Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 85 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4201 Angels Elite 14-1 1746 22-12 65% 14 CA
4202 #951 Elite 14-1 1746 26-14 65% 14 CA
4203 ADREN 18-1 1746 55-22 71% 18 CA
4204 ZTV 14-2 platinum 1746 25-6 71% 14 MT
4205 RVA 15-Gladden 1746 27-32 46% 15 IA
4206 Blue Ridge 15-Orange 1746 16-10 62% 15 VA
4207 Blue Ridge 13-Orange 1746 14-6 70% 13 VA
4208 Core 12-Haney 1746 21-4 81% 12 NJ
4209 EXCEL 12-National gold 1746 23-11 55% 12 TX
4210 Alpha 17-1 1746 45-23 66% 17 KY
4211 OCTANE PENN YORK 16-1 1746 9-0 100% 16
4212 LKN Swarm 13 Gold 1746 50-21 70% 13 NC
4213 ACAD 15-Red 1746 28-40 41% 15 NY
4214 AJV 15-Helix 1746 46-23 67% 15 TX
4215 AAC 13-Regional 1746 34-6 85% 13 FL
4216 MAVS 816 16-Premier 1746 36-10 78% 16 KS
4217 FVC 13-Tigers 1746 10-0 100% 13 CA
4218 WEVBC 15-1 1745 17-11 61% 15
4219 S-N-P 14-Jennifer 1745 7-1 88% 14
4220 Texas Performance TXP 14-Black aaron 1745 2-6 25% 14
4221 Cincy Classics 13-Red 1745 39-18 68% 13 OH
4222 Eagan Juniors 14-S 1745 12-3 80% 14 MN
4223 414 14-Elite 1745 43-27 61% 14 WI
4224 IA Juniors 14-Black 1745 36-19 65% 14 IA
4225 Miami Elite 14 1745 40-34 54% 14 FL
4226 OPVBC 16 National 1745 42-15 74% 16 WA
4227 CINCY EAST 13-1 black 1745 52-16 76% 13 OH
4228 Corpus Christi Storm 17-1 1745 36-13 73% 17 TX
4229 EP Elite 16-Smack 1 1745 28-17 62% 16 TX
4230 NKYVC 17-2 tide 1745 35-31 53% 17 KY
4231 Rollers 15-Royal 1745 35-13 73% 15 TX
4232 Seal Beach 16-Blue 1745 36-22 62% 16 CA
4233 Team Yakima 12-Summit 1745 22-5 81% 12 WA
4234 SMV 12-1 black 1745 42-16 72% 12 MN
4235 SPVB 16-Red 1745 32-23 58% 16 IL
4236 HP Illinois 13-Select 1745 34-10 77% 13 IL
4237 Sunshine 17-Westside 1745 29-38 43% 17 CA
4238 Max Performance 16-Jess 1745 42-8 84% 16 MA
4239 JAG VBC 13-1 national 1745 55-16 77% 13 WI
4240 Mill City 16-Orange 1745 23-16 59% 16 MA
4241 Dinamite 14-Casey 1745 7-0 100% 14 CA
4242 OPU 14-2 1745 30-14 68% 14 FL
4243 Country Fire 16-1 1745 53-17 75% 16 TX
4244 MVP 13-Gold 1745 29-22 57% 13 SC
4245 Arete 13-Navy 1745 30-17 56% 13 TX
4246 Nebraska ONE 15-Black 1745 16-13 55% 15 NE
4247 GJV 13-1 1744 20-3 87% 13
4248 Metro 14 North 1744 48-23 66% 14 DC
4249 Tville Smash 14 1744 43-19 69% 14 IL
4250 Victory 14-National black 1744 25-26 47% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.