4272 | EP Elite 16-Smack 1 | 1744 | 28-17 | 62% | 16 | TX |
| 4273 | United 14 National | 1744 | 35-19 | 65% | 14 | AL |
| 4274 | A4 Volley 14-Aaron | 1744 | 28-17 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 4275 | Canuck 14-1 | 1744 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | WA |
| 4276 | COV Team FB 13-S | 1744 | 27-12 | 69% | 13 | CA |
| 4277 | TEV 17-Patrick/joe | 1744 | 29-4 | 88% | 17 | TN |
| 4278 | Shock 18-Ua storm | 1744 | 20-2 | 91% | 18 | IL |
| 4279 | 1st Alliance 15-Red | 1744 | 55-37 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 4280 | 1 Flight 12-1 regional | 1744 | 19-3 | 86% | 12 | OR |
| 4281 | Absolute 12-Pink | 1744 | 25-21 | 54% | 12 | CA |
| 4282 | Momentum 13-Gold | 1744 | 56-18 | 76% | 13 | FL |
| 4283 | CGSV 14-Hutson | 1744 | 20-3 | 87% | 14 | OH |
| 4284 | Actyve 15-Adidas | 1744 | 33-18 | 65% | 15 | CA |
| 4285 | Kulia 16-Gold | 1744 | 51-12 | 81% | 16 | HI |
| 4286 | I AM VBC 18-Red | 1744 | 38-21 | 64% | 18 | WI |
| 4287 | West E 14-Purple | 1744 | 27-6 | 79% | 14 | PA |
| 4288 | Team Pineapple 14-Black | 1744 | 29-15 | 66% | 14 | IN |
| 4289 | McHenry C. Jr's 12-Select | 1744 | 30-12 | 71% | 12 | IL |
| 4290 | SMV 12-1 black | 1744 | 42-16 | 72% | 12 | MN |
| 4291 | Cody Volleyball Club 12-3 | 1744 | 6-0 | 86% | 12 | |
| 4292 | AAC 13-Regional | 1743 | 34-6 | 85% | 13 | FL |
| 4293 | 3CVBC 14-White | 1743 | 41-15 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 4294 | MJVA 15-Elite teal | 1743 | 40-19 | 68% | 15 | TN |
| 4295 | Dime Volleyball Club 12-Premier | 1743 | 48-21 | 70% | 12 | CA |
| 4296 | 1United 17-N silver | 1743 | 32-16 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 4297 | DSVC 15-National blue | 1743 | 34-18 | 65% | 15 | AL |
| 4298 | AVA 15-N evans | 1743 | 34-22 | 61% | 15 | OH |
| 4299 | Elevation 13-Timberline | 1743 | 40-24 | 63% | 13 | CO |
| 4300 | Adrenaline Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1743 | 55-22 | 71% | 18 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.