Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 85 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4201 A5 Gwinnett 14-April 1746 35-14 71% 14 GA
4202 MVSA 13 Xtreme 1746 52-17 73% 13 MD
4203 Elevate 15-Silver 1746 27-20 50% 15 TX
4204 Iowa Rockets 15-1 1746 48-24 66% 15 IA
4205 Syndicate VC 14-1 1746 20-1 95% 14 CA
4206 Angelo Premier 17 1746 38-11 78% 17 TX
4207 FC United 13-Black 1746 34-17 65% 13 MO
4208 Seal Beach 16-Blue 1746 36-22 62% 16 CA
4209 High Voltage 13-1 1746 17-5 77% 13 MN
4210 ACAD 15-Red 1746 28-40 41% 15 NY
4211 Flyers 14-Usa-kevin 1746 28-24 52% 14 TX
4212 LV 11 Avoli 1746 30-16 64% 11 TX
4213 Blast Volleyball Club 18 18U Blast Black 1746 32-7 82% 18 PA
4214 Chadron Elite 12 1746 5-0 100% 12 WY
4215 Tville Smash 14 1746 43-19 69% 14 IL
4216 APEX1 Volleyball Club 16-Black 1746 33-26 56% 16 CA
4217 Southland 13-Black 1746 32-6 80% 13 LA
4218 Stars 16-Johna 1746 52-19 73% 16 SC
4219 ZTV 14-2 platinum 1746 25-6 71% 14 MT
4220 APEX1 15-Black 1746 42-18 70% 15 CA
4221 Valley Juniors 16-Black 1746 32-20 62% 16 VA
4222 SG Elite 17-Roshambo 1746 5-18 22% 17 CA
4223 Exodus 15-Breeze 1746 20-13 61% 15 CA
4224 Colorado Skyline 17 Royal 1746 27-30 47% 17 CO
4225 Texas Performance TXP 14-Black aaron 1746 2-6 25% 14 NV
4226 MVC 16-1 1746 3-6 33% 16 OH
4227 Ignite 16-Brooke 1746 25-11 69% 16 UT
4228 DAKOTA APEX 14-1 1746 35-8 73% 14 ND
4229 Onyx Volleyball Club 14 Onyx Volleyball Club 1746 9-1 90% 14 CA
4230 Manhattan Mayhem 16-P 1746 7-7 50% 16 KS
4231 Image 17-Black 1746 9-6 53% 17
4232 MINOI 17-Grey 1745 31-22 58% 17 UT
4233 Mineral Area 14 Elite 1745 35-17 67% 14 MO
4234 Dubuque Digz 14 1745 37-5 84% 14 IA
4235 3DGE 15-2 gold 1745 39-25 61% 15 PA
4236 AVC 12-Navy 1745 20-11 65% 12 FL
4237 MVVC G 12-Black 1745 34-19 64% 12 CA
4238 MVBC 16-Red 1745 40-17 70% 16 NJ
4239 Club Z 16-Shawn 1745 32-20 62% 16 NM
4240 Idaho Peak ADAM NATIONAL 16 1745 19-10 66% 16 ID
4241 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-F damarys 1745 4-3 57% 16 PR
4242 Temecula Viper 17-1 michelle/natalie 1745 29-20 59% 17 CA
4243 Rise Volleyball Club 14-Regional 1745 40-15 73% 14 CA
4244 Illini Elite 12-Joe 1745 13-3 81% 12 IL
4245 McAllen Fierce 15-Lolo 1745 18-19 49% 15 TX
4246 Augusta 4:12 12-Botkin 1745 25-2 93% 12 VA
4247 S-N-P 14-Jennifer 1745 7-1 88% 14 CA
4248 NL 17-Gold 1745 37-7 84% 17 MI
4249 MOVSelect 15-Green 1745 36-12 75% 15 OH
4250 SIVBC 15-Lightning 1745 33-26 56% 15 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.