Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 86 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4251 Team Yakima 12-Summit 1745 22-5 81% 12 WA
4252 ARIZONA STORM 11-Thunder 1745 49-21 70% 11 AZ
4253 #951 Elite 14-1 1745 26-14 65% 14 CA
4254 Dinamite 14-Casey 1745 7-0 100% 14 CA
4255 Wisconsin Ice 18 National 1745 40-15 73% 18 WI
4256 Alliance 18-Ren blue 1745 31-18 63% 18 TN
4257 McAllen Fierce 11-1 1745 25-12 68% 11 TX
4258 BVA - Lions 13-Elite 1745 22-16 58% 13 IL
4259 LOBOS 17-Black 1745 33-16 67% 17 CO
4260 Arete 13-Navy 1745 30-17 56% 13 TX
4261 FRVBC 14-Black 1745 30-20 60% 14 CO
4262 M2 Volleyball 16-E2 1745 52-25 68% 16 GA
4263 SPVB 14-C-fed 1745 31-23 57% 14 IL
4264 NOVA Juniors 16-S gold 1745 30-26 54% 16 OH
4265 DSVC 14 NATIONAL 1745 33-16 67% 14 AL
4266 Hatillo Volleyball Club by Vaqueros 16 Hatillo Volleyball Club By Vaqueros Charlie 1745 9-8 53% 16
4267 APEX Volleyball Club 18-Elite 1745 6-0 100% 18 BC
4268 WAJ 15-Purple storm purple 1744 21-4 81% 15 AL
4269 NYC Volleyball Academy 16-Broadway 1744 46-33 58% 16 NY
4270 Club One AZ 13-Titanium 1744 40-25 62% 13 AZ
4271 AVA TX 13-Adidas 1744 27-16 63% 13 TX
4272 EP Elite 16-Smack 1 1744 28-17 62% 16 TX
4273 United 14 National 1744 35-19 65% 14 AL
4274 A4 Volley 14-Aaron 1744 28-17 62% 14 CA
4275 Canuck 14-1 1744 6-1 86% 14 WA
4276 COV Team FB 13-S 1744 27-12 69% 13 CA
4277 TEV 17-Patrick/joe 1744 29-4 88% 17 TN
4278 Shock 18-Ua storm 1744 20-2 91% 18 IL
4279 1st Alliance 15-Red 1744 55-37 60% 15 IL
4280 1 Flight 12-1 regional 1744 19-3 86% 12 OR
4281 Absolute 12-Pink 1744 25-21 54% 12 CA
4282 Momentum 13-Gold 1744 56-18 76% 13 FL
4283 CGSV 14-Hutson 1744 20-3 87% 14 OH
4284 Actyve 15-Adidas 1744 33-18 65% 15 CA
4285 Kulia 16-Gold 1744 51-12 81% 16 HI
4286 I AM VBC 18-Red 1744 38-21 64% 18 WI
4287 West E 14-Purple 1744 27-6 79% 14 PA
4288 Team Pineapple 14-Black 1744 29-15 66% 14 IN
4289 McHenry C. Jr's 12-Select 1744 30-12 71% 12 IL
4290 SMV 12-1 black 1744 42-16 72% 12 MN
4291 Cody Volleyball Club 12-3 1744 6-0 86% 12
4292 AAC 13-Regional 1743 34-6 85% 13 FL
4293 3CVBC 14-White 1743 41-15 73% 14 TX
4294 MJVA 15-Elite teal 1743 40-19 68% 15 TN
4295 Dime Volleyball Club 12-Premier 1743 48-21 70% 12 CA
4296 1United 17-N silver 1743 32-16 63% 17 TX
4297 DSVC 15-National blue 1743 34-18 65% 15 AL
4298 AVA 15-N evans 1743 34-22 61% 15 OH
4299 Elevation 13-Timberline 1743 40-24 63% 13 CO
4300 Adrenaline Volleyball Club 18-1 1743 55-22 71% 18 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.