Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 86 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4251 Alliance 13-Molten 1744 39-10 80% 13 TN
4252 KC Power 11-1 1744 29-18 60% 11 KS
4253 1 Flight 16-1 national 1744 31-19 62% 16 OR
4254 Wisconsin Ice 18 National 1744 40-15 73% 18 WI
4255 VV U18 1744 22-11 67% 18 VA
4256 Augusta 4:12 12-Botkin 1744 25-2 93% 12 VA
4257 LVL 13 ABBY 1744 33-14 70% 13 LA
4258 McAllen Fierce 11-1 1744 25-12 68% 11 TX
4259 1United 17-N silver 1744 32-16 63% 17 TX
4260 SIVBC 15-Lightning 1744 33-26 56% 15 WA
4261 NorthShore 15 Hammerheads 1744 33-25 57% 15 MI
4262 EVA 12-Green 1744 30-7 81% 12 KY
4263 Big Sky 15-Eastside 1744 5-0 71% 15 MT
4264 Mid City VBC 17-1 1744 7-1 88% 17 CA
4265 MOVSelect 15-Green 1744 36-12 75% 15 OH
4266 Image 17-Black 1744 9-6 53% 17
4267 SPIKEFORCE KERNDAWGS 16 1744 17-4 77% 16
4268 DNVB 15-Black 1744 5-4 56% 15
4269 Blue Steel VBC 18-Black 1744 7-1 88% 18 IL
4270 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 15-Navy 1744 25-12 68% 15 CO
4271 Canuck 14-1 1743 6-1 86% 14
4272 SPVB 14-C-fed 1743 31-23 57% 14 IL
4273 Northern Lights 11-1 1743 45-21 68% 11 MN
4274 High Voltage 13-1 1743 17-5 77% 13 MN
4275 MJVA 15-Elite teal 1743 40-19 68% 15 TN
4276 Oak Creek K-Force 13U 1743 37-8 82% 13 WI
4277 SPVB 15-C-fed 1743 25-30 45% 15 IL
4278 Iowa United 17-1 premier 1743 25-26 49% 17 IA
4279 808 Athletic Club 12-S 1743 32-13 71% 12 HI
4280 Club Four 12-Boost 1743 24-9 73% 12 IL
4281 805 Elite 15-National 1743 36-16 69% 15 CA
4282 C1VB 16-One grvl 1743 46-17 73% 16 SC
4283 SEIVB 16-Elite 1743 27-10 73% 16 IN
4284 MAVA 12-S 1743 5-0 100% 12 KY
4285 TEJAS 15-Black josh 1743 35-20 59% 15 TX
4286 AVA 15-N evans 1742 34-22 61% 15 OH
4287 C2 15-2 regional blue kym 1742 16-2 89% 15 TN
4288 Northern Lights 14-R 1742 42-14 75% 14 MN
4289 SoFLO 14-Premier 1742 59-11 84% 14 FL
4290 Mizuno M1 15-1 1742 32-33 49% 15 MN
4291 Hype VB 13-Benson 1742 13-1 93% 13 CO
4292 Athlete HQ 18-Stalker 1742 35-18 66% 18 OH
4293 ESVC 12-Black 1742 32-7 82% 12 AL
4294 CVA 10 1742 19-3 83% 10 LA
4295 GP 18 Premier 1742 29-12 71% 18 FL
4296 MVA 15-Anthony 1742 50-22 69% 15 FL
4297 MAVS 816 11-National 1742 13-10 57% 11 KS
4298 SUPERIOR 13-1 adidas 1742 54-11 83% 13 TX
4299 1 Flight 12-1 regional 1742 19-3 86% 12 OR
4300 Venom 11-Black 1742 53-26 67% 11 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.